Concurrence of Porin Loss and Modular Amplification of β-Lactamase Encoding Genes Drives Carbapenem Resistance in a Cohort of Recurrent Enterobacterales Bacteremia
In recurrent *Enterobacterales* bacteremia, carbapenem resistance developed through amplification of β-lactamase genes and porin disruption, independent of carbapenemase acquisition.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This historical, retrospective cohort study examined recurrent extended-spectrum β-lactamase–positive (ESBL-E) Enterobacterales bacteremia cases from a vulnerable patient population at MD Anderson Cancer Center (2015–2016), using phylogenetic and comparative genomics with Illumina and Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing to track how carbapenem resistance emerged. In four serial recurrent isolates, three developed carbapenem resistance without acquiring a known carbapenemase; these non-carbapenemase-producing CRE relied on IS26- and ISEcp1-mediated amplification and transposition of mobile units carrying blaOXA-1 and blaCTX-M variants, together with outer membrane porin disruption via insertion into porin gene open reading frames in a subset of isolates. Serial passaging of an index ST131 isolate under carbapenem selection recapitulated in vivo progression through chromosomal modular amplification of β-lactamase–bearing translocatable units with porin inactivation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,078 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00