The determination of seismic performance of single-story masonry buildings and strengthening proposal

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Non‑engineered structures—exemplified by traditional unreinforced masonry dwellings—constitute a vital repository of vernacular construction knowledge that should be safeguarded for future generations. However, their intrinsic vulnerability to seismic action demands systematic assessment. This study evaluates the seismic performance of a single-story non‑engineered building through an integrated appraisal of its as‑found condition, material properties, and geometric configuration. Field surveys supplied the requisite data, underpinning a suite of state‑of‑the‑art analyses: elastic response‑spectrum assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, and kinematic limit‑state modeling. All three approaches consistently revealed localized zones of elevated stress and excessive deformation, elucidating critical weaknesses and probable collapse mechanisms. On this basis, strengthening strategies are proposed, focusing on strengthening the lateral‑load‑resisting system, enhancing material capacity, and judiciously introducing modern technologies. The research program was extended by strengthening the masonry walls with externally bonded textile‑reinforced mortar (TRM) overlays. A parametric investigation of one‑, two‑, and four‑ply TRM configurations was undertaken to quantify the incremental enhancements in global seismic performance afforded by successive layers. The findings offer a methodological framework for the seismic appraisal of non‑engineered residential stock and establish a robust foundation for future research into conserving and upgrading heritage masonry assets.
Full text 11,332 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
The determination of seismic performance of single-story masonry buildings and strengthening proposal | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The determination of seismic performance of single-story masonry buildings and strengthening proposal Basak Boduroglu Yazici, Oguz Uzdil This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Non‑engineered structures—exemplified by traditional unreinforced masonry dwellings—constitute a vital repository of vernacular construction knowledge that should be safeguarded for future generations. However, their intrinsic vulnerability to seismic action demands systematic assessment. This study evaluates the seismic performance of a single-story non‑engineered building through an integrated appraisal of its as‑found condition, material properties, and geometric configuration. Field surveys supplied the requisite data, underpinning a suite of state‑of‑the‑art analyses: elastic response‑spectrum assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, and kinematic limit‑state modeling. All three approaches consistently revealed localized zones of elevated stress and excessive deformation, elucidating critical weaknesses and probable collapse mechanisms. On this basis, strengthening strategies are proposed, focusing on strengthening the lateral‑load‑resisting system, enhancing material capacity, and judiciously introducing modern technologies. The research program was extended by strengthening the masonry walls with externally bonded textile‑reinforced mortar (TRM) overlays. A parametric investigation of one‑, two‑, and four‑ply TRM configurations was undertaken to quantify the incremental enhancements in global seismic performance afforded by successive layers. The findings offer a methodological framework for the seismic appraisal of non‑engineered residential stock and establish a robust foundation for future research into conserving and upgrading heritage masonry assets. Civil Engineering Seismic Performance URM Kinematic analysis Pushover analysis TRM Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5347299","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":371692084,"identity":"cfabf393-df60-40b7-a35c-235e47fa7c10","order_by":0,"name":"Basak Boduroglu Yazici","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Basak","middleName":"Boduroglu","lastName":"Yazici","suffix":""},{"id":456736049,"identity":"e9be4c8b-62f0-427b-b196-62613e324891","order_by":1,"name":"Oguz Uzdil","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-6392","institution":"Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Oguz","middleName":"","lastName":"Uzdil","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-28 12:57:51","currentVersionCode":2,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":true,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe determination of seismic performance of single-story masonry buildings and strengthening proposal\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Seismic Performance, URM, Kinematic analysis, Pushover analysis, TRM","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eNon‑engineered structures\u0026mdash;exemplified by traditional unreinforced masonry dwellings\u0026mdash;constitute a vital repository of vernacular construction knowledge that should be safeguarded for future generations. However, their intrinsic vulnerability to seismic action demands systematic assessment. This study evaluates the seismic performance of a single-story non‑engineered building through an integrated appraisal of its as‑found condition, material properties, and geometric configuration. Field surveys supplied the requisite data, underpinning a suite of state‑of‑the‑art analyses: elastic response‑spectrum assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, and kinematic limit‑state modeling. All three approaches consistently revealed localized zones of elevated stress and excessive deformation, elucidating critical weaknesses and probable collapse mechanisms. On this basis, strengthening strategies are proposed, focusing on strengthening the lateral‑load‑resisting system, enhancing material capacity, and judiciously introducing modern technologies. The research program was extended by strengthening the masonry walls with externally bonded textile‑reinforced mortar (TRM) overlays. A parametric investigation of one‑, two‑, and four‑ply TRM configurations was undertaken to quantify the incremental enhancements in global seismic performance afforded by successive layers. The findings offer a methodological framework for the seismic appraisal of non‑engineered residential stock and establish a robust foundation for future research into conserving and upgrading heritage masonry assets.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The determination of seismic performance of single-story masonry buildings and strengthening proposal","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":2,"date":"2025-05-29 19:21:42","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-29 10:36:31","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5347299/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"11402dbf-58f6-48fb-96cd-150a369cee19","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 29th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":48545852,"name":"Civil Engineering"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-10-29T10:36:31+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-29 19:21:42","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v2","identity":"rs-5347299","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5347299","identity":"rs-5347299","version":["v2"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0