Is there a role for gamete intra-fallopian transfer and other tubal insemination procedures?

Arthur J. Castelbaum, Martin F. Freedman
In: Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 1998 · vol. 10(3) , pp. 239–242 · doi:10.1097/00001703-199806000-00011 · PMID:9619348 · W2334780293
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This review examines which patients may still benefit from gamete intra-fallopian transfer and other tubal insemination procedures, given rising IVF success rates and potential improvements in intrauterine insemination.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates have risen dramatically over the past decade. Consequently, fewer patients are currently undergoing gamete intra-fallopian transfer and zygote intra-fallopian transfer. This review identifies which patients may still benefit from tubal transfer procedures. Additionally, recent modifications in intrauterine insemination techniques may significantly raise pregnancy rates.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (1)

References (24)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK