Introduction
Diseases related to the uterus, such as uterine fibroids,
adenomyosis, and pregnancy-related uterine and placental
diseases constitute a major part of morbidity in women.
Many of these patients eventually undergo invasive surgi-
cal therapy when medical management fails. Minimally
invasive therapies such as uterine artery embolization
(UAE) are safe and effective for many of these conditions.
However, there are concerns regarding appropriate indica-
tions, future infertility risk, and radiation injury with UAE.
The published literature is heterogenous and often confus-
ing. We attempt to provide an updated and comprehensive
evidence-based review regarding indications, the role of
imaging, technical aspects, complications, radiation and
infertility concerns of uterine artery embolization in vari-
ous uterine pathologies.
UAE for Fibroids
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign pelvic tumors
in women with a prevalence ranging from 4.5 to 68% depend-
ing on study population. 1 Around 25 to 50% of these patients
are symptomatic with bleeding or pelvic pain. Around 30% of
these patients resort to invasive surgical therapies including
myomectomy or hysterectomy.
1 The number of UAE proce-
dures for fibroids is increasing and various societies have
suggested guidelines with subtle differences ( ►Table 1 ).
While the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guide-
lines of 2014 recommended UAE for all symptomatic fib-
roids, the Royal College of Gynecology (RCOG) endorses
primary myomectomy as the first line option in patients
who wish for future pregnancy, with UAE reserved for
surgically un fit patients.
2 The Cardiovascular Interventional
Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE) standards of practice
Keywords
► uterine artery
embolization
► fibroids
► arteriovenous
malformation
► pseudoaneurysm
► perinatal period
► ectopic pregnancy
Abstract
Uterine artery embolization is an established minimally invasive therapy for symptom-
atic fibroids. It has also been used for other diseases of the uterus, including
adenomyosis, uterine arteriovenous malformation, ectopic pregnancy, abnormal
invasive placenta, and postpartum hemorrhage. In this review, we provide an updated
and comprehensive review of uterine artery embolization based on the evidence
published. We review the indications, the role of MRI, technical aspects, and
complications of the procedure. The issues with a future pregnancy, risk of infertility,
and fetal radiation are discussed as well.
article published online
October 23, 2022
DOI https://doi.org/
10.1055/s-0042-1758050.
ISSN 2457-0214.
© 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All
rights reserved.
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonDeri vative-NonCommercial-License,
permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given
appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or
adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scienti fic Publishers Pvt. Ltd., A-12, 2nd Floor,
Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP , India
THIEME
Review Article 87
Article published online: 2022-10-23
guidelines of 2015 concur with RCOG guidelines and do not
support UAE in subserosal fibroids with a stalk diameter less
than 50% of the tumor diameter and when there is a common
arterial supply to both uterus and ovaries. 3 All these guide-
lines emphasize the bene ficial role of UAE in patients with
symptomatic fibroids who have heavy menstrual bleeding
and pain and who wish to preserve the uterus. UAE is
relatively contraindicated in patients with symptoms due
to pressure on pelvic structures such as the rectum and
bladder, as the volume reduction may be insuf ficient to
eliminate pressure effects. According to the fifth radiological
gynecological expert meet consensus, absolute contraindi-
cations for UAE include viable pregnancy, active pelvic
infection, and malignancy of uterus/ovaries. The relative
contraindications include GnRH analog treatment in previ-
ous 3 months, isolated submucosal fibroid (type 0 and 1-
European society for Gynecological endoscopy classi fica-
tion), isolated pedunculated subserosal fibroids, and fibroids
supplied by the ovarian artery.
4
Surgery versus UAE for Fibroids
The FUME trial, an RCT comparing UAE with myomectomy,
found signi ficant and equal improvement in quality of life
(QoL) in both arms at 2 years with shorter length of hospital
stay (2.0 vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.0001) as well as fewer complica-
tions (2% in UAE and 8% in myomectomy) with the UAE.
5 The
EMMY trial, which compared 10-year outcomes of UAE and
myomectomy, showed that UAE was an acceptable alterna-
tive to surgical treatment in women who wish to preserve
the uterus.
6 However, reintervention rates due to residual
lesion within 2 years were high in UAE compared with
myomectomy (14% vs. 4% in myomectomy). Sandberg et al
found that reintervention after 5 years was 14.4% in UAE,
whereas after myomectomy, it was 12.2%.
7 Meta-analysis of
surgical methods versus UAE showed UAE having fewer
major complications (RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.32 –2.06];
p < 0.00001) compared with surgery but higher reinterven-
tion rates after 5 years (RR of 5.01).
8
The recent FEMME trial that evaluated the cost utility of
myomectomy versus UAE showed UAE to be associated with
higher costs (difference of 645 pounds) in 4 year horizon 9
These results point out that the short-term results of UAE are
good, while the long-term results of myomectomy are better,
as UAE may require frequent reinterventions.
Investigations
A trans-abdominal ultrasound is recommended for preoper-
ative workup. However, pre-procedure MRI can help in
predicting the treatment response of UAE. Fibroids are
usually hypointense on T2-weighted images. However,
Table 1 Comparison of indications and contraindications for UAE by different societies
Indications Contraindications
ACR appropriateness
criteria 2017
Symptomatic fibroids in middle-aged and childbear-
ing women with multiple fibroids do not wish to
become pregnant in future but want to conserve the
uterus
Single fibroid of less than 3 cm with adenomyosis or
pedunculated sub-serosal fibroid in middle age
women
Viable pregnancy
Active pelvic infection
CIRSIE standards of
practice guidelines-2015
Symptomatic fibroids
As a part of palliation/adjunct to surgery in case of
uterine/ovarian malignancy
C a nb ec o n s i d e r e di nw o m a nw h ow a n t st ob e c o m e
pregnant and myomectomy is contraindicated but
not as the first choice
Viable pregnancy
Active infection of the uterus
Malignancy of uterus/ovaries
Relative contraindications
Who wants to become pregnant.
Pedunculated subserosal fibroid with
stalk diameter less than 50% of tumor
diameter
Presence of common arterial supply
for both uterus and ovaries.
Presence of intrauterine contraceptive
device
SIR 2014 Symptomatic fibroid Viable pregnancy
Active infection of the uterus
Malignancy of uterus/ovaries
RCOG 2013 Symptomatic fibroids
Fibroids and adenomyosis coexistence
Contraindication/ unwillingness/unsuccessful
surgery
Active genital tract infection
Viable pregnancy
Asymptomatic fibroid
Relative contraindications
Pedunculated submucosal fibroid with
an a r r o ws t a l k
Pedunculated subserosal fi
broid.
Large fibroid causing bulk symptoms
(volume reduction is not suf ficient)
Women who wish to preserve fertility
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al.88
moderate degrees of T2 hyperintensity can be seen in hyper-
cellular fibroids, whereas marked hyperintensity suggests
degeneration10. Duvnjak et al had shown that higher ratio
(>2.6) of T2 hyperintensity of fibroids compared with adja-
cent myometrium was associated with increased volume
reduction of more than 50% of the fibroid.
11 Fibroids with T1
hyperintensity respond poorly due to hemorrhagic necrosis
or fat within. 10 The fibroid location can also affect the
response, with submucosal fibroids having higher volume
reduction compared with intramural or subserosal fibroids
due to predominant supply from the uterine radial arteries.12
Kalina et al showed that fibroids with enhancement which is
more than the myometrium on gadolinium-enhanced MRI
show more signi ficant volume reduction (61.3% vs. 47.6%)
than hypo-enhancing fibroids.12 MRI also helps predict
ovarian artery supply to fibroids. Normally, the ovarian
arteries are very small and the visualization of ovarian
arteries on pelvic MRA indicates substantial contribution
from them resulting in incomplete embolization if over-
looked.
10 MRI is superior to ultrasound as it allows tissue
characterization of uterine fibroids and helps distinguish
them from malignant tumors such as low-grade leiomyosar-
coma. Diffusion-weighted MRI and T1 perfusion techniques
help differentiate malignant tumors with a sensitivity of 94%,
and this distinction is vital as these tumors are treated by
definitive surgery.
13
Pre-procedure Antibiotics
The possible source of infection after UAE is either from the
arterial access site or ascending infection from the vagina by
staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermis , Streptococ-
cus,a n d Escherichia coli 14. SIR recommends prophylactic
intravenous cephazolin (1 –2 g) 1 hour before procedure
with the addition of 100 mg of doxycycline, twice daily for
1 week in cases of associated hydrosalpinx. 14 Though Assaf
et al found no change in the rate of infectious complications
between individuals with and without post-procedure anti-
biotics (1.8% vs. 1.3%), RCOG endorses a combination of
cephalosporin and metronidazole, quinolones or amoxicillin
post-procedure. However, the choice of antibiotic depends
on local hospital guidelines.
15
Vascular Access
The access artery can be unilateral common femoral artery
(CFA), bilateral CFA, or radial artery (►Fig. 1). Compared with
unilateral approach, bilateral femoral access is associated
with shorter procedure times (54.9 vs. 62.9 minutes,
p ¼ 0.026), shorter fluoroscopic times (12.8 vs. 16.6 minutes,
p ¼ 0.046) and reduced radiation to ovaries (25% less in
bilateral access group).
16 Except for minor groin pain at
the puncture site, there was no signi ficant increase in access
site complications in the bilateral access group. 17 Radial
access is also used, as it has fewer complications rate
compared with femoral access. 18 Left radial artery is usually
preferred due to fewer manipulations needed in the arch of
aorta, thus minimizing the risk of cerebral embolism and
reducing the distance from the access site to the uterine
artery (5 –10 cm less compared with right side). Longer
length (125 cm) catheters are preferred in the radial route.
19
An RCT by Evgeny et al comparing trans-radial vs. trans-
femoral access for UAE in 153 patients showed that trans-
radial access was associated with shorter procedure times
(32.2 /C6 7.9 vs. 39.2 /C6 9.7 minutes, p < 0.001), uterine artery
catheterization time (12.3 /C6 5.7 vs. 19.0 /C6 6.0 minutes,
p < 0.001) and radiation dose (0.28 /C6 0.14 mSv vs. 0.5 /C6 0.2,
p < 0.001) compared with transfemoral access.
19
Embolization Materials for Fibroid Embolization
Particulate materials are preferred for fibroid embolization.
Various embolic materials include nonspherical polyvinyl
alcohol particles (PVA, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IL and
Contour, Boston Scienti fic, Natick, MA), spherical tris-acrylic
gelatin microspheres (Embospheres, Merit Medical inc.,
USA), and Polyzene F-coated hydrogel microspheres (Embo-
zene, Varian Medical Systems, Pala Alto, CA, USA). Nonspher-
ical PVA particles have an irregular shape and tend to occlude
in the peri- fibroid vascular plexus leading to moderate
perivascular inflammatory change and partial recanalization
(90% at 6 months).
20,21 Spherical PVA particles are associated
with less tumor infarction compared with nonspherical PVA
particles.22 Embospheres are compressible, allow easy pas-
sage through the microcatheter and cause less aggregate
formation within the catheter or in this vasculature. This
property enables deeper penetration into the distal vascula-
ture, resulting in occlusion of more distal arteries.
20 Inflam-
mation with embosphere is less intense compared with
nonspherical PVA. 23 A meta-analysis by Das et al showed
no superiority of the available embolic materials for UAE. 20
Fig. 1 A 31-year-old female patient presented with menorrhagia
and dysmenorrhea due to uterinefibroid. She underwent bilateral UAE with
500 to 700 micron-sized PVA particles. Preprocedure sagittal T2 imaging
(image A) shows hypointensity of mass (white arrow) as compared with
adjacent myometrium (white arrow head). The presence of T2 hypointense
is associated with poor response. Images B and C show dilated bilateral
uterine artery (arrowheads in image B and C) with multiple corkscrew
type of branches (arrow in image C) supplying fibroid (star in image C).
Image D shows no filling of vessels after uterine artery embolization.
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al. 89
The choice of the size of particles is also important due to the
presence of utero-ovarian anastomosis that measures
/C24 350 µm in size. Small PVA particles with a size less than
350 µm though have better penetration into distal vessels,
causing more intense ischemic necrosis of fibroids and
therapeutic response but have a higher chance of non-target
embolization through utero-ovarian anastomosis (
►Fig. 2 ).
PVA particles of 500 to 750 microns result in more proximal
occlusion, but with less non-targeted embolization. 24 In a
study comparing 350 to 500 micron and 500 to 700 micron,
there was no difference in outcomes at 6 months though
smaller PVA was associated with higher post-procedure
pain.
24 A detailed description of various embolization mate-
rials used in UAE is given in ►Table 2 .
Fig. 2 Anatomy of uterine artery. ( A), (B) diagrammatic and angiographic image of internal iliac artery which divides into anterior and posterior branch.
From the posterior division (yellow arrow) superior gluteal artery. Iliolumbar and lateral sacral arises caliber. From the anterior division, infe rior gluteal
artery (green arrow) is a large branch coursing outside the pelvis. Other branches from anterior division include obturator artery which passes
through obturator foramen and have a distal fork like configuration (blue arrowhead), Internal pudendal artery (yellow arrowhead) which passes through
greater sciatic foramen reentering the pelvis through lesser sciatic foramen providing vascular supply to pelvic organs. Uterine artery (white arr ow)
arising from inferior gluteal artery has a‘U’ shaped course with descending (orange arrow), transverse (white arrow) and ascending course (blue arrowhead)
as shown in image ( C). Cervicovaginal arteries (black arrow) arise from the transverse part of uterine artery and need to be spared while embolization to
prevent vaginal ischemia.
Table 2 Embolization agents in UAE, advantages and disadvantages and speci ficu s e
Agent Property Advantage Disadvantages Specific use
PVA particle
Non-spherical
(500–700)
Irregular particles
Causes arteriolar
occlusion
Permanent agent
Less ovarian failure due
to larger size
Proximal occlusion
Catheter clumping
Fibroids
PVA particle.
Non-spherical
(350–500)
Irregular particles
Causes arteriolar
occlusion
Better distal emboliza-
tion in
More chances of
passing through
utero-ovarian anasto-
mosis
More pain
Less preferred com-
pared with 500 –700
particles
Embospheres Spherical particles
Uniform size
Less catheter block
Better and uniform pen-
etration
Lesser pain
Higher cost Fibroids
NBCA Liquid permanent
embolic
Can permeate distally in
case dif ficult emergency
cannulation
Uterine ischemia Refractory PPH, distal
pseudoaneurysm
Gelfoam Temporary agent Concentration can be
adjusted for proximal or
distal embolization
No risk for permanent
ischemia
Temporary agent Post-partum
hemorrhage
Vascular Coils Permanent agents,
proximal artery
occlusion
Inability to prevent flow
through collaterals
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al.90
Pain Management
Significant pain after fibroid embolization is due to ische-
mia of the uterus releasing lactate and adenosine that
stimulate chemosensitive receptors. The pain is usually
severe and cramping in nature and is most severe in the
initial 2 to 3 hours, and stabilizes by 8 to 12 hours. It can also
be seen as part of post embolization syndrome, which may
present with fever and fatigue, commonly on the third post-
procedure day. Various pain management strategies are
described, including NSAIDs and opioids, patient-controlled
analgesia, nerve block, and intrauterine artery injection of
analgesics. A systematic review showed that the combina-
tion of NSAIDs, acetaminophen and intrauterine injection of
lignocaine had better control of pain compared with NSAIDS
only.
25 Intraarterial use of lignocaine (20 –200 mg) into
uterine arteries after embolization helps in the reduction
of post-procedure pain for 7 hours (half-life of lignocaine
90–120 minutes) with reduced requirement of narcotic
dose.
26 Superior hypogastric nerve block (SNBH) effectively
reduces procedural pain and decreases the need for opioid
analgesic. It is done by instilling 3 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine
(75–100 mg) or 15 –20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine at the level
below the abdominal aortic bifurcation (L5 level) and the
anesthetic effect usually lasts for 8 to 12 hours.
27,28 The
injection can be done fluoroscopically after locating the
aortic bifurcation by a catheter or angiogram. 28 Post-proce-
dure, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 24 hours fol-
lowed by naproxen 500 mg BD or ibuprofen 800 mg three
times a day next seven days is effective in reducing post
embolization syndrome.
28 Opioids including fentanyl, mor-
phine, hydromorphine, hydrocodone, and oxycodone can
also be considered in cases of severe pain.
Fertility and Ovarian Reserve Function Post-uterine
Fibroid Embolization
A significant concern related to uterine fibroid embolization
is future fertility. The cause of infertility includes (1) reduced
blood supply to uterine endometrium, (2) residual distortion
of uterine cavity by any embolized involuting fibroid having a
submucosal extension, thereby resulting in abnormal pla-
centation and miscarriage, and (3) a decrease in ovarian
function due to nontarget ovarian embolization through
utero-ovarian anastomosis.
29 The risk of ovarian failure after
the UAE is high in women more than 45 years of age. A
systematic review by Karsen et al showed that the pregnancy
rate was lesser in patients undergoing UAE (50% vs. 78%) with
a higher miscarriage rate compared with myomectomy (60%
vs. 20%).
30 A RCT by Mara et al showed that myomectomy had
a superior reproductive outcome than UAE within 2 years of
treatment with higher pregnancy rate (78% vs. 50% p < 0.05)
and lower abortion rate (23% vs. 64%, p < 0.05).
31 A system-
atic review by Sandberg et al suggested that if a patient is a
surgical candidate and concerned about future pregnancy,
myomectomy should be the first choice.
7,32 UAE may be
considered in fibroids, that are surgically challenging to treat
in sub-fertility patients. 32 The diminution of ovarian reserve
leading to infertility after UAE is controversial. Razavi et al
classified the utero-ovarian anastomosis (UOA) into three
types (►Table 3 ) and described a high change ovarian failure
after UAE in type Ib, and type III UOA and in patients with age
more than 45 years. 33 Sheikh et al described the use of coils
and 700 to 900 µm PVA particles to occlude the UAO in type
1b and type III to reduce ovarian failure. 34 However, a
systematic review by Tare et al that compared case –control
and three cohort studies, showed that ovarian reserve as
measured by the level of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and
follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) was not affected by
UAE. However, majority of the population included in their
study were less than 40 years. In the EMMY study, which
analyzed a homogenous population, the level of FSH used as a
measure of the ovarian reserve was seen to increase after
embolization more in women over 45 years of age.
35 In
summary, the ovaries of younger age exhibit greater recovery
after ischemic damage suggesting that the infertility is more
likely to be due to uterine and endometrial causes than
ovarian in younger age, compared with those of age > 45
years.
UAE in Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis ( ►Fig. 3 ) is commonly seen in the fourth to
fifth decade presenting as dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, or
abdominal pain. 36 The management is by medical therapy
with hysterectomy reserved for refractory cases. UAE is
emerging as a potential alternative. Liang et al showed a
success rate of 88% in controlling bleeding with a pain score
reduction from 7.45 to 1.32 ( p < 0.001).
37 The short term (6-
month) success rate described by Kim et al amounts to 82 to
83%, while Popovic et al showed a long-term (5-year) success
Table 3 Utero-ovarian anastomosis and signi ficance
Type Morphology Significance
Ia Ovarian artery connects to uterine mural artery and then supplies fibroid. Flow
in tubal arteries is toward the uterus on selective uterine angiogram
Chances of failure of UAE high
Ib Same as type Ia. Re flux of contrast into an ovarian artery is seen during pre-
embolization angiogram followed by was hout of contrast washout toward the
uterus
Ovarian failure risk
II The ovarian artery directly supplies fibroid apart from uterine artery Chances of residual fibroid
III Ovary is supplied by uterine artery with flow in the tuboovarian segment is
toward the ovary
Ovarian failure risk
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al. 91
rate of 64.5%. 38,39 The ongoing QUESTA trial that compares
UAE with hysterectomy in premenopausal women may
provide insights regarding the future role of the UAE in
adenomyosis.
40 MRI can help in predicting the response:
lesions with low T2 (higher smooth muscle quantity with
less extracellular matrix) intensity compared with rectus
muscle has been shown to have better therapeutic re-
sponse.
38,41 A ratio of rectus to adenomyosis T2 signal
intensity of more than 0.475 was associated with complete
necrosis in such lesions. 41 Lesions with higher vascularity
also show better response than lesions without signi ficant
vascularity.42 Post-procedure MR can predict the midterm
(2 years) clinical recurrence, with necrosis of less than
34.3% of volume associated with seven-fold risk of recur-
rence.
42 Kim et al using 150 to 250 micron-sized nonspher-
ical PVA particles, followed by 250 to 355 micron and 355 to
500 micron-sized particles achieved a success rate of 90%.
However, as discussed, smaller particles( < 350 µm) should
not be considered in young patients who want to become
pregnant.
38
UAE in Arteriovenous Uterine Malformations
Uterine AVMs ( ►Fig. 4 ) are of two types: congenital or
acquired. Congenital AVM occurs due to a defect in embryo-
logical differentiation leading to abnormal arteriovenous
communications.
43 Even though these are present since
childhood, they are commonly noticed during the reproduc -
tive period and are frequently associated with multiple
feeders from other pelvic arteries in addition to uterine
artery.
44 Acquired AVMs involve fistulous communication
between uterine artery branches and venous plexuses in the
myometrium.
43 These are more common and seen in con-
ditions with prior uterine interventions, uterine surgery, and
in gestational trophoblastic disease and infection. 44 Ultra-
sound is the initial imaging test and shows multiple cystic
structures in uterine myometrium on grayscale, and high
turbulent flow on color flow imaging.44 Doppler parameters
can help in guiding treatment. Timmerman et al and Lee et al in
their studies showed AVMs with high PSV (/C21 83 cm/s) required
embolization whereas lesions with a PSV of less than 39 cm/s
required only conservative medical management.
45,46 For
women who wish to conserve uterus, expectant management
and UAE are the main methods of treatment. 47 Hysterectomy
is considered in individuals who do not wish to have future
pregnancies or in whom UAE has failed.44 As y s t e m a t i cr e v i e w
by Yoon et al reported that the primary success rate of UAE in
acquired AVM was 61%, whereas, in cases of repeated emboli-
zation, it was 91%43. Recent studies by Delplanque and Zhu et al
showed that the success rate of UAE was 71% to 87% in acquired
AVMs.47,48 Sophie et al, in 22 patients, showed reasonable
fertility rates post UAE (6/7, 85.7%) compared with expectant
management (2/5, 33.3%), with no miscarriages and ectopic
pregnancy.
47 Pei et al showed similar results in 62 acquired
AVMs treated with UAE where 10 patients became pregnant
and resulted in the delivery of a healthy live baby.
48 Young age
and lack of uterine distortion by fibroid are the probable
reasons for successful pregnancy.47 The choice of embolizing
Material
is variable and in cases of ovarian artery supply,
temporary occlusion by gelfoam is suf ficient as the main
goal is to prevent bleeding. 43
UAE in Antenatal Bleeding
There is increasing use of UAE in controlling antepartum
bleed in ectopic pregnancy and invasive placenta. Scar
ectopics (
►Fig. 5 ) require early termination in the first
trimester.49 Various treatment options include systemic
methotrexate, hysteroscopic resection, dilatation and curet-
tage. Timor et al showed bleeding rate (due to the slow action
of the drug, which results in growth of embryo and placental
Fig. 3 A 37-year-old female patient is a known case of adenomyosis.
She underwent bilateral UAE with 300 to 50 micron-sized PVA
particles. Image A-Sagittal MRI shows increased junctional zone
thickness of more than 12 mm (arro whead). Angiogram shows dilated
torturous bilateral uterine arteries with multiple feeders supplying
the uterus (arrow in image B and arrowhead in image C). Post
embolization angiogram shows occlusion of the uterine artery.
Fig. 4 Uterine AVM in a 26-year-female patient post gestational
trophoblastic disease underwent bi lateral UAE with glue emboliza-
tion. Image A shows an abnormal dilated uterine artery with small
communications (arrowhead), there is an additional pseudoaneurysm
(arrow). Image B-post glue embolization shows occlusion of the
fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and uterine artery.
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al.92
tissue) with methotrexate was 62%, thus requiring further
treatment.50 Hysteroscopic removal or dilation and curet-
tage (D & C) in cervical scar ectopic results in profuse life-
threatening bleeding due to lack of normal myometrium in
cervix. UAE has shown to reduce preoperative bleeding in
cases of surgical evacuation.
50 Systematic review by Pektas
et al showed 82% of cases treated initially with UAE alone
require further treatment by curettage or methotrexate 49.
Though the exact time interval between the UAE and evacu-
ation of products is not clearly de fined, it is better to do the
evacuation as early as possible after UAE, because delaying
evacuation results in recruitment and development of uter-
ine collaterals.
Abnormal invasive placenta (
►Fig. 6 ) includes placenta
accreta, increta, and percreta. Planned delivery by cesarean
section is performed at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation. Endo-
vascular interventions help in preserving the uterus and
decreasing intraoperative bleeding. 51 Endovascular inter-
ventions include prophylactic balloon occlusion (PBO) and
uterine artery embolization. In PBO compliant balloons are
placed under fluoroscopy guidance and are in flated after the
delivery of the baby and clamping of the umbilical cord.
Balloon occlusion can be performed either proximally at the
infrarenal abdominal aorta, bilateral common iliac arteries,
or distally at the internal iliac or uterine arteries. Proximal
occlusion in the aorta is quick to perform with less radiation
exposure to the fetus and it also reduces bleeding from
collaterals compared with distal occlusion. Uterine artery
embolization can be considered after balloon occlusion if
there is persistent bleeding. In a systematic review, Shahin
et al compared proximal versus distal balloon occlusion and
reported that proximal balloon occlusion of the abdominal
aorta resulted in better control of blood loss (mean differ-
ence-1.391 mL, p < 0.001), lower hysterectomy rates, and
less fetal radiation dose.
52 Wu et al showed average fetal
radiation dose in aortic balloon occlusion was 5.1 /C6 3m G yi n
230 patients, whereas the radiation dose with internal iliac
balloon occlusion was 21 to 61 mGy. 53 The average radiation
dose absorbed by the skin for 10 to 35 minutes of fluoroscopy
was /C24 450 to 1600 mGy, and the dose absorbed by ovaries was
7 to 378 mGy, which is far less compared with the recom-
mended dose limits. 54
UAE in Postpartum Bleed
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an important cause of
morbidity and mortality worldwide with more than 1 lakh
death per annum.
55 It is de fined as blood loss of more than
1000 mL of blood associated with features of volume loss
such as hypotension and tachycardia. It can be primary,
which occurs within the first 24 hours due to uterine atony,
Fig. 6 A 33-year-female patient with placenta percre ta invading bladder at 35 weeks of gestation underwent bilateral internal iliac arteries
balloon placement before delivery. Image ( A) showing the fetus (blue arrowhead) with vascular placental blush. Bilateral femoral artery
access was done and 10 mm x 2 cm balloon was placed in the both internal iliac artery (arrowsheads in image B and image C). The patient
was then taken for cesarean section and the balloons were in flated after the delivery of fetus, followed by hysterectomy. The perioperative
blood loss was 350 mL, which was signi ficantly low compared with a surgery for placenta percreta.
Fig. 5 Case of scar ectopic in a 34-year-old female patient awaiting
curettage-prophylactic bilateral uterine artery embolization is
done using gelfoam. In image A, abnormal feeders to the uterus
(arrow) and fetal head can also be noted (arrowhead). Image B-Post
gel foam embolization of uterine artery shows stoppage of flow.
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al. 93
trauma to the genital tract, retained placental tissues or
coagulopathic disorders or secondary (occurring 24 hours to
12 weeks) due to retained placental tissue, infection, coagul-
opathy, uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (
►Fig. 7 )o rA V M56.
The latest FIGO guidelines recommend UAE for refractory PPH
uncontrolled by medical and nonsurgical methods, provided
there is availability of skilled personnel.
57 UAE can be consid-
ered when conservative management fails. It is preferable to
perform angiography after 30 minutes of administration of
uterotonics, as these drugs cause vasospasm, obscuring the
total extent of the problem. During angiography, contrast
extravasation is seen in 21 to 52% of cases, and the most
common source of bleeding is from distal branches of the
uterine artery, or vaginal arteries. Absorbable gel foam as
embolizing material is preferred as it stops bleeding and allows
recanalization within 2 to 4 weeks, thereby preventing ische-
mia.
55 Liquid embolics such as N-butyl cyanoacrylate are used
only when the total permanent occlusion of the vessel is
required in recurrent or refractory PPH or in large pseudoa-
neurysms.
58 In cases where the bleeding site is not identified,
empirical embolization of bilateral uterine arteries or anterior
division of the internal iliac artery can be attempted. 58 Sys-
tematic review by Zhang et al showed that UAE was successful
in controlling bleeding in 90.5% of cases with 91 to 100% of
these cases resuming their normal menstruation during fol-
low-up.
54 Study by Lee et al in 251 patients with primary PPH
showed successful rate of UAE in 88% of patients with dissemi-
nated intravascular coagulation and massive transfusion as
independent predictors for clinical failure.
59
Conclusion
In conclusion, uterine artery embolization is a safe, effective,
and minimally invasive technique in treating various uterine
pathologies such as fibroids, adenomyosis, and uterine vas-
cular malformations. It can help reduce bleeding and pre-
serve the uterus in abnormal invasive placenta and scar
ectopic pregnancy. Proper patient selection and consider-
ation of appropriate technical aspects can achieve better
success rate.
Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
1 Marsh EE, Al-Hendy A, Kappus D, Galitsky A, Stewart EA, Kerolous
M. Burden, prevalence, and treatment of uterine fibroids: a survey
of U.S. women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(11):
1359–1367
2 Dariushnia SR, Nikolic B, Stokes LS, Spies JBSociety of Interven-
tional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality im-
provement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for
symptomatic leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25(11):
1737–1747
3 Rand T, Patel R, Magerle W, Uberoi R. CIRSE standards of practice
on gynaecological and obstetric haemorrhage. CVIR Endovasc
2020;3(01):85https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.-
gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695782/ cited 2021Jun1 [Internet]
4 Kröncke T, David Mparticipants of the Consensus Meeting. Uter-
ine artery embolization (UAE) for fibroid treatment - results of the
5th radiological gynecological expert meeting. Geburtshilfe
Frauenheilkd 2015;75(05):439 –441
5 Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM.
Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on
quality of life –results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus:
Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol 2012;35(03):530 –536
6 van der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJK, Volkers NA, Birnie E, Ankum
WM, Reekers JA. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in
the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome
from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203
(02):105.e1–105.e13
7 Sandberg EM, Tummers FHMP, Cohen SL, van den Haak L, Dekkers
OM, Jansen FW. Reintervention risk and quality of life outcomes
after uterine-sparing interventions for fibroids: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2018;109(04):698 –707.e1
8 Fonseca MCM, Castro R, Machado M, Conte T, Girao MJBC. Uterine
artery embolization and surgical methods for the treatment of
symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a systemic review and meta-
analysis followed by indirect treatment comparison. Clin Ther
2017;39(07):1438–1455.e2
9 Rana D, Wu O, Cheed V, et al; FEMME Trial Collaborative Group.
Uterine artery embolisation or myomectomy for women with
uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: a cost-utility
analysis of the FEMME trial. BJOG 2021;128(11):1793 –1802
10 Kirby JM, Burrows D, Haider E, Maizlin Z, Midia M. Utility of MRI
before and after uterinefibroid embolization: why to do it and what
to look for. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34(04):705–716
11 Duvnjak S, Ravn P, Green A, Andersen PE. Magnetic resonance
signal intensity ratio measurement before uterine artery emboli-
zation: ability to predict fibroid size reduction. Cardiovasc Inter-
vent Radiol 2017;40(12):1839 –1844
12 Kalina I, Tóth A, Valcseva É, et al. Prognostic value of pre-
embolisation MRI features of uterine fibroids in uterine artery
embolisation. Clin Radiol 2018;73(12):1060.e1 –1060.e7
13 Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Bonneau C, et al. How to
differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using
MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2013;23(08):2306 –2314
14 Chehab MA, Thakor AS, Tulin-Silver S, et al. Adult and pediatric
antibiotic prophylaxis during vascular and IR procedures: a
Society of Interventional Radiology Practice Parameter Update
Endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological
Society of Europe and the Canadian Association for Interventional
Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018;29(11):1483 –1501.e2
Fig. 7 A 35-year-female patient presented with bleeding per vagina
after a recent D&C. Image A shows a large pseudoaneurysm seen
arising from right uterine artery(arrowhead). After selectively can-
nulating the right uterine artery, it was embolized with 20% glue.
Image B-Post embolization shows occlusion of uterine artery as well as
pseudoaneurysm.
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al.94
15 Graif A, Leung DA, McKenna G, Patel KD, Holmes LE, Grilli CJ.
Evaluation of the effect of routine antibiotic administration after
uterine artery embolization on infection rates. J Vasc Interv Radiol
2020;31(08):1263–1269
16 Bratby MJ, Ramachandran N, Sheppard N, Kyriou J, Munneke GM,
Belli AM. Prospective study of elective bilateral versus unilateral
femoral arterial puncture for uterine artery embolization. Car-
diovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30(06):1139 –1143
17 Costantino M, Lee J, McCullough M, Nsouli-Maktabi H, Spies JB.
Bilateral versus unilateral femoral access for uterine artery em-
bolization: results of a randomized comparative trial. J Vasc Interv
Radiol 2010;21(06):829 –835, quiz 835
18 Resnick NJ, Kim E, Patel RS, Lookstein RA, Nowakowski FS, Fisch-
man AM. Uterine artery embolization using a transradial ap-
proach: initial experience and technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol
2014;25(03):443–447
19 Khayrutdinov E, Vorontsov I, Arablinskiy A, Shcherbakov D,
Gromov D. A randomized comparison of transradial and trans-
femoral access in uterine artery embolization. Diagn Interv Radiol
2021;27(01):59–64
20 Das R, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Belli AM. Comparison of embolic
agents used in uterine artery embolisation: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37(05):
1179–1190
21 Das R, Gonsalves M, Vlahos I, Manyonda I, Belli AM. MRI assess-
ment of uterine artery patency and fibroid infarction rates
6 months after uterine artery embolization with nonspherical
polyvinyl alcohol. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36(05):
1280–1287
22 Rasuli P, Hammond I, Al-Mutairi B, et al. Spherical versus conven-
tional polyvinyl alcohol particles for uterine artery embolization.
J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19(01):42 –46
23 Laurent A, Wassef M, Namur J, Martal J, Labarre D, Pelage JP.
Recanalization and particle exclusion after embolization of uter-
ine arteries in sheep: a long-term study. Fertil Steril 2009;91(03):
884–892
24 Bilhim T, Pisco JM, Duarte M, Oliveira AG. Polyvinyl alcohol
particle size for uterine artery embolization: a prospective ran-
domized study of initial use of 350-500 μm particles versus initial
use of 500-700 μm particles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22(01):
21–27
25 Saibudeen A, Makris GC, Elzein A, et al. Pain management pro-
tocols during uterine fibroid embolisation: a systematic review of
the evidence. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019;42(12):
1663–1677
26 Shiwani TH, Shiwani H. Intra-arterial anaesthetics for pain control
in arterial embolisation procedures: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. CVIR Endovasc 2021;4(01):6
27 Pereira K, Morel-Ovalle LM, Wiemken TL, et al. Intraprocedural
superior hypogastric nerve block allows same-day discharge
following uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol
2020;31(03):388–392
28 Spencer EB, Stratil P, Mizones H. Clinical and periprocedural pain
management for uterine artery embolization. Semin Intervent
Radiol 2013;30(04):354 –363
29 Czuczwar P, Stępniak A, Wrona W, Wo źniak S, Milart P, Paszkow-
ski T. The in fluence of uterine artery embolisation on ovarian
reserve, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes - a review of literature.
Przegl Menopauz 2016;15(04):205 –209
30 Karlsen K, Hrobjartsson A, Korsholm M, Mogensen O, Humaidan
P, Ravn P. Fertility after uterine artery embolization of fibroids:
a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297(01):
13–25
31 Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O.
Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized
controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and
myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008;31(01):73 –85
32 Spies JB. Current role of uterine artery embolization in the
management of uterine fibroids. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59
(01):93–102
33 Razavi MK, Wolanske KA, Hwang GL, Sze DY, Kee ST, Dake MD.
Angiographic classi fication of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery
anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization.
Radiology 2002;224(03):707 –712
34 Sheikh GT, Naja fi A, Cunier M, Hess TH, Binkert CA. Angiographic
detection of utero-ovarian anastomosis and in fluence on ovarian
function after uterine artery embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol 2020;43(02):231 –237
35 de Bruijn AM, Ankum WM, Reekers JA, et al. Uterine artery
embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic
uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY
trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215(06):745.e1 –745.e12
36 Kulshrestha V, Yadav R, Malla S, Gamanagatti S, Bhatla N. Suc -
cessful pregnancy outcome in refractory adenomyosis treated
with two sessions of uterine artery embolization: a case report
and brief review. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021;50(07):
102132
37 Liang E, Brown B, Rachinsky M. A clinical audit on the ef ficacy and
safety of uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic adeno-
myosis: results in 117 women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58
(04):454–459
38 Kim MD, Kim YM, Kim HC, et al. Uterine artery embolization for
symptomatic adenomyosis: a new technical development of the
1-2-3 protocol and predictive factors of MR imaging affecting
outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22(04):497 –502
39 Popovic M, Puchner S, Berzaczy D, Lammer J, Bucek RA. Uterine
artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a review. J
Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22(07):901 –909, quiz 909
40 de Bruijn AM, Lohle PN, Huirne JA, de Vries J, Twisk M, Hehenkamp
WJQUESTA-Trial Group. Uterine artery embolization versus hyster-
ectomy in the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: protocol for
the randomized QUESTA trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(03):e47
41 Jung DC, Kim MD, Oh YT, Won JY, Lee DY. Prediction of early
response to uterine arterial embolisation of adenomyosis: value
of T2 signal intensity ratio of adenomyosis. Eur Radiol 2012;22
(09):2044–2049
42 Bae SH, Kim MD, Kim GM, et al. Uterine artery embolization for
adenomyosis: percentage of necrosis predicts midterm clinical
recurrence. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;26(09):1290 –6.e2
43 Yoon DJ, Jones M, Taani JA, Buhimschi C, Dowell JD. A systematic
review of acquired uterine arteriovenous malformations: patho-
physiology, diagnosis, and transcatheter treatment. AJP Rep 2016;
6(01):e6–e14
44 Szpera-Goździewicz A, Gruca-Stryjak K, Br ęborowicz GH,
Ropacka-Lesiak M. Uterine arteriovenous malformation - diagno-
sis and management. Ginekol Pol 2018;89(05):276 –279
45 Timmerman D, Wauters J, Van Calenbergh S, et al. Color Doppler
imaging is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of
uterine vascular malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2003;21(06):570–577
46 Lee TY, Kim SH, Lee HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic indications for
conservative treatment in pregnancy-related uterine arteriove-
nous malformations. Acta Radiol 2014;55(09):1145 –1152
47 Delplanque S, Le Lous M, Proisy M, et al. Fertility, pregnancy, and
clinical outcomes after uterine arteriovenous malformation man-
agement. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26(01):153 –161
48 Zhu YP, Sun ZJ, Lang JH, Pan J. Clinical characteristic and manage-
ment of acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation. Chin Med J
(Engl) 2018;131(20):2489 –2491
49 Kanat-Pektas M, Bodur S, Dundar O, Bak ır VL. Systematic review:
what is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic
pregnancy? Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55(02):263 –269
50 Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the
increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al. 95
cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207
(01):14–29
51 Huang KL, Tsai CC, Fu HC, et al. Prophylactic transcatheter arterial
embolization helps intraoperative hemorrhagic control for RE-
MOVING Invasive Placenta. J Clin Med 2018;7(11):460
52 Shahin Y, Pang CL. Endovascular interventional modalities for
haemorrhage control in abnormal placental implantation deliv-
eries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2018;28
(07):2713–2726
53 Wu Q, Liu Z, Zhao X, et al. Outcome of pregnancies after balloon
occlusion of the infrarenal abdominal aorta during caesarean in
230 patients with placenta praevia accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol 2016;39(11):1573 –1579
54 Zhang XQ, Chen XT, Zhang YT, Mai CX. The emergent pelvic artery
embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021;
76(04):234–244
55 Brown M, Hong M Jr, Lindquist J. Uterine artery embolization for
primary postpartum hemorrhage. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2021;
24(01):100727
56 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no.
183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(04):
e168–e186
57 Escobar MF, Nassar AH, Theron G, et al; FIGO Safe Motherhood and
Newborn Health Committee. FIGO recommendations on the
management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet 2022;157(Suppl 1):3 –50
58 Loya MF, Garcia-Reyes K, Gichoya J, Newsome J. Uterine artery
embolization for secondary postpartum hemorrhage. Tech Vasc
Interv Radiol 2021;24(01):100728 https://www.techvir.com/
article/S1089-2516(21)00006-8/fulltextcited 2022Aug15 [Internet]
59 Lee HY, Shin JH, Kim J, et al. Primary postpartum hemorrhage:
outcome of pelvic arterial embolization in 251 patients at a single
institution. Radiology 2012;264(03):903 –909
Journal of Clinical Interventional R adiology ISVIR Vol. 7 No. 2/2023 © 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. All rights res erved.
Uterine Artery Embolization Bellala et al.96
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.