Endometriose-Laparoskopie: Elektrodiathermie vs. Helium-Thermokoagulation

In: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021 · vol. 81(02) , pp. 110 · doi:10.1055/a-1254-0471 · W4240860166
OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study compared electrodiathermy and helium-plasma coagulation for laparoscopic endometriosis ablation, investigating benefits regarding symptom relief and morbidity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-30 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not contain the abstract or body of a research paper regarding endometriosis laparoscopy. Instead, it displays a security challenge page from a service called Anubis, which uses a Proof-of-Work scheme to prevent AI scraping. The text explains that this barrier is temporary and requires modern JavaScript features to be resolved by legitimate users. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Zur Ablation von Endometrioseherden kommt im Rahmen der Laparoskopie üblicherweise die Elektrodiathermie zum Einsatz. Problematisch ist diese Behandlung jedoch bei Läsionen an empfindlichen Strukturen wie dem Darm oder der Blase. Die Koagulation mittels eines Helium-Plasmas bietet hier eine höhere Sicherheit. Aber hat sie auch im Hinblick auf die Symptomlinderung und die Morbidität Vorteile?
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

die_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK