Triple Enfermedad Ginecológica: Endometriosis, adenomiosis y miomatosis

In: 2469-0252 · 2026 · W7221209250
Observational OA: diamond CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-19 ⓘ

MRI mapping of 419 women revealed that adenomyosis, leiomyomatosis, and endometriosis frequently coexist, with 24.8% meeting criteria for triple pathology, supporting an integrated diagnostic approach.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The concept of “triple gynaecological disease” describe the coexistence of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine leiomyomatosis, entities that share pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical overlap. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a dedicated endometriosis mapping protocol represents an integral tool for their simultaneous evaluation. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the frequency and distribution pattern of the coexistence of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine leiomyomas (UL) in MRI studies performed using a dedicated endometriosis mapping protocol. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To analyze morphological correlations and highlight the diagnostic value of MRI for the simultaneous detection of these pathologies. METHODS: Two databases from Instituto Doyenne were retrospectively analyzed, including reproductive-age women with clinical suspicion of endometriosis, adenomyosis, or uterine leiomyomatosis. Individual and combined MRI findings were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were evaluated. Adenomyosis was identified in 90.9% of cases, leiomyomatosis in 28.6%, and 24.8% met criteria for “triple pathology.” Intramural fibroids were the most frequent subtype (60%). Deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis was identified in 39.1% of cases, with C2 nodules (1–3 cm) being the most prevalent. Adenomyosis was significantly associated with a lower probability of superficial endometriosis (OR 0.129; p=0.001). DISCUSSION: The significant coexistence of these pathologies supports the concept of “triple gynecological disease” and emphasizes the need for an integral diagnostic approach using MRI.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-20T06:05:04.844366+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK