Latent Genital Tuberculosis – A Causative Factor for Ectopic Pregnancy- A Retrospective Analysis

tubercular infestation; endometrium; ectopic tubal pregnancy; latent genital tuberculosis; infertility

Ectopic tubal pregnancy (ETP) is a dreadful situation for both the patient and the doctor. Prevalence of ETP is increasing because of availability of convenient and modern modalities for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Patients are aware of the condition and many lives can be saved when diagnosed and managed at an early stage; still almost 10% of maternal deaths are due to ETP. The etiology of ETP remains unknown in almost half of the cases and hence the risk of recurrence remains high. The present study has been conducted to screen patients with history of tubal ectopic pregnancyand to determine the role of tubercular infestation of the eutopicendometrium as an important etiological factor in ‘unexplained’ ectopic.

This retrospective analysis was conducted at Calcutta Fertility Mission in Kolkata, India, from January 2010 to December 2018. Of 282 patients with history of ETP,who were selected, 109 were in Group A, 72 of them in Group B and 101 in Group C. Tubercular infestation of the endometrium (DNA-PCR positive) was found in all (109) patients in Group A, and others in Group B and C had previous history of pelvic surgery or endometriosis, pelvic infection or unexplained infertility associated with tubercular infestation of the endometrium. In our study latent genital tuberculosis has been proved to be a statistically significant factor for ETP. (p value - <0.001) Moreover other factors like tubal surgeries (p value - <0.001) or correction of minor tubal defects (p value – 0.024); endometriosis (p value- <0.001) and pelvic inflammatory disease (p value -<0.001), have shown statistical significance in causing ectopic pregnancy. Clinical pregnancy rate (p value -0.002) and live birth rate (p value-<0.001) has been proved to be statistically significant after treatment of ETP.

Along with the documented causes of ETP tubercular infestation of the endometrium should be considered as an important etiology for ectopic pregnancy and should be screened on a routine basis for early intervention and treatment. Ectopic tubal pregnancy (ETP) is an alarming condition both for the expectant mother and for the treating physician. ETP occurs when the developing blastocyst gets implanted at either of the fallopian tubes instead of the eutopicendometrium. It eventually ends up in pregnancy loss which is a frustrating situation for the patient. The prevalence of ETP is on the rise because of increased awareness, availability of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), estimation of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) in serum and urine. Many cases of “silent” or asymptomatic ETP which resolve automatically may be picked up on a larger scale by modern diagnostic methods; thereby adding to the prevalence as well. Today, early intervention saves lives and reduces morbidity, but ectopic pregnancy still accounts for 4% to 10% of maternal deaths and leads to a high incidence of ectopic site gestations in subsequent pregnancies.[1]Several risk factors for ETP have been documented including age, sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history (multiple sexual partners, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), Chlamydia trachomatis infection, certain forms of contraception, smoking, DES exposure, endometriosis, utero-tubal anomalies and treatment for infertility. [2]In about 50 This retrospective study was conducted at Calcutta Fertility Mission in Kolkata, India, from January 2010 to December 2018. The data were collected from a total of 282 patients as cases between 20-35years of age, who had previous history of ectopic pregnancy diagnosed by serialβhCG estimation, TVUS. 150 of them (72 patients in Group B and 78 patients in Group C) were treated by salphingostomy or salphingectomy and the rest of 132 patients were either treated with methotrexate or had spontaneous remission.They did not have any history of cigarette smoking or alcoholism. These patients were either scared to attempt another pregnancy or could not conceive after they started the attempt between last 6-9months. Patients were grouped into Group A, B and C depending on the predisposing factors for ETP. 282 women were divided into three groups: Groups A, B, and C in which 109 (38.6%) patients were in Group A who had history of single ETP had only latent female genital tuberculosis (FGTB) as the etiological factor (only TB-PCR Positive) .Group B consisted of 72 (25.5%) women in which 26 (36.11%) patients with history of single ETP were found to have tubercular bacilli infestation in the endometrium, along with previous history of surgical intervention as pre-disposing factors for ETP. Group C included 101 (35.8%) patients of whom 66 (65.35%) had endometrialtubercular infestation associated with other pelvic pathology as etiology. These patients were treated with anti-tubercular drugs (ATD) and the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), rate of miscarriage, recurrent ectopic pregnancy and live birth rate (LBR) were recorded, within one year of treatment. | | GROUP | Total | | | ||| | GROUP A | GROUP B | GROUP C | p Value | Significance | ||| AGE | 21-25 | | 22(20.18) | 29(40.28) | 29(28.71) | 80(28.37) | 0.068 | Not Significant | 26-30 | | 40(36.7) | 20(27.78) | 35(34.65) | 95(33.69) | ||| 31-35 | | 47(43.12) | 23(31.94) | 37(36.63) | 107(37.94) | ||| Total | | 109(100) | 72(100) | 101(100) | 282(100) | | | Table 1 - Age of patients: Data analysis done by Fisher's Exact Test Etiology | | Group A | Group B | Group C | p Value | Statistical Significance | TUBERCULAR INFESTATION (PCR POSITIVE) | | 109(100) | 26(36.11) | 66(65.35) | | Significant | PCR NEGATIVE | | 0(0) | 46(63.89) | 35(34.65) | | | LAPAROSCOPIC CORRECTION OF TUBAL DEFECTS | YES | 0(0) | 26 | 0(0) | 0.024 | Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 46 | 0(0) | | | OVARIAN CYSTECTOMY | YES | 0(0) | 29 | 0(0) | 0.125 | Not Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 43 | 0(0) | | | APPENDICECTOMY | YES | 0(0) | 7 | 0(0) | | Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 65 | 0(0) | | | TUBAL SURGERY | YES | 0(0) | 10 | 0(0) | | Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 62 | 0(0) | | | ENDOMETRIOSIS | YES | 0(0) | 0(0) | 32 | | Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 0(0) | 69 | | | PID | YES | 0(0) | 0(0) | 28 | | Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 0(0) | 73 | | | UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY | YES | 0(0) | 0(0) | 43 | 0.163 | Not Significant | | NO | 0(0) | 0(0 | 58 | | | Table 2- Participants’ etiology:Data analysis done by Binomial test PCR POSITIVE | | GROUP A | GROUP B | GROUP C | p Value | Statistical significance | CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE | NO | 53(48.62) | 16(61.54) | 50(75.76) | 0.002 | Significant | | YES | 56(51.38) | 10(38.46) | 16(24.24) | | | MISCARRIAGE | NO | 94(86.24) | 24(92.31) | 60(90.91) | 0.522 | Not Significant | | YES | 15(13.76) | 2(7.69) | 6(9.09) | | | RECURRENT ECTOPIC | NO | 103(94.5) | 22(84.62) | 61(92.42) | 0.227 | Not Significant | | YES | 6(5.5) | 4(15.38) | 5(7.58) | | | LIVE BIRTH RATE | NO | 74(67.89) | 22(84.62) | 61(92.42) | | Significant | | YES | 35(32.11) | 4(15.38) | 5(7.58) | | | Table 3 Data analysis done by Pearson’s Chi Square test for Independence of Attributes/ Fisher's Exact Test PCR NEGATIVE | | GROUP A | GROUP B | GROUP C | p Value | Statistical significance | CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE | NO | 0(0) | 40(86.96) | 24(68.57) | 0.044 | Significant | | YES | 0(0) | 6(13.04) | 11(31.43) | | | MISCARRIAGE | NO | 0(0) | 45(97.83) | 32(91.43) | 0.188 | Not Significant | | YES | 0(0) | 1(2.17) | 3(8.57) | | | RECURRENT ECTOPIC | NO | 0(0) | 43(93.48) | 30(85.71) | 0.246 | Not Significant | | YES | 0(0) | 3(6.52) | 5(14.29) | | | LIVE BIRTH RATE | NO | 0(0) | 44(95.65) | 32(91.43) | 0.434 | Not Significant | | YES | 0(0) | 2(4.35) | 3(8.57) | | | Table 4: Data analysis done by Pearson’s Chi Square test for Independence of Attributes/ Fisher's Exact Test Almost one half of women with ectopic pregnancy have no identifiable causal factors (ACOG 2018). ETP has been seen to be on an increasing trend in women with more than 35 years of age. [3]The relevance of age along with the effect on the fallopian tube or delay of oocyte transport has been questioned time and again by many authors.[4,5]In our study we have included nulliparous women Pelvic infection, abnormal implantation, placentation or blood vessel transformation can result in miscarriage.[15,16] In our study the miscarriage rate in Group A was as high as 13.76% even after treatment, which can be correlated with our previous study.[ 17 ] Miscarriage rates in our overall patients with (p value - 0.522) or without (p value – 0.188) genital tuberculosis was not statistically significant. Pelvic adhesions due to endometriosis, appendicitis, or other pelvic infections, may distort the anatomy of the fallopian tube resulting in an abnormal tubo-ovarian relation, impair oocyte release, alter sperm motility, cause abberant myometrial contractions, as well as affect embryo transport. [18][19] In women with endometriosis, there can be impaired endometrial growth, structural and molecular alterations in eutopic endometrium resulting in implantation failure or progesterone resistance in the endometrium.[20-23] Women with endometriosishad a significantly higher risk of early pregnancy complications or ETP.[24] Other authors also indicated higher risk of miscarriage (about 76%) and nearly three times higher for ectopic pregnancy in women with endometriosis.[19]The findings of our study also support the fact where endometriosis has been seen to be a statistically significant factor for ectopic pregnancy. (p value- Previous surgical interventions like tubal reanastamosis, salpingostomy, tuboplasty, ovarian cystectomy, laparoscopic correction of tubal defects are obvious risk factors of ETP. 2–13 % women suffered from ETP after tubal reanastomosis performed manually or by robotic approaches[25, 26] Correction of minor tubal defects arising from mild or minimal endometriosis (Stage I and II) or subclinical pelvic infection result in about 25% pregnancy rate within one year of the procedure. Similar result is obtained with laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy as well. In both the conditions ETP is a possible sequelae.[27,28] In the present study laparoscopic tubal surgery has been seen to be statistically significant factor for ETP (p value The association of infertility and ectopic pregnancy is complex, as ectopic pregnancy has been observed to be a cause as well as a consequence of infertility and it can be presumed that they have common causal factors. Previous history of tubal damage or rupture ; use of ovulation induction drugs increase risk of ETP.[29,30]Unexplained infertility or treatment for the same like use of Ovulation Induction drugs like Clomiphene citrate (CC) or Gonadotrophins (GnRH) as well as ART increases risk of ectopic pregnancy.[31]Long term treatment with CC leads to alteration of ESR2 (especially ESR2A) expression and activation in cilia were seen before the onset of CC-induced tubal apoptosis, suggesting a mechanism for CC-induced ETP.[32] Although many of these factors have always been screened and sometime the possible cause of ectopic pregnancy has been detected, in about 50% of cases the cause still remains unknown. Endometrial inflammation has been proved to be hostile for implantation and the movement of the embryo comes to a halt in the fallopian tube or it might as well move to the other tube by trans-uterine migration. In order to find out the cause in these patients with unexplained ETP we had screened them for LGTB using DNA-PCR test. Presence of tubercular bacilli is responsible for inflammation of the fallopian tubes resulting in presence of pro-inflammatory interleukins which might facilitate tubal implantation leading to ETP as seen in cases of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Tubercular insult of the female genital tract is responsible solely or in association with other predisposing factors for ETP as documented by other authors.[33,34 31 to 59 % patients treated with Anti-tubercular drugs (ATD) for FGTB conceived spontaneously and even those who had undergone IVF had live birth, spontaneous abortion or ectopic pregnancy.[35-38] In the present study clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) has been seen to be statistically significant in both the section of patients who had tubercular infestation i.e. PCR positive (p value -0.002) as well as who did not have genital tuberculosis i.e. PCR negative (p value – 0.044). In our study live birth rate (LBR) has statistical significance in women with post-ATD treatment (p value - Risk of ETP increases by 7- to 13-fold after one episode of tubal ectopic pregnancy. A patient with prior pregnancy has a 50%-80% chance of having a subsequent intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and a 10%-25% risk of a future tubal pregnancy.[31] Recurrent ETPs were significantly more likely to have a positive history of tubal or pelvic surgery (61.5 % vs. 3.5 %, p < 0.05 and 53.8 vs. 14 %, p < 0.05) and positive history of previous tubal surgery and previous ectopic pregnancy differ in women at risk of a recurrent ETP when compared to women not at risk (AUC, 0.844), according to Hurrell A et al.[42]In the present study recurrent ectopic pregnancy rate has no statistical significance in the overall cohort of participants. (p value – 0.227, p value – 0.246) Ectopic pregnancy needs immediate attention and intervention due to its fatal consequence. In about 50 Ethical considerations Our study was a retrospective study which included patient records, and we did not directly get in contact with them, but our study was confirmed by Ethical Committee of Calcutta Fertility Mission. Availability of data and material – Retrospective data of a prospective database of our institution Competing interests–There is no conflict of interest among the authors. Funding – Intramural grant of Calcutta Fertility Mission Authors' contributions – Dr. Siddhartha Chatterjee – concept of study, preparation and editing of manuscript Dr. Bishista Bagchi – data collection, preparation of manuscript, follow-up of patients, sample collection Dr.RajibGon Chowdhury– data collection, preparation of manuscript Ms. Abira Dutta – laboratory procedures and reporting, sample collection

- We, the authors acknowledge Mr. Souvik Dutta for preparation of statistical analysisand Ms. Orphi Bhattacharya for formatting the manuscript. - Marion LL, Meeks GR. Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. ClinObstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;55(2):376-86. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Moini A, Hosseini R, Jahangiri N et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study.J Res Med Sci. 2014 Sep;19(9):844-9. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Tubal ectopic pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ObstetGynecol 2018;131:e91–103. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(3): 185-194. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study. Aust N Z J ObstetGynaecol. 2006; 46(6): 521-527. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, Bauer P, Feichtinger W. Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:13–7. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Shaw JL, Horne AW. The paracrinology of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358:216–22. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Aminu MB, Abdullahi K, Dattijo LM. Tubal ectopic gestation associated with genital schistosomiasis: a case report. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18:144–6. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, Low N, Xu F, Ness RB. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:S134–55. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hvid M, Baczynska A, Deleuran B, Fedder J, Knudsen HJ, Christiansen G, et al. Interleukin-1 is the initiator of Fallopian tube destruction during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:2795–803. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Shaw JL, Fitch P, Cartwright J, Entrican G, Schwarze J, Critchley HO, et al. Lymphoid and myeloid cell populations in the non-pregnant human Fallopian tube and in ectopic pregnancy. J ReprodImmunol. 2011;89:84–91. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ulziibat S, Ejima K, Shibata Y, Hishikawa Y, Kitajima M, Fujishita A, et al. Identification of estrogen receptor beta-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes and their possible roles in normal and tubal pregnancy oviducts. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2281–9. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - von Rango U, Classen-Linke I, Kertschanska S, Kemp B, Beier HM. Effects of trophoblast invasion on the distribution of leukocytes in uterine and tubal implantation sites. FertilSteril. 2001;76:116–24. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Huang C-C, Huang C-C, Lin S-Y, ChangCY-Y, Lin W-C, Chung C-H, et al. (2019)Association of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)with ectopic pregnancy and preterm laborinTaiwan: A nationwide population-basedretrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0219351. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Michel MZ, Khong TY, Clark DA, Beard RW. A morphological and immunological study of human placental bed biopsies in miscarriage. Br J ObstetGynaecol 1990;97:984–988. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ball E, Bulmer JN, Ayis S, Lyall F, Robson SC. Late sporadic miscarriage is associated with abnormalities in spiral artery transformation and trophoblast invasion. J Pathol 2006;208:535–542. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Bagchi B, Chatterjee S, Gon Chowdhury R. Role of latent female genital tuberculosis in recurrent early pregnancy loss: A retrospective analysis. IJRM. 2019; 17 (12) :929-934. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Dun EC, Nezhat CH. Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology. ObstetGynecolClin North Am. 2012;39:551–66. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Holoch KJ, LesseyBA. Endometriosis and infertility.ClinObstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun; 53(2):429-38. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Jason G. Bromer, M.D., Tamir S. Aldad, B.A., and Hugh S. Taylor, M.D. Defining the proliferative phase endometrial defect. (FertilSteril_ 2009;91:698–704. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Georgina Jones, Crispin Jenkinson & Stephen Kennedy(2004)The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: a qualitative analysis,Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics &Gynecology,25:2,123-133, View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Miller JE, Ahn SH, Monsanto SP, Khalaj K, Koti M, Tayade C. Implications of immune dysfunction on endometriosis associated infertility. Oncotarget. 2017;8(4):7138–7147. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Brosens I(1), Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Al-Sabbagh M, Kuroda K, Benagiano G. Risks of adverse pregnancy outcome in endometriosis. FertilSteril. 2012;98(1):30-5. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Saraswat L, et al. Reproductive and pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis: a Scottish national record linkage study. ESHRE2015 Abstract O-122 View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion. FertilSteril. 2013;100:638–44. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1375–80. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Chatterjee S,Gon Chowdhury R , Dey S, Vishnu P. Minor tubal defects — The unnoticed causes of unexplained infertility. J ObstetGynaecol India. 2010;60(4):331–336. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Chatterjee S, Dey S. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts in infertile women. The J. Obs& Gyn. India: 1999:49:68–70. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Job-Spira N1, Fernandez H, Bouyer J, Pouly JL et al. Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy: risk factors and reproductive outcome: results of a population-based study in France.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):938-44. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Herve Fernandez, Amelie Gervaise, Ectopic pregnancies after infertility treatment: modern diagnosis and therapeutic strategy, Human Reproduction Update. 2004; 10(6) :503–513. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Patil M. Ectopic pregnancy after infertility treatment. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(2):154–165. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ruijin Shao, Magdalena Nutu, BirgittaWeijdegård, Emil Egecioglu, Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez, Linda Karlsson-Lindahl et al. Clomiphene Citrate Causes Aberrant Tubal Apoptosis and Estrogen Receptor Activation in Rat Fallopian Tube: Implications for Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy, Biology of Reproduction. 2009 ;80(6):1262- 1271. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Malik S; Genital tuberculosis and implantation in assisted reproduction; Reviews in Gynecological Practice 2003;3: 160-164. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Infestation Of Endometrium By Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Bacilli-Cause Of Reproductive Failure RajibGon Chowdhury 1, Suman Kalyan Paine2, Basudev Bhattacharjee2.and Siddhartha Chatterjee1* Al Ameen J Med S c i (2 010 )3 (4 ) :3 2 2 -3 3 1 View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Kulshrestha V, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Singh UB, Rana T. Genital tuberculosis among infertile women and fertility outcome after antitubercular therapy. Int J GynaecolObstet 2011; 113 : 229-34 View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Naredi N, Talwar P, Narayan N, Rai S, Vardhan S, Panda S. Spontaneous conception following anti-tubercular treatment for sub-fertile women with multiple imaging markers suggesting genital tuberculosis. FertilSci Res 2014; 1 : 44-9 View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Jindal UN, Verma S, Bala Y. Favorable infertility outcomes following anti-tubercular treatment prescribed on the sole basis of a positive polymerase chain reaction test for endometrial tuberculosis. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 : 1368-74 View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Infertility and pregnancy outcome in female genital tuberculosis. Int J GynaecolObstet 2002; 76 : 159-63. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - M.M.Lin , et al. Lower cumulative live birth rates in cured endometrial tuberculosis patients after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles: A matched pair study.EurJObstetGynecol.2019; View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Neelam B, Mohanlal S, Namita K. Genital tuberculosis and its consequences on subsequent fertility. J ObstetGynecol India. 2005;55(6):534-7. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Shende P, Valecha SM, Gandhewar M, Dhingra D. Genital tuberculosis and infertility. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol 2017;6:3514-7. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hurrell A, Reeba O, Funlayo O. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy as a unique clinical sub group: a case control study. Springerplus. 2016;5:265. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Saraswat L, Ayansina DT, Cooper KG, Bhattacharya S, Miligkos D, Horne AW, Bhattacharya S. Pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis: a national record linkage study. BJOG 2017;124:444–452. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Chatterjee S, Dey S, Chowdhury RG. Ectopic pregnancy in previously infertile women-subsequent perregnancy outcome after laparoscopic management. Al A meen J Med Sci. 2009;2(1):67- 7251. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Xiong X, Buekens P, Wollast E. IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case–control studies. Contraception. 1995;52:23–34. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 2005;366:583–91. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team. Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova, Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING. Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).