Ultrasound-defined adenomyosis subtypes and their impact on outcomes following frozen embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched cohort study
This study found that adenomyosis, especially internal and mixed types defined by ultrasound, is linked to lower live birth rates and higher early pregnancy loss after frozen embryo transfer.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective single-center study evaluated whether ultrasound-defined adenomyosis subtypes using revised MUSA criteria are associated with reproductive and obstetric outcomes after a first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle with high-quality embryos, comparing 879 women with adenomyosis to 879 propensity score-matched controls without ultrasound evidence of adenomyosis. The primary outcome was live birth (≥28 weeks), and live birth was significantly lower in women with adenomyosis overall (35.38% vs 45.16%; OR 0.67, P < 0.001). External adenomyosis had live-birth rates comparable to controls, whereas internal and mixed subtypes had progressively lower live-birth rates (internal OR 0.52; mixed OR 0.28) and adenomyosis was associated with higher early pregnancy loss among clinical pregnancies (22.25% vs 15.65%; OR 1.54, P = 0.011), with no broad differences in most other outcomes among those achieving live birth. The authors note limitations inherent to a retrospective, single-center design, and prospective validation is needed, and data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethics. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it uses ultrasound-defined MUSA subtypes to assess their impact on live birth and early pregnancy loss after FET.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,068 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-09T06:15:24.302764+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-09-09T06:10:45.524441+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-09T06:31:01.691765+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine