QModel: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

QModel presents an open-source, time-aware framework and companion module (QModel Compilation) for mining GitHub repositories by collecting and linking commits, pull requests, issues, timelines, file changes, and user reactions into a consistent relational schema for software quality analysis. In a containerized, end-to-end pipeline, researchers can write SQL hypotheses and generate datasets that are then analyzed using correlation, regression, PCA, random forest, and other statistical or machine-learning strategies; the paper illustrates this on long-lived projects using time-aware graph metrics combined with SZZ-style defect linking. It reports that metrics of bug-introducing commits can act as lightweight proxies for process bottlenecks and delayed defect handling in distributed development. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Empirical studies in software engineering frequently rely on ad hoc scripts to mineGitHub data, which makes metrics hard to compare and results difficult to reproduce. Thispaper presents QModel, an open-source framework that automatically collects and linksrepository information about commits (as a DAG-directed acyclic graph), pull requests,issues, timelines, file changes, and user reactions into a consistent relational schema designedfor quality analysis. Its companion module, QModel Compilation, turns SQL queries over thisschema into executable analyses by generating feature-target datasets and running statisticalor machine-learning strategies (correlation, regression, PCA, random forest, and others).Together, the tools provide an end-to-end, containerized pipeline that allows researchers andpractitioners to define quality hypotheses in SQL, recreate analyses across projects, andexplore how process and structural characteristics (e.g., branching depth, merge activity,developer responsiveness) relate to outcomes such as review time and defect density. Weillustrate the framework on long-lived GitHub projects, combining time-aware graph metricswith SZZ-style defect linking, and show how metrics of bug-introducing commits can serveas lightweight proxies for process bottlenecks and delayed defect handling in distributeddevelopment. All source code, container images, and replication notebooks are publiclyavailable, supporting the community goal of transparent, reusable, and extensible researchon software quality.
Full text 11,657 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
QModel: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article QModel: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies Dmytro Polishchuk This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Empirical studies in software engineering frequently rely on ad hoc scripts to mineGitHub data, which makes metrics hard to compare and results difficult to reproduce. Thispaper presents QModel, an open-source framework that automatically collects and linksrepository information about commits (as a DAG-directed acyclic graph), pull requests,issues, timelines, file changes, and user reactions into a consistent relational schema designedfor quality analysis. Its companion module, QModel Compilation, turns SQL queries over thisschema into executable analyses by generating feature-target datasets and running statisticalor machine-learning strategies (correlation, regression, PCA, random forest, and others).Together, the tools provide an end-to-end, containerized pipeline that allows researchers andpractitioners to define quality hypotheses in SQL, recreate analyses across projects, andexplore how process and structural characteristics (e.g., branching depth, merge activity,developer responsiveness) relate to outcomes such as review time and defect density. Weillustrate the framework on long-lived GitHub projects, combining time-aware graph metricswith SZZ-style defect linking, and show how metrics of bug-introducing commits can serveas lightweight proxies for process bottlenecks and delayed defect handling in distributeddevelopment. All source code, container images, and replication notebooks are publiclyavailable, supporting the community goal of transparent, reusable, and extensible researchon software quality. mining software repositories empirical software engineering software quality Git time-aware metrics defect prediction reproducibility open tools Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files qmodel.zip qmodelcompilation.zip Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8478733","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":571631768,"identity":"073a1b1b-1f9e-45c6-976e-e8669fe82e7c","order_by":0,"name":"Dmytro Polishchuk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jagiellonian University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dmytro","middleName":"","lastName":"Polishchuk","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-30 07:53:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":100365926,"identity":"30b9b61f-e47c-4a7a-8ece-dc3b6ff5a98b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-16 07:55:45","extension":"json","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3716,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"991b4955dbfd4869b5200b50164841d7.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8478733/v1/a834e9efcd74794c60862f58.json"},{"id":107706801,"identity":"d3f684e0-8294-4adf-9121-0fbcbe316859","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-24 09:18:46","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3044366,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"qmodelmanuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8478733/v1_covered_6249468c-4c22-489e-b7c4-1d408f8b9906.pdf"},{"id":100088299,"identity":"b05ae23e-9a87-4768-ac10-2312e2930b93","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-12 22:19:22","extension":"zip","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":338790,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"qmodel.zip","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8478733/v1/cdb0f4435fd2633a634be707.zip"},{"id":100088301,"identity":"ea45dfba-0281-495f-b79d-0a537d7bc13f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-12 22:19:22","extension":"zip","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1218198,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"qmodelcompilation.zip","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8478733/v1/2990d618540d5829f092c150.zip"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eQModel: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"mining software repositories, empirical software engineering, software quality, Git, time-aware metrics, defect prediction, reproducibility, open tools","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Empirical studies in software engineering frequently rely on ad hoc scripts to mineGitHub data, which makes metrics hard to compare and results difficult to reproduce. Thispaper presents QModel, an open-source framework that automatically collects and linksrepository information about commits (as a DAG-directed acyclic graph), pull requests,issues, timelines, file changes, and user reactions into a consistent relational schema designedfor quality analysis. Its companion module, QModel Compilation, turns SQL queries over thisschema into executable analyses by generating feature-target datasets and running statisticalor machine-learning strategies (correlation, regression, PCA, random forest, and others).Together, the tools provide an end-to-end, containerized pipeline that allows researchers andpractitioners to define quality hypotheses in SQL, recreate analyses across projects, andexplore how process and structural characteristics (e.g., branching depth, merge activity,developer responsiveness) relate to outcomes such as review time and defect density. Weillustrate the framework on long-lived GitHub projects, combining time-aware graph metricswith SZZ-style defect linking, and show how metrics of bug-introducing commits can serveas lightweight proxies for process bottlenecks and delayed defect handling in distributeddevelopment. All source code, container images, and replication notebooks are publiclyavailable, supporting the community goal of transparent, reusable, and extensible researchon software quality.","manuscriptTitle":"QModel: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-12 22:19:17","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8478733/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"fbcad948-649b-44d5-b83b-329cd4ec9f7f","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 12th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-22T16:25:28+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-12 22:19:17","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8478733","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8478733","identity":"rs-8478733","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0