Accounting for longitudinal peak quality metrics with MSstats+ enhances differential analysis in proteomic experiments with data-independent acquisition

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

MSstats+ is a computational workflow that uses peak intensities and longitudinal quality metrics to downweight poor-quality measurements in differential proteomic analysis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

The paper develops MSstats+, an R/Bioconductor workflow for differential protein analysis in data-independent acquisition proteomics that incorporates not only peak intensities but also quality metrics such as peak shape and retention time, along with longitudinal run-order profiles. MSstats+ converts these quality metrics into a single quality measure that downweights poor-quality measurements and uses this information to handle missing values by weighting imputed values according to quality across runs. Across four experiments—including two anomaly-augmented benchmarking studies, a controlled proteome mixture, and a large-scale clinical investigation—the authors report improved accuracy of differential analysis. The main caveat is that the approach relies on the availability and proper reporting of peak-level quality metrics from upstream quantification tools, and the study does not claim coverage of scenarios lacking those metrics. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics with data-independent acquisition benefits from advanced instrumentation and computational analysis. Despite continued improvements, the quality of quantification may be poor for some measurements. As the scale of proteomic experiments increases, these poor-quality measurements are challenging to characterize by hand, yet they undermine the detection of differentially abundant proteins and the downstream biological conclusions. We introduce MSstats+ , a computational workflow that takes as input not only peak intensities reported by tools such as Spectronaut, but also quality metrics such as peak shape and retention time, and longitudinal run order profiles of these metrics. MSstats+ translates these metrics into a single measure of quality, and downweights poor quality measurements when detecting differentially abundant proteins. The method offers a natural treatment of missing values, weighting the imputed values according to the quality metrics in the run. We demonstrate the accuracy of the resulting differential analysis in four experiments: two custom benchmarking studies with intentionally induced anomalies, a controlled mixture of proteomes, and a large-scale clinical investigation. MSstats+ is implemented in the family of open-source R/Bioconductor packages MSstats .
Full text 1,512 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Mass spectrometry-based proteomics with data-independent acquisition benefits from advanced instrumentation and computational analysis. Despite continued improvements, the quality of quantification may be poor for some measurements. As the scale of proteomic experiments increases, these poor-quality measurements are challenging to characterize by hand, yet they undermine the detection of differentially abundant proteins and the downstream biological conclusions. We introduce MSstats+, a computational workflow that takes as input not only peak intensities reported by tools such as Spectronaut, but also quality metrics such as peak shape and retention time, and longitudinal run order profiles of these metrics. MSstats+ translates these metrics into a single measure of quality, and downweights poor quality measurements when detecting differentially abundant proteins. The method offers a natural treatment of missing values, weighting the imputed values according to the quality metrics in the run. We demonstrate the accuracy of the resulting differential analysis in four experiments: two custom benchmarking studies with intentionally induced anomalies, a controlled mixture of proteomes, and a large-scale clinical investigation. MSstats+ is implemented in the family of open-source R/Bioconductor packages MSstats. Competing Interest Statement M.B., O.K., M.M., and V.A. are current or former employees of Genentech and may own Roche stock. Footnotes ↵* E-mail: o.vitek{at}northeastern.edu

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0