Construction of a Convenient Screening Method for P-Hydroxybenzoate Hydroxylase To Enable Efficient Gallic Acid and Pyrogallol Biosynthesis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Construction of a Convenient Screening Method for P -Hydroxybenzoate Hydroxylase To Enable Efficient Gallic Acid and Pyrogallol Biosynthesis Zhenya Chen, Tongtong Chen, Shengzhu Yu, Yi-Xin Huo This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Gallic acid (GA) and pyrogallol are phenolic hydroxyl compounds and have diverse biological activities. Microbial-based biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol has been emerged as an ecofriendly method to replace the traditional chemical synthesis. In GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways, the low hydroxylation activity of p -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PobA) towards 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (3,4-DHBA) limited the high-level biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol. Results This work reported a high active PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) towards 3,4-DHBA. This mutant was screened out from a PobA random mutagenesis library through a novel naked eye visual screening method. In vitro enzyme assay showed this mutant has a k cat / K m of 0.059 μM -1 s -1 towards 3,4-DHBA, which was 4.92-fold higher than the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA). Molecular docking simulation provided the mechanism explanation of the high activity. Expression of this mutant in E. coli BW25113 (F’) can generate 830 ± 33 mg/L GA from 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. After that, we utilized this mutant to assemble a de novo GA biosynthetic pathway. Subsequently, this pathway was introduced into a 3,4-DHBA-producing strain ( E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE ) to achieve 301 ± 15 mg/L GA production from simple carbon sources. Similarly, assembling this mutant into a de novo pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway enabled 129 ± 15 mg/L pyrogallol production. Conclusions This work established an efficient screening method and generated a high active PobA mutant. Assembling this mutant into GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways achieved the de novo production of these two compounds. Besides, this mutant has great potential for GA or pyrogallol derivatives production. The screening method could be used for other GA biosynthesis-related enzymes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering p-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase screening hydroxylation gallic acid pyrogallol biosynthesis Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Background Gallic acid (GA) is a natural phenolic acid of plants, and its phenolic hydroxyl groups endow GA with diverse biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities [1-7]. Pyrogallol (1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene), a decarboxylated product of GA, exhibits similar biological activities to GA [8, 9]. Besides, pyrogallol has broad-spectrum antiseptic activity [10, 11]. According to the properties of GA and pyrogallol, these two compounds have been widely applied in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [12, 13]. For instance, GA can recover the antioxidase activity in the liver, brain and kidney of senescence accelerated mice [14]. Pyrogallol was a crucial precursor for synthesizing antianginal drug trimethoxybenzidine [15]. Traditional method for GA production mainly relies on the hydrolysis of tannins through acids or bases [16]. In addition, GA can be alternatively produced by fermentation of tannins using the strain with active tannase [17-19]. The main approach for pyrogallol production was decarboxylation of GA via toxic chemicals under harsh conditions. Besides, enzymatic decarboxylation induced by 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid decarboxylase (PDC) was also utilized to produce pyrogallol [20]. The PDC-induced decarboxylation reaction required the anaerobic environment. Besides, the PDC purification was complicated and time-consuming. The abovementioned methods for GA and pyrogallol production also suffered from other drawbacks, such as the limited amount of raw materials, harsh reaction conditions, environment pollution and low yield [21]. In recent years, microbial-based biosynthesis has been attempted to produce many value-added compounds from simple carbon sources [22-27], including GA and pyrogallol [28, 29]. GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways generally extended from 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), which was an Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) endogenous compound generated from the shikimate pathway [28]. 4-HBA can be catalyzed to form GA through a two-step reaction, which included hydroxylation of 4-HBA into 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (3,4-DHBA) and hydroxylation of 3,4-DHBA into GA. This two-step reaction was generally activated by p -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PobA). For pyrogallol biosynthesis, PDC was generally introduced into GA-producing strain in order to convert GA into pyrogallol [29]. In GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways, hydroxylase PobA plays as a significant role. Native PobA from Pseudomonas fluorescens ( P. fluorescens ) displays high hydroxylase activity towards 4-HBA, but very weak or negligible activity towards 3,4-DHBA [30]. To address this issue, previous studies mutated the tyrosine at 385th position of PobA into phenylalanine, which led PobA to hydroxylate 3,4-DHBA into GA [30, 31]. Further, Chen et al. rationally designed a higher active mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA) towards 3,4-DHBA [28]. Though PobA mutants with the ability of hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA have been obtained, the hydroxylation activity was still not satisfied the demand of high-level GA and pyrogallol production. Specifically, the low activity of PobA towards 3,4-DHBA can lead carbon source to flow into the byproduct (catechol) biosynthetic pathway. Therefore, PobA mutant with higher activity urgently needs to be investigated. Rational design of PobA mutants generally required to deeply understand the catalytic mechanism of PobA. In many cases, the mutants generated from rational design did not have the expected high activity [32]. Compared to rational design, random mutagenesis is a method with higher probability to obtain high active PobA mutants. Effective screening method can ensure the acquirement of ideal mutants. In this study, we established an efficient and simple method for screening high active PobA mutants. This method depended on the instability of GA in alkaline conditions and the generated degradation products could react with each other to form a phenolic mixture [33, 34]. Specifically, the mixture has a green color visible to naked eyes and the maximum absorption wavelength was at 640 nm. Based on that, we adopted this method to screen out a PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) from a PobA random mutagenesis library. The k cat and k cat / K m of this mutant towards 3,4-DHBA were 1.78 ± 0.16 s −1 and 0.059 µM −1 s −1 , respectively, which were 1.12- and 4.92-fold higher than that of the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA), respectively. Subsequently, the in vivo conversion ability of this mutant was represented through feeding 3,4-DHBA experiments. E. coli BW25113 (F’) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA expression could convert 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA into 830 ± 33 mg/L GA, representing a 75% molar conversion ratio. Meanwhile, E. coli BW25113 (F’) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and PDC expression could generate 323 ± 23 mg/L pyrogallol from 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. After that, we employed Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA to assemble an artificial pathway for GA production from simple carbon sources and then introduced this pathway into a 3,4-DHBA-producing strain ( E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE ). The de novo production of GA could reach 301 ± 15 mg/L. Correspondingly, assembling Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into a de novo pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway could enable pyrogallol production to 129 ± 15 mg/L. This work constructed an efficient screening method to screen out a high active PobA mutant, and this mutant has great potential for industrial GA, pyrogallol and their derived compounds production. Results And Discussion Confirmation of GA performance in alkaline conditions This study aimed to acquire the PobA mutants with high hydroxylation activity towards 3,4-DHBA. As a product GA is unstable in alkaline conditions and the degradation products can react with each other to form a phenolic mixture [ 33-37 ]. In this work, we firstly mixed GA and alkali NaHCO 3 . After 2 h, we found the mixture with a pH of 9.3 displayed a green color visible to naked eyes (Fig. 1A). Moreover, the green color deepened with the increase of GA concentration. Besides, UHPLC and MS were used to analyze the mixture. Fig. S1 shows 200 mg/L GA can be completely degraded in 2 hours. MS results in Fig. S2A show several new compounds were formed in the mixture. According to MS results, we speculated one of the new compounds might be ellagic acid (Fig. S2B), whose amount was highest in the mixture. Subsequently, the mixture was scanned at full wavelength (340-820 nm). Results in Fig. 1B show the mixture has a maximum absorption wavelength of 640 nm. We then confirmed the relationship between OD 640 value and GA concentration of the mixture. Fig. 1C shows GA concentration exhibited linear relationship with OD 640 value. These results demonstrate through adding NaHCO 3 , the change of GA concentration can be observed by naked eyes, and GA concentration can be confirmed through detection of OD 640 value. These suggest addition of NaHCO 3 in the finished reaction of PobA hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA can be used as an efficient strategy for screening high active PobA mutants. Screening and in vitro enzyme assay of PobA mutants According to the performance of GA in NaHCO 3 , we designed a complete process for screening high active PobA mutants (Fig. 1D). Firstly, error-prone PCR was conducted on gene pobA , generating a PobA mutagenesis library. The single colonies of the library were pre-incubated into 96-deep-well plates containing LB medium, and the pre-inoculum was then transferred into another 96-deep-well plates containing M9Y medium with 1000 mg/L substrate 3,4-DHBA. After 12 h, the culture samples were taken into 96-well plates which contained 0.1 M NaHCO 3 . After reaction for 2 hours, the samples with deepest green color were picked out, and were then re-screened through detection of OD 640 value. Based on that, a high active PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A) was screened out from PobA mutagenesis library. Subsequently, this mutant was expressed and purified. SDS-PAGE in Fig. S3 shows the purity of purified Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was greater than 95%. Enzyme assay of the purified mutant was then performed. The non-linear regression curves of PobA mutants towards 4-HBA and 3,4-DHBA through the Michaelis-Menten equation are shown in Fig. S4. The K m of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was 30.3 ± 10.4 μM towards 3,4-DHBA (Table 2), which was 4.22-fold lower than that of the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA), suggesting that Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has stronger affinity towards 3,4-DHBA when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has a k cat / K m of 0.059 μM -1 s -1 towards 3,4-DHBA, a 4.92-fold higher value when compared with that of Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, the k cat / K m of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA towards 4-HBA was 0.094 μM -1 s -1 , which was 5.22-fold higher than that of Y385F/T294A PobA. These indicate Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possesses higher catalytic efficiency towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA than Y385F/T294A PobA towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA. Molecular docking simulation of PobA mutants Subsequently, molecular docking simulation was conducted to provide mechanism explanation for the high activity of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA. Wild-type PobA (PDB code: 1IUV) was used as template for simulation of Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA. After that, molecular docking of the mutants with substrate 3,4-DHBA and cofactor FAD were conducted. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possess similar catalytic pocket. In the pocket, amino acid residues Y201, P293 and T294A of PobA mutants, and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA composed a hydrogen-bond loop, which was same as the complex of wild-type PobA with native substrate 4-HBA [ 28 ]. Besides, 3-OH of 3,4-DHBA formed hydrogen bonds with P293 of PobA mutants and cofactor FAD. The hydrogen-bond loop is a stable binding. Based on that, we speculated the catalytic mechanism of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA was similar to that of wild-type PobA towards 4-HBA [ 38 , 39 ]. First, FAD cofactor in the complex is reduced by NADPH, which is responded to the binding of 3,4-DHBA to PobA mutants. Subsequently, the oxygen in environment oxidizes the reduced FAD to produce a hydroperoxide. The hydroperoxide then attacks the C-H bond at 5 th position of 3,4-DHBA to generate a new hydroxyl group, forming product GA. Compared to Y385F/T294A PobA (Fig. 2A), a new hydrogen bond was formed between S348 and V349A in Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA (Fig. 2B), which further influenced the binding of 3,4-DHBA to Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA. As a generated result, the hydrogen bond distance between P293 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA (1.9 Å) was 1.58-fold shorter than that of Y385F/T294A PobA and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA, suggesting the hydrogen bond between Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and 3,4-DHBA was stronger than that between Y385F/T294A PobA and 3,4-DHBA. Besides, the hydrogen bond distances between 3-OH of 3,4-DHBA and P293 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and between 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA and Y201 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was close to these in complex of Y385F/T294A PobA with 3,4-DHBA. These indicate the tight binding of 3,4-DHBA to Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA resulted in the high activity. Bioconversion of 3,4-DHBA into GA To test the in vivo conversion ability of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA, Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA were individually expressed in E. coli BW25113 (F’), generating strains CTT1 and CTT2, respectively. 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was added to the culture at 5.5 h. As shown in Fig. 3A, CTT1 accumulated 104 ± 18 mg/L GA at 6.5 h, representing an initial in vivo conversion rate of 27.9 ± 4.9 mg/L/h/OD. The OD 600 value of CTT1 raised rapidly from 5.5 h to 24 h and reached 7.58 ± 0.04 at 24 h. After this time point, the growth of CTT1 stopped. Within 24 h, about half of 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was consumed and 651 ± 5 mg/L GA was generated in the culture. In the next 24 hours, the conversion ability of CTT1 decreased and no more GA was produced. At 48 h, GA titer reduced to 575 ± 7 mg/L because of the degradation induced by oxidation. Meanwhile, 3,4-DHBA with a titer of 502 ± 32 mg/L was detected, indicating that about half of 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA cannot be converted into GA by CTT1. Similar to CTT1, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was also fed to CTT2 at 5.5 h. The results in Fig. 3B show OD 600 value of CTT2 increased steadily throughout the 48-h feeding experiment and reached 9.07 ± 0.14 at 48 h. At 6.5 h, CTT2 produced 149 ± 5 mg/L GA in the culture and displayed an initial in vivo conversion rate of 35.4 ± 1.2 mg/L/h/OD, which was 1.27-fold higher than that of CTT1. Within 36 h, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was completely consumed by CTT2 and 830 ± 33 mg/L GA was generated, representing a 75% molar conversion ratio. Significantly, the titer of GA was 1.27-fold higher than that of CTT1 at 24 h. These results suggest that E. coli BW25113 (F’) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA expression exhibits higher in vivo conversion ability towards 3,4-DHBA than E. coli BW25113 (F’) with Y385F/T294A PobA expression. Bioconversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol Further, in vivo conversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol were achieved by expressing PobA mutants and decarboxylase PDC in E. coli BW25113 (F’). Plasmids pZE-PobA ** and pZE-PobA *** were individually introduced into E. coli BW25113 (F’) harboring pCS-PDC, resulting in strains CTT3 and CTT4, respectively. 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was fed to CTT3 or CTT4 at 5.5 h. As shown in Fig. 3C, CTT3 possessed a high growth rate in the first 12 hours and has an OD 600 value of 6.62 ± 0.05 at 12 h. Within 12 h, 9.17 ± 5.20 mg/L GA, 171 ± 26 mg/L pyrogallol and 503 ± 3 mg/L byproduct catechol accumulated in the culture. During the next 36 hours, the titer of pyrogallol increased to 222 ± 16 mg/L at 48 h, while the titer of catechol decreased to 465 ± 9 mg/L. Though CTT3 could convert 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol, large accumulation of byproduct catechol was accompanied. As a comparison, the results in Fig. 3D show CTT4 grew rapidly in the first 12 hours and has an OD 600 value of 6.66 ± 0.11 at 12 h. Meanwhile, pyrogallol with a titer of 237 ± 21 mg/L was detected in the culture, which was 1.39-fold higher than that of CTT3 at the same time point. In addition, the byproduct catechol has a titer of 367 ± 14 mg/L, a 1.37-fold lower value when compared with that of CTT3. After 12 h, OD 600 value has no significant increase, which was similar to CTT3. Significantly, the titer of pyrogallol gradually increased to 323 ± 23 mg/L at 48 h, which was 1.45-fold higher than that of CTT3. These results indicate expressing PobA mutant and PDC in E. coli BW25113 (F’) could achieve the in vivo conversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol. Moreover, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA coupling with PDC represents higher in vivo ability of converting 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA coupling with PDC. Establishment of the biosynthetic pathway for 3,4-DHBA production Construction of an efficient 3,4-DHBA biosynthetic pathway was significant for achieving the de novo production of GA and pyrogallol. In previous study, 3,4-DHBA was produced from 4-HBA through expression of heterogenous PobA in E. coli [ 28 ]. For GA and pyrogallol production, heterogenous PobA required to catalyze two reactions, hydroxylating 4-HBA into 3,4-DHBA and hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA into GA (Fig. 4). Generally, the efficiency of two reactions induced by one kind of enzyme was lower than that of one reaction induced by one kind of enzyme. In this work, to avoid the issue of PobA-catalyzing two reactions and achieve efficient GA and pyrogallol production, E. coli BW25113 (F’) was engineered to produce 3,4-DHBA from 3-dehydro-shikimate (DHS) (Fig. 4). Firstly, 4-HBA biosynthetic pathway in E. coli BW25113 (F’) was blocked through knockout of gene aroE (strain CTT5) or knockout of genes aroE and ydiB (strain CTT6). AroE and YdiB are isoenzymes that can catalyze DHS to produce shikimate. Fig. S5 shows CTT5 can grow in M9 medium, while CTT6 cannot grow in M9 medium because it cannot synthesize the essential amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. These results were consistent with the theoretical expectation. Subsequently, the growth curves of CTT5 and CTT6 were measured in LB medium. As shown in Fig. 5A, the OD 600 values of CTT5 and CTT6 increased with the extension of culture time. At 15 h, CTT5 and CTT6 reached maximum OD 600 values, 4.13 ± 0.10 and 4.15 ± 0.13, respectively. After this time point, the growth of CTT5 and CTT6 stopped. As a comparison, the original strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) has a maximum OD 600 value of 4.61 ± 0.13 at 16 h, which was close to that of CTT5 and CTT6 at 15 h. After 16 h, E. coli BW25113 (F’) stopped growing. These results suggest knockout of aroE or knockout of aroE and ydiB has no significant influence on the cell growth of E. coli BW25113 (F’). To achiev e the de novo production of 3,4-DHBA, 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (AroZ) which can catalyze 3-dehydro-shikimate to produce 3,4-DHBA, was individually introduced into E. coli BW25113 (F’), CTT5 and CTT6, resulting in strains CTT7, CTT8 and CTT9, respectively. Results in Fig. 5B show 3,4-DHBA titers of CTT8 and CTT9 continued to increase during the 48-h fermentation. The growth curves of CTT8 and CTT9 were similar. The OD 600 values of CTT8 and CTT9 raised rapidly in first 12 hours and have no significant improvement during the next 36 hours. At 48 h, CTT8 produced 752 ± 17 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. Meanwhile, the OD 600 value was 2.03 ± 0.06. For CTT9, 420 ± 26 mg/L 3,4-DHBA accumulated in the culture at 48 h, which was 1.79-fold lower than that of CTT8. These indicate the ability of strain CTT8 to produce 3,4-DHBA was higher than that of CTT9. As a comparison, CTT7 has negligible 3,4-DHBA accumulation throughout the 48-h fermentation, suggesting without knockout of aroE or ydiB E. coli BW25113 (F’) could not synthesize 3,4-DHBA in large amount. These results suggest the engineered E. coli BW25113 (F’) (CTT8 or CTT9) has ability to de novo produce 3,4-DHBA and can be used as host for de novo GA and pyrogallol production. De novo production of GA To achieve the de novo production of GA, plasmid pZE-AroZ-PobA ** was individually introduced into E. coli BW25113 (F’), CTT5 and CTT6, generating strains CTT10, CTT11 and CTT12, respectively. The fermentation results are displayed in Fig. 6. For strain CTT10, the production of GA lasted up to 36 h. At 36 h, only 14.1 ± 1.0 mg/L GA accumulated in the culture, meanwhile, the OD 600 value was 3.08 ± 0.42 (Fig. 6A). Besides, negligible 3,4-DHBA was observed in the culture, suggesting the generated 3,4-DHBA could be immediately converted into GA by strain CTT10. For strain CTT11, 3,4-DHBA and GA titers, as well as the cell growth, kept increasing throughout the 48-h fermentation (Fig. 6B). Significantly, within 48 h, 3,4-DHBA with a titer of 400 ± 17 mg/L and GA with a titer of 180 ± 31 mg/L were detected in the culture. At the same time point, CTT11 has an OD 600 value of 9.10 ± 0.51. Notably, CTT11 produced 12.8-fold higher amount of GA when compared with CTT10, indicating that knockout of aroE significantly increased the ability of E. coli BW25113 (F’) to de novo produce GA. For strain CTT12, GA titer and OD 600 value continued to increase during the 48-h fermentation (Fig. 6C). CTT12 has a GA titer of 46.5 ± 8.0 mg/L and an OD 600 value of 4.35 ± 0.84 at 48 h. Significantly, GA titer of CTT12 was 3.87-fold lower than that of CTT11, suggesting that E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB has lower ability to de novo synthesize GA when compared with E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE . As a comparison, plasmid pZE-AroZ-PobA *** was individually introduced into E. coli BW25113 (F’), CTT5 and CTT6, generating strains CTT13, CTT14 and CTT15, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6D, CTT13 produced trace amount of GA (10.9 ± 2.3 mg/L) as CTT10. For strain CTT14, the increasing trends of 3,4-DHBA and GA titers, and OD 600 value were similar to that of CTT11 (Fig. 6E). Within 48 h, the accumulation of 3,4-DHBA reached 344 ± 11 mg/L, which were 1.16-fold lower than that of CTT11. Meanwhile, GA production reached 301 ± 15 mg/L, a 1.67-fold higher value when compared with that of CTT11, suggesting mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has stronger ability to de novo produce GA when compared with mutant Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, results in Fig. 6F show strain CTT15 produced 208 ± 20 mg/L 3,4-DHBA and 204 ± 17 mg/L GA at 48 h, which were 1.25- and 4.39-fold higher than these of CTT12, respectively. Compared to that of CTT14, 3,4-DHBA and GA titers of CTT15 were 1.65- and 1.48-fold lower, respectively. Overall, introducing the designed artificial pathway into E. coli could achieve GA biosynthesis from simple carbon sources. E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE demonstrates stronger ability for de novo producing GA when compared with E. coli BW25113 (F’) or E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB . Assembling mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into GA biosynthetic pathway enabled more GA production than that of assembling Y385F/T294A PobA into GA biosynthetic pathway, which were consistent with the results of in vitro enzyme assay and in vivo conversion experiments. De novo production of pyrogallol E. coli BW25113 (F’) harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT16), CTT5 harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT17) and CTT6 harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT18) were constructed to de novo produce pyrogallol. The fermentation results of CTT16 in Fig. 7A show trace amount of 3,4-DHBA, GA, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol accumulated in the culture throughout the 48-h fermentation. For CTT17, the OD 600 value increased during the first 24 hours and has no remarkable raise during the next 24 hours (Fig. 7B). Pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers increased throughout the 48-h fermentation, and reached 48.6 ± 12.0 and 121 ± 12 mg/L at 48 h, respectively. At the same time point, the OD 600 value was 3.02 ± 0.21. Besides, the accumulation of GA cannot be significantly detected in the culture, indicating that the generated GA was immediately converted into pyrogallol. For CTT18, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers raised continuously in 48 hours, and reached 19.2 ± 5.4 and 43.7 ± 4.8 mg/L at 48 h, respectively (Fig. 7C). Significantly, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers were 2.53- and 2.77-fold lower than these of CTT17, which suggest E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE performed better than E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB for de novo production of pyrogallol. Subsequently, plasmids pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC were co-transferred into E. coli BW25113 (F’), CTT5 and CTT6, resulting in strains CTT19, CTT20 and CTT21, respectively. As shown Fig. 7D, CTT19 hardly produced 3,4-DHBA, GA, pyrogallol and catechol as CTT16. In Fig. 7E, CTT20 continued to grow in the first 24 hours and stopped growing in the subsequent 24 hours. CTT20 yielded 67.4 ± 9.7 mg/L pyrogallol at 48 h, which was 1.39-fold higher than that of CTT17. Meanwhile, 99.7 ± 20.3 mg/L catechol accumulated in the culture, which was 1.21-fold lower than that of CTT17. These indicate the efficiency of mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was higher than that of mutant Y385F/T294A PobA for de novo biosynthesis of pyrogallol. For CTT21, pyrogallol was continuously synthesized in the first 36 hours (Fig. 7F) and has a titer of 129 ± 15 mg/L at 36 h, a 1.91-fold higher value when compared with that of CTT20. Meanwhile, only 6.12 ± 0.46 mg/L catechol were detected, which was 12.0-fold lower than that of CTT20 at 36 h. Within 48 h, pyrogallol titer decreased to 68.5 ± 5.0 mg/L and catechol increased to 15.8 ± 2.6 mg/L. These suggest CTT21 could achieve efficient de novo pyrogallol production, meanwhile, the accumulation of byproduct catechol was trace. In all, E. coli containing the designed artificial pathway could achieve the de novo biosynthesis of pyrogallol. Among the engineered strains, E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB with overexpression of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and PDC demonstrates strongest ability for de novo production of pyrogallol. Conclusion The low hydroxylation activity of native PobA towards 3,4-DHBA limited the high-level production of GA and pyrogallol. Random mutagenesis was an efficient method to generate high active PobA mutants. This work first established a simple screening method which based on the instability of GA under alkaline conditions. Using this screening method a PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) with high activity towards 3,4-DHBA was screen out from a PobA random mutagenesis library. In vitro enzyme assay demonstrates Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possesses higher catalytic efficiency towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA than Y385F/T294A PobA towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA. Moreover, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA represents higher in vivo ability of converting 3,4-DHBA into GA or pyrogallol when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA. Assembling Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into the de novo GA or pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway achieved GA or pyrogallol production from simple carbon sources. In all, this work constructed an efficient method for screening high active hydroxylase PobA, and this method could be applied for screening other GA biosynthesis-related enzymes. The generated high active PobA has great potential for GA or pyrogallol derivatives production. Materials And Methods Media, strains and plasmids Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 10 g NaCl, 10 g tryptone and 5 g yeast extract per liter, was used for cell inoculation and propagation. For solid medium, 20 g/L agar was added. Modified M9 (M9Y) medium which contains 11.28 g/L 5×M9 Minimal Salt, 10 g/L glycerol, 2.5 g/L glucose, 1 mM MgSO 4 , 0.05 mM CaCl 2 , 2 g/L MOPS and 5 g/L yeast extract, was used for feeding experiments and de novo production of GA and pyrogallol. Terrific Broth (TB) medium which contains 12 g/L tryptone, 24 g/L yeast extract, 4 g/L glycerol, 12.5 g/L K 2 HPO 4 and 2.31 g/L KH 2 PO 4 , was used for protein expression. If needed, 100 μg/mL ampicillin, 50 μg/mL kanamycin or 25 μg/mL chloramphenicol was added to the culture. E. coli XL10-Gold and E. coli BL21(DE3) were used for plasmid construction and protein expression, respectively, while E. coli BW25113 (F’) was used for feeding experiments and de novo biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol. Plasmids pZE12-luc and pCS27 were used for pathway construction. Plasmid pETDuet-1 was used for protein expression. Plasmids pKD46 and pCP20 were used for knockout of genes. Strains and plasmids used in this study are depicted in Table 1. DNA manipulation Genes Y385F/T294A pobA [ 28 ] and Y385F/T294A/V349A pobA were individually cloned into pZE-luc by Gibson assembly, generating plasmids pZE-PobA ** and pZE-PobA *** . Genes Y385F/T294A pobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A pobA were individually cloned into pETDuet-1, generating plasmids pETDuet-PobA ** and pETDuet-PobA *** . To realize the efficient biosynthesis of 3,4-DHBA, gene aroZ (GenBank: VCW80955.1) was synthesized by OE-PCR, and was then inserted into pZE-luc by Gibson assembly, generating pZE-AroZ. In order to achieve GA production from simple carbon sources, P L lacO1-AroZ amplified from pZE-AroZ was individually inserted into pZE-PobA ** and pZE-PobA *** by Gibson assembly, resulting in plasmids pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pZE-AroZ-PobA *** . Plasmid pCS-PDC [ 29 ] was used for conversion of GA into pyrogallol. All the plasmids were confirmed through DNA sequencing. Establishment of a PobA mutagenesis library by error-prone PCR To construct a PobA mutagenesis library, error-prone PCR was carried out on Y385F/T294A pobA . Plasmid pZE-pobA ** was used as a template of error-prone PCR. First, 10× unbalanced dNTPs mixture which contained 2 mM dATP, 2 mM dGTP, 10 mM dCTP and 10 mM dTTP, was prepared. A 100 μL error-prone PCR reaction mixture included 1 μL 100 ng/μL pZE-pobA ** , 10 μL 10× unbalanced dNTPs mixture, 0.5 μL 25 mM MnCl 2 , 1 μL 200 mM MgCl 2 , 1 μL 10 μM forward primer, 1 μL 10 μM reverse primer, 2 μL 5 U/μL Hieff TM Taq DNA Polymerase, 10 μL 10× M5 Taq PCR Buffer (Mg 2+ free) and 73.5 μL ddH 2 O. The amplification program was as follows: 94 °C initial denaturation for 3 min, and then 30 cycles of 94 °C denaturation for 1 min, 58 °C annealing for 1 min and 72 °C extension for 1.5 min. After that, the PCR product was confirmed and purified via agarose gel electrophoresis. The purified product was digested by Dpn I at 37 °C for 1.5 h and then cloned into pZE-luc, generating a PobA mutagenesis library. High-throughput screening of PobA mutants Single colonies of PobA mutagenesis library were pre-inoculated into 96-deep-well plates which contained 1 mL LB and100 μg/mL ampicillin, and were then aerobically cultured at 37 °C for 12 h to acquire the seed cultures. After that, 10 μL seed cultures were transferred into 990 μL M9Y medium which was supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin ,0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 1 g/L 3,4-DHBA in 96-deep-well plates. The cultures were left at 30 °C for incubation. After 12 h, samples were taken. The samples were firstly centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the cells and sediments in medium. After that, 50 μL supernatant was taken into 96-well plates which contained 0.1 M NaHCO 3 . After reaction for 2 hours, the samples which with deepest green color among all the samples were screened out. The screened samples were then re-screened through detecting their optical densities at 640 nm with microplate reader (BioTek Cytation 3). The screened pobAs were sequenced to confirm the mutations. Expression and purification of PobA mutants E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing pETDuet-PobA ** or pETDuet-PobA *** was pre-inoculated in 5 mL LB medium which contained 100 μg/mL ampicillin, and was then cultured overnight at 37 °C. Then, 1 mL of pre-inoculum was transferred into 100 mL of fresh TB containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and cultured at 37 °C until OD 600 reached around 0.6. After that, 0.5 mM IPTG was added to the culture to induce protein expression at 16 °C. After 12 h, the cells were harvested via centrifugation (4000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C) and then resuspended in 20 mL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). The cells were disrupted by ultrasonic processor. The lysed mixture was centrifuged (10000 rpm for 60 min at 4 °С). The supernatant was collected. The proteins were purified by nickel column. Quick Start TM Bradford Protein Assay (BIO-RED) was used for measuring protein concentrations. In vitro enzyme assay and modeling of PobA mutants Mutant PobAs activity was assayed by measuring the oxidation of NADPH at 340 nm using a microplate reader. A 500-μL reaction system which contained 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 μM FAD, 1000 μM NADPH, 500 nM purified enzyme and 0-1000 μM 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA, was used for kinetic parameters measurement. The reactions were conducted at 30 °C for 2 min. The kinetic parameters were estimated through non-linear regression of the Michaelis-Menten equation in OriginPro8.5. Wild-type PobA (PDB code: 1IUV) was used as template to model the tertiary structure of PobA mutants by Swiss-model(https://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The complexes of PobA mutants with 3,4-DHBA and FAD were modeled by AutoDock (version 4.2.6). Hydrogen bonds in the complexes were analyzed by PyMOL (version 2.4). Feeding experiments To testify the in vivo conversion efficiency of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA, feeding experiments were conducted. E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-PobA ** (CTT1), E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-PobA *** (CTT2), E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT3), and E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-PobA *** and pCS-PDC(CTT4) were used. The single colonies were pre-inoculated into 5 mL LB with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and then cultured at 37 °C overnight. 200 μL overnight cultures were inoculated into 20 mL M9Y medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The cultures were cultivated at 37 °C for 2.5 h, and then induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at 30 °C. After induction for 3 hours, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was fed to the culture. For GA production, samples were taken at 5.5, 6.5, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. For pyrogallol production, samples were taken at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. Cell growth was confirmed through measuring OD 600 . Products and intermediates were analyzed by UHPLC. Knockout of genes aroE or ydiB To acquire 3,4-DHBA-producing strains, gene aroE or ydiB of E. coli BW25113 (F’) was knocked out. First, donor fragments for pre-knockout genes needed to be constructed. For knockout of gene aroE , 530 bp at the 5’-terminus of aroE, FRT from pRecA-FRT [ 40 ], kan , FRT and 340 bp at the 3’-terminus of aroE were sequentially assembled through OE-PCR, generating aroE -donor. For knockout of gene ydiB , ydiB -donor was constructed like aroE -donor. To construct E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE , the aroE -donor fragment was transferred into E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pKD46, and then cultured at 30 °C overnight. To eliminate pKD46, the overnight cultures were then spread on LB solid medium with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and then cultured at 37 °C overnight. After that, plasmid pCP20 was transferred into the generated strain and cultured at 30 °C overnight. To induce FLP recombinase and eliminate plasmid pCP20, the single colonies were picked and individually incubated on LB solid medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin, LB solid medium with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and LB solid medium overnight at 43 °C. The colonies which can grow on LB solid medium and cannot grow on LB solid medium with ampicillin or kanamycin, were the colonies of strain E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE (CTT5). The construction of E. coli BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB (CTT6) was similar like CTT5. De novo production of 3,4-DHBA, GA and pyrogallol E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-AroZ (CTT7), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ (CTT8) and CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ (CTT9), were used for de novo biosynthesis of 3,4-DHBA. E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** (CTT10), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** (CTT11), CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** (CTT12), E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** (CTT13), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** (CTT14) and CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** (CTT15), were used for de novo biosynthesis of GA. E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT16), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT17), CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC (CTT18), E. coli BW25113 (F’) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC (CTT19), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC (CTT20) and CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC (CTT21), were used for de novo biosynthesis of pyrogallol. Transformants were pre-inoculated into 5 mL LB medium with appropriated antibiotics and cultured overnight at 37 °C. Then, 200 μL seed cultures were transferred into 20 mL M9Y medium containing appropriated antibiotics and 0.5 mM IPTG. The cultures were cultivated at 30 °C for 48 hours. Samples were collected at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. OD 600 values were measured. UHPLC was used for analyzing the products and intermediates. UHPLC analysis The standards (3,4-DHBA, GA, catechol and pyrogallol) were purchased from J&K Chemicals. UHPLC (Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity II), equipped with a reverse phase column (Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18, 5 μm, 4.6×250 mm), was used for analyzing and quantifying standards and samples. Firstly, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the cells and sediments in medium. Then, the supernatants were filtered by 0.22 μm membrane and loaded. The column temperature was set at 30 °C. Flowing phase containing solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (100% methanol) were used, with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The gradients were used as follows: 5% to 40% solvent B for 20 min, 100% solvent B for 2 min, 100% to 5% solvent B for 2 min and 5% solvent B for an additional 6 min. 3,4-DHBA, GA, catechol and pyrogallol were quantified based on their peak areas at 268 nm. Declarations Acknowledgements Not applicable. Author Contributions ZC and YH conceived the topic. TC performed the experiments. ZC, TC, SY and YH prepared first draft manuscript. ZC and YH revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Funding The authors would like to acknowledge financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21908007) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Author details Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China References Fang Z, Zhang Y, Lue Y, Ma G, Liu JCD, Ye X. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities of bayberry juices. Food Chem. 2009;113(4):884-888. Ma NF, Galeano-Diaz T, Lopez O, Fernandez-Bolanos JG, Sanchez J, Miguel CD, Ma VG, Martin-Vertedor D. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of virgin olive oil. Food Chem. 2014;163:289-298. Zheng W, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Miao K, Jiang H. NMR-based metabonomic analysis on effect of light on production of antioxidant phenolic compounds in submerged cultures of Inonotus obliquus. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(19):4481-4487. Aruoma OI, Murcia A, Butler J, Halliwell B. Evaluation of the antioxidant and prooxidant actions of gallic acid and its derivatives. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;41(11):1880–1885. Kim, You-Jung. Antimelanogenic and antioxidant properties of gallic acid. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30(6):1052-1055. Soong YY, Ba Rlow PJ. Quantification of gallic acid and ellagic acid from longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) seed and mango (Mangifera indica L.) kernel and their effects on antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2006;97(3):524-530. Yen GC, Duh PD, Tsai HL. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of ascorbic acid and gallic acid. Food Chem. 2002;79(3):307-313. Lima VN, Oliveira-Tintino CDM, Santos ES, Morais LP, Tintino SR, Freitas TS, Geraldo YS, Pereira RLS, Cruz RP, Menezes IRA. Antimicrobial and enhancement of the antibiotic activity by phenolic compounds: Gallic acid, caffeic acid and pyrogallol. Microb Pathog. 2016;99:56-61. Xiao ZP, Ma TW, Fu WC, Peng XC, Zhu HL. The synthesis, structure and activity evaluation of pyrogallol and catechol derivatives as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45(11):5064-5070. Taguri, Tanaka, Kouno. Antibacterial spectrum of plant polyphenols and extracts depending upon hydroxyphenyl structure. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(11):2226-2235. Tinh TH, Nuidate T, Vuddhakul V, Rodkhum C. Antibacterial activity of pyrogallol, a polyphenol compound against Vibrio parahaemolyticus soilated from the central region of Thailand. Procedia Chem. 2016;18:162-168. Chen HM, Wu YC, Chia YC, Chang FR, Yuan SS. Gallic acid, a major component of Toona sinensis leaf extracts, contains a ROS-mediated anti-cancer activity in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2009;286(2):161-171. Sang-Hyun K, Chang-Duk J, Kyongho S, Byung-Ju C, Hyunjeung L, Seunja P, Ho LS, Hye-Young S, Dae-Keun K, Tae-Yong S. Gallic acid inhibits histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells. Toxicol Sci. 2006(1):123-131. Li L, Ng TB, Gao W, Li W, Fu M, Niu SM, Zhao L, Chen RR, Liu F. Antioxidant activity of gallic acid from rose flowers in senescence accelerated mice. Life Sci. 2005;77(2):230-240. Rawat KA, Kailasa SK. 2,3,4-Trihydroxy benzophenone as a novel reducing agent for one-step synthesis of size-optimized gold nanoparticles and their application in colorimetric sensing of adenine at nanomolar concentration. RSC Adv. 2016;6:11099-11108. Rommel A, Wrolstad RE. Influence of acid and base hydrolysis on the phenolic composition of red raspberry juice. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(8):1237-1241. Beniwal V, Chhokar V, Singh N, Sharma J. Optimization of process parameters for the production of tannase and gallic acid by Enterobacter cloacae MTCC 9125. J Am Sci. 2010;6(8):389-397. Kar B, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya BC. Microbial production of gallic acid by modified solid state fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;23(3):173-177. Trevino-Cueto, Luis, Contreras-Esquivel, JC, Rodriguez, Aguilera, Aguilar, CN. Gallic acid and tannase accumulation during fungal solid state culture of a tannin-rich desert plant (Larrea tridentata Cov.). Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(3)(-):721-724. Kambourakis S, Draths KM, Frost JW. Synthesis of gallic acid and pyrogallol from glucose: replacing natural product isolation with microbial catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122(37):8–17. Rewatkar K, Shende DZ, Wasewar KL. Effect of temperature on reactive extraction of gallic acid using Tri- n -butyl Phosphate, Tri- n -octylamine and Aliquat 336. J Chem Eng Data. 2016;61(9): 3217–3224. Zhao Y, Liu S, Lu Z, Zhao B, Yu A. Hybrid promoter engineering strategies in Yarrowia lipolytica : isoamyl alcohol production as a test study. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1). https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-369447/v1 Zhang Y, Peng J, Zhao H, Shi S. Engineering oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium Toruloides for overproduction of fatty acid ethyl esters. 2020. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-131804/v1 Ye Z, Li S, Hennigan JN, Lebeau J, Lynch MD. Two-stage dynamic deregulation of metabolism improves process robustness & scalability in engineered E. coli . 2020. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/ 10.1101/2020.08.30.274290v1 Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature. 2008;451(7174):86-89. Jang WD, Kim GB, Kim Y, Sang YL. Applications of artificial intelligence to enzyme and pathway design for metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;73:101-107. Xu P, Gu Q, Wang W, Wong L, Bower A, Collins CH, Koffas M. Modular optimization of multi-gene pathways for fatty acids production in E. coli . Nat Commun. 2013;4:1409. Chen Z, Shen X, Jian W, Jia W, Yuan Q, Yan Y. Rational engineering of p -ydroxybenzoate hydroxylase to enable efficient gallic acid synthesis via a novel artificial biosynthetic pathway. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(11):2571-2580. Huo YX, Ren H, Yu H, Zhao L, Yu S, Yan Y, Chen Z. CipA-mediating enzyme self-assembly to enhance the biosynthesis of pyrogallol in Escherichia coli . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:10005–10015. Eschrich, K., Bolt VD, F. JT, Kok D, A., Berkel V, W. JH. Role of Tyr201 and Tyr385 in substrate activation by p -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase from Pseudomonas fluorescens . Eur J Biochem. 1993;216(1):137-146. Entsch B, Palfey BA, Ballou DP, Massey V. Catalytic function of tyrosine residues in para -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase as determined by the study of site-directed mutants. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(26):17341-17349. Yu H, Chen Z, Wang N, Yu S, Huo YX. Engineering transcription factor BmoR for screening butanol overproducers. Metab Eng. 2019;56: 28-38. Bailey RG, Nursten HE, Mcdowell I. The chemical oxidation of catechins and other phenolics: A study of the formation of black tea pigments. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;63(4):455-464. Caregnato P, Gara PD, Bosio GN, Gonzalez MC, Russo N, Michelini M, Mártire D. Theoretical and experimental investigation on the oxidation of gallic acid by sulfate radical anions. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112(6):1188-1194. Kamel MY, Saleh NA, Ghazy AM. Gallic acid oxidation by turnip peroxidase. Phytochemistry. 1977;16(5):521-524. Melo RP, Leal JP, Botelho ML. Radiolytic degradation mechanism of gallic acid and its end-products. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2011;25(1):218-222. Pospíšil F, Cvikrová M, Hrubcová M. Oxidation of gallic acid by an enzyme preparation isolated from the culture medium of Nicotiana tabacum cell suspension. Biol Plant. 1983;25(5):373-377. Cole LJ, Entsch B, Ortizmaldonado M, Ballou DP. Properties of p -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase when stabilized in its open conformation. Biochemistry. 2005;44(45):14807-14817. Gatti DL, Entsch B, Ballou DP, Ludwig§ M. pH-dependent structural changes in the active site of p -hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase point to the importance of proton and water movements during catalysis. Biochemistry. 1996;35(2):567–578. Broach JR, Hicks JB. Replication and recombination functions associated with the yeast plasmid, 2∝ circle. Cell. 1980;21(2):501-508. Tables Table 1 Plasmids and strains used in this study Plasmids and strains Description Source Plasmids pZE12-luc P L lacO1; colE1; amp r Storage pCS-PDC P L lacO1-PDC; P15A; kan r Storage pETDuet-1 P T7 ; pBR322; amp r Storage pKD46 P araB - g am-beta-exo; pCS101; amp r Storage pCP20 P λpR - flp; pCS101; amp r ; cm r Storage pZE-PobA ** P L lacO1 - Y385F/T294A PobA; colE1; amp r This study pZE-PobA *** P L lacO1 - Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA; colE1; amp r This study pETDuet-PobA ** P T7 -Y385F/T294A PobA; pBR322; amp r This study pETDuet-PobA *** P T7 -Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA; pBR322; amp r This study pZE-AroZ P L lacO1-AroZ; colE1; amp r This study pZE-AroZ-PobA ** P L lacO1 - AroZ; P L lacO1-Y385F/T294A PobA; colE1; amp r This study pZE-AroZ-PobA *** P L lacO1 - AroZ; P L lacO1-Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA; colE1; amp r This study E. coli strains XL10-Gold TetrD(mcrA)183 D(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 supE44 thi-1recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac Hte [F’ proAB lacIqZ Δ M15 Tn10 (Tet r ) Amy Cam r ] Storage BW25113 (F’) rrnBT14 Δ lacZWJ16 hsdR514 Δ araBADAH33 Δ rhaBADLD78 F’[traD36 proAB lacI q Z Δ M15 Tn10(Tet r )] Storage BL21(DE3) F − ompT hsdS (rB − mB − ) gal dcm (DE3) Storage CTT1 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA ** This study CTT2 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA *** This study CTT3 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA ** and pCS-PDC This study CTT4 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA *** and pCS-PDC This study CTT5 BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE This study CTT6 BW25113 (F’)Δ aroE Δ ydiB This study CTT7 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ This study CTT8 CTT5 with pZE-AroZ This study CTT9 CTT6 with pZE-AroZ This study CTT10 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** This study CTT11 CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** This study CTT12 CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** This study CTT13 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA *** This study CTT14 CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA *** This study CTT15 CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA *** This study CTT16 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC This study CTT17 CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC This study CTT18 CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA ** and pCS-PDC This study CTT19 BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC This study CTT20 CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA *** and pCS-PDC This study CTT21 CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA* ** and pCS-PDC This study Table 2 Kinetic parameters of PobA mutants towards 4-HBA and 3,4-DHBA PobA mutants 4-HBA 3,4-DHBA V max (μM . s -1 ) K m (μM) k cat (s -1 ) k cat / K m (μM -1. s -1 ) V max (μM . s -1 ) K m (μM) k cat (s -1 ) k cat / K m (μM -1. s -1 ) Chen et al. [28] Wild type 0.35 ± 0.04 34.67 ± 9.51 14.12 ± 1.49 0.41 - - - - Y385F 0.20 ± 0.001 19.55 ± 0.32 0.20 ± 0.001 0.01 0.39 ± 0.06 228.02 ± 53.57 0.39 ± 0.06 0.002 Y385F/T294A 0.45 ± 0.01 48.38 ± 3.00 0.90 ± 0.03 0.02 0.84 ± 0.09 157.02 ± 31.41 1.69 ± 0.18 0.012 This study Y385F/T294A 0.800 ± 0.020 89.9 ± 11.2 1.60 ± 0.05 0.018 0.79 ± 0.12 128 ± 52 1.59 ± 0.32 0.012 Y385F/T294A/V349A 0.680 ± 0.020 14.5 ± 2.5 1.36 ± 0.04 0.094 0.89 ± 0.08 30.3 ± 10.4 1.78 ± 0.16 0.059 Supplementary Files 20211020SupportingInformation.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1019346","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":59805928,"identity":"7e032634-0a71-45b0-8275-170cea2b6c10","order_by":0,"name":"Zhenya Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Institute of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhenya","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":59805929,"identity":"7303036c-0150-4fca-9a65-b1297c95bdca","order_by":1,"name":"Tongtong Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Institute of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tongtong","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":59805930,"identity":"ba79ff02-4366-4f06-bf61-f9bfe9b98ae8","order_by":2,"name":"Shengzhu Yu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Institute of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shengzhu","middleName":"","lastName":"Yu","suffix":""},{"id":59805931,"identity":"9b9a627d-1b96-4da4-9128-5423fc949ea1","order_by":3,"name":"Yi-Xin Huo","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4644-999X","institution":"College of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology No.5South Zhongguancun Street Beijing, China, 100081","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yi-Xin","middleName":"","lastName":"Huo","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-10-26 08:51:25","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":15095513,"identity":"05ec904d-8b46-4e36-af0c-2d4df967bd63","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:29:39","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":142559,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"GA performance in alkaline conditions and the whole screening process of PobA mutants. (A) The reaction mixture of GA and NaHCO3. GA concentrations in tube 1-12 were 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.5 g/L, respectively. NaHCO3 concentration in the tube was 1 M. (B) The full wavelength (340-820 nm) scan results of the mixture. (C) The linear relationship of GA concentration and the optical density at 640 nm. (D) The whole screening process for screening high active PobA mutants.","description":"","filename":"fig1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/15d4e99168f2c699dc6ff8c4.jpg"},{"id":15095881,"identity":"a0d49129-4a77-44e4-bf5f-fd742512bd18","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:32:39","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":403841,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The catalytic pockets of PobA mutants. (A) Close view of the catalytic pocket of Y385F/T294A PobA with FAD and 3,4-DHBA complex. (B) Close view of the catalytic pocket of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA with FAD and 3,4-DHBA complex. The hydrogen bonds were shown as dashed line.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/665571981684cada26098971.png"},{"id":15095512,"identity":"d58764b6-cf9c-45df-9ae5-18adc6b62f4f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:29:39","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":363332,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"In vivo conversion of 3,4-DHBA into GA or pyrogallol. 3,4-DHBA with a concentration of 1000 mg/L was fed to the culture at 5.5 h. (A) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA** (CTT1) was used. (B) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA*** (CTT2) was used. (C) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA** and pCS-PDC (CTT3) was used. (D) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-PobA*** and pCS-PDC (CTT4) was used.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/31ad054d05a017513855f4a6.png"},{"id":15095517,"identity":"8a819a95-20a5-445b-8584-84530384ac3d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:29:39","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":161369,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The de novo biosynthetic pathway of GA and pyrogallol. Black-colored arrows indicate the native pathways in E. coli; blue-colored arrow indicates the heterologous steps; yellow-colored arrow indicates side-reaction step. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; E4P , D-erythrose 4-phosphate; DAHP , 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate; DHS 3-dehydroshikimate; 3,4-DHBA, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; GA, gallic acid; PpsA, phosphoenolpyruvate synthetase; TktA, transketolase; AroG, 2-dehydro-3-deoxyphosphoheptonate aldolase; AroD, 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase; AroE, shikimate dehydrogenase; YdiB, quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase; AroZ, 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase; AroL, shikimate kinase II; UbiC, chorismate lyase; PobA mutant, p-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase with mutations; PDC, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid decarboxylase.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/52dce03fbacab30e364e983b.png"},{"id":15095880,"identity":"07dd6466-bd62-4b83-aa9f-f507cc2e0bc4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:32:39","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":90684,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The cell growth and de novo production of 3,4-DHBA. (A) The growth curves of E. coli BW25113 (F’), E. coli BW25113 (F’)ΔaroE (CTT5) and E. coli BW25113 (F’)ΔaroEΔydiB (CTT6) in LB medium. (B) 3,4-DHBA production of strains E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ (CTT7), CTT5 with pZE-AroZ (CTT8) and CTT6 with pZE-AroZ (CTT9) in M9Y medium.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/71535b2f22c2638f937ddf99.png"},{"id":15095879,"identity":"89a00940-aeb2-4bd4-9dad-68ca6f5b7d5c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:32:39","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":280169,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"De novo production of GA. (A) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA** (CTT10) was used. (B) Strain CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA** (CTT11) was used. (C) Strain CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA** (CTT12) was used. (D) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** (CTT13) was used. (E) Strain CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** (CTT14) was used. (F) Strain CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** (CTT15) was used.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/25fbf0cb9bc26f510b49523e.png"},{"id":15095515,"identity":"cfa51aa2-b761-44d9-8536-38ac1ec567fa","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:29:39","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":269400,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"De novo production of pyrogallol. (A) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA** and pCS-PDC (CTT16) was used. (B) Strain CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA** and pCS-PDC (CTT17) was used. (C) Strain CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA** and pCS-PDC (CTT18) was used. (D) Strain E. coli BW25113 (F’) with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** and pCS-PDC (CTT19) was used. (E) Strain CTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** and pCS-PDC (CTT20) was used. (F) Strain CTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA*** and pCS-PDC (CTT21) was used.","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig.7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/3413789f271c3100818c46f8.png"},{"id":15946705,"identity":"8f96081b-5b98-4c91-aafa-2e94e896d427","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-28 15:02:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2292965,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/a0c47843-1887-4cff-8d36-5241190839a3.pdf"},{"id":15095519,"identity":"5426d249-8339-4de1-9e37-0fdbc573929b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-01 15:29:39","extension":"docx","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2554793,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"20211020SupportingInformation.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1019346/v1/977f68ade24d797af37015af.docx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eConstruction of a Convenient Screening Method for \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e-Hydroxybenzoate Hydroxylase To Enable Efficient Gallic Acid and Pyrogallol Biosynthesis\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eGallic acid (GA) is a natural phenolic acid of plants, and its phenolic hydroxyl groups endow GA with diverse biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities [1-7]. Pyrogallol (1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene), a decarboxylated product of GA, exhibits similar biological activities to GA [8, 9]. Besides, pyrogallol has broad-spectrum antiseptic activity [10, 11]. According to the properties of GA and pyrogallol, these two compounds have been widely applied in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [12, 13]. For instance, GA can recover the antioxidase activity in the liver, brain and kidney of senescence accelerated mice [14]. Pyrogallol was a crucial precursor for synthesizing antianginal drug trimethoxybenzidine [15].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional method for GA production mainly relies on the hydrolysis of tannins through acids or bases [16]. In addition, GA can be alternatively produced by fermentation of tannins using the strain with active tannase [17-19]. The main approach for pyrogallol production was decarboxylation of GA via toxic chemicals under harsh conditions. Besides, enzymatic decarboxylation induced by 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid decarboxylase (PDC) was also utilized to produce pyrogallol [20]. The PDC-induced decarboxylation reaction required the anaerobic environment. Besides, the PDC purification was complicated and time-consuming. The abovementioned methods for GA and pyrogallol production also suffered from other drawbacks, such as the limited amount of raw materials, harsh reaction conditions, environment pollution and low yield [21].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn recent years, microbial-based biosynthesis has been attempted to produce many value-added compounds from simple carbon sources [22-27], including GA and pyrogallol [28, 29]. GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways generally extended from 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), which was an \u003cem\u003eEscherichia coli\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e) endogenous compound generated from the shikimate pathway [28]. 4-HBA can be catalyzed to form GA through a two-step reaction, which included hydroxylation of 4-HBA into 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (3,4-DHBA) and hydroxylation of 3,4-DHBA into GA. This two-step reaction was generally activated by \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PobA). For pyrogallol biosynthesis, PDC was generally introduced into GA-producing strain in order to convert GA into pyrogallol [29]. In GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways, hydroxylase PobA plays as a significant role. Native PobA from \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas fluorescens\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eP. fluorescens\u003c/em\u003e) displays high hydroxylase activity towards 4-HBA, but very weak or negligible activity towards 3,4-DHBA [30]. To address this issue, previous studies mutated the tyrosine at 385th position of PobA into phenylalanine, which led PobA to hydroxylate 3,4-DHBA into GA [30, 31]. Further, Chen et al. rationally designed a higher active mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA) towards 3,4-DHBA [28].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThough PobA mutants with the ability of hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA have been obtained, the hydroxylation activity was still not satisfied the demand of high-level GA and pyrogallol production. Specifically, the low activity of PobA towards 3,4-DHBA can lead carbon source to flow into the byproduct (catechol) biosynthetic pathway. Therefore, PobA mutant with higher activity urgently needs to be investigated. Rational design of PobA mutants generally required to deeply understand the catalytic mechanism of PobA. In many cases, the mutants generated from rational design did not have the expected high activity [32]. Compared to rational design, random mutagenesis is a method with higher probability to obtain high active PobA mutants. Effective screening method can ensure the acquirement of ideal mutants. In this study, we established an efficient and simple method for screening high active PobA mutants. This method depended on the instability of GA in alkaline conditions and the generated degradation products could react with each other to form a phenolic mixture [33, 34]. Specifically, the mixture has a green color visible to naked eyes and the maximum absorption wavelength was at 640 nm. Based on that, we adopted this method to screen out a PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) from a PobA random mutagenesis library. The \u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e and \u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e of this mutant towards 3,4-DHBA were 1.78 \u0026plusmn; 0.16 s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;1\u003c/sup\u003e and 0.059 \u0026micro;M\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;1\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;1\u003c/sup\u003e, respectively, which were 1.12- and 4.92-fold higher than that of the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA), respectively. Subsequently, the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion ability of this mutant was represented through feeding 3,4-DHBA experiments. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA expression could convert 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA into 830 \u0026plusmn; 33 mg/L GA, representing a 75% molar conversion ratio. Meanwhile, \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and PDC expression could generate 323 \u0026plusmn; 23 mg/L pyrogallol from 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. After that, we employed Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA to assemble an artificial pathway for GA production from simple carbon sources and then introduced this pathway into a 3,4-DHBA-producing strain (\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)Δ\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e). The \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e production of GA could reach 301 \u0026plusmn; 15 mg/L. Correspondingly, assembling Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into a \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway could enable pyrogallol production to 129 \u0026plusmn; 15 mg/L. This work constructed an efficient screening method to screen out a high active PobA mutant, and this mutant has great potential for industrial GA, pyrogallol and their derived compounds production.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results And Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConfirmation of GA performance in alkaline conditions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to acquire the PobA mutants with high hydroxylation activity towards 3,4-DHBA. As a product GA is unstable in alkaline conditions and\u0026nbsp;the degradation products can react with each other to form a phenolic mixture\u0026nbsp;[\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_33\" title=\"Bailey, 2010 #20\"\u003e33-37\u003c/a\u003e]. In this work, we firstly mixed GA and alkali NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e. After 2 h, we found the mixture with a pH of 9.3 displayed a green color visible to naked eyes (Fig. 1A). Moreover, the green color deepened with the increase of GA concentration. Besides, UHPLC and MS were used to analyze the mixture. Fig. S1 shows 200 mg/L GA can be completely degraded in 2 hours. MS results in Fig. S2A show several new compounds were formed in the mixture. According to MS results, we speculated one of the new compounds might be ellagic acid (Fig. S2B), whose amount was highest in the mixture. Subsequently, the mixture was scanned at full wavelength (340-820 nm). Results in Fig. 1B show the mixture has a maximum absorption wavelength of 640 nm. We then confirmed the relationship between OD\u003csub\u003e640\u003c/sub\u003e value and GA concentration of the mixture. Fig. 1C shows GA concentration exhibited linear relationship with OD\u003csub\u003e640\u003c/sub\u003e value. These results demonstrate through adding NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, the change of GA concentration can be observed by naked eyes, and GA concentration can be confirmed through detection of OD\u003csub\u003e640\u003c/sub\u003e value. These suggest addition of NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003ein the finished reaction of PobA hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA can be used as an efficient strategy for screening high active PobA mutants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScreening and \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e enzyme assay of PobA mutants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to the performance of GA in NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, we designed a complete process for screening high active\u0026nbsp;PobA mutants (Fig. 1D). Firstly, error-prone PCR was conducted on gene\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;pobA\u003c/em\u003e, generating a PobA mutagenesis library. The single colonies\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eof the library were pre-incubated into 96-deep-well plates containing LB medium, and the pre-inoculum was then transferred into another 96-deep-well plates containing M9Y medium with 1000 mg/L substrate 3,4-DHBA. After 12 h, the culture samples were taken into 96-well plates which contained 0.1 M\u0026nbsp;NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e.\u003csub\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003eAfter reaction for 2 hours, the samples with deepest green color were picked out, and were then re-screened through detection of OD\u003csub\u003e640\u003c/sub\u003e value. Based on that, a high active PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A) was screened out from PobA mutagenesis library. Subsequently, this mutant was expressed and purified. SDS-PAGE in Fig. S3 shows the purity of purified Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was greater than 95%. Enzyme assay of the purified mutant was then performed. The non-linear regression curves of PobA mutants towards 4-HBA and 3,4-DHBA through the Michaelis-Menten equation are shown in Fig. S4. The \u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was 30.3 \u0026plusmn; 10.4 \u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003etowards 3,4-DHBA (Table 2), which was 4.22-fold lower than that of the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA), suggesting that Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has stronger affinity towards 3,4-DHBA when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has a \u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e of 0.059 \u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003etowards 3,4-DHBA, a 4.92-fold higher value when compared with that of Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, the \u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA towards 4-HBA was 0.094 \u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, which was 5.22-fold higher than that of Y385F/T294A PobA. These indicate Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possesses higher catalytic efficiency towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA than Y385F/T294A PobA towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMolecular docking simulation of PobA mutants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSubsequently,\u0026nbsp;molecular docking simulation was conducted to provide mechanism explanation for the high activity of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA. Wild-type PobA (PDB code: 1IUV) was used as template for simulation of Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA.\u0026nbsp;After that, molecular docking of the mutants with substrate 3,4-DHBA and\u0026nbsp;cofactor\u0026nbsp;FAD were conducted. As shown in\u0026nbsp;Fig. 2A and B, Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possess similar catalytic pocket. In the pocket, amino acid residues Y201, P293 and T294A of PobA mutants, and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA composed a hydrogen-bond loop, which was same as the complex of wild-type PobA with native substrate 4-HBA\u0026nbsp;[\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_28\" title=\"Chen, 2017 #18\"\u003e28\u003c/a\u003e]. Besides, 3-OH of 3,4-DHBA formed hydrogen bonds with P293 of PobA mutants and cofactor FAD. The hydrogen-bond loop is a stable binding. Based on that, we speculated the catalytic mechanism of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA was similar to that of wild-type PobA towards 4-HBA\u0026nbsp;[\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_38\" title=\"Cole, 2005 #16\"\u003e38\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_39\" title=\"Gatti, 1996 #17\"\u003e39\u003c/a\u003e]. First, FAD cofactor in the complex is reduced by NADPH, which is responded to the binding of 3,4-DHBA to PobA mutants. Subsequently, the oxygen in environment oxidizes the reduced FAD to produce a hydroperoxide. The hydroperoxide then attacks the C-H bond at 5\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e position of 3,4-DHBA to generate a new hydroxyl group, forming product GA.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompared to Y385F/T294A PobA (Fig. 2A), a new hydrogen bond was formed between S348 and V349A in Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA (Fig. 2B), which further influenced the binding of 3,4-DHBA to Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA. As a generated result, the hydrogen bond distance between P293 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA (1.9 \u0026Aring;) was 1.58-fold shorter than that of Y385F/T294A PobA and 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA, suggesting the hydrogen bond between Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and 3,4-DHBA was stronger than that between Y385F/T294A PobA and 3,4-DHBA. Besides, the hydrogen bond distances between 3-OH of 3,4-DHBA and P293 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and between 4-OH of 3,4-DHBA and Y201 of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was close to these in complex of Y385F/T294A PobA with 3,4-DHBA. These indicate the tight binding of 3,4-DHBA to Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA resulted in the high activity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBioconversion of 3,4-DHBA into GA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo test the\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;in vivo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003econversion ability of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA, Y385F/T294A PobA and Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA were individually expressed in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;), generating strains CTT1 and CTT2, respectively. 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was added to the culture at 5.5 h. As shown in Fig. 3A, CTT1 accumulated 104 \u0026plusmn; 18 mg/L GA at 6.5 h, representing an initial \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion rate of 27.9 \u0026plusmn; 4.9 mg/L/h/OD. The OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of CTT1 raised rapidly from 5.5 h to 24 h and reached 7.58 \u0026plusmn; 0.04 at 24 h. After this time point, the growth of CTT1 stopped. \u0026nbsp;Within 24 h, about half of 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was consumed and 651 \u0026plusmn; 5 mg/L GA was generated in the culture. In the next 24 hours, the conversion ability of CTT1 decreased and no more GA was produced. At 48 h, GA titer reduced to 575 \u0026plusmn; 7 mg/L because of the degradation induced by oxidation. Meanwhile, 3,4-DHBA with a titer of 502 \u0026plusmn; 32 mg/L was detected, indicating that about half of 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA cannot be converted into GA by CTT1.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSimilar to CTT1, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was also fed to CTT2 at 5.5 h. The results in Fig. 3B show OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of CTT2 increased steadily throughout the 48-h feeding experiment and reached 9.07 \u0026plusmn; 0.14 at 48 h. At 6.5 h, CTT2 produced 149 \u0026plusmn; 5 mg/L GA in the culture and displayed an initial \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion rate of 35.4 \u0026plusmn; 1.2 mg/L/h/OD, which was 1.27-fold higher than that of CTT1. Within 36 h, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was completely consumed by CTT2 and 830 \u0026plusmn; 33 mg/L GA was generated, representing a 75% molar conversion ratio. Significantly, the titer of GA was 1.27-fold higher than that of CTT1 at 24 h. These results suggest\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethat \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA expression exhibits higher\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;in vivo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003econversion ability towards 3,4-DHBA than \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with Y385F/T294A PobA expression.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBioconversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurther,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;in vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol were achieved by expressing PobA mutants and decarboxylase PDC in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;). Plasmids pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003eand pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e were individually introduced into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) harboring pCS-PDC, resulting in strains CTT3 and CTT4, respectively. 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was fed to CTT3 or CTT4 at 5.5 h. As shown in Fig. 3C, CTT3 possessed a high growth rate in the first 12 hours and has an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of 6.62 \u0026plusmn; 0.05 at 12 h. Within 12 h, 9.17 \u0026plusmn; 5.20 mg/L GA, 171 \u0026plusmn; 26 mg/L pyrogallol and 503 \u0026plusmn; 3 mg/L byproduct catechol accumulated in the culture. During the next 36 hours, the titer of pyrogallol increased to 222 \u0026plusmn; 16 mg/L at 48 h, while the titer of catechol decreased to 465 \u0026plusmn; 9 mg/L. Though CTT3 could convert 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol, large accumulation of byproduct catechol was accompanied. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a comparison, the results in Fig. 3D show CTT4 grew rapidly in the first 12 hours and has an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of 6.66 \u0026plusmn; 0.11 at 12 h. Meanwhile, pyrogallol with a titer of 237 \u0026plusmn; 21 mg/L was detected in the culture, which was 1.39-fold higher than that of CTT3 at the same time point. In addition, the byproduct catechol has a titer of 367 \u0026plusmn; 14 mg/L, a 1.37-fold lower value when compared with that of CTT3. After 12 h, OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value has no significant increase, which was similar to CTT3. Significantly, the titer of pyrogallol gradually increased to 323 \u0026plusmn; 23 mg/L at 48 h, which was 1.45-fold higher than that of CTT3. These results indicate expressing PobA mutant and PDC in\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) could achieve the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion of 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol. Moreover, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA coupling with PDC represents higher \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eability of converting 3,4-DHBA into pyrogallol when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA coupling with PDC.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEstablishment of the biosynthetic pathway for 3,4-DHBA production\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConstruction of an efficient 3,4-DHBA biosynthetic pathway was significant for achieving the \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e production of GA and pyrogallol. In previous study, 3,4-DHBA was produced from 4-HBA through expression of heterogenous PobA in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e [\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_28\" title=\"Chen, 2017 #18\"\u003e28\u003c/a\u003e]. For GA and pyrogallol production, heterogenous PobA required to catalyze two reactions, hydroxylating 4-HBA into 3,4-DHBA and hydroxylating 3,4-DHBA into GA (Fig. 4). Generally, the efficiency of two reactions induced by one kind of enzyme was lower than that of one reaction induced by one kind of enzyme. In this work, to avoid the issue of PobA-catalyzing two reactions and achieve efficient GA and pyrogallol production, \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) was engineered to produce 3,4-DHBA from 3-dehydro-shikimate (DHS) (Fig. 4). Firstly, 4-HBA biosynthetic pathway in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) was blocked through knockout of gene \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e (strain CTT5) or knockout of\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003egenes\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;aroE\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e (strain CTT6). AroE and YdiB are isoenzymes that can catalyze DHS to produce shikimate. Fig. S5 shows CTT5 can grow in M9 medium, while CTT6 cannot grow in M9 medium because it cannot synthesize the essential amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. These results were consistent with the theoretical expectation. Subsequently, the growth curves of CTT5 and CTT6 were measured in LB medium. As shown in Fig. 5A, the OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e values of CTT5 and CTT6 increased with the extension of culture time. At 15 h, CTT5 and CTT6 reached maximum OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e values, 4.13 \u0026plusmn; 0.10 and 4.15 \u0026plusmn; 0.13, respectively. After this time point, the growth of CTT5 and CTT6 stopped. As a comparison, the original strain \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) has a maximum OD\u003csub\u003e600\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003evalue of 4.61 \u0026plusmn; 0.13 at 16 h, which was close to that of CTT5 and CTT6 at 15 h. After 16 h, \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) stopped growing. These results suggest knockout of \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e or knockout of \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e has no significant influence on the cell growth of \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo achiev\u003cem\u003ee\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethe\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u003c/em\u003e production of\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e3,4-DHBA, 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (AroZ) which can catalyze 3-dehydro-shikimate to produce 3,4-DHBA, was individually introduced into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;), CTT5 and CTT6, resulting in strains CTT7, CTT8 and CTT9, respectively. Results in Fig. 5B show 3,4-DHBA titers of CTT8 and CTT9 continued to increase during the 48-h fermentation. The growth curves of CTT8 and CTT9 were similar. The OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e values of CTT8 and CTT9 raised rapidly in first 12 hours and have no significant improvement during the next 36 hours. At 48 h, CTT8 produced 752 \u0026plusmn; 17 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. Meanwhile, the OD\u003csub\u003e600\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003evalue was 2.03 \u0026plusmn; 0.06. For CTT9, 420 \u0026plusmn; 26 mg/L 3,4-DHBA accumulated in the culture at 48 h, which was 1.79-fold lower than that of CTT8. These indicate the ability of strain CTT8 to produce 3,4-DHBA was higher than that of CTT9. As a comparison, CTT7 has negligible 3,4-DHBA accumulation throughout the 48-h fermentation, suggesting without knockout of \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) could not synthesize 3,4-DHBA in large amount. These results suggest the engineered \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) (CTT8 or CTT9) has ability to\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eproduce 3,4-DHBA and can be used as host for\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u003c/em\u003e GA and pyrogallol production.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDe novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eproduction of GA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo achieve\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethe\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u003c/em\u003e production of GA, plasmid pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003ewas individually introduced into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;), CTT5 and CTT6, generating strains CTT10, CTT11 and CTT12, respectively. The fermentation results are displayed in Fig. 6. For strain CTT10, the production of GA lasted up to 36 h. At 36 h, only 14.1 \u0026plusmn; 1.0 mg/L GA accumulated in the culture, meanwhile, the OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value was 3.08 \u0026plusmn; 0.42 (Fig. 6A). Besides, negligible 3,4-DHBA was observed in the culture, suggesting the generated 3,4-DHBA could be immediately converted into GA by strain CTT10. For strain CTT11, 3,4-DHBA and GA titers, as well as the cell growth, kept increasing throughout the 48-h fermentation (Fig. 6B). Significantly, within 48 h, 3,4-DHBA with a titer of 400 \u0026plusmn; 17 mg/L and GA with a titer of 180 \u0026plusmn; 31 mg/L were detected in the culture. At the same time point, CTT11 has an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of 9.10 \u0026plusmn; 0.51. Notably, CTT11 produced 12.8-fold higher amount of GA when compared with CTT10, indicating that knockout of \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e significantly increased the ability of \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) to \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e produce GA. For strain CTT12, GA titer and OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value continued to increase during the 48-h fermentation (Fig. 6C). CTT12 has a GA titer of 46.5 \u0026plusmn; 8.0 mg/L and an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value of 4.35 \u0026plusmn; 0.84 at 48 h. Significantly, GA titer of CTT12 was 3.87-fold lower than that of CTT11, suggesting that \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e has lower ability to \u003cem\u003ede novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esynthesize GA when compared with \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a comparison, plasmid pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e was individually introduced into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;), CTT5 and CTT6, generating strains CTT13, CTT14 and CTT15, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6D, CTT13 produced trace amount of GA (10.9 \u0026plusmn; 2.3 mg/L) as CTT10. For strain CTT14, the increasing trends of 3,4-DHBA and GA titers, and OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value were similar to that of CTT11 (Fig. 6E). Within 48 h, the accumulation of 3,4-DHBA reached 344 \u0026plusmn; 11 mg/L, which were 1.16-fold lower than that of CTT11. Meanwhile, GA production reached 301 \u0026plusmn; 15 mg/L, a 1.67-fold higher value when compared with that of CTT11, suggesting mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA has stronger ability to\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u003c/em\u003e produce GA when compared with mutant Y385F/T294A PobA. Besides, results in Fig. 6F show strain CTT15 produced 208 \u0026plusmn; 20 mg/L 3,4-DHBA and 204 \u0026plusmn; 17 mg/L GA at 48 h, which were 1.25- and 4.39-fold higher than these of CTT12, respectively. Compared to that of CTT14, 3,4-DHBA and GA titers of CTT15 were 1.65- and 1.48-fold lower, respectively. Overall, introducing the designed artificial pathway into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ecould\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eachieve GA biosynthesis from simple carbon sources. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e demonstrates\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003estronger ability for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e producing GA when compared with\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) or \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e. Assembling mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into GA biosynthetic pathway enabled more GA production than that of assembling Y385F/T294A PobA into GA biosynthetic pathway, which were consistent with the results of \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e enzyme assay and \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion experiments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDe novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eproduction of pyrogallol\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT16), CTT5 harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT17) and CTT6 harboring pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT18) were constructed to \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e produce pyrogallol. The fermentation results of CTT16 in Fig. 7A show trace amount of 3,4-DHBA, GA, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol accumulated in the culture throughout the 48-h fermentation. For CTT17, the OD\u003csub\u003e600\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003evalue increased during the first 24 hours and has no remarkable raise during the next 24 hours (Fig. 7B).\u0026nbsp;Pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers increased\u0026nbsp;throughout the 48-h fermentation, and reached 48.6\u0026nbsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026nbsp;12.0 and 121\u0026nbsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026nbsp;12 mg/L at 48 h, respectively. At the same time point, the OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e value was 3.02 \u0026plusmn; 0.21. Besides, the accumulation of GA cannot be significantly detected in the culture, indicating that the generated GA was immediately converted into pyrogallol. For CTT18, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers raised continuously in 48 hours, and reached 19.2 \u0026plusmn; 5.4 and 43.7 \u0026plusmn; 4.8 mg/L at 48 h, respectively (Fig. 7C). Significantly, pyrogallol and byproduct catechol titers were 2.53- and 2.77-fold lower than these of CTT17, which suggest \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e performed better than \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e for\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eproduction of pyrogallol.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSubsequently, plasmids pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC were co-transferred into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;), CTT5 and CTT6, resulting in strains CTT19, CTT20 and CTT21, respectively. As shown Fig. 7D, CTT19 hardly produced 3,4-DHBA, GA, pyrogallol and catechol as CTT16. In Fig. 7E, CTT20 continued to grow in the first 24 hours and stopped growing in the subsequent 24 hours. CTT20 yielded 67.4 \u0026plusmn; 9.7 mg/L pyrogallol at 48 h, which was 1.39-fold higher than that of CTT17. Meanwhile, 99.7 \u0026plusmn; 20.3 mg/L catechol accumulated in the culture, which was 1.21-fold lower than that of CTT17. These indicate the efficiency of mutant Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA was higher than that of mutant Y385F/T294A PobA for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e biosynthesis of pyrogallol. For CTT21, pyrogallol was continuously synthesized in the first 36 hours (Fig. 7F) and has a titer of 129 \u0026plusmn; 15 mg/L at 36 h, a 1.91-fold higher value when compared with that of CTT20. Meanwhile, only 6.12 \u0026plusmn; 0.46 mg/L catechol were detected, which was 12.0-fold lower than that of CTT20 at 36 h. Within 48 h, pyrogallol titer decreased to 68.5 \u0026plusmn; 5.0 mg/L and catechol increased to 15.8 \u0026plusmn; 2.6 mg/L. These suggest CTT21 could achieve efficient \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e pyrogallol\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eproduction, meanwhile, the accumulation of byproduct catechol was trace. In all, \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e containing the designed artificial pathway could achieve the \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e biosynthesis of pyrogallol. Among the engineered strains, \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e with overexpression of Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA and PDC demonstrates\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003estrongest ability for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e production of pyrogallol.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe low hydroxylation activity of native PobA towards 3,4-DHBA limited the high-level production of GA and pyrogallol. Random mutagenesis was an efficient method to generate high active PobA mutants. This work first established a simple screening method which based on the instability of GA under alkaline conditions. Using this screening method a PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) with high activity towards 3,4-DHBA was screen out from a PobA random mutagenesis library. \u003cem\u003eIn vitro\u003c/em\u003e enzyme assay demonstrates Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA possesses higher catalytic efficiency towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA than Y385F/T294A PobA towards 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA. Moreover, Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA represents higher \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e ability of converting 3,4-DHBA into GA or pyrogallol when compared with Y385F/T294A PobA. Assembling Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA into the \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e GA or pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway achieved GA or pyrogallol production from simple carbon sources. In all, this work constructed an efficient method for screening high active hydroxylase PobA, and this method could be applied for screening other GA biosynthesis-related enzymes. The generated high active PobA has great potential for GA or pyrogallol derivatives production.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMedia, strains and plasmids\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 10 g NaCl, 10 g tryptone and 5 g yeast extract per liter, was used for cell inoculation and propagation. For solid medium, 20 g/L agar was added. Modified M9 (M9Y) medium which contains 11.28 g/L 5\u0026times;M9 Minimal Salt, 10 g/L glycerol, 2.5 g/L glucose, 1 mM MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.05 mM CaCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 2 g/L MOPS and 5 g/L yeast extract, was used for feeding experiments and \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e production of GA and pyrogallol. Terrific Broth (TB) medium which contains 12 g/L tryptone, 24 g/L yeast extract, 4 g/L glycerol, 12.5 g/L K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eHPO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e and 2.31 g/L KH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ePO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, was used for protein expression. If needed, 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin, 50 \u0026mu;g/mL kanamycin or 25 \u0026mu;g/mL chloramphenicol was added to the culture. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e XL10-Gold and\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. coli\u003c/em\u003e BL21(DE3) were used for plasmid construction and protein expression, respectively, while\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) was used for feeding experiments and\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;de novo\u003c/em\u003e biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol. Plasmids pZE12-luc and pCS27 were used for pathway construction. Plasmid pETDuet-1 was used for protein expression. Plasmids pKD46 and pCP20 were used for knockout of genes. Strains and plasmids used in this study are depicted in Table 1.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDNA manipulation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGenes \u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A pobA\u003c/em\u003e [\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_28\" title=\"Chen, 2017 #18\"\u003e28\u003c/a\u003e] and \u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A/V349A pobA\u003c/em\u003e were individually cloned into pZE-luc by Gibson assembly, generating plasmids pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e. Genes \u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A pobA\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A/V349A pobA\u003c/em\u003e were individually cloned into pETDuet-1, generating plasmids pETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e. To realize the efficient biosynthesis of 3,4-DHBA, gene \u003cem\u003earoZ\u003c/em\u003e (GenBank: VCW80955.1) was synthesized by OE-PCR, and was then inserted into pZE-luc by Gibson assembly, generating pZE-AroZ. In order to achieve GA production from simple carbon sources, \u003cem\u003eP\u003csub\u003eL\u003c/sub\u003elacO1-AroZ\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eamplified from pZE-AroZ was individually inserted into pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e by Gibson assembly, resulting in plasmids pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e. Plasmid pCS-PDC\u0026nbsp;[\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_29\" title=\"Huo, 2018 #25\"\u003e29\u003c/a\u003e] was used for conversion of GA into pyrogallol. All the plasmids were confirmed through DNA sequencing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEstablishment of a PobA mutagenesis library by error-prone PCR\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo construct a PobA mutagenesis library, error-prone PCR was carried out on \u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A pobA\u003c/em\u003e. Plasmid pZE-pobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e was used as a template of error-prone PCR. First, 10\u0026times; unbalanced dNTPs mixture which contained 2 mM dATP, 2 mM dGTP, 10 mM dCTP and 10 mM dTTP, was prepared. A 100 \u0026mu;L error-prone PCR reaction mixture included 1 \u0026mu;L 100 ng/\u0026mu;L pZE-pobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e, 10 \u0026mu;L 10\u0026times; unbalanced dNTPs mixture, 0.5 \u0026mu;L 25 mM MnCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 1 \u0026mu;L 200 mM MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 1 \u0026mu;L 10 \u0026mu;M forward primer, 1 \u0026mu;L 10 \u0026mu;M reverse primer, 2 \u0026mu;L 5 U/\u0026mu;L Hieff\u003csup\u003eTM\u003c/sup\u003e Taq DNA Polymerase, 10 \u0026mu;L 10\u0026times; M5 Taq PCR Buffer (Mg\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e free) and 73.5 \u0026mu;L ddH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO. The amplification program was as follows: 94 \u0026deg;C initial denaturation for 3 min, and then 30 cycles of 94 \u0026deg;C denaturation for 1 min, 58 \u0026deg;C annealing for 1 min and 72 \u0026deg;C extension for 1.5 min. After that, the PCR product was confirmed and purified via agarose gel electrophoresis. The purified product was digested by \u003cem\u003eDpn\u003c/em\u003eI at 37 \u0026deg;C for 1.5 h and then cloned into pZE-luc, generating a PobA mutagenesis library.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHigh-throughput screening of PobA mutants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSingle colonies of PobA mutagenesis library were pre-inoculated into 96-deep-well plates which contained 1 mL LB and100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin, and were then aerobically cultured at 37 \u0026deg;C for 12 h to acquire the seed cultures. After that, 10 \u0026mu;L seed cultures were transferred into 990 \u0026mu;L M9Y medium which was supplemented with 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin ,0.5 mM isopropyl-\u0026beta;-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 1 g/L 3,4-DHBA in 96-deep-well plates. The cultures were left at 30 \u0026deg;C for incubation. After 12 h, samples were taken. The samples were firstly centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the cells and sediments in medium. After that, 50 \u0026mu;L supernatant was taken into 96-well plates which contained 0.1 M NaHCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e. After reaction for 2 hours, the samples which with deepest green color among all the samples were screened out. The screened samples were then re-screened through detecting their optical densities at 640 nm with microplate reader (BioTek Cytation 3). The screened \u003cem\u003epobAs\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewere sequenced to confirm the mutations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpression and purification of PobA mutants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BL21 (DE3) containing pETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e or pETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e was pre-inoculated in 5 mL LB medium which contained 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin, and was then cultured overnight at 37 \u0026deg;C. Then, 1 mL of pre-inoculum was transferred into 100 mL of fresh TB containing 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin and cultured at 37 \u0026deg;C until OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e reached around 0.6. After that, 0.5 mM IPTG was added to the culture to induce protein expression at 16 \u0026deg;C. After 12 h, the cells were harvested via centrifugation (4000 rpm for 30 min at 4 \u0026deg;C) and then resuspended in 20 mL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). The cells were disrupted by ultrasonic processor. The lysed mixture was centrifuged (10000 rpm for 60 min at 4 \u0026deg;С). The supernatant was collected. The proteins were purified by nickel column. Quick Start\u003csup\u003eTM\u003c/sup\u003e Bradford Protein Assay (BIO-RED) was used for measuring protein concentrations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn vitro\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;enzyme assay and modeling of PobA mutants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMutant PobAs activity was assayed by measuring the oxidation of NADPH at 340 nm using a microplate reader. A 500-\u0026mu;L reaction system which contained 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 \u0026mu;M FAD, 1000 \u0026mu;M NADPH, 500 nM purified enzyme and 0-1000 \u0026mu;M 4-HBA or 3,4-DHBA, was used for kinetic parameters measurement. The reactions were conducted at 30 \u0026deg;C for 2 min. The kinetic parameters were estimated through non-linear regression of the Michaelis-Menten equation in OriginPro8.5.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWild-type PobA (PDB code: 1IUV) was used as template to model the tertiary structure of PobA mutants by Swiss-model(https://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The complexes of PobA mutants with 3,4-DHBA and FAD were modeled by AutoDock (version 4.2.6). Hydrogen bonds in the complexes were analyzed by PyMOL (version 2.4).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFeeding experiments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo testify the \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e conversion efficiency of PobA mutants towards 3,4-DHBA, feeding experiments were conducted. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT1), \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT2), \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT3), and \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC(CTT4) were used. The single colonies were pre-inoculated into 5 mL LB with 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin and then cultured at 37 \u0026deg;C overnight. 200 \u0026mu;L overnight cultures were inoculated into 20 mL M9Y medium containing 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin. The cultures were cultivated at 37 \u0026deg;C for 2.5 h, and then induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at 30 \u0026deg;C. After induction for 3 hours, 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA was fed to the culture. For GA production, samples were taken at 5.5, 6.5, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. For pyrogallol production, samples were taken at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. Cell growth was confirmed through measuring OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e. Products and intermediates were analyzed by UHPLC.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnockout of genes \u003cem\u003earoE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eor \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo acquire 3,4-DHBA-producing strains, gene \u003cem\u003earoE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eor \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e of \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) was knocked out. First, donor fragments for pre-knockout genes needed to be constructed. For knockout of gene \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e, 530 bp at the 5\u0026rsquo;-terminus of \u003cem\u003earoE,\u003c/em\u003e FRT from pRecA-FRT [\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_40\" title=\"Broach, 1980 #43\"\u003e40\u003c/a\u003e], \u003cem\u003ekan\u003c/em\u003e, FRT and 340 bp at the 3\u0026rsquo;-terminus of \u003cem\u003earoE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewere sequentially assembled through OE-PCR, generating \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e-donor. For knockout of gene \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e-donor was constructed like \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e-donor. To construct \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e, the \u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e-donor fragment was transferred into \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pKD46, and then cultured at 30 \u0026deg;C overnight. To eliminate pKD46, the overnight cultures were then spread on LB solid medium with 50 \u0026mu;g/mL kanamycin and then cultured at 37 \u0026deg;C overnight. After that, plasmid pCP20 was transferred into the generated strain and cultured at 30 \u0026deg;C overnight. To induce FLP recombinase and eliminate plasmid pCP20, the single colonies were picked and individually incubated on LB solid medium with 100 \u0026mu;g/mL ampicillin, LB solid medium with 50 \u0026mu;g/mL kanamycin and LB solid medium overnight at 43 \u0026deg;C. The colonies which can grow on LB solid medium and cannot grow on LB solid medium with ampicillin or kanamycin, were the colonies of strain \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e (CTT5). The construction of \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u0026Delta;\u003cem\u003eydiB\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(CTT6)\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewas similar like CTT5.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDe novo\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;production of 3,4-DHBA, GA and pyrogallol\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-AroZ (CTT7),\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eCTT5 containing pZE-AroZ (CTT8) and\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eCTT6 containing pZE-AroZ (CTT9), were used for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ebiosynthesis of 3,4-DHBA. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT10), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT11), CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT12), \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT13), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT14) and CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e (CTT15), were used for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e biosynthesis of GA. \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT16), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT17), CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT18), \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT19), CTT5 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC (CTT20) and CTT6 containing pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003eand pCS-PDC (CTT21), were used for \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e biosynthesis of pyrogallol. Transformants were pre-inoculated into 5 mL LB medium with appropriated antibiotics and cultured overnight at 37 \u0026deg;C. Then, 200 \u0026mu;L seed cultures were transferred into 20 mL M9Y medium containing appropriated antibiotics and 0.5 mM IPTG. The cultures were cultivated at 30 \u0026deg;C for 48 hours. Samples were collected at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e values were measured. UHPLC was used for analyzing the products and intermediates.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUHPLC analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe standards (3,4-DHBA, GA, catechol and pyrogallol) were purchased from J\u0026amp;K Chemicals. UHPLC (Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity II), equipped with a reverse phase column (Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18, 5 \u0026mu;m, 4.6\u0026times;250 mm), was used for analyzing and quantifying standards and samples. Firstly, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the cells and sediments in medium. Then, the supernatants were filtered by 0.22 \u0026mu;m membrane and loaded. The column temperature was set at 30 \u0026deg;C. Flowing phase containing solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (100% methanol) were used, with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The gradients were used as follows: 5% to 40% solvent B for 20 min, 100% solvent B for 2 min, 100% to 5% solvent B for 2 min and 5% solvent B for an additional 6 min. 3,4-DHBA, GA, catechol and pyrogallol were quantified based on their peak areas at 268 nm.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZC and YH conceived the topic. TC performed the experiments. ZC, TC, SY and YH prepared first draft manuscript. ZC and YH revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to acknowledge financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21908007) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor details\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFang Z, Zhang Y, Lue Y, Ma G, Liu JCD, Ye X. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities of bayberry juices. Food Chem. 2009;113(4):884-888.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMa NF, Galeano-Diaz T, Lopez O, Fernandez-Bolanos JG, Sanchez J, Miguel CD, Ma VG, Martin-Vertedor D. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of virgin olive oil. Food Chem. 2014;163:289-298.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZheng W, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Miao K, Jiang H. NMR-based metabonomic analysis on effect of light on production of antioxidant phenolic compounds in submerged cultures of Inonotus obliquus. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(19):4481-4487.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAruoma OI, Murcia A, Butler J, Halliwell B. Evaluation of the antioxidant and prooxidant actions of gallic acid and its derivatives. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;41(11):1880\u0026ndash;1885.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, You-Jung. Antimelanogenic and antioxidant properties of gallic acid. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30(6):1052-1055.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoong YY, Ba Rlow PJ. Quantification of gallic acid and ellagic acid from longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) seed and mango (Mangifera indica L.) kernel and their effects on antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2006;97(3):524-530.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYen GC, Duh PD, Tsai HL. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of ascorbic acid and gallic acid. Food Chem. 2002;79(3):307-313.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLima VN, Oliveira-Tintino CDM, Santos ES, Morais LP, Tintino SR, Freitas TS, Geraldo YS, Pereira RLS, Cruz RP, Menezes IRA. Antimicrobial and enhancement of the antibiotic activity by phenolic compounds: Gallic acid, caffeic acid and pyrogallol. Microb Pathog. 2016;99:56-61.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXiao ZP, Ma TW, Fu WC, Peng XC, Zhu HL. The synthesis, structure and activity evaluation of pyrogallol and catechol derivatives as Helicobacter pylori urease inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45(11):5064-5070.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaguri, Tanaka, Kouno. Antibacterial spectrum of plant polyphenols and extracts depending upon hydroxyphenyl structure. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(11):2226-2235.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTinh TH, Nuidate T, Vuddhakul V, Rodkhum C. Antibacterial activity of pyrogallol, a polyphenol compound against \u003cem\u003eVibrio parahaemolyticus\u003c/em\u003e soilated from the central region of Thailand. Procedia Chem. 2016;18:162-168.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen HM, Wu YC, Chia YC, Chang FR, Yuan SS. Gallic acid, a major component of Toona sinensis leaf extracts, contains a ROS-mediated anti-cancer activity in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2009;286(2):161-171.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSang-Hyun K, Chang-Duk J, Kyongho S, Byung-Ju C, Hyunjeung L, Seunja P, Ho LS, Hye-Young S, Dae-Keun K, Tae-Yong S. Gallic acid inhibits histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells. Toxicol Sci. 2006(1):123-131.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi L, Ng TB, Gao W, Li W, Fu M, Niu SM, Zhao L, Chen RR, Liu F. Antioxidant activity of gallic acid from rose flowers in senescence accelerated mice. Life Sci. 2005;77(2):230-240.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRawat KA, Kailasa SK. 2,3,4-Trihydroxy benzophenone as a novel reducing agent for one-step synthesis of size-optimized gold nanoparticles and their application in colorimetric sensing of adenine at nanomolar concentration. RSC Adv. 2016;6:11099-11108.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRommel A, Wrolstad RE. Influence of acid and base hydrolysis on the phenolic composition of red raspberry juice. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(8):1237-1241.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeniwal V, Chhokar V, Singh N, Sharma J. Optimization of process parameters for the production of tannase and gallic acid by \u003cem\u003eEnterobacter cloacae\u003c/em\u003e MTCC 9125. J Am Sci. 2010;6(8):389-397.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKar B, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya BC. Microbial production of gallic acid by modified solid state fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;23(3):173-177.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrevino-Cueto, Luis, Contreras-Esquivel, JC, Rodriguez, Aguilera, Aguilar, CN. Gallic acid and tannase accumulation during fungal solid state culture of a tannin-rich desert plant (Larrea tridentata Cov.). Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(3)(-):721-724.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKambourakis S, Draths KM, Frost JW. Synthesis of gallic acid and pyrogallol from glucose: replacing natural product isolation with microbial catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122(37):8\u0026ndash;17.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRewatkar K, Shende DZ, Wasewar KL. Effect of temperature on reactive extraction of gallic acid using Tri-\u003cem\u003en\u003c/em\u003e-butyl Phosphate, Tri-\u003cem\u003en\u003c/em\u003e-octylamine and Aliquat 336. J Chem Eng Data. 2016;61(9): 3217\u0026ndash;3224.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao Y, Liu S, Lu Z, Zhao B, Yu A. Hybrid promoter engineering strategies in \u003cem\u003eYarrowia lipolytica\u003c/em\u003e: isoamyl alcohol production as a test study. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-369447/v1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang Y, Peng J, Zhao H, Shi S. Engineering oleaginous yeast \u003cem\u003eRhodosporidium Toruloides\u003c/em\u003e for overproduction of fatty acid ethyl esters. 2020. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-131804/v1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYe Z, Li S, Hennigan JN, Lebeau J, Lynch MD. Two-stage dynamic deregulation of metabolism improves process robustness \u0026amp; scalability in engineered \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e. 2020. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1101/2020.08.30.274290v1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAtsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature. 2008;451(7174):86-89.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJang WD, Kim GB, Kim Y, Sang YL. Applications of artificial intelligence to enzyme and pathway design for metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;73:101-107.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu P, Gu Q, Wang W, Wong L, Bower A, Collins CH, Koffas M. Modular optimization of multi-gene pathways for fatty acids production in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1409.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen Z, Shen X, Jian W, Jia W, Yuan Q, Yan Y. Rational engineering of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-ydroxybenzoate hydroxylase to enable efficient gallic acid synthesis via a novel artificial biosynthetic pathway. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(11):2571-2580.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuo YX, Ren H, Yu H, Zhao L, Yu S, Yan Y, Chen Z. CipA-mediating enzyme self-assembly to enhance the biosynthesis of pyrogallol in \u003cem\u003eEscherichia coli\u003c/em\u003e. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:10005\u0026ndash;10015.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEschrich, K., Bolt VD, F. JT, Kok D, A., Berkel V, W. JH. Role of Tyr201 and Tyr385 in substrate activation by \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase from \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas fluorescens\u003c/em\u003e. Eur J Biochem. 1993;216(1):137-146.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEntsch B, Palfey BA, Ballou DP, Massey V. Catalytic function of tyrosine residues in \u003cem\u003epara\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase as determined by the study of site-directed mutants. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(26):17341-17349.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYu H, Chen Z, Wang N, Yu S, Huo YX. Engineering transcription factor BmoR for screening butanol overproducers. Metab Eng. 2019;56: 28-38.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBailey RG, Nursten HE, Mcdowell I. The chemical oxidation of catechins and other phenolics: A study of the formation of black tea pigments. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;63(4):455-464.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCaregnato P, Gara PD, Bosio GN, Gonzalez MC, Russo N, Michelini M, M\u0026aacute;rtire D. Theoretical and experimental investigation on the oxidation of gallic acid by sulfate radical anions. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112(6):1188-1194.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKamel MY, Saleh NA, Ghazy AM. Gallic acid oxidation by turnip peroxidase. Phytochemistry. 1977;16(5):521-524.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMelo RP, Leal JP, Botelho ML. Radiolytic degradation mechanism of gallic acid and its end-products. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2011;25(1):218-222.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePosp\u0026iacute;\u0026scaron;il F, Cvikrov\u0026aacute; M, Hrubcov\u0026aacute; M. Oxidation of gallic acid by an enzyme preparation isolated from the culture medium of \u003cem\u003eNicotiana tabacum\u003c/em\u003e cell suspension. Biol Plant. 1983;25(5):373-377.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCole LJ, Entsch B, Ortizmaldonado M, Ballou DP. Properties of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase when stabilized in its open conformation. Biochemistry. 2005;44(45):14807-14817.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGatti DL, Entsch B, Ballou DP, Ludwig\u0026sect; M. pH-dependent structural changes in the active site of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase point to the importance of proton and water movements during catalysis. Biochemistry. 1996;35(2):567\u0026ndash;578.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBroach JR, Hicks JB. Replication and recombination functions associated with the yeast plasmid, 2\u0026prop; circle. Cell. 1980;21(2):501-508.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlasmids and strains used in this study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlasmids and strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSource\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlasmids\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE12-luc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1-PDC; P15A; kan\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epETDuet-1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT7\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e; \u003cem\u003epBR322; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epKD46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003earaB\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e-\u003c/em\u003eg\u003cem\u003eam-beta-exo; pCS101; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epCP20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eλpR\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e-\u003cem\u003eflp; pCS101; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; \u003cem\u003ecm\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1\u003c/em\u003e-\u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A PobA; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1\u003c/em\u003e-\u003cem\u003eY385F/T294A/V349A PobA; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT7\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e-Y385F/T294A PobA; pBR322; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epETDuet-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT7\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e-Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA; pBR322; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE-AroZ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1-AroZ; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1\u003c/em\u003e-\u003cem\u003eAroZ; P\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1-Y385F/T294A PobA; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1\u003c/em\u003e-\u003cem\u003eAroZ; P\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003elacO1-Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA; colE1; amp\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eXL10-Gold\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTetrD(mcrA)183 D(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 supE44 thi-1recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac Hte [F\u0026rsquo; proAB lacIqZ\u003c/em\u003eΔ\u003cem\u003eM15 Tn10 (Tet\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003e) Amy Cam\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003e]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003errnBT14\u003c/em\u003e Δ\u003cem\u003elacZWJ16 hsdR514\u003c/em\u003e Δ\u003cem\u003earaBADAH33\u003c/em\u003e Δ\u003cem\u003erhaBADLD78 F\u0026rsquo;[traD36 proAB lacI\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eq\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003eZ\u003c/em\u003eΔ\u003cem\u003eM15 Tn10(Tet\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003e)]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBL21(DE3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003eompT hsdS (rB\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003emB\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003e) gal dcm (DE3)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStorage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)Δ\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;)Δ\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003eΔ\u003cem\u003eydiB\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-AroZ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5 with pZE-AroZ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6 with pZE-AroZ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBW25113 (F\u0026rsquo;) with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT5 with pZE-AroZ-PobA\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCTT6 with pZE-AroZ-PobA*\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e and pCS-PDC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/br\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eKinetic parameters of PobA mutants towards 4-HBA and 3,4-DHBA\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv align=\"center\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"24.472049689440993%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;PobA mutants\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\" width=\"37.7639751552795%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4-HBA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\" width=\"37.7639751552795%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3,4-DHBA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.131578947368421%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e.\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.664473684210526%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.335526315789474%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(s\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.868421052631579%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e-1.\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.335526315789474%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e.\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.460526315789474%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.335526315789474%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(s\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.868421052631579%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u0026mu;M\u003csup\u003e-1.\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"9.06832298136646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChen et al. [28]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.403726708074535%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWild type\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.428571428571429%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.35 \u0026plusmn; 0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.565217391304348%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34.67 \u0026plusmn; 9.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.12 \u0026plusmn; 1.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"7.453416149068323%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.677018633540373%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"7.453416149068323%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.939890710382514%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY385F\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.568306010928962%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20 \u0026plusmn; 0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.519125683060109%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.55 \u0026plusmn; 0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20 \u0026plusmn; 0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.39 \u0026plusmn; 0.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.841530054644808%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e228.02 \u0026plusmn; 53.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.39 \u0026plusmn; 0.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.002\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.939890710382514%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY385F/T294A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.568306010928962%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45 \u0026plusmn; 0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.519125683060109%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48.38 \u0026plusmn; 3.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.90 \u0026plusmn; 0.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.84 \u0026plusmn; 0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"12.841530054644808%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e157.02 \u0026plusmn; 31.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.69 \u0026plusmn; 0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.012\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"9.06832298136646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThis study\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.403726708074535%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY385F/T294A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.428571428571429%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.800 \u0026plusmn; 0.020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.565217391304348%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e89.9 \u0026plusmn; 11.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.60 \u0026plusmn; 0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.453416149068323%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.79 \u0026plusmn; 0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.677018633540373%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e128 \u0026plusmn; 52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.316770186335404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.59 \u0026plusmn; 0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.453416149068323%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.012\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.939890710382514%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY385F/T294A/V349A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.568306010928962%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.680 \u0026plusmn; 0.020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.519125683060109%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.5 \u0026plusmn; 2.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.36 \u0026plusmn; 0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.094\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.89 \u0026plusmn; 0.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.841530054644808%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.3 \u0026plusmn; 10.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.245901639344263%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.78 \u0026plusmn; 0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.19672131147541%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.059\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"p-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase, screening, hydroxylation, gallic acid, pyrogallol, biosynthesis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGallic acid (GA) and pyrogallol are phenolic hydroxyl compounds and have diverse biological activities. Microbial-based biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol has been emerged as an ecofriendly method to replace the traditional chemical synthesis. In GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways, the low hydroxylation activity of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PobA) towards 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (3,4-DHBA) limited the high-level biosynthesis of GA and pyrogallol.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work reported a high active PobA mutant (Y385F/T294A/V349A PobA) towards 3,4-DHBA. This mutant was screened out from a PobA random mutagenesis library through a novel naked eye visual screening method. \u003cem\u003eIn vitro \u003c/em\u003eenzyme assay showed this mutant has a \u003cem\u003ek\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003ecat\u003c/sub\u003e/\u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003em\u003c/sub\u003e of 0.059 μM\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003es\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003etowards 3,4-DHBA, which was 4.92-fold higher than the reported mutant (Y385F/T294A PobA). Molecular docking simulation provided the mechanism explanation of the high activity. Expression of this mutant in \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F’) can generate 830 ± 33 mg/L GA from 1000 mg/L 3,4-DHBA. After that, we utilized this mutant to assemble a \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e GA biosynthetic pathway. Subsequently, this pathway was introduced into a 3,4-DHBA-producing strain (\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e BW25113 (F’)Δ\u003cem\u003earoE\u003c/em\u003e) to achieve 301 ± 15 mg/L GA production from simple carbon sources. Similarly, assembling this mutant into a \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e pyrogallol biosynthetic pathway enabled 129 ± 15 mg/L pyrogallol production.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work established an efficient screening method and generated a high active PobA mutant. Assembling this mutant into GA and pyrogallol biosynthetic pathways achieved the \u003cem\u003ede novo\u003c/em\u003e production of these two compounds. Besides, this mutant has great potential for GA or pyrogallol derivatives production. The screening method could be used for other GA biosynthesis-related enzymes.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Construction of a Convenient Screening Method for P-Hydroxybenzoate Hydroxylase To Enable Efficient Gallic Acid and Pyrogallol Biosynthesis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-11-01 15:29:37","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1019346/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a17ec237-516f-11e9-9e20-12b504df345a","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 1st, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":8233484,"name":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-11-28T15:02:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-11-01 15:29:37","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1019346","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1019346","identity":"rs-1019346","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.