Scaling Up Co-Created Clinical Guidelines: Processes, Experiences, and Lessons from Maternity Care in Urban Tanzania – The PartoMa Project
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Objective: Resource constraints limit the use of evidence-based clinical guidelines (CPGs). This study describes the adaptation and scale-up of a context-specific maternity care pocket guide, initially co-created in Zanzibar, to five urban health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Design: Participatory, iterative co-creation. Settings: : Five government health facilities in Dar es Salaam (2021). Population: Maternity care providers, researchers, women and other stakeholders. Methods: : A structured, flexible CPG adaptation model was applied, combining a mixed-methods situational analysis, review of global and national CPGs, and iterative feedback via focus groups and individual reviews until saturation. The guide was then pilot-tested and implemented. Main Outcome Measures: Co-creation process, PartoMa Pocket Guide and implementation strategy. Results: : Two review cycles with 54 frontline providers, two external reviews (11 international experts and 10 Dar es Salaam Health Management Team members), and two consultation meetings with a 28-member core team. The process produced a 24-page infographic pocket guide of CPGs, covering routine care and common complications during childbirth, and a dissemination strategy including in-house, low-dose, high-frequency training. Using the Zanzibar guide streamlined adaptation, revealing notable consistency across resource-constrained settings. However, the process remained time- and resource-intensive, particularly when international scientific evidence was insufficient or failed to capture urban clinical complexities. Conclusions: The PartoMa CPG adaptation model effectively contextualises and scales evidence-based CPGs in high-volume, resource-constrained urban settings. Global CPG developers should integrate end-user needs from the outset for more practical and cost-effective adaptations. Funding: Danida Fellowship Centre (DFC), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DFC project no. 18-08-KU).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00