Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary
Apple and pear exhibit distinct nonhost resistance to each other's scab pathogens, with pear showing more robust and decipherable transcriptomic defense responses than apple.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
A bstract Nonhost resistance is the outcome of most plant/pathogen interactions, but it has rarely been described in Rosaceous fruit species. Apple ( Malus x domestica Borkh.) have a nonhost resistance to Venturia pyrina , the scab species attacking European pear ( Pyrus communis L.). Reciprocally, P. communis have a nonhost resistance to Venturia inaequalis , the scab species attacking apple. The major objective of our study was to compare the scab nonhost resistance in apple and in European pear, at the phenotypic and transcriptomic levels. Macro- and microscopic observations after reciprocal scab inoculations indicated that, after a similar germination step, nonhost apple/ V. pyrina interaction remained nearly symptomless, whereas more hypersensitive reactions were observed during nonhost pear/ V. inaequalis interaction. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of apple and pear nonhost interactions with V. pyrina and V. inaequalis , respectively, revealed differences. Very few differentially expressed genes were detected during apple/ V. pyrina interaction, preventing the inferring of underlying molecular mechanisms. On the contrary, numerous genes were differentially expressed during pear/ V. inaequalis interaction, allowing a deep deciphering. Pre-invasive defense, such as stomatal closure, could be inferred, as well as several post-invasive defense mechanisms (apoplastic reactive oxygen species accumulation, phytoalexin production and alterations of the epidermis composition). In addition, a comparative analysis between pear scab host and nonhost interactions indicated that, although specificities were observed, two major defense lines seems to be shared in these resistances: cell wall and cuticle potential modifications and phenylpropanoid pathway induction. This first deciphering of the molecular mechanisms underlying a nonhost scab resistance in pear offers new possibilities for the genetic engineering of sustainable scab resistance in this species. Concerning nonhost scab resistance in apple, further analyses must be considered with the aid of tools adapted to this resistance with very few cells engaged.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0