Value and Interest Rates: Are Rates to Blame for Value’s Torments?
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This meta-analysis of 38 studies including 13,129 women found no evidence for an association between tobacco smoking and the risk of endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective Since conflicting results have been published on the role of tobacco smoking on the risk of endometriosis, we provide an up-to-date summary quantification of this potential association. Design We performed a PubMed/MEDLINE search of the relevant publications up to September 2014, considering studies on humans published in English. We searched the reference list of the identified papers to find other relevant publications. Case–control as well as cohort studies have been included reporting risk estimates on the association between tobacco smoking and endometriosis. 38 of the 1758 screened papers met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies included a total of 13 129 women diagnosed with endometriosis. Setting Academic hospitals. Main outcome measure Risk of endometriosis in tobacco smokers. Results We obtained the summary estimates of the relative risk (RR) using the random effect model, and assessed the heterogeneity among studies using the χ2 test and quantified it using the I2 statistic. As compared to never-smokers, the summary RR were 0.96 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.08) for ever smokers, 0.95 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.11) for former smokers, 0.92 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.04) for current smokers, 0.87 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.07) for moderate smokers and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.26) for heavy smokers. Conclusions The present meta-analysis provided no evidence for an association between tobacco smoking and the risk of endometriosis. The results were consistent considering ever, former, current, moderate and heavy smokers, and across type of endometriosis and study design.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (19)
- W1714741508 via openalex
- W1742241294 via openalex
- W1995834279 via openalex
- W2008301397 via openalex
- W2047134779 via openalex
- W2113305199 via openalex
- W2144965980 via openalex
- W2954001191 via openalex
- W2958846545 via openalex
- W3121456775 via openalex
- W3121508937 via openalex
- W3121981420 via openalex
- W3122649028 via openalex
- W3122712023 via openalex
- W3122913149 via openalex
- W3123639445 via openalex
- W3124909920 via openalex
- W3125078388 via openalex
- W3125854176 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-30T06:25:36.955031+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK