Impact of Change in Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines for Infants Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Background: In 2016, the neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) withdrew its recommendation to perform endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in non-vigorous neonates born through MSAF before and after the change in NRP’s recommendations. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single center assessing all neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation with MSAF in 2010-2015 (pre-implementation of new guidelines) and 2017-2022 (post-implementation of new guidelines). Results: Neonates receiving tracheal suctioning were more likely to be diagnosed with MAS (29.3% vs. 19.7%; P=0.03) and PPHN (8.9% vs. 2.5%; P=0.003), and more likely to receive surfactant (7.6% vs. 3.2%; P=0.03). Conclusion: In our institution, non-vigorous neonates born via MSAF after the change in NRP guidelines were less likely to be diagnosed with MAS and PPHN and were less likely to receive surfactant. Our study supports current NRP guidelines.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0