Microalgae strains of the Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection with activity against plant fungal pathogens | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Microalgae strains of the Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection with activity against plant fungal pathogens Áron N Horváth, Lajos Németh, Lajos Vörös, Wendy A Stirk, Johannes Staden, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Jan, 2023 Read the published version in Phytoparasitica → Version 1 posted 7 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Microalgae produce many secondary metabolites that are biologically active, including compounds with antifungal activity. These could potentially function as biofungicides. Selection criteria for potential strains include having good antifungal activity against specific phytopathogenic fungi and high biomass productivity rates to ensure sufficient biomass can be generated. Water extracts were prepared from 280 strains comprising of 33 Cyanophyceae strains (13 genera), 157 Chlorophyceae strains (29 genera), 80 Trebouxiophyceae strains (19 genera), 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains (1 genus) and 1 Zygnematophyceae strain. These were tested against 9 phytopathogenic fungi. In total, 45% of the species had antifungal activity against at least one fungal pathogen. Cyanobacteria had the highest “hit-rate” (64%), followed by the Chlorophyceae (49%) and Trebouxiophyceae (30%). Water extracts of 19 strains had fungicidal activity – these were predominantly Cyanobacteria. The Cyanobacteria displayed a wider spectrum of activity with five strains being active (either fungicidal or fungistatic) against three or more fungal strains - Trichormis variabilis MACC-304 and Tolypothrix tennis MACC-205 had antifungal activity against 6 phytopathogens and Nostoc linckia MACC-612 inhibited 4 fungi. Each Chlorophyta strain was only active against 1–2 fungal strains. However, the daily productivity rates of Cyanobacteria were significantly lower than Chlorophyta strains. Further investigation of 15 Nostocales species (Families Nostocaceae, Tolypothrichaceae and Calotrichaceae) showed the Nostoc species generally had significantly lower biomass generation compared to other Nostocacaeae strains. The most promising strain was Tolypothrix tenuis MACC-205 which had the most potent, broad spectrum antifungal activity as well as significantly higher daily biomass productivity rates. Some microalgae strains (8%) had a stimulatory effect, suggesting the potential to screen strains especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi. Thus, Cyanobacteria can potentially be developed as effective agricultural tools for environmentally-friendly disease management. Biofungicides Chlorophyta Cyanobacteria Growth rates Nostocales Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Introduction Fungal infections are a common problem in agriculture, causing diseases such as leaf blight, vascular wilt, root rot and damping off (Asimakis et al., 2022 ). Intensive agricultural practices apply pesticides together with synthetic fertilizers for crop protection and to improve yield. However, their long term overuse has led to environmental problems such as soil salinization, eutrophication of water systems and ocean acidification (Wang et al., 2018 ; Costa et al., 2019 ). These chemicals are also detrimental to the rhizospheric microbial community which plays an important role in plant health and disease resistance (Yuan et al., 2017 ). There is now a shift towards more eco-friendly “green” agricultural practices such as the use of natural biostimulants and biopesticides to promote plant growth and improve tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (du Jardin, 2015 ; Costa et al., 2019 ). Benefits of natural biopesticides over synthetic pesticides include that they are more easily biodegradable than synthetic chemicals and thus have a lower residual; they are more specific and thus safer to non-target organisms such as beneficial soil microorganisms; their diverse mechanisms of action reduce the possibility of microbes developing resistance and thus they have a lower impact on the environment and human health (Costa et al., 2019 ; Asimakis et al., 2022 ). One emerging category of natural biostimulants is microalgae (Colla & Rouphael, 2020 ). These are a rapidly growing, sustainable resource that can be cultivated on non-arable land using recycled wastewater (Falaise et al., 2016 ; Costa et al., 2019 ), thereby further contributing to the reduction of eutrophication. There are numerous studies showing that application of either extracts or living Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta improve plant growth (reviewed in Chiaiese et al., 2018 ; Poveda, 2021 ). For example, hydrolysates of Cyanobacteria strains ( Nostoc sp., Tolypothrix sp. and Leptolyngbya sp.) significantly increased root and shoot growth and leaf number in basil plants grown in a hydroponic system (Santini et al., 2022 ). Chlorella sp. and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii extracts increased fruit size in tomato. Chlorella sp. extracts induced earlier flowering and more flowers and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii extracts delayed flowering and reduced flower number. Chlorella sp. extracts increased chlorophyll b and carotenoid content and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii extracts increased chlorophyll a content (Gitau et al., 2022 ). This biostimulating activity is attributed to the microalgae being rich in primary metabolites (proteins, lipids and carbohydrates) as well as other beneficial metabolites such as plant hormones, polysaccharides, amino acids, vitamins, polyamines and antioxidant compounds (de Morais et al., 2015 ; Colla & Rouphael, 2020 ). The biostimulatory effects are strain specific with the elicited response dependent on the biochemical and structural properties on the microalgae. Microalgae also produce a large variety of secondary metabolites which are biologically active, including compounds with antifungal activity (reviewed in Stirk & van Staden, 2022 ). These could potentially function as natural biofungicides. Most antifungal screening has focussed on medicinal applications where microalgal extracts are tested against human pathogens such as Candida albicans (Falaise et al., 2016 ; Poveda, 2021 ) with fewer studies focusing on plant pathogens. Examples of microalgae with phytopathogenic activity include Nostoc commune and Oscillatoria tenuis inhibiting Fusarium oxysporum , Phytophthora capsici and Alternaria alternata (Kim, 2006 ) and Anabaena subcylindrica , Nostoc muscorum and Oscillatoria angusta inhibiting seven pathogenic fungi isolated from infected Faba bean plants (Abo-Shady et al., 2007 ). There are examples of microalgae extracts reducing fungal diseases in greenhouse and field trials. For example, Chlorella fusca extracts (0.4% extract) applied at two-weekly intervals as a foliar application and soil irrigation enhanced strawberry plant growth and increased the chlorophyll content and number of flowers. It also decreased the incidence of Fusarium wilt disease in the strawberry crop by supressing the population of Fusarium oxysporum (Kim et al., 2020 ). Dipping wheat grains into the Oscillatoria agardhii and Anabaena sphaerica extracts and drying them reduced seed-born infection and improved germination when seeds were stored for up to 180 days (Haggag et al., 2014 ). The long evolutionary history of microalgae and their diverse ecological habitats confer a vast potential to produce a number of secondary metabolites. However, most research has been conducted on only a few microalgae genera that are commonly cultivated for other biotechnological applications such as biofuel and animal feed (Santini et al., 2022 ). It is conservatively estimated that there are approximately 70 000 microalgae species of which about 73% have been described (Guiry, 2012 ). Only a small fraction of these are maintained in culture collections and have been evaluated for their biological activity (de Morais et al., 2015 ). Thus microalgae provide a rich, untapped reserve of novel compounds which could potentially be developed as biocontrol agents for agriculture. The commercialization of microalgae-derived biofungicides is still in its infancy and they are only used niche markets such as organic agriculture (Costa et al., 2019 ). There is a need to screen diverse genera to find suitable strains with good bioactivity (Colla & Rouphael, 2020 ) coupled with rapid growth rates and a robust morphology so that they can be cultivated in outdoor systems to generate sufficient biomass for commercial applications (Borowitzka & Vonshak, 2017 ). The aim of the present study was screen taxonomically diverse microalgae for antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi in order to identify fast-growing strains with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Materials And Methods Microalgae strains screened for antifungal activity The Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection (MACC) of the Széchenyi István University, Hungary maintains 970 strains in culture. In total 280 strains were selected from the MACC to test for antifungal activity. These comprised of 33 Cyanophyceae strains from 13 genera, 157 Chlorophyceae strains from 29 genera, 80 Trebouxiophyceae strains from 19 genera, 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains from 1 genus and 1 Zygenematophyceae strain (Table 1 ; Supplementary Table A). These strains originated from soil and water samples collected in six European countries and Brazil (South America; Supplementary Table A). The main criteria for strain selection was based on their dry weight (DW) and daily biomass production with selected Cyanobacteria strains having over 1.5 g.L − 1 DW and 0.1 g.L − 1 daily biomass production and Chlorophyta and Charophyta having over 2.0 g.L − 1 DW and 0.2 g.L − 1 daily biomass production. All strains were monoalgal and Chlorella and Chlamydomonas strains were axenic. Besides microscopic taxonomic determination, Anabaena , Nostoc , Chlorella , Scenedesmus and Chlamydomonas strains have been identified by molecular sequencing. The global algal database “AlgaeBase” was used in the description of the taxonomic positions of the MACC strains (Guiry & Guiry, 2022 ). Table 1 Number of strains and their taxonomic position of the 280 MACC microalgae strains tested for antifungal activity Class Order Family No. of Genera No. of strains Phylum Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Nostocaceae 3 12 Tolypothrichaceae 1 3 Calotrichaceae 1 4 Oscillatoriales Oscillatoriaceae 3 8 Microcoleaceae 1 1 Synechococcales Synechococceae 1 1 Leptolyngbyaceae 1 1 Merismopediaceae 1 1 Chroococcales Chroococcaceae 1 2 33 strains Phylum Chlorophyta Chlorophyceae Chlamydomonadales Chlamydomonadaceae 3 31 Chlorococcaeae 4 30 Chlorosarcinaceae 2 5 Haematococcaceae 1 1 Pleurastraceae 1 1 Sphaeropleales Scenedesmaceae 7 41 Radiococcaceae 3 12 Neochloridaceae 2 15 Selenastraceae 2 5 Mychonastaceae 1 10 Bracteacoccaceae 1 3 Hydrodictyaceae 1 1 Chaetophoraceae 1 2 157 strains Trebouxiophyceae Chlorellales Chlorellaceae 4 43 Oocystaceae 5 13 Prasinolales Strichococcaceae 2 11 Prisinolales incertae sedis 1 1 Watanabeales Watanabeaceae 1 8 Trebouxiophyceae ordo incertae sedis Coccomyaceae 1 2 Trebouxiophyceae incertae sedis 1 1 Trebouxiales Trebouxiaceae 1 1 80 strains Ulvophyceae Ulotrichales Planophilaceae 1 1 Ulotrichaceae 2 3 4 strains Phylum Charophyta Klebsormidiophyceae Klebsormidiales Klebsormidiaceae 1 5 5 strains Zygenematophyceae Zygenatales Zygnemataceae 1 1 1 strain The 280 microalgae strains were maintained on solidified medium in dim light at 15 ± 2°C in a stock culture room. Each Cyanobacteria strain was initially inoculated from agar culture into two 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing either 250 mL Zehnder-8 liquid medium (Staub, 1961 ) or BG-11 medium (Rippka et al., 1979 ). The Chlorophyta and Charophyta strains were inoculated into Tamiya (Kuznetsov & Vladmirova, 1964) or Bristol (Bold, 1949 ) liquid medium (Supplementary Table A). The cultures were grown in the apparatus described by Ördög ( 1982 ) under controlled laboratory conditions at 25 ± 2°C in a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod. Cultures were illuminated from below with 130 µmol photon.m 2 .s − 1 light intensity and aerated continuously (1.33 vvm 20 L.h − 1 per flask) with sterile air enriched with 1.5% CO 2 during the day. After 7 days, the suspension cultures were used to inoculate four 500 mL flasks containing 250 mL culture medium. The starting density of the cultures was 10 mg.L − 1 DW. The cultures were harvested between 8–21 days when they were in the stationary growth phase. The dry weight was determined by filtering 5–20 mL cell suspension from each flask through Whatman GF/C glass fibre filters as previously described (Stirk et al., 2020 ). This was used to calculate the DW of the biomass at harvest and the average daily production of the strain (n = 4). The remainder of the cell suspension from the four flasks was combined and centrifuged (2150 x g for 15 min at room temperature). The pellet was freeze-dried (Christ Gamma 1–15) and stored at -18°C until tested for antifungal activity. Fungal strains Axenic cultures of nine phytopathogenic fungi isolated from infected plants were obtained from the collection of the Department of Plant Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary (Table 2 ). Identification of fungal species was carried out based on host plant identification and micro- and macromorphological characteristics. In addition, a fragment of the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) gene was sequenced in Fusarium graminearum and the ITS nrDNA region in Rhizoctonia solani was sequenced to help with species specific identification. The ITS nrDNA region, fragments of the RNA polymerase 2 gene ( rpb2 ) and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh ) genes were also sequenced from Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea to resolve the species complexes these strains belong to. Table 2 Fungal phytopathogens used to screen 280 microalgae (Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Charophyta) from the Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection for antifungal activity Fungal pathogens Diseases Hosts Isolated from a Alternaria alternata (Pleosporales) leaf spot, fruit rot wide range of host plants including Allium , Beta , Brassica , Capsicum , Lycopersicon , Solanum , Triticum Vitis vinifera Fusarium graminearum (Hypocreales) ear mold, head blight wheat, barley, rice, oats, maize Triticum aestivum Rhizoctonia solani (Cantharellales) damping off, black scurf, root rot wide range of host plants including soybean, potato, cereals, sugarbeet Solanum tuberosum Pythium ultimum (Pythiales) seed rot, damping off, black-leg of seedlings wide range of host plants including maize, soybean, potato, wheat Zea mays Phytophthora infestans (Peronosporales) late blight potato, tomato Solanum tuberosum Plasmopara viticola (Peronosporales) grape downy mildew wine grapes Vitis vinifera Phaeoramularia capsicicola (Mycosphaerellales) velvet spot, leaf loss pepper Capsicum annuum Botrytis cinerea (Helotiales) grey mold wide range of host plants including wine grapes, strawberry, tomato, rhubarb Fragaria × ananassa Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Helotiales) white mold wide range of host plants including herbaceous plants, woody ornamentals Helianthus annuus a Host species from which the fungal strains were isolated for the present study Fungal cultures were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium at 4°C with a monthly passage regime. The exception was the obligate biotrophic parasite Plasmopara viticola which was maintained in vitro on detached grapevine leaves. Young grapevine leaves were surface sterilized by dipping in 2% sodium hypochlorite (60 s), then 70% ethanol (90 s) and washed in sterile tap water. After drying, leaves were placed with their adaxial surface upwards onto the surface of Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige & Skoog, 1962 ) into Petri dishes (MS medium Mod. No. 1B, Duchefa, solidified with 6.5 g.L − 1 phyto agar) and the tip of the petiole was inserted into the medium. The dishes were kept at 25 ± 2°C in a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod and the pathogen was transferred monthly. Extract preparation The freeze-dried microalgae biomass was resuspended in distilled water (10 mg.mL − 1 DW) and sonicated for 3 min (VirSonic 600, Virtis) to disrupt the cells to improve the extraction of secondary metabolites. This extract was used in the agar-diffusion and Plasmopara leaf disc assays to test for antifungal activity. Antifungal assays The antifungal activity of the 280 microalgae water extracts was determined against the eight fungal pathogens (excluding P. viticola ) using the in vitro agar diffusion method (Aponyiné, 1997 ). Briefly, 7 day old fungal mycelium cultures were washed and suspended in cooled PDA medium (42°C), gently shaken and then poured into sterile 90 mm petri dishes. Once solidified, four equidistant holes were cut in the agar with a 9 mm cork borer and 150 µL microalgae extract placed in three holes. Sterile tap water was added to the fourth hole as the negative control (C-). The petri dishes were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 25 ± 2°C in the dark. The effect of the microalgae extracts on fungal mycelium growth was evaluated by measuring the diameter of the inhibition ring (including the diameter of the hole) 72 h after incubation. Further observations were made at 96 h and 120 h. The toxicity of the microalgae extract was evaluated by scoring the “clearness” of the inhibition ring. The effect was classified into one of the following categories: fungicidal activity (F), mild (FS-), medium (FS–) or strong fungistatic (FS—) activity and mild (S+), medium (S++) and strong (S+++) stimulatory activity. Each microalga was tested in four parallels in two repeated experiments (n = 8). It was necessary to use a different method to test antifungal activity against P. viticola as it can only grow on plant tissue. For this, either whole leaves or 10 mm leaf discs cut from grape leaves ( Vitis vinifera var. Kékfrankos) were placed onto sterile solidified MS medium in a 90 mm Petri dish and sprayed with 500 µL microalgae extract or water (C-). The leaves and leaf discs were dried and then inoculated with P. viticola suspension (10 4 zoosporagium cm − 3 ). Petri dishes were incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 7 days. Antifungal activity was evaluated on the 8th day by estimating the leaf area ratio covered with the pathogen and comparing it to the negative control. Antifungal activity in the Nostocales Based on the results of the screening study, 15 Cyanobacteria strains from the Nostocales (Families Nostocaceae, Tolypothrichaceae and Calotrichaceae) were selected for further testing. These included 8 strains showing fungicidal (F) or strong fungistatic (FS—) activity in the initial screening (Supplementary Table A). This study was expanded to include an additional seven Nostocales strains that were not previously screened. The microalgae were grown as described above and harvested on day 6. Water extracts were made from the freeze-dried algal pellet as outlined above. These extracts were tested against four fungal strains. Alternaria alternata and Fusarium graminearum were tested using the method described above where the fungal mycelium was mixed into the cooled PDA medium (termed mixed-method). As Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani suspensions did not mix homogenously in the cooled PDA medium, it was necessary to modify the assay method. For this, PDA medium was poured into 90 mm Petri dishes and 6 mm discs were cut from growing regions of the fungal colonies and placed upside down in the middle of the PDA plate (termed disc-method). As with the mixed-method, four 9 mm equidistant holes were cut in the solidified PDA plates. Three holes were filled with 150 µL microalgae extract and the fourth hole with sterile tap water (C-). The commercial fungicide Quadris (active ingredient 250 g.L − 1 azoxystrobin) was included in the assays as a positive control (C+). This was dissolved in sterile tap water to give a final concentration of 1 µg.mL − 1 . Each microalgae extract and the positive control were tested in four parallel plates in three independent experiments to give 12 parallel measurements for each Cyanobacteria strain (n = 12). After 72 h incubation at 25 ± 2°C in the dark, the radius of the inhibition ring (without the radius of the hole) was measured (mm) for the mixed-method assay. For the disc-method, the inhibition zone was measured as the distance (mm) from the fungal colony edge to the treatment holes. The negative control was taken into account in these measurements. The toxicity of the extract was evaluated in two ways depending on the assay method. For the mixed-method, the “clearness” of the inhibition ring as ranked using the scale from 1–4 where 1 = no visible effect, 2 = mild FS, 3 = strong FS and 4 = F effect. The mean of the 12 parallel replicates was calculated and the extract was classed as non-fungistatic (nFS; mean between 1-1.5), weak fungistatic (Fs-; mean between 1.6–2.5), strong fungistatic (Fs–; mean between 2.6–3.5) or fungicidal (F; mean between 3.6-4.0). For the disc-method, the extent of the fungal growth towards the microalgae extracts was measured at 48 h and 72 h. This growth over 24 h (mm) was ranked into four categories, namely nFS (> 8.0 mm), Fs- (5.5-8.0 mm), Fs—(3.0-5.5 mm) and F (0–3.0. mm). Statistical analysis Statistical differences in the average growth rates of the microalgae were calculated by One-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey test. Data was tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test (SigmaPlot v. 13). To analyse the effect of the Nostocales extracts on mycelium growth, a linear model was used where the treatment (MACC strain, positive and negative controls) was included as a fixed factor. Differences between the microalgae strains and controls were compared by contrasting the emmeans function with the false discovery rate (fdr) p value adjustment method (RStudio Team). Results Growth rates of the 280 microalgae strains Cultures were harvested once they entered the stationary growth phase. This was detected visually by the colour and density of the culture. The average harvest day for strains in each class was 13–14 days. The four Ulvophyceae strains were harvested significantly later at 17-18-days (Table 3 ). Growth rates measured as dry weight at harvest and daily biomass productivity were significantly similar in the Chlorophyta (Chlorophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Ulvophyceae) and Charophyta. The Cyanophyceae had significantly lower growth rates compared to the Chlorophyta strains (Table 3 ; Supplementary Table A). Table 3 Growth rates of microalgae strains used in the antifungal screening study harvested in the stationary growth phase. Results are presented as mean ± SEM of the microalgae strains within each family. Different letters in each column represent significant differences (p < 0.05) Class (no. of strains) Harvest day Dry weight (g.L − 1 ) Daily biomass productivity (g.L − 1 ) Cyanophyceae (33) 14.3 ± 0.5 ab 2.04 ± 0.12 b 0.15 ± 0.01 b Chlorophyceae (157) 14.1 ± 0.2 ab 2.61 ± 0.06 a 0.19 ± 0.04 a Trebouxiophyceae (80) 13.1 ± 0.3 b 2.62 ± 0.08 a 0.20 ± 0.01 a Ulvophyceae (4) 17.8 ± 1.6 a 3.20 ± 0.29 a 0.18 ± 0.01 a Klebsormidiophyceae (5) 13.6 ± 2.5 ab 2.44 ± 0.68 ab 0.18 ± 0.05 ab Zygenematophyceae (1) 14.0 1.68 0.12 Antifungal activity of the 280 microalgae strains In total, 127 extracts showed some antifungal activity against at least one of the nine fungal pathogens. This was an overall “hit-rate” of 45%. The Cyanophyceae had the highest incidence of strains with antifungal activity with 64% of the strains tested showing some activity. In comparison, less than half the Chlorophyceae (49%) and Trebouxiophyceae (30%) strains tested had antifungal activity. Too few strains were tested from the other taxonomic classes to discern trends (Table 4 ). A few microalgae strains (8%) had a stimulatory effect on the fungal pathogens. Three of the 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains (60%) were stimulatory as well as 8% of the Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae strains. No Cyanophyceae had a stimulatory effect on the fungal pathogens (Table 4 ). A few strains, namely Chlorosarcina sp. MACC-560, Scenedesmus acutus var. globosus MACC-551, Scenedesmus sp. MACC-575, Gloeocystis sp. MACC 631 (Chlorophyceae) and Chlorella sp. MACC-564 (Trebouxiophyceae) had both inhibitory and stimulatory activity against different pathogen strains (Supplementary Table A). The active microalgae strains were isolated from both soil and water habitats (Table 4 ). Table 4 Number of microalgae strains with inhibitory and stimulatory activity against the nine phytopathogens. The “hit-rate” shows the % of strains with activity from the total number of tested strains in each class Class (no. of strains) No. of strains with inhibitory activity No. of strains with stimulatory activity Strain origin Strain origin Soil Water “Hit-rate” Soil Water “Hit-rate” Cyanophyceae (33) 13 8 64% - - - Chlorophyceae (157) 51* 26* 49% 6* 7* 8% Trebouxiophyceae (80) 19 5* 30% 3 3* 8% Ulvophyceae (4) 4 - 100% - - - Klebsormidiophyceae (5) - - - 2 1 60% Zygenematophyceae (1) - 1 100% - - - Total (280) 87 39 45% 11 11 8% * Some strains with both inhibitory and stimulatory activity Water extracts of 19 of the 280 microalgae strains had fungicidal activity against at least one of the nine fungal phytopathogens. Cyanobacteria had a higher hit-rate with 20.5% of the strains (7 strains) having fungicidal activity compared to 4.9% (12 strains) of the Chlorophyta having fungicidal activity. The active Cyanobacteria were all from the Nostocales and the Chlorophyta belonged to the Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae (Table 5 ). The Cyanobacteria strains displayed a wider spectrum of activity with five strains being active (either fungicidal or fungistatic) against three or more fungal strains, namely Trichormus variabilis MACC-304 and Tolypothrix tenuis MACC-205 had antifungal activity against 6 phytopathogens and Nostoc linckia MACC-612 inhibited 4 fungi. In contrast, each Chlorophyta strain was only active against 1–2 fungal strains (Table 5 ). Table 5 Cyanophyta and Chlorophyta MACC-strains demonstrating fungicide (F) activity against at least one of the nine phytopathogens detected with the agar gel diffusion bioassay. FS shows fungistatic activity. The number indicates the size of the inhibition zone (mm). Plasmopara viticola was tested using leaf discs made from grape leaves. Results are the mean of 8 replicates Microalgae Phytopathogen Taxon MACC strain code Alter-naria Fusa-rium Rhizo-ctonia Pythium Phyto-phthora Plasmo-para Phaeo-ramularia Botrytis Sclero-tinia Cyanophyta Nostocales Trichormus variabilis 304 F-13 F-13 F-13 F-13 F-13 F-12 Nostoc linckia 612 F-9 F-9 F-9 F-9 Tolypothrix sp. 465 F-15 F-13 Tolypothrix tenuis 205 F-19 F-17 F-17 FS-25 F-24 F-15 Nostoc insulare 661 F-13 Nostoc calcicola 251 F-19 FS-20 Nostoc sp. 150 FS-15 FS-25 F-23 Chlorophyta Chlorophyceae Desmococcus olivaceus 343 FS-22 F-25 Scenedesmus sp. 540 FS-10 F-14 Fernandinella alpina 682 FS-21 F-13 Scenedesmus sp. 9 F-10 Lobochlamys segnis 10 F-24 F-14 Desmodesmus dispar 302 F Haematococcus lacustris 90 F-25 Trebouxiophyceae Mychonastes homosphaera 339 F-20 F-20 Scotiellopsis sp. 14 F Pseudococcomyxa sp. 76 F Stichococcus bacillaris 147 F-21 Mychonastes homosphaera 151 F-22 Phaeoramularia capsicicola was the most susceptible fungi with 25% of the microalgae extracts inhibiting its growth with 11 extracts having fungicidal activity. Other susceptible fungi were Fusarium graminearum , Pythium ultimum and Botrytis cinerea where the microalgae extracts mainly had weak fungistatic activity. The most resistant fungi was Plasmopara viticola with only 3 microalgae extracts having an inhibitory effect (Fig. 1 A). However, this may have been due to the assay used to test the extracts. Four of the fungal strains were stimulated by a few microalgae extracts with Botrytis cinerea being the most frequently stimulated fungi (Fig. 1 B). Antifungal activity in the Nostocales The Nostoc strains generally had significantly slower growth (determined as DW and daily biomass productivity on day 6) compared to the other microalgae strains (Table 6 ). Table 6 Culture collection details and growth rates of 15 Nostocales strains analyzed for antifungal activity against four phytopathegenic fungi. Cultures were harvested on day 6. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4) Microalgae Dry weight Daily biomass productivity Taxon MACC Origin Habitat (g.L − 1 ) (g.L − 1 ) Family Nostocaceae Nostoc calcicola 150 Hungary water 0.371 ± 0.012 c 0.062 ± 0.002 c Nostoc calcicola 251 Serbia soil 0.561 ± 0.026 ab 0.093 ± 0.004 ab Nostoc insulare 661 Czech Republic soil 0.355 ± 0.035 c 0.059 ± 0.006 c Nostoc linckia 612 Czech Republic water 0.405 ± 0.065 c 0.067 ± 0.011 c Nostoc muscorum 132 Germany water 0.388 ± 0.019 c 0.065 ± 0.003 c Nostoc muscorum 189 Serbia soil 0.405 ± 0.066 c 0.067 ± 0.011 c Nostoc muscorum 683 Brazil soil 0.626 ± 0.045 ab 0.104 ± 0.007 ab Trichormus variabilis 128 Serbia soil 0.853 ± 0.030 a 0.142 ± 0.005 a Trichormus variabilis 134 Hungary water 0.708 ± 0.015 ab 0.118 ± 0.002 ab Trichormus variabilis 221 Serbia soil 0.511 ± 0.030 ab 0.085 ± 0.005 ab Trichormus variabilis 304 Russia water 0.675 ± 0.031 ab 0.112 ± 0.005 ab Anabaena cylindrica 307 Russia water 0.617 ± 0.025 ab 0.103 ± 0.004 ab Family Tolypothrichaceae Tolypothrix tenuis 205 Germany water 0.647 ± 0.142 ab 0.108 ± 0.023 ab Tolypothrix sp. 465 Brazil soil 0.835 ± 0.049 ab 0.139 ± 0.008 ab Family Calotrichaceae Calothrix sp. 405 Brazil soil 0.611 ± 0.051 ab 0.102 ± 0.007 ab Overall, Rhizoctonia solani was the most susceptible fungi with all the microalgae extracts inhibiting its growth with nine of the extracts having strong fungistatic activity (Fig. 2 D). Alternaria alternata was the least susceptible fungi with seven microalgae extracts having no inhibitory activity (Fig. 2 A). The positive control azoxystrobin (1 µg.mL − 1 ) had fungicidal activity against the four fungi strains (Fig. 2 ). The only microalgae extract to have fungicidal activity was Tolypothrix tenuis MACC-205 against Botrytis cinerea (Fig. 2 C) as well as strong fungistatic activity against Alternaria alternata (Fig. 2 A). Other extracts with significantly high antifungal activity were Tolypothrix sp. MACC-465 and Nostoc linckia MACC-612 against Fusarium graminearum (Fig. 2 B), N. muscorum MACC-189 and N. calcicola MACC-150 against Botrytis cinerea (Fig. 2 C) and Trichormus variabilis MACC-304 and Nostoc insulare MACC-661 against Rhizoctonia solani (Fig. 2 D). There was no apparent trend between the growth rates and antifungal activity. Discussion The cost of producing microalgae-derived biofungicides is limiting their market potential. Their success will depend on strain selection to encompass rapid growth, a robust morphology suitable for mass cultivation systems and a high level of the target compounds (Righini et al., 2022 ) It is also necessary keep down-stream production costs (harvesting, drying and biomass processing) to the minimum before microalgae biofungicides can compete with synthetic agrochemicals and become an economically viable agricultural tool (Costa et al., 2019 ; Gitau et al., 2022 ; Righini et al., 2022 ). The least time-consuming and most energy and cost-efficient way to prepare microalgae biomass for use in agriculture is to remove the liquid medium (dewatering) to form a pellet which is then suspended in water and applied as a foliar spray or soil drench (Gitau et al., 2022 ). This eliminates the need to use expensive solvents or other energy-intensive extraction methods. It is thus best to test for water-soluble compounds when screening for suitable strains to develop as biofungicides (Asimakis et al., 2022 ) as was done in the present study where water extracts were prepared from the microalgal biomass. While there are many microalgal screening studies testing organic solvent extracts, aqueous extracts are less widely investigated (Righini et al., 2022 ). Cell pellets of the 280 strains were freeze-dried and briefly sonicated (3 min) prior to extraction. Freeze-drying damages the cell membrane due to the formation of intracellular ice-crystals, making it more porous so that water soluble, low molecular weight compounds can be released (Lee et al., 2017 ). The cell wall acts as a barrier for compound extraction and needs to be disrupted to improve compound extraction. For example, electrical conductivity was higher in freeze-dried Chlorella and Scenedesmus extracts compared to living cultures and electrical conductivity and extract yields further increased when cells were sonicated for 3 min which caused 10–20% disruption to the cell walls (Stirk et al., 2020 ). The effectiveness of the cell disruption method is dependent on the cell wall structure (Günerken et al., 2015 ) with sonication being more suitable for species with less resistant cell walls (Alhattab et al., 2019 ). Highly resistant cell walls require more intense cell disruption methods and this would increase the downstream production costs. Such strains would not be suitable for commercialization of microalgae biostimulants. In the present study, cultures were harvested once they had reached their stationary growth phase. On average, cultures were harvested between 13–14 days with the four Ulvophyceae strains being harvested later (17–18 days). The dry mass at harvest and the daily biomass productivity were significantly lower for the Cyanophyceae strains compared to the Chlorophyta strains (Table 3 ). Productivity rates (including inoculum generation time) are a crucial consideration when selecting potential microalgae strains for commercial production of microalgal products (Borowitzka & Vonshak, 2017 ). Almost half (45%) the water extracts screened in the present study had some antifungal activity against at least one of the nine phytopathogenic fungi tested. The water extracts of the Cyanobacteria strains had the highest incidence (% hit-rate) of biological activity with 64% of the tested strains showing some antifungal activity, followed by the Chlorophyceae (49% hit-rate) and the Trebouxiophyceae having the lowest incidence of strains with antifungal activity (30% hit-rate; Table 4 ). Other studies report similar or lower incidences of antifungal activity for both water and organic solvent extracts (Kim, 2006 ; Prasanna et al., 2008 ; Najdenski et al., 2013 ; Mudimu et al., 2014 ; Cepas et al., 2019 ). For example, organic solvent (petroleum ether, propanol and methanol) and water extracts of 40 strains from 9 genera of halotolerant Cyanobacteria were tested against five phytopathogenic fungi that had been isolated from diseased plants and seeds. Of these, 20 isolates had antifungal activity (50% hit-rate) with three isolates having “hyper-antifungal activity” (strong antifungal activity). Synechocystis sp. had the broadest spectrum of antifungal activity (Pawar & Puranik, 2008 ). The Cyanobacteria also had a higher efficacy, having a higher incidence of fungicidal activity (20.5%) compared to the Chlorophyta (4.9%). The Cyanobacteria strains with fungicidal activity were all from the Nostocales. In addition, the Cyanobacteria generally had a broad spectrum of antifungal activity with many strains being active against 3 or more fungal pathogens while the Chlorophyta were only active against 1–2 fungal pathogens (Table 5 ). Similarly, in a screening of 225 microalgae from 13 phylum for biofilm inhibitory activity, species from the Crypthophyta, Euglenophyta and Glaucophyta had the best broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity while inhibitory activity in the Chlorophyta was generally limited to Candida albicans and Enterobacter cloaceae (Cepas et al., 2019 ). A review of antimicrobial activity based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) indicated that species from the Nostocales were the most active Cyanobacteria strains while antimicrobial activity was similar in most Chlorophyta orders (Stirk & van Staden, 2022 ). Comparison of antifungal activity in the 15 Nostocales strains investigated suggest that species from the Family Tolypothrichaceae are the most promising. Tolypothrix tenuis MACC-205 had fungicidal activity against Botrytis cinerea and strong fungistatic activity against Alternaria alternata . These microalgae also had significantly higher growth rates (DW and daily biomass productivity) compared to the majority of the Nostoc strains investigated (Table 6 ). This suggests that it should be possible to design screening programmes using a taxonomic approach to improve the “hit-rate” with Nostocales being the most promising order to date. It is also important to list microalgae species that had no or weak antifungal activity as a guideline to the taxonomic groups which have a low probability of activity (Stirk & van Staden, 2022 ) as was done in the present study (Supplementary Table A). Many antifungal compounds including novel metabolites have been identified in Cyanobacteria with the Nostocaceae being the most widely studied, suggesting that they are a metabolically versatile family (Falaise et al., 2016 ). Cyanobacteria produce a wide variety of lipoproteins with over 600 identified to date. Many lipoproteins such as nostofungicidine, laxaphycins, lobocyclamides, hassallidins and anabaenolysins have antifungal activity (Shishido et al., 2015 ). Other biologically active metabolites include polysaccharides and phycobiliproteins (Najdenski et al., 2013 ; Righini et al., 2022 ). Polysaccharides precipitated from aqueous extracts of Anabaena sp. inhibited growth of Botrytis cinerea . Pre-harvest treatments to strawberry fruits reduced infection in a dose-response manner. Post-harvest treatments were not effective, suggesting that the polysaccharides induced plant defence mechanisms in strawberry plants (Righini et al., 2019 ). Water soluble phycobiliproteins extracted from Arthrospira platensis reduced colony growth, colony forming units and spore germination of Botrytis cinerea when grown on PDA. Post-harvest treatment of tomato fruits prior to artificially infecting them with Botrytis cinerea reduced the disease incidence and its severity in a dose-dependent relationship (Righini et al., 2020 ). Free (predominately chlorogenic acid) and bound phenolic compounds extracted from Spirulina sp. and Nannochloropsis sp. (Ochrophyta) had antifungal activity against three Fusarium strains while conjugated phenolic compounds and carotenoids had no activity. Natural phenolic extracts from these microalgae were more effective than similar synthetic formulations indicating synergistic effects can alter the potency of the extract (Scaglioni et al., 2019 ). In contrast, fewer antimicrobial compounds have been identified in the Chlorophyta. Antimicrobial activity of Chlorophyta extracts is often linked to their fatty acid content (Plaza et al., 2012 ; Shaima et al., 2022 ). Polar organic solvents such as methanol are the most effective for fatty acid extraction. This may explain the limited antifungal activity of the water extracts made from Chlorophyta strains in the present study compared to the broad spectrum of activity in the water extracts of the tested Cyanobacteria strains. However, the diversity of metabolites in Cyanobacteria also has some drawbacks with approximately 26% of Cyanobacteria genera producing toxins that are harmful to humans and animals and elicit toxic effects in plants (Poveda, 2021 ; Righini et al., 2022 ). While Nostoc sp. was effective at controlling Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infections in tomato seedlings, it also elicited some negative effects on the plants. This was probably due to cytotoxic metabolites synthesized by Nostoc sp. (Biondi et al., 2004 ). Similarly, 31 Cyanobacteria strains from 12 genera were tested for biostimulatory activity in the watercress germination assay and for antifungal activity against Pythium ultimum in an agar-diffusion assay. One third of the extracts had antifungal activity with five strains having good activity. Most strains improved the germination and seedling growth but eight strains had a phytotoxic effect (Toribio et al., 2021 ). These negative effects are mainly due to microcystins and cylindrospermopsins which cause structural and physiological changes in the plants (reviewed in Righini et al., 2022 ). Future screening studies for microalgae biofungicidal agents should also incorporate assays to test for phytotoxicity as this could make application of Cyanobacteria in agriculture problematic. Excessive use of pesticides is detrimental to the beneficial soil microorganisms (Kim & Kim, 2008 ). Three of the five tested Klebsormidiophyceae and a few Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae tested in the present study had a stimulatory effect on the fungi, especially Botrytis cinerea . Similarly, Spirulina sp. and Nannochloropsis sp. promoted Sclerotium rolfsii and Alternaria alternata growth respectively (Schmid et al., 2022 ). While microalgae strains must be screened against a range of phytopathogenic strains to ensure they do not promote the growth of some phytopathogenic fungi, there is potential to screen microalgae especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi. These strains could potentially be applied as to the soil to promote the rhizosphere microorganism communities and thereby improve soil health. Phaeoramularia capsicicola was the most susceptible fungal strain tested in the present study with 11 microalgae having fungicidal activity. Other susceptible strains included Fusarium graminearum , Pythium ultimum and Botrytis cinerea . The most resistant strains were Plasmopara viticola , Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Phytophthora infestans (Fig. 2 A). These results are similar to other studies while other results are variable. For example, Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea were most susceptible and Pythium ultimum and Rhizopus stolonifer most resistant when tested against 142 cyanobacterial strains (Kim, 2006 ); Fusarium moniliforme , Fusarium solani , Alternaria solani and Aspergillus candidus were the most susceptible when tested against 70 Anabaena strains. Other strains including Pythium debaryanum , Fusarium oxysporum , Fusarium graminearum , Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium oryzae were not inhibited. This antifungal activity was linked to the production of hydrolytic enzymes (Prasanna et al., 2008 ). Sclerotium rolfsii was the most susceptible and Alternaria alternata was the most resistant when tested against 5 microalgae (Schmid et al., 2022 ). This variability indicates that there is strong target specificity with activity depending on both the microalgae strain and the phytopathogen. The mechanisms of action may either be direct action to the fungal mycelium (toxic or inhibitory), may induce defence mechanisms in the plant via elicitor molecules and quorum sensing inhibitors or form biofilms that block sites for fungal infections (Poveda, 2021 ; Asimakis et al., 2022 ). Microalgae synthesize secondary metabolites and enzymes that are released into the environment where they can degrade fungal cell walls, damage cell membranes, inactivate enzymes and suppress fungal protein and DNA synthesis. They may also stimulate the defence system in plants by activating various defence-related enzymes (Costa et al., 2019 ; Poveda, 2021 ). Conclusion Microalgae can potentially provide effective tools in environmentally-friendly disease management. A number of criteria need to be considered when selecting potential strains as natural fungicides in order to be more effective and cheaper than synthetic chemicals. In addition to having good antifungal activity against specific phytopathogenic fungal strains, biomass productivity rates are an important criterion to ensure that sufficient biomass can be generated. Cyanobacteria from the Nostocales showed the most promising antifungal activity with water extracts having broad spectrum activity and nine species having fungicidal activity. However, their daily productivity rates were significantly lower than Chlorophyta strains. The most promising strain was Tolypothrix tenuis MACC-205 which had broad spectrum fungicidal activity as well as significantly higher daily biomass productivity rates compared to most of the investigated Nostoc strains. Some microalgae strains had a stimulatory effect on the fungi, suggesting the potential to screen strains especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi. Abbreviations C- negative control; C+ positive control; DW dry weight; F fungicidal activity; FS fungistatic activity; MACC Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection; MS Murashige & Skoog medium; PDA potato dextrose agar; S stimulatory activity Declarations Ethics approval not applicable Consent for publication All authors grant consent to publish the manuscript. Lajos Németh passed away since completing the antifungal testing of the 280 microalgae strains. Availability of data and material All data is available upon reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Funding This research was funded by the project SABANA (grant number 727874) from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program. The University of KwaZulu-Natal is also thanked for their support. Authors’ contribution Áron N. Horváth carried out the molecular identification of the pathogens and tested the 15 Nostocales for antifungal activity, Lajos Németh isolated the fungal strains and tested the 280 microalgae strains for antifungal activity, Lajos Vörös identified the microalgae strains, Wendy A. Stirk was involved in the conceptualization of the project and wrote the manuscript; Johannes van Staden edited the manuscript; Vince Ördög conceptualized the project, collected and produced the microalgae strains. Acknowledgements not applicable References Abo-Shady, A.M., Al-ghaffar, B.A., Rahhal, M.M.H., & Abd-El Monem, H.A. (2007). Biological control of FAba Bean pathogenic fungi by three Cyanobacteria filtrates. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 3029–3038. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.200.3029.3038 Alhattab, M., Kermanshahi-Pour, A., & Brooks, M.S.L. (2019). Microalgae disruption techniques for product recovery: influence of cell wall composition. Journal of Applied Phycology, 31, 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1560-9 Aponyiné (1997). Authority fungicide and bactericide testing methodology. Ministry of Agriculture, Main Department of Plant Protection and Agro-Environmental Management, Budapest, pp. 460. ISBN 9630342316 Asimakis, E., Shehata, A.A., Eisenreich, W., Acheuk, F., Lasram, S., Basiouni, S., Emekci, M., Ntougias, S., Taner, G., May-Simera, H., Yilmaz, M., & Tsiamis, G. (2022). Algae and their metabolites as potential bio-pesticides. Microorganisms, 10, 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020307 Biondi, N., Piccardi, R., Margheri, M.C., Rodolfi, L., Smith, G.D., & Tredici, M.R. (2004). Evaluation of Nostoc -strain ATCC 53789 as a potential source of natural pesticides. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 3313–3320. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3313-3320.2004 Bold, H.C. (1949). The morphology of Chlamydomonas chlamydogama sp. nov. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 76, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2482218 Borowitzka, M.A., & Vonshak, A. (2017). Scaling up microalgal cultures to commercial scale. European Journal of Phycology, 52, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365177 Cepas, V., López, Y., Gabasa, Y., Martins, C.B., Ferreira, J.D., Correia, M.J., Santos, L.M.A., Oliveira, F., Ramos, V., Reis, M., Castelo-Branco, R., Morais, J., Vasconcelos, V., Probert, I., Guilloud, E., Mehiri, M., & Soto, S.M. (2019). Inhibition of bacterial and fungal biofilm formation by 675 extracts from microalgae and cyanobacteria. Antibiotics, 8, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020077 Chiaiese, P., Corrado, G., Colla, G., Kyriacou, M.C., & Rouphael, Y. (2018). Renewable sources of plant biostimulants: microalgae as a sustainable means to improve crop performance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 87, 1782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01782 Colla, G., & Rouphael, Y. (2020). Microalgae: new source of plant biostimulants. Agronomy, 10, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091240 Costa, J.A.V., Freitas, B.C.B., Cruz, C.G., Silveira, J., & Morais, M.G. (2019). Potential of microalgae as biopesticides to contribute to sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 54, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1571366 de Morais, M.G., da Silva Vaz, B., de Morais, E.G., & Costa, J.A.V. (2015). Biologically active metabolites synthesized by microalgae. BioMed Research International , 2015, 835761. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/835761 du Jardin, P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021 Falaise, C., Francois, C., Travers, M.A., Morga, B., Haure, J., Tremblay, R., Turcotte, F., Pasetto, P., Gastineau, R., Hardivillier, Y., Leignel, V., & Mouget, J.L. (2016). Antimicrobial compounds from eukaryotic microalgae against human pathogens and diseases in aquaculture. Marine Drugs, 14, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/md14090159 Gitau, M.M., Farkas, A., Ördög, V., & Maróti, G. (2022). Evaluation of the biostimulants effects of two Chlorophyta microalgae on tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ). Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132689 Guiry, M.D. (2012). How many species of algae are there? Journal of Phycology, 48, 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2021.01222.x Guiry, M.D., & Guiry, G.M. (2022). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org . searched in June 2022 Günerken, E., D’Hondt, E., Eppink, M.H.M., Garcia-Gonzalez, L., Elst, K., & Wijffels, R.H. (2015). Cell disruption for microalgae biorefineries. Biotechnology Advances, 33, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.008 Haggag, W., Abd El-Aty, A., Mohamed, A.A. (2014). The potential effect of two Cyanobacterial species; Anabaena sphaerica and Oscillatoria agardhii against grain storage fungi. European Scientific Journal, 10, 427–443 Kim, J.D. (2006). Screening of Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) from rice paddy soil for antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology, 34, 138–142. https:/doi.org/10.4489/myco.2006.34.3.138 Kim, J., & Kim, J.D. (2008). Inhibitory effect of algal extracts on mycelial growth of the tomato-wilt pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici . Mycobiology, 36, 242–248. https://doi.org/10.4489/myco.2008.36.4.242 Kim, M.-J., Shim, C.-K., Ko, B.-G., & Kim, J. (2020). Effect of the microalga Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on strawberry PGPR and biological control of Fusarium wilt disease in non-pesticide hydroponic strawberry cultivation. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30, 708–716. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2001.01015 Kuznetsov, E.D., & Vladimirova, M.G. (1964). Iron as a factor limiting the growth of Chlorella on Tamiya medium. Soviet Plant Physiology, 11, 82–89. Lee, S.Y., Cho, J.M., Chang, Y.K., & Oh, Y.K. (2017). Cell disruption and lipid extraction for microalgae biorefineries: a review. Bioresource Technology, 244, 1317–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.038 Mudimu, O., Rybalka, N., Bauersachs, T., Born, J., Friedl, T., & Schulz, R. (2014). Biotechnological screening of microalgal and cyanobacterial strains for biogas production and antibacterial and antifungal effects. Metabolites, 4, 373–393. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4020373 Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3053.1962.tb08052.x Najdenski, H.M., Gigova, L.G., Iliev, I.I., Pilarski, P.S., Lukavsky, J., Tsvetkova, I.V., Ninova, M.S., & Kussovski, V.K. (2013). Antibacterial and antifungal activities of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48, 1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12122 Ördög, V. (1982). Apparatus for laboratory algal bioassay. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie , 61, 127–136. ISBN: 0020-9309 Pawar, S.T., & Puranik, P.R. (2008). Screening of terrestrial and freshwater halotolerant cyanobacteria for antifungal activities. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9565-6 Plaza, M., Santoyo, S., Jaime, L., Avalo, B., Cifuentes, A., Reglero, G., Garcia-Blairsy Reina, G., Señoráns, F.J., & Ibáñez, E., (2012). Comprehensive characterization of the functional activities of pressurized liquid and ultrasound-assisted extracts from Chlorella vulgaris . LWT – Food Science and Technology , 46, 245–253. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.lwt.2011.09.024 Poveda, J. (2021). Cyanobacteria in plant health: biological strategy against abiotic and biotic stresses. Crop Protection, 141, 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105450 Prasanna, R., Nain, L., Tripathi, R., Gupta, V., Chaudhary, V., Middha, S., Joshi, M., Ancha, R., & Kaushik, B.D. (2008). Evaluation of fungicidal activity of extracellular filtrates of cyanobacteria – possible role of hydrolytic enzymes. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 48, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200700199 Righini, H., Baraldi, E., Fernández, Y.G., Quintana, A.M., & Roberti, R. (2019). Different antifungal activity of Anabaena sp., Ecklonia sp. and Jania sp. against Botrytis cinerea . Marine Drugs , 17, 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17050299 Righini, H., Francioso, O., Di Foggia, M., Quintana, A.M., & Roberti, R. (2020). Preliminary study on the activity of phycobiliproteins against Botrytis cinerea . Marine Drugs, 18, 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120600 Righini, H., Francioso, O., Quintana, A.M., & Roberti, R. (2022). Cyanobacteria: a natural source for controlling agricultural plant diseases caused by fungi and oomycetes and improving plant growth. Horticulturae, 8, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010058 Rippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J.B., Herdman, M., & Stanier, R.Y. (1979). Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Journal of General Microbiology, 111, 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-111-1-1 Santini, G., Rodolfi, L., Biondi, N., Sampietro, G., & Tredici, M. (2022 online). Effects of cyanobacterial-based biostimulants on plant growth and development: a case study of basil ( Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of Applied Phycology , 34, 2063–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02781-4 Scaglioni, P.T., Pagnussatt, F.A., Lemos, A.C., Nicolli, C.P., Del Ponte, E.M., & Badiale-Furlong, E. (2019). Nannochloropsis sp. and Spirulina sp. as a source of antifungal compounds to mitigate contamination by Fusarium graminearum species complex. Current Microbiology, 76, 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/500284-019-01663-2 Schmid, B., Coelho, L., Schulze, P.S.C., Pereira, H., Santos, T., Maia, I.B., Reis, M., & Vaarela, J. (2022). Antifungal properties of aqueous microalgal extracts. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18, 11096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101096 Shaima, A.F., Yasin, N.H.M., Ibrahim, N., Takriff, M.S., Gunasekaran, D., Ismaeel, M.Y.Y. (2022). Unveiling antimicrobial activity of microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana (UKM2), Chlorella sp. (UKM8) and Scenedesmus sp. (UKM9). Saudi Journal of Biological Science 29, 1043–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.069 Shishido, T.K., Jokela, J., Kolehmainen, C.T., Fewer, D.P., Wahlsten, M., Wang, H., Rouhiainen, L., Rizzi, E., De Bellis, G., Permi, P., & Sivonen, K. (2015). Antifungal activity improved by coproduction of cyclodextrins and anabaenolysins in Cyanobacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 13669–13674. Staub, R. (1961). Ernährungsphysiologisch-autökologische untersuchungen an der planktischen Blaualge Oscillatoria rubescens DC. Schweizerische. Zeitschrift für Hydrologie, 23, 82–198. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000092335 Stirk, W.A., Bálint, P., Vambe, M., Lovász, C., Molnár, Z., van Staden, J., & Ördög, V. (2020). Effect of cell disruption methods on the extraction of bioactive metabolites from microalgal biomass. Journal of Biotechnology, 307, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotec.2019.10.012 Stirk, W.A., & van Staden, J. (2022) Bioprospecting for bioactive compounds in microalgae: Antimicrobial compounds. Biotechnology Advances, 59, 107977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107977 Toribio, A.J., Jurado, M.M., Suárez-Estrella, F., López, M.J., López-González, J.A., & Moreno, J. (2021). Seed biopriming with cyanobacteroal extracts as an eco-friendly strategy to control damping off caused by Pythium ultimum in seedbeds. Microbiological Research, 248, 126766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126766 Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. (2018). What could promote farmers to replace chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers? Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.222 Yuan, J., Zhao, M., Li Rong, L., Huang, Q., Rensing, C., & Shen, Q. (2017). Lipotides produced by B. amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 altered the soil fungal community and non-ribosomal peptides genes harbouring microbial community. Applied Soil Ecology, 117–118, 96–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.002 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryTableA280strains.xlsx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Jan, 2023 Read the published version in Phytoparasitica → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 27 Sep, 2022 Reviews received at journal 09 Sep, 2022 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 Sep, 2022 Reviewers invited by journal 29 Aug, 2022 Editor assigned by journal 23 Aug, 2022 Submission checks completed at journal 22 Aug, 2022 First submitted to journal 29 Jul, 2022 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1907982","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":130867249,"identity":"6a73f872-20fe-4f86-8ef5-392660234ae6","order_by":0,"name":"Áron N Horváth","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Centre for Agricultural Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Áron","middleName":"N","lastName":"Horváth","suffix":""},{"id":130867250,"identity":"e5ffc3aa-d824-4578-a671-55b5f9803c04","order_by":1,"name":"Lajos Németh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Széchenyi István University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lajos","middleName":"","lastName":"Németh","suffix":""},{"id":130867251,"identity":"cdb1ca74-fdee-494b-9c81-67656e086c0f","order_by":2,"name":"Lajos Vörös","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Balaton Limnological Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lajos","middleName":"","lastName":"Vörös","suffix":""},{"id":130867252,"identity":"e3b7ecd9-e5b2-4826-9695-73f3e912d34f","order_by":3,"name":"Wendy A Stirk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of KwaZulu-Natal","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wendy","middleName":"A","lastName":"Stirk","suffix":""},{"id":130867253,"identity":"f3fb9e13-a69a-4e79-b8bb-1db924a1b904","order_by":4,"name":"Johannes Staden","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of KwaZulu-Natal","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Johannes","middleName":"","lastName":"Staden","suffix":""},{"id":130867254,"identity":"932ca602-4728-44d4-9664-9875849f3a79","order_by":5,"name":"Vince Ördög","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Széchenyi István University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vince","middleName":"","lastName":"Ördög","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-07-29 07:44:19","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01045-2","type":"published","date":"2023-01-18T18:23:18+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":25623644,"identity":"b16269cc-1596-485e-835d-c21f77a1baa1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-08-24 17:32:15","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":462622,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eNumber of phytopathogenic fungal strains A) inhibited and B) stimulated by the 280 microalgae water extracts\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.1280strainsHORVATHetal..jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1907982/v1/2414171c094addec975ba9a8.jpg"},{"id":25623645,"identity":"ee4649e4-523c-417b-ad2b-d78173c72b5a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-08-24 17:32:15","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":207666,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAntifungal activity of the 15 Nostocales strains against A) \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternate\u003c/em\u003e, B) \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e, C) \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e and D) \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e showing the inhibition ring from the mixed-method (A\u0026amp;B) and the width of the inhibition zone from the disc-method (C\u0026amp;D) after 72 h incubation. The microalgae are presented on the X-axis according to their dry weight at day 6 with the highest biomass producing strains nearest the y-axis. Azoxystrobin (1 µg/mL) was included as a postivie control (C+) and sterile tap water as a negative control (C-). Boxes represent four parallel plates each with\u0026nbsp;three technical repeats (n=12) where the thick middle line is the median, the box is the interquartile range and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points within 1.5 × interquartile range from the box. Lowercase letters below the boxes indicate statistically significant differences in the inhibitory activity of the microalgae water extracts and controls (p\u0026lt;0.05). The Degree of Freedom was 176 for the mixed-method (A\u0026amp;B) and 187 for the disc-method (C\u0026amp;D).The shading of the boxes indicates differences in toxicity (fungicidal/fungistatic) effects of the water extracts and control(s).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1907982/v1/4b00d9e93def372db23a8072.png"},{"id":44717535,"identity":"1872df37-7073-47db-8150-c3ae5d1283d5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-10-16 18:36:14","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":698628,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1907982/v1/1a91af22-c2a1-4388-bf51-1cdb9626b3c5.pdf"},{"id":25623646,"identity":"96dbe530-ceb4-47fe-8488-2f00239af645","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-08-24 17:32:15","extension":"xlsx","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":42077,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTableA280strains.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1907982/v1/872c2355e5cb5a06cf0a6e63.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Microalgae strains of the Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection with activity against plant fungal pathogens","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eFungal infections are a common problem in agriculture, causing diseases such as leaf blight, vascular wilt, root rot and damping off (Asimakis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Intensive agricultural practices apply pesticides together with synthetic fertilizers for crop protection and to improve yield. However, their long term overuse has led to environmental problems such as soil salinization, eutrophication of water systems and ocean acidification (Wang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). These chemicals are also detrimental to the rhizospheric microbial community which plays an important role in plant health and disease resistance (Yuan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). There is now a shift towards more eco-friendly \u0026ldquo;green\u0026rdquo; agricultural practices such as the use of natural biostimulants and biopesticides to promote plant growth and improve tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (du Jardin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Benefits of natural biopesticides over synthetic pesticides include that they are more easily biodegradable than synthetic chemicals and thus have a lower residual; they are more specific and thus safer to non-target organisms such as beneficial soil microorganisms; their diverse mechanisms of action reduce the possibility of microbes developing resistance and thus they have a lower impact on the environment and human health (Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Asimakis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne emerging category of natural biostimulants is microalgae (Colla \u0026amp; Rouphael, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). These are a rapidly growing, sustainable resource that can be cultivated on non-arable land using recycled wastewater (Falaise et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), thereby further contributing to the reduction of eutrophication. There are numerous studies showing that application of either extracts or living Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta improve plant growth (reviewed in Chiaiese et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Poveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). For example, hydrolysates of Cyanobacteria strains (\u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e sp., \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eLeptolyngbya\u003c/em\u003e sp.) significantly increased root and shoot growth and leaf number in basil plants grown in a hydroponic system (Santini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas reinhardtii\u003c/em\u003e extracts increased fruit size in tomato. \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e sp. extracts induced earlier flowering and more flowers and \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas reinhardtii\u003c/em\u003e extracts delayed flowering and reduced flower number. \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e sp. extracts increased chlorophyll b and carotenoid content and \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas reinhardtii\u003c/em\u003e extracts increased chlorophyll a content (Gitau et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This biostimulating activity is attributed to the microalgae being rich in primary metabolites (proteins, lipids and carbohydrates) as well as other beneficial metabolites such as plant hormones, polysaccharides, amino acids, vitamins, polyamines and antioxidant compounds (de Morais et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Colla \u0026amp; Rouphael, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The biostimulatory effects are strain specific with the elicited response dependent on the biochemical and structural properties on the microalgae.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicroalgae also produce a large variety of secondary metabolites which are biologically active, including compounds with antifungal activity (reviewed in Stirk \u0026amp; van Staden, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). These could potentially function as natural biofungicides. Most antifungal screening has focussed on medicinal applications where microalgal extracts are tested against human pathogens such as \u003cem\u003eCandida albicans\u003c/em\u003e (Falaise et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Poveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) with fewer studies focusing on plant pathogens. Examples of microalgae with phytopathogenic activity include \u003cem\u003eNostoc commune\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eOscillatoria tenuis\u003c/em\u003e inhibiting \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora capsici\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e (Kim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eAnabaena subcylindrica\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNostoc muscorum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eOscillatoria angusta\u003c/em\u003e inhibiting seven pathogenic fungi isolated from infected Faba bean plants (Abo-Shady et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). There are examples of microalgae extracts reducing fungal diseases in greenhouse and field trials. For example, \u003cem\u003eChlorella fusca\u003c/em\u003e extracts (0.4% extract) applied at two-weekly intervals as a foliar application and soil irrigation enhanced strawberry plant growth and increased the chlorophyll content and number of flowers. It also decreased the incidence of \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e wilt disease in the strawberry crop by supressing the population of \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e (Kim et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Dipping wheat grains into the \u003cem\u003eOscillatoria agardhii\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAnabaena sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e extracts and drying them reduced seed-born infection and improved germination when seeds were stored for up to 180 days (Haggag et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe long evolutionary history of microalgae and their diverse ecological habitats confer a vast potential to produce a number of secondary metabolites. However, most research has been conducted on only a few microalgae genera that are commonly cultivated for other biotechnological applications such as biofuel and animal feed (Santini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). It is conservatively estimated that there are approximately 70 000 microalgae species of which about 73% have been described (Guiry, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Only a small fraction of these are maintained in culture collections and have been evaluated for their biological activity (de Morais et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Thus microalgae provide a rich, untapped reserve of novel compounds which could potentially be developed as biocontrol agents for agriculture.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe commercialization of microalgae-derived biofungicides is still in its infancy and they are only used niche markets such as organic agriculture (Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). There is a need to screen diverse genera to find suitable strains with good bioactivity (Colla \u0026amp; Rouphael, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) coupled with rapid growth rates and a robust morphology so that they can be cultivated in outdoor systems to generate sufficient biomass for commercial applications (Borowitzka \u0026amp; Vonshak, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The aim of the present study was screen taxonomically diverse microalgae for antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi in order to identify fast-growing strains with broad-spectrum antifungal activity.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eMicroalgae strains screened for antifungal activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mosonmagyar\u0026oacute;v\u0026aacute;r Algal Culture Collection (MACC) of the Sz\u0026eacute;chenyi Istv\u0026aacute;n University, Hungary maintains 970 strains in culture. In total 280 strains were selected from the MACC to test for antifungal activity. These comprised of 33 Cyanophyceae strains from 13 genera, 157 Chlorophyceae strains from 29 genera, 80 Trebouxiophyceae strains from 19 genera, 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains from 1 genus and 1 Zygenematophyceae strain (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e; Supplementary Table A). These strains originated from soil and water samples collected in six European countries and Brazil (South America; Supplementary Table A). The main criteria for strain selection was based on their dry weight (DW) and daily biomass production with selected Cyanobacteria strains having over 1.5 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e DW and 0.1 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e daily biomass production and Chlorophyta and Charophyta having over 2.0 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e DW and 0.2 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e daily biomass production. All strains were monoalgal and \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas\u003c/em\u003e strains were axenic. Besides microscopic taxonomic determination, \u003cem\u003eAnabaena\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas\u003c/em\u003e strains have been identified by molecular sequencing. The global algal database \u0026ldquo;AlgaeBase\u0026rdquo; was used in the description of the taxonomic positions of the MACC strains (Guiry \u0026amp; Guiry, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumber of strains and their taxonomic position of the 280 MACC microalgae strains tested for antifungal activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClass\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOrder\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFamily\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo. of Genera\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo. of strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePhylum Cyanobacteria\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyanophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNostocales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNostocaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTolypothrichaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCalotrichaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOscillatoriales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOscillatoriaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicrocoleaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSynechococcales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSynechococceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLeptolyngbyaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMerismopediaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChroococcales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChroococcaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e33 strains\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePhylum Chlorophyta\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlamydomonadales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlamydomonadaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorococcaeae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorosarcinaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaematococcaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePleurastraceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSphaeropleales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScenedesmaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRadiococcaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNeochloridaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelenastraceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMychonastaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBracteacoccaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHydrodictyaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChaetophoraceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e157 strains\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorellales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorellaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOocystaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrasinolales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrichococcaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrisinolales incertae sedis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWatanabeales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWatanabeaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiophyceae ordo incertae sedis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCoccomyaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiophyceae incertae sedis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e80 strains\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUlvophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUlotrichales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlanophilaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUlotrichaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4 strains\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePhylum Charophyta\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKlebsormidiophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKlebsormidiales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKlebsormidiaceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5 strains\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZygenematophyceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZygenatales\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZygnemataceae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1 strain\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 280 microalgae strains were maintained on solidified medium in dim light at 15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C in a stock culture room. Each Cyanobacteria strain was initially inoculated from agar culture into two 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing either 250 mL Zehnder-8 liquid medium (Staub, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1961\u003c/span\u003e) or BG-11 medium (Rippka et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e). The Chlorophyta and Charophyta strains were inoculated into Tamiya (Kuznetsov \u0026amp; Vladmirova, 1964) or Bristol (Bold, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1949\u003c/span\u003e) liquid medium (Supplementary Table A). The cultures were grown in the apparatus described by \u0026Ouml;rd\u0026ouml;g (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1982\u003c/span\u003e) under controlled laboratory conditions at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C in a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod. Cultures were illuminated from below with 130 \u0026micro;mol photon.m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e.s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e light intensity and aerated continuously (1.33 vvm 20 L.h\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e per flask) with sterile air enriched with 1.5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e during the day. After 7 days, the suspension cultures were used to inoculate four 500 mL flasks containing 250 mL culture medium. The starting density of the cultures was 10 mg.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e DW. The cultures were harvested between 8\u0026ndash;21 days when they were in the stationary growth phase.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dry weight was determined by filtering 5\u0026ndash;20 mL cell suspension from each flask through Whatman GF/C glass fibre filters as previously described (Stirk et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). This was used to calculate the DW of the biomass at harvest and the average daily production of the strain (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4). The remainder of the cell suspension from the four flasks was combined and centrifuged (2150 x \u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e for 15 min at room temperature). The pellet was freeze-dried (Christ Gamma 1\u0026ndash;15) and stored at -18\u0026deg;C until tested for antifungal activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungal strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAxenic cultures of nine phytopathogenic fungi isolated from infected plants were obtained from the collection of the Department of Plant Sciences, Sz\u0026eacute;chenyi Istv\u0026aacute;n University, Mosonmagyar\u0026oacute;v\u0026aacute;r, Hungary (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Identification of fungal species was carried out based on host plant identification and micro- and macromorphological characteristics. In addition, a fragment of the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) gene was sequenced in \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e and the ITS nrDNA region in \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e was sequenced to help with species specific identification. The ITS nrDNA region, fragments of the RNA polymerase 2 gene (\u003cem\u003erpb2\u003c/em\u003e) and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase \u003cem\u003e(gapdh\u003c/em\u003e) genes were also sequenced from \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e to resolve the species complexes these strains belong to.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungal phytopathogens used to screen 280 microalgae (Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Charophyta) from the Mosonmagyar\u0026oacute;v\u0026aacute;r Algal Culture Collection for antifungal activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungal pathogens\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiseases\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHosts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIsolated from\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e (Pleosporales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eleaf spot, fruit rot\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewide range of host plants including \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBeta\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBrassica\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCapsicum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eLycopersicon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eSolanum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTriticum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eVitis vinifera\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e (Hypocreales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eear mold, head blight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewheat, barley, rice, oats, maize\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e (Cantharellales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003edamping off, black scurf, root rot\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewide range of host plants including soybean, potato, cereals, sugarbeet\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSolanum tuberosum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e (Pythiales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eseed rot, damping off, black-leg of seedlings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewide range of host plants including maize, soybean, potato, wheat\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhytophthora infestans\u003c/em\u003e (Peronosporales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003elate blight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epotato, tomato\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSolanum tuberosum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePlasmopara viticola\u003c/em\u003e (Peronosporales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003egrape downy mildew\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewine grapes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eVitis vinifera\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhaeoramularia capsicicola\u003c/em\u003e (Mycosphaerellales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003evelvet spot, leaf loss\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epepper\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCapsicum annuum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e (Helotiales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003egrey mold\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewide range of host plants including wine grapes, strawberry, tomato, rhubarb\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFragaria \u0026times; ananassa\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSclerotinia sclerotiorum\u003c/em\u003e (Helotiales)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewhite mold\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewide range of host plants including herbaceous plants, woody ornamentals\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHelianthus annuus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e Host species from which the fungal strains were isolated for the present study\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungal cultures were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium at 4\u0026deg;C with a monthly passage regime. The exception was the obligate biotrophic parasite \u003cem\u003ePlasmopara viticola\u003c/em\u003e which was maintained \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e on detached grapevine leaves. Young grapevine leaves were surface sterilized by dipping in 2% sodium hypochlorite (60 s), then 70% ethanol (90 s) and washed in sterile tap water. After drying, leaves were placed with their adaxial surface upwards onto the surface of Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige \u0026amp; Skoog, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1962\u003c/span\u003e) into Petri dishes (MS medium Mod. No. 1B, Duchefa, solidified with 6.5 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e phyto agar) and the tip of the petiole was inserted into the medium. The dishes were kept at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C in a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod and the pathogen was transferred monthly.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExtract preparation\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe freeze-dried microalgae biomass was resuspended in distilled water (10 mg.mL\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e DW) and sonicated for 3 min (VirSonic 600, Virtis) to disrupt the cells to improve the extraction of secondary metabolites. This extract was used in the agar-diffusion and \u003cem\u003ePlasmopara\u003c/em\u003e leaf disc assays to test for antifungal activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntifungal assays\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe antifungal activity of the 280 microalgae water extracts was determined against the eight fungal pathogens (excluding \u003cem\u003eP. viticola\u003c/em\u003e) using the \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e agar diffusion method (Aponyin\u0026eacute;, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, 7 day old fungal mycelium cultures were washed and suspended in cooled PDA medium (42\u0026deg;C), gently shaken and then poured into sterile 90 mm petri dishes. Once solidified, four equidistant holes were cut in the agar with a 9 mm cork borer and 150 \u0026micro;L microalgae extract placed in three holes. Sterile tap water was added to the fourth hole as the negative control (C-). The petri dishes were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C in the dark. The effect of the microalgae extracts on fungal mycelium growth was evaluated by measuring the diameter of the inhibition ring (including the diameter of the hole) 72 h after incubation. Further observations were made at 96 h and 120 h. The toxicity of the microalgae extract was evaluated by scoring the \u0026ldquo;clearness\u0026rdquo; of the inhibition ring. The effect was classified into one of the following categories: fungicidal activity (F), mild (FS-), medium (FS\u0026ndash;) or strong fungistatic (FS\u0026mdash;) activity and mild (S+), medium (S++) and strong (S+++) stimulatory activity. Each microalga was tested in four parallels in two repeated experiments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt was necessary to use a different method to test antifungal activity against \u003cem\u003eP. viticola\u003c/em\u003e as it can only grow on plant tissue. For this, either whole leaves or 10 mm leaf discs cut from grape leaves (\u003cem\u003eVitis vinifera\u003c/em\u003e var. K\u0026eacute;kfrankos) were placed onto sterile solidified MS medium in a 90 mm Petri dish and sprayed with 500 \u0026micro;L microalgae extract or water (C-). The leaves and leaf discs were dried and then inoculated with \u003cem\u003eP. viticola\u003c/em\u003e suspension (10\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e zoosporagium cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3\u003c/sup\u003e). Petri dishes were incubated at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C for 7 days. Antifungal activity was evaluated on the 8th day by estimating the leaf area ratio covered with the pathogen and comparing it to the negative control.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntifungal activity in the Nostocales\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the results of the screening study, 15 Cyanobacteria strains from the Nostocales (Families Nostocaceae, Tolypothrichaceae and Calotrichaceae) were selected for further testing. These included 8 strains showing fungicidal (F) or strong fungistatic (FS\u0026mdash;) activity in the initial screening (Supplementary Table A). This study was expanded to include an additional seven Nostocales strains that were not previously screened. The microalgae were grown as described above and harvested on day 6. Water extracts were made from the freeze-dried algal pellet as outlined above.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese extracts were tested against four fungal strains. \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e were tested using the method described above where the fungal mycelium was mixed into the cooled PDA medium (termed mixed-method). As \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e suspensions did not mix homogenously in the cooled PDA medium, it was necessary to modify the assay method. For this, PDA medium was poured into 90 mm Petri dishes and 6 mm discs were cut from growing regions of the fungal colonies and placed upside down in the middle of the PDA plate (termed disc-method). As with the mixed-method, four 9 mm equidistant holes were cut in the solidified PDA plates. Three holes were filled with 150 \u0026micro;L microalgae extract and the fourth hole with sterile tap water (C-). The commercial fungicide Quadris (active ingredient 250 g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e azoxystrobin) was included in the assays as a positive control (C+). This was dissolved in sterile tap water to give a final concentration of 1 \u0026micro;g.mL\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Each microalgae extract and the positive control were tested in four parallel plates in three independent experiments to give 12 parallel measurements for each Cyanobacteria strain (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter 72 h incubation at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C in the dark, the radius of the inhibition ring (without the radius of the hole) was measured (mm) for the mixed-method assay. For the disc-method, the inhibition zone was measured as the distance (mm) from the fungal colony edge to the treatment holes. The negative control was taken into account in these measurements. The toxicity of the extract was evaluated in two ways depending on the assay method. For the mixed-method, the \u0026ldquo;clearness\u0026rdquo; of the inhibition ring as ranked using the scale from 1\u0026ndash;4 where 1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;no visible effect, 2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;mild FS, 3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;strong FS and 4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;F effect. The mean of the 12 parallel replicates was calculated and the extract was classed as non-fungistatic (nFS; mean between 1-1.5), weak fungistatic (Fs-; mean between 1.6\u0026ndash;2.5), strong fungistatic (Fs\u0026ndash;; mean between 2.6\u0026ndash;3.5) or fungicidal (F; mean between 3.6-4.0). For the disc-method, the extent of the fungal growth towards the microalgae extracts was measured at 48 h and 72 h. This growth over 24 h (mm) was ranked into four categories, namely nFS (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;8.0 mm), Fs- (5.5-8.0 mm), Fs\u0026mdash;(3.0-5.5 mm) and F (0\u0026ndash;3.0. mm).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatistical differences in the average growth rates of the microalgae were calculated by One-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey test. Data was tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test (SigmaPlot v. 13). To analyse the effect of the Nostocales extracts on mycelium growth, a linear model was used where the treatment (MACC strain, positive and negative controls) was included as a fixed factor. Differences between the microalgae strains and controls were compared by contrasting the emmeans function with the false discovery rate (fdr) p value adjustment method (RStudio Team).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eGrowth rates of the 280 microalgae strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCultures were harvested once they entered the stationary growth phase. This was detected visually by the colour and density of the culture. The average harvest day for strains in each class was 13\u0026ndash;14 days. The four Ulvophyceae strains were harvested significantly later at 17-18-days (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Growth rates measured as dry weight at harvest and daily biomass productivity were significantly similar in the Chlorophyta (Chlorophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Ulvophyceae) and Charophyta. The Cyanophyceae had significantly lower growth rates compared to the Chlorophyta strains (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e; Supplementary Table A).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGrowth rates of microalgae strains used in the antifungal screening study harvested in the stationary growth phase. Results are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SEM of the microalgae strains within each family. Different letters in each column represent significant differences (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClass (no. of strains)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHarvest day\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDry weight (g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDaily biomass productivity (g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyanophyceae (33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.5\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.04\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.12\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorophyceae (157)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.2\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.61\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.06\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.19\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiophyceae (80)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.3\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.08\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUlvophyceae (4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.29\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKlebsormidiophyceae (5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.5\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.44\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.68\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZygenematophyceae (1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntifungal activity of the 280 microalgae strains\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn total, 127 extracts showed some antifungal activity against at least one of the nine fungal pathogens. This was an overall \u0026ldquo;hit-rate\u0026rdquo; of 45%. The Cyanophyceae had the highest incidence of strains with antifungal activity with 64% of the strains tested showing some activity. In comparison, less than half the Chlorophyceae (49%) and Trebouxiophyceae (30%) strains tested had antifungal activity. Too few strains were tested from the other taxonomic classes to discern trends (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). A few microalgae strains (8%) had a stimulatory effect on the fungal pathogens. Three of the 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains (60%) were stimulatory as well as 8% of the Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae strains. No Cyanophyceae had a stimulatory effect on the fungal pathogens (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). A few strains, namely \u003cem\u003eChlorosarcina\u003c/em\u003e sp. MACC-560, \u003cem\u003eScenedesmus acutus\u003c/em\u003e var. \u003cem\u003eglobosus\u003c/em\u003e MACC-551, \u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e sp. MACC-575, \u003cem\u003eGloeocystis\u003c/em\u003e sp. MACC 631 (Chlorophyceae) and \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e sp. MACC-564 (Trebouxiophyceae) had both inhibitory and stimulatory activity against different pathogen strains (Supplementary Table A). The active microalgae strains were isolated from both soil and water habitats (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumber of microalgae strains with inhibitory and stimulatory activity against the nine phytopathogens. The \u0026ldquo;hit-rate\u0026rdquo; shows the % of strains with activity from the total number of tested strains in each class\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClass (no. of strains)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo. of strains with inhibitory activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo. of strains with stimulatory activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrain origin\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c6\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrain origin\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Hit-rate\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Hit-rate\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyanophyceae (33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChlorophyceae (157)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrebouxiophyceae (80)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUlvophyceae (4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKlebsormidiophyceae (5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZygenematophyceae (1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTotal (280)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e87\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e39\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e45%\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8%\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"7\"\u003e* Some strains with both inhibitory and stimulatory activity\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater extracts of 19 of the 280 microalgae strains had fungicidal activity against at least one of the nine fungal phytopathogens. Cyanobacteria had a higher hit-rate with 20.5% of the strains (7 strains) having fungicidal activity compared to 4.9% (12 strains) of the Chlorophyta having fungicidal activity. The active Cyanobacteria were all from the Nostocales and the Chlorophyta belonged to the Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The Cyanobacteria strains displayed a wider spectrum of activity with five strains being active (either fungicidal or fungistatic) against three or more fungal strains, namely \u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-304 and \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 had antifungal activity against 6 phytopathogens and \u003cem\u003eNostoc linckia\u003c/em\u003e MACC-612 inhibited 4 fungi. In contrast, each Chlorophyta strain was only active against 1\u0026ndash;2 fungal strains (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyanophyta and Chlorophyta MACC-strains demonstrating fungicide (F) activity against at least one of the nine phytopathogens detected with the agar gel diffusion bioassay. FS shows fungistatic activity. The number indicates the size of the inhibition zone (mm). \u003cem\u003ePlasmopara viticola\u003c/em\u003e was tested using leaf discs made from grape leaves. Results are the mean of 8 replicates\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"11\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c11\" colnum=\"11\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicroalgae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"9\" nameend=\"c11\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhytopathogen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTaxon\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMACC strain code\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlter-naria\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFusa-rium\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhizo-ctonia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePythium\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhyto-phthora\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePlasmo-para\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhaeo-ramularia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBotrytis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSclero-tinia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCyanophyta\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNostocales\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e304\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc linckia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e612\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolypothrix\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e465\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e205\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc insulare\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e661\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc calcicola\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e251\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e150\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-23\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eChlorophyta\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eChlorophyceae\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDesmococcus olivaceus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e343\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e540\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFernandinella alpina\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e682\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFS-21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLobochlamys segnis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDesmodesmus dispar\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e302\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHaematococcus lacustris\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e90\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTrebouxiophyceae\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMychonastes homosphaera\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e339\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eScotiellopsis\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePseudococcomyxa\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStichococcus bacillaris\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e147\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMychonastes homosphaera\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e151\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF-22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003ePhaeoramularia capsicicola\u003c/em\u003e was the most susceptible fungi with 25% of the microalgae extracts inhibiting its growth with 11 extracts having fungicidal activity. Other susceptible fungi were \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e where the microalgae extracts mainly had weak fungistatic activity. The most resistant fungi was \u003cem\u003ePlasmopara viticola\u003c/em\u003e with only 3 microalgae extracts having an inhibitory effect (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). However, this may have been due to the assay used to test the extracts. Four of the fungal strains were stimulated by a few microalgae extracts with \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e being the most frequently stimulated fungi (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntifungal activity in the Nostocales\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e strains generally had significantly slower growth (determined as DW and daily biomass productivity on day 6) compared to the other microalgae strains (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCulture collection details and growth rates of 15 Nostocales strains analyzed for antifungal activity against four phytopathegenic fungi. Cultures were harvested on day 6. Results are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SEM (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicroalgae\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDry weight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDaily biomass productivity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTaxon\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMACC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOrigin\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHabitat\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(g.L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFamily Nostocaceae\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc calcicola\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e150\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHungary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.371\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.012\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.062\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.002\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc calcicola\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e251\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerbia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.561\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.026\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.093\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.004\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc insulare\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e661\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCzech Republic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.355\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.035\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.059\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.006\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc linckia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e612\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCzech Republic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.405\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.065\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.067\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.011\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc muscorum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e132\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermany\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.388\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.019\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.065\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.003\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc muscorum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e189\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerbia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.405\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.066\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.067\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.011\u003csup\u003ec\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNostoc muscorum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e683\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBrazil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.626\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.045\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.104\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.007\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e128\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerbia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.853\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.030\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.142\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.005\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e134\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHungary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.708\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.015\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.118\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.002\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e221\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerbia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.511\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.030\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.085\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.005\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e304\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRussia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.675\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.031\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.112\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.005\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAnabaena cylindrica\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e307\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRussia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.617\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.025\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.103\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.004\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFamily Tolypothrichaceae\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e205\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGermany\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewater\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.647\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.142\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.108\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.023\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolypothrix\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e465\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBrazil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.835\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.049\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.139\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.008\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFamily Calotrichaceae\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCalothrix\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e405\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBrazil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esoil\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.611\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.051\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.102\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.007\u003csup\u003eab\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e was the most susceptible fungi with all the microalgae extracts inhibiting its growth with nine of the extracts having strong fungistatic activity (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e was the least susceptible fungi with seven microalgae extracts having no inhibitory activity (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA). The positive control azoxystrobin (1 \u0026micro;g.mL\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) had fungicidal activity against the four fungi strains (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The only microalgae extract to have fungicidal activity was \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC) as well as strong fungistatic activity against \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA). Other extracts with significantly high antifungal activity were \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix\u003c/em\u003e sp. MACC-465 and \u003cem\u003eNostoc linckia\u003c/em\u003e MACC-612 against \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB), \u003cem\u003eN. muscorum\u003c/em\u003e MACC-189 and \u003cem\u003eN. calcicola\u003c/em\u003e MACC-150 against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC) and \u003cem\u003eTrichormus variabilis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-304 and \u003cem\u003eNostoc insulare\u003c/em\u003e MACC-661 against \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). There was no apparent trend between the growth rates and antifungal activity.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe cost of producing microalgae-derived biofungicides is limiting their market potential. Their success will depend on strain selection to encompass rapid growth, a robust morphology suitable for mass cultivation systems and a high level of the target compounds (Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) It is also necessary keep down-stream production costs (harvesting, drying and biomass processing) to the minimum before microalgae biofungicides can compete with synthetic agrochemicals and become an economically viable agricultural tool (Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Gitau et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). The least time-consuming and most energy and cost-efficient way to prepare microalgae biomass for use in agriculture is to remove the liquid medium (dewatering) to form a pellet which is then suspended in water and applied as a foliar spray or soil drench (Gitau et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This eliminates the need to use expensive solvents or other energy-intensive extraction methods. It is thus best to test for water-soluble compounds when screening for suitable strains to develop as biofungicides (Asimakis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) as was done in the present study where water extracts were prepared from the microalgal biomass. While there are many microalgal screening studies testing organic solvent extracts, aqueous extracts are less widely investigated (Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCell pellets of the 280 strains were freeze-dried and briefly sonicated (3 min) prior to extraction. Freeze-drying damages the cell membrane due to the formation of intracellular ice-crystals, making it more porous so that water soluble, low molecular weight compounds can be released (Lee et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The cell wall acts as a barrier for compound extraction and needs to be disrupted to improve compound extraction. For example, electrical conductivity was higher in freeze-dried \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e extracts compared to living cultures and electrical conductivity and extract yields further increased when cells were sonicated for 3 min which caused 10\u0026ndash;20% disruption to the cell walls (Stirk et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The effectiveness of the cell disruption method is dependent on the cell wall structure (G\u0026uuml;nerken et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) with sonication being more suitable for species with less resistant cell walls (Alhattab et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Highly resistant cell walls require more intense cell disruption methods and this would increase the downstream production costs. Such strains would not be suitable for commercialization of microalgae biostimulants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the present study, cultures were harvested once they had reached their stationary growth phase. On average, cultures were harvested between 13\u0026ndash;14 days with the four Ulvophyceae strains being harvested later (17\u0026ndash;18 days). The dry mass at harvest and the daily biomass productivity were significantly lower for the Cyanophyceae strains compared to the Chlorophyta strains (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Productivity rates (including inoculum generation time) are a crucial consideration when selecting potential microalgae strains for commercial production of microalgal products (Borowitzka \u0026amp; Vonshak, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmost half (45%) the water extracts screened in the present study had some antifungal activity against at least one of the nine phytopathogenic fungi tested. The water extracts of the Cyanobacteria strains had the highest incidence (% hit-rate) of biological activity with 64% of the tested strains showing some antifungal activity, followed by the Chlorophyceae (49% hit-rate) and the Trebouxiophyceae having the lowest incidence of strains with antifungal activity (30% hit-rate; Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Other studies report similar or lower incidences of antifungal activity for both water and organic solvent extracts (Kim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Prasanna et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Najdenski et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Mudimu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Cepas et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). For example, organic solvent (petroleum ether, propanol and methanol) and water extracts of 40 strains from 9 genera of halotolerant Cyanobacteria were tested against five phytopathogenic fungi that had been isolated from diseased plants and seeds. Of these, 20 isolates had antifungal activity (50% hit-rate) with three isolates having \u0026ldquo;hyper-antifungal activity\u0026rdquo; (strong antifungal activity). \u003cem\u003eSynechocystis\u003c/em\u003e sp. had the broadest spectrum of antifungal activity (Pawar \u0026amp; Puranik, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Cyanobacteria also had a higher efficacy, having a higher incidence of fungicidal activity (20.5%) compared to the Chlorophyta (4.9%). The Cyanobacteria strains with fungicidal activity were all from the Nostocales. In addition, the Cyanobacteria generally had a broad spectrum of antifungal activity with many strains being active against 3 or more fungal pathogens while the Chlorophyta were only active against 1\u0026ndash;2 fungal pathogens (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, in a screening of 225 microalgae from 13 phylum for biofilm inhibitory activity, species from the Crypthophyta, Euglenophyta and Glaucophyta had the best broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity while inhibitory activity in the Chlorophyta was generally limited to \u003cem\u003eCandida albicans\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEnterobacter cloaceae\u003c/em\u003e (Cepas et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). A review of antimicrobial activity based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) indicated that species from the Nostocales were the most active Cyanobacteria strains while antimicrobial activity was similar in most Chlorophyta orders (Stirk \u0026amp; van Staden, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Comparison of antifungal activity in the 15 Nostocales strains investigated suggest that species from the Family Tolypothrichaceae are the most promising. \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 had fungicidal activity against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e and strong fungistatic activity against \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e. These microalgae also had significantly higher growth rates (DW and daily biomass productivity) compared to the majority of the \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e strains investigated (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis suggests that it should be possible to design screening programmes using a taxonomic approach to improve the \u0026ldquo;hit-rate\u0026rdquo; with Nostocales being the most promising order to date. It is also important to list microalgae species that had no or weak antifungal activity as a guideline to the taxonomic groups which have a low probability of activity (Stirk \u0026amp; van Staden, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) as was done in the present study (Supplementary Table A).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany antifungal compounds including novel metabolites have been identified in Cyanobacteria with the Nostocaceae being the most widely studied, suggesting that they are a metabolically versatile family (Falaise et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Cyanobacteria produce a wide variety of lipoproteins with over 600 identified to date. Many lipoproteins such as nostofungicidine, laxaphycins, lobocyclamides, hassallidins and anabaenolysins have antifungal activity (Shishido et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Other biologically active metabolites include polysaccharides and phycobiliproteins (Najdenski et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Polysaccharides precipitated from aqueous extracts of \u003cem\u003eAnabaena\u003c/em\u003e sp. inhibited growth of \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. Pre-harvest treatments to strawberry fruits reduced infection in a dose-response manner. Post-harvest treatments were not effective, suggesting that the polysaccharides induced plant defence mechanisms in strawberry plants (Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Water soluble phycobiliproteins extracted from \u003cem\u003eArthrospira platensis\u003c/em\u003e reduced colony growth, colony forming units and spore germination of \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e when grown on PDA. Post-harvest treatment of tomato fruits prior to artificially infecting them with \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e reduced the disease incidence and its severity in a dose-dependent relationship (Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Free (predominately chlorogenic acid) and bound phenolic compounds extracted from \u003cem\u003eSpirulina\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eNannochloropsis\u003c/em\u003e sp. (Ochrophyta) had antifungal activity against three \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e strains while conjugated phenolic compounds and carotenoids had no activity. Natural phenolic extracts from these microalgae were more effective than similar synthetic formulations indicating synergistic effects can alter the potency of the extract (Scaglioni et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast, fewer antimicrobial compounds have been identified in the Chlorophyta. Antimicrobial activity of Chlorophyta extracts is often linked to their fatty acid content (Plaza et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Shaima et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Polar organic solvents such as methanol are the most effective for fatty acid extraction. This may explain the limited antifungal activity of the water extracts made from Chlorophyta strains in the present study compared to the broad spectrum of activity in the water extracts of the tested Cyanobacteria strains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, the diversity of metabolites in Cyanobacteria also has some drawbacks with approximately 26% of Cyanobacteria genera producing toxins that are harmful to humans and animals and elicit toxic effects in plants (Poveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). While \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e sp. was effective at controlling \u003cem\u003eSclerotinia sclerotiorum\u003c/em\u003e infections in tomato seedlings, it also elicited some negative effects on the plants. This was probably due to cytotoxic metabolites synthesized by \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e sp. (Biondi et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, 31 Cyanobacteria strains from 12 genera were tested for biostimulatory activity in the watercress germination assay and for antifungal activity against \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e in an agar-diffusion assay. One third of the extracts had antifungal activity with five strains having good activity. Most strains improved the germination and seedling growth but eight strains had a phytotoxic effect (Toribio et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). These negative effects are mainly due to microcystins and cylindrospermopsins which cause structural and physiological changes in the plants (reviewed in Righini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Future screening studies for microalgae biofungicidal agents should also incorporate assays to test for phytotoxicity as this could make application of Cyanobacteria in agriculture problematic.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExcessive use of pesticides is detrimental to the beneficial soil microorganisms (Kim \u0026amp; Kim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). Three of the five tested Klebsormidiophyceae and a few Chlorophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae tested in the present study had a stimulatory effect on the fungi, especially \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. Similarly, \u003cem\u003eSpirulina\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eNannochloropsis\u003c/em\u003e sp. promoted \u003cem\u003eSclerotium rolfsii\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e growth respectively (Schmid et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). While microalgae strains must be screened against a range of phytopathogenic strains to ensure they do not promote the growth of some phytopathogenic fungi, there is potential to screen microalgae especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi. These strains could potentially be applied as to the soil to promote the rhizosphere microorganism communities and thereby improve soil health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003ePhaeoramularia capsicicola\u003c/em\u003e was the most susceptible fungal strain tested in the present study with 11 microalgae having fungicidal activity. Other susceptible strains included \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. The most resistant strains were \u003cem\u003ePlasmopara viticola\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eSclerotinia sclerotiorum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora infestans\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA). These results are similar to other studies while other results are variable. For example, \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e were most susceptible and \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRhizopus stolonifer\u003c/em\u003e most resistant when tested against 142 cyanobacterial strains (Kim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003eFusarium moniliforme\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eFusarium solani\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eAlternaria solani\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAspergillus candidus\u003c/em\u003e were the most susceptible when tested against 70 \u003cem\u003eAnabaena\u003c/em\u003e strains. Other strains including \u003cem\u003ePythium debaryanum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSclerotium oryzae\u003c/em\u003e were not inhibited. This antifungal activity was linked to the production of hydrolytic enzymes (Prasanna et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eSclerotium rolfsii\u003c/em\u003e was the most susceptible and \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e was the most resistant when tested against 5 microalgae (Schmid et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This variability indicates that there is strong target specificity with activity depending on both the microalgae strain and the phytopathogen.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mechanisms of action may either be direct action to the fungal mycelium (toxic or inhibitory), may induce defence mechanisms in the plant via elicitor molecules and quorum sensing inhibitors or form biofilms that block sites for fungal infections (Poveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Asimakis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Microalgae synthesize secondary metabolites and enzymes that are released into the environment where they can degrade fungal cell walls, damage cell membranes, inactivate enzymes and suppress fungal protein and DNA synthesis. They may also stimulate the defence system in plants by activating various defence-related enzymes (Costa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Poveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eMicroalgae can potentially provide effective tools in environmentally-friendly disease management. A number of criteria need to be considered when selecting potential strains as natural fungicides in order to be more effective and cheaper than synthetic chemicals. In addition to having good antifungal activity against specific phytopathogenic fungal strains, biomass productivity rates are an important criterion to ensure that sufficient biomass can be generated. Cyanobacteria from the Nostocales showed the most promising antifungal activity with water extracts having broad spectrum activity and nine species having fungicidal activity. However, their daily productivity rates were significantly lower than Chlorophyta strains. The most promising strain was \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 which had broad spectrum fungicidal activity as well as significantly higher daily biomass productivity rates compared to most of the investigated \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e strains. Some microalgae strains had a stimulatory effect on the fungi, suggesting the potential to screen strains especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eC- negative control; C+ positive control; DW dry weight; F fungicidal activity; FS fungistatic activity; MACC Mosonmagyar\u0026oacute;v\u0026aacute;r Algal Culture Collection; MS Murashige \u0026amp; Skoog medium; PDA potato dextrose agar; S stimulatory activity\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003enot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll authors grant consent to publish the manuscript. Lajos N\u0026eacute;meth passed away since completing the antifungal testing of the 280 microalgae strains.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and material\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll data is available upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThis research was funded by the project SABANA (grant number 727874) from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program. The University of KwaZulu-Natal is also thanked for their support.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; contribution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026Aacute;ron N. Horv\u0026aacute;th carried out the molecular identification of the pathogens and tested the 15 Nostocales for antifungal activity, Lajos N\u0026eacute;meth isolated the fungal strains and tested the 280 microalgae strains for antifungal activity, Lajos V\u0026ouml;r\u0026ouml;s identified the microalgae strains, Wendy A. Stirk was involved in the conceptualization of the project and wrote the manuscript; Johannes van Staden edited the manuscript; Vince \u0026Ouml;rd\u0026ouml;g conceptualized the project, collected and produced the microalgae strains.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003enot applicable\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbo-Shady, A.M., Al-ghaffar, B.A., Rahhal, M.M.H., \u0026amp; Abd-El Monem, H.A. (2007). Biological control of FAba Bean pathogenic fungi by three Cyanobacteria filtrates. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 3029\u0026ndash;3038. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.200.3029.3038\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3923/pjbs.200.3029.3038\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlhattab, M., Kermanshahi-Pour, A., \u0026amp; Brooks, M.S.L. (2019). Microalgae disruption techniques for product recovery: influence of cell wall composition. Journal of Applied Phycology, 31, 61\u0026ndash;88. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1560-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10811-018-1560-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAponyin\u0026eacute; (1997). Authority fungicide and bactericide testing methodology. Ministry of Agriculture, Main Department of Plant Protection and Agro-Environmental Management, Budapest, pp.\u0026nbsp;460. ISBN 9630342316\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAsimakis, E., Shehata, A.A., Eisenreich, W., Acheuk, F., Lasram, S., Basiouni, S., Emekci, M., Ntougias, S., Taner, G., May-Simera, H., Yilmaz, M., \u0026amp; Tsiamis, G. (2022). Algae and their metabolites as potential bio-pesticides. Microorganisms, 10, 307. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020307\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/microorganisms10020307\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBiondi, N., Piccardi, R., Margheri, M.C., Rodolfi, L., Smith, G.D., \u0026amp; Tredici, M.R. (2004). Evaluation of \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e-strain ATCC 53789 as a potential source of natural pesticides. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 3313\u0026ndash;3320. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3313-3320.2004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/AEM.70.6.3313-3320.2004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBold, H.C. (1949). The morphology of \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas chlamydogama\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 76, 101\u0026ndash;108. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/2482218\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2307/2482218\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBorowitzka, M.A., \u0026amp; Vonshak, A. (2017). Scaling up microalgal cultures to commercial scale. European Journal of Phycology, 52, 407\u0026ndash;418. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365177\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/09670262.2017.1365177\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCepas, V., L\u0026oacute;pez, Y., Gabasa, Y., Martins, C.B., Ferreira, J.D., Correia, M.J., Santos, L.M.A., Oliveira, F., Ramos, V., Reis, M., Castelo-Branco, R., Morais, J., Vasconcelos, V., Probert, I., Guilloud, E., Mehiri, M., \u0026amp; Soto, S.M. (2019). Inhibition of bacterial and fungal biofilm formation by 675 extracts from microalgae and cyanobacteria. Antibiotics, 8, 77. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020077\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/antibiotics8020077\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChiaiese, P., Corrado, G., Colla, G., Kyriacou, M.C., \u0026amp; Rouphael, Y. (2018). Renewable sources of plant biostimulants: microalgae as a sustainable means to improve crop performance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 87, 1782. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01782\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2018.01782\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColla, G., \u0026amp; Rouphael, Y. (2020). Microalgae: new source of plant biostimulants. Agronomy, 10, 1240. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091240\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/agronomy10091240\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCosta, J.A.V., Freitas, B.C.B., Cruz, C.G., Silveira, J., \u0026amp; Morais, M.G. (2019). Potential of microalgae as biopesticides to contribute to sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 54, 366\u0026ndash;375. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1571366\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/03601234.2019.1571366\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ede Morais, M.G., da Silva Vaz, B., de Morais, E.G., \u0026amp; Costa, J.A.V. (2015). Biologically active metabolites synthesized by microalgae. \u003cem\u003eBioMed Research International\u003c/em\u003e, 2015, 835761. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/835761\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1155/2015/835761\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003edu Jardin, P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 3\u0026ndash;14. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFalaise, C., Francois, C., Travers, M.A., Morga, B., Haure, J., Tremblay, R., Turcotte, F., Pasetto, P., Gastineau, R., Hardivillier, Y., Leignel, V., \u0026amp; Mouget, J.L. (2016). Antimicrobial compounds from eukaryotic microalgae against human pathogens and diseases in aquaculture. Marine Drugs, 14, 159. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/md14090159\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/md14090159\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGitau, M.M., Farkas, A., \u0026Ouml;rd\u0026ouml;g, V., \u0026amp; Mar\u0026oacute;ti, G. (2022). Evaluation of the biostimulants effects of two Chlorophyta microalgae on tomato (\u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e). Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132689. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132689\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132689\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuiry, M.D. (2012). How many species of algae are there? Journal of Phycology, 48, 1057\u0026ndash;1063. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2021.01222.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1529-8817.2021.01222.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuiry, M.D., \u0026amp; Guiry, G.M. (2022). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.algaebase.org\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.algaebase.org\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. searched in June 2022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026uuml;nerken, E., D\u0026rsquo;Hondt, E., Eppink, M.H.M., Garcia-Gonzalez, L., Elst, K., \u0026amp; Wijffels, R.H. (2015). Cell disruption for microalgae biorefineries. Biotechnology Advances, 33, 243\u0026ndash;260. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.008\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaggag, W., Abd El-Aty, A., Mohamed, A.A. (2014). The potential effect of two Cyanobacterial species; \u003cem\u003eAnabaena sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eOscillatoria agardhii\u003c/em\u003e against grain storage fungi. European Scientific Journal, 10, 427\u0026ndash;443\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, J.D. (2006). Screening of Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) from rice paddy soil for antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology, 34, 138\u0026ndash;142. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps:/doi.org/10.4489/myco.2006.34.3.138\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4489/myco.2006.34.3.138\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, J., \u0026amp; Kim, J.D. (2008). Inhibitory effect of algal extracts on mycelial growth of the tomato-wilt pathogen, \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e f. sp. \u003cem\u003elycopersici\u003c/em\u003e. Mycobiology, 36, 242\u0026ndash;248. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4489/myco.2008.36.4.242\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4489/myco.2008.36.4.242\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, M.-J., Shim, C.-K., Ko, B.-G., \u0026amp; Kim, J. (2020). Effect of the microalga \u003cem\u003eChlorella fusca\u003c/em\u003e CHK0059 on strawberry PGPR and biological control of \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e wilt disease in non-pesticide hydroponic strawberry cultivation. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30, 708\u0026ndash;716. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2001.01015\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4014/jmb.2001.01015\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuznetsov, E.D., \u0026amp; Vladimirova, M.G. (1964). Iron as a factor limiting the growth of \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e on Tamiya medium. Soviet Plant Physiology, 11, 82\u0026ndash;89.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, S.Y., Cho, J.M., Chang, Y.K., \u0026amp; Oh, Y.K. (2017). Cell disruption and lipid extraction for microalgae biorefineries: a review. Bioresource Technology, 244, 1317\u0026ndash;1328. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.038\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.038\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMudimu, O., Rybalka, N., Bauersachs, T., Born, J., Friedl, T., \u0026amp; Schulz, R. (2014). Biotechnological screening of microalgal and cyanobacterial strains for biogas production and antibacterial and antifungal effects. Metabolites, 4, 373\u0026ndash;393. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4020373\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/metabo4020373\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurashige, T., \u0026amp; Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473\u0026ndash;497. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3053.1962.tb08052.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1399-3053.1962.tb08052.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNajdenski, H.M., Gigova, L.G., Iliev, I.I., Pilarski, P.S., Lukavsky, J., Tsvetkova, I.V., Ninova, M.S., \u0026amp; Kussovski, V.K. (2013). Antibacterial and antifungal activities of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48, 1533\u0026ndash;1540. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12122\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/ijfs.12122\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026Ouml;rd\u0026ouml;g, V. (1982). Apparatus for laboratory algal bioassay. \u003cem\u003eInternationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie\u003c/em\u003e, 61, 127\u0026ndash;136. ISBN: 0020-9309\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePawar, S.T., \u0026amp; Puranik, P.R. (2008). Screening of terrestrial and freshwater halotolerant cyanobacteria for antifungal activities. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 1019\u0026ndash;1025. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9565-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11274-007-9565-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePlaza, M., Santoyo, S., Jaime, L., Avalo, B., Cifuentes, A., Reglero, G., Garcia-Blairsy Reina, G., Se\u0026ntilde;or\u0026aacute;ns, F.J., \u0026amp; Ib\u0026aacute;\u0026ntilde;ez, E., (2012). Comprehensive characterization of the functional activities of pressurized liquid and ultrasound-assisted extracts from \u003cem\u003eChlorella vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eLWT \u0026ndash; Food Science and Technology\u003c/em\u003e, 46, 245\u0026ndash;253. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.lwt.2011.09.024\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePoveda, J. (2021). Cyanobacteria in plant health: biological strategy against abiotic and biotic stresses. Crop Protection, 141, 105450. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105450\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105450\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePrasanna, R., Nain, L., Tripathi, R., Gupta, V., Chaudhary, V., Middha, S., Joshi, M., Ancha, R., \u0026amp; Kaushik, B.D. (2008). Evaluation of fungicidal activity of extracellular filtrates of cyanobacteria \u0026ndash; possible role of hydrolytic enzymes. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 48, 186\u0026ndash;194. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200700199\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/jobm.200700199\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRighini, H., Baraldi, E., Fern\u0026aacute;ndez, Y.G., Quintana, A.M., \u0026amp; Roberti, R. (2019). Different antifungal activity of \u003cem\u003eAnabaena\u003c/em\u003e sp., \u003cem\u003eEcklonia\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eJania\u003c/em\u003e sp. against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eMarine Drugs\u003c/em\u003e, 17, 299. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/md17050299\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/md17050299\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRighini, H., Francioso, O., Di Foggia, M., Quintana, A.M., \u0026amp; Roberti, R. (2020). Preliminary study on the activity of phycobiliproteins against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. Marine Drugs, 18, 600. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/md18120600\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/md18120600\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRighini, H., Francioso, O., Quintana, A.M., \u0026amp; Roberti, R. (2022). Cyanobacteria: a natural source for controlling agricultural plant diseases caused by fungi and oomycetes and improving plant growth. Horticulturae, 8, 58. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010058\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/horticulturae8010058\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J.B., Herdman, M., \u0026amp; Stanier, R.Y. (1979). Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Journal of General Microbiology, 111, 1\u0026ndash;61. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-111-1-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/00221287-111-1-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantini, G., Rodolfi, L., Biondi, N., Sampietro, G., \u0026amp; Tredici, M. (2022 online). Effects of cyanobacterial-based biostimulants on plant growth and development: a case study of basil (\u003cem\u003eOcimum basilicum\u003c/em\u003e L.). \u003cem\u003eJournal of Applied Phycology\u003c/em\u003e, 34, 2063\u0026ndash;2073. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02781-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10811-022-02781-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eScaglioni, P.T., Pagnussatt, F.A., Lemos, A.C., Nicolli, C.P., Del Ponte, E.M., \u0026amp; Badiale-Furlong, E. (2019). \u003cem\u003eNannochloropsis\u003c/em\u003e sp. and \u003cem\u003eSpirulina\u003c/em\u003e sp. as a source of antifungal compounds to mitigate contamination by \u003cem\u003eFusarium graminearum\u003c/em\u003e species complex. Current Microbiology, 76, 930\u0026ndash;938. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/500284-019-01663-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/500284-019-01663-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchmid, B., Coelho, L., Schulze, P.S.C., Pereira, H., Santos, T., Maia, I.B., Reis, M., \u0026amp; Vaarela, J. (2022). Antifungal properties of aqueous microalgal extracts. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18, 11096. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101096\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101096\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShaima, A.F., Yasin, N.H.M., Ibrahim, N., Takriff, M.S., Gunasekaran, D., Ismaeel, M.Y.Y. (2022). Unveiling antimicrobial activity of microalgae \u003cem\u003eChlorella sorokiniana\u003c/em\u003e (UKM2), \u003cem\u003eChlorella\u003c/em\u003e sp. (UKM8) and \u003cem\u003eScenedesmus\u003c/em\u003e sp. (UKM9). Saudi Journal of Biological Science 29, 1043\u0026ndash;1052. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.069\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.069\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShishido, T.K., Jokela, J., Kolehmainen, C.T., Fewer, D.P., Wahlsten, M., Wang, H., Rouhiainen, L., Rizzi, E., De Bellis, G., Permi, P., \u0026amp; Sivonen, K. (2015). Antifungal activity improved by coproduction of cyclodextrins and anabaenolysins in Cyanobacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 13669\u0026ndash;13674. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"www.pnas.cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510432112\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStaub, R. (1961). Ern\u0026auml;hrungsphysiologisch-aut\u0026ouml;kologische untersuchungen an der planktischen Blaualge \u003cem\u003eOscillatoria rubescens\u003c/em\u003e DC. Schweizerische. Zeitschrift f\u0026uuml;r Hydrologie, 23, 82\u0026ndash;198. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000092335\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3929/ethz-a-000092335\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStirk, W.A., B\u0026aacute;lint, P., Vambe, M., Lov\u0026aacute;sz, C., Moln\u0026aacute;r, Z., van Staden, J., \u0026amp; \u0026Ouml;rd\u0026ouml;g, V. (2020). Effect of cell disruption methods on the extraction of bioactive metabolites from microalgal biomass. Journal of Biotechnology, 307, 35\u0026ndash;43. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotec.2019.10.012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biotec.2019.10.012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStirk, W.A., \u0026amp; van Staden, J. (2022) Bioprospecting for bioactive compounds in microalgae: Antimicrobial compounds. Biotechnology Advances, 59, 107977. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107977\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107977\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eToribio, A.J., Jurado, M.M., Su\u0026aacute;rez-Estrella, F., L\u0026oacute;pez, M.J., L\u0026oacute;pez-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez, J.A., \u0026amp; Moreno, J. (2021). Seed biopriming with cyanobacteroal extracts as an eco-friendly strategy to control damping off caused by \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e in seedbeds. Microbiological Research, 248, 126766. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126766\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2021.126766\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, S., \u0026amp; Wang, Y. (2018). What could promote farmers to replace chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers? Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 882\u0026ndash;890. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.222\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.222\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYuan, J., Zhao, M., Li Rong, L., Huang, Q., Rensing, C., \u0026amp; Shen, Q. (2017). Lipotides produced by \u003cem\u003eB. amyloliquefaciens\u003c/em\u003e NJN-6 altered the soil fungal community and non-ribosomal peptides genes harbouring microbial community. Applied Soil Ecology, 117\u0026ndash;118, 96\u0026ndash;105. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"phytoparasitica","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pypa","sideBox":"Learn more about [Phytoparasitica](http://link.springer.com/journal/12597)","snPcode":"12600","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12600/3","title":"Phytoparasitica","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Biofungicides, Chlorophyta, Cyanobacteria, Growth rates, Nostocales ","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMicroalgae produce many secondary metabolites that are biologically active, including compounds with antifungal activity. These could potentially function as biofungicides. Selection criteria for potential strains include having good antifungal activity against specific phytopathogenic fungi and high biomass productivity rates to ensure sufficient biomass can be generated. Water extracts were prepared from 280 strains comprising of 33 Cyanophyceae strains (13 genera), 157 Chlorophyceae strains (29 genera), 80 Trebouxiophyceae strains (19 genera), 5 Klebsormidiophyceae strains (1 genus) and 1 Zygnematophyceae strain. These were tested against 9 phytopathogenic fungi. In total, 45% of the species had antifungal activity against at least one fungal pathogen. Cyanobacteria had the highest \u0026ldquo;hit-rate\u0026rdquo; (64%), followed by the Chlorophyceae (49%) and Trebouxiophyceae (30%). Water extracts of 19 strains had fungicidal activity \u0026ndash; these were predominantly Cyanobacteria. The Cyanobacteria displayed a wider spectrum of activity with five strains being active (either fungicidal or fungistatic) against three or more fungal strains - \u003cem\u003eTrichormis variabilis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-304 and \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tennis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 had antifungal activity against 6 phytopathogens and \u003cem\u003eNostoc linckia\u003c/em\u003e MACC-612 inhibited 4 fungi. Each Chlorophyta strain was only active against 1\u0026ndash;2 fungal strains. However, the daily productivity rates of Cyanobacteria were significantly lower than Chlorophyta strains. Further investigation of 15 Nostocales species (Families Nostocaceae, Tolypothrichaceae and Calotrichaceae) showed the \u003cem\u003eNostoc\u003c/em\u003e species generally had significantly lower biomass generation compared to other Nostocacaeae strains. The most promising strain was \u003cem\u003eTolypothrix tenuis\u003c/em\u003e MACC-205 which had the most potent, broad spectrum antifungal activity as well as significantly higher daily biomass productivity rates. Some microalgae strains (8%) had a stimulatory effect, suggesting the potential to screen strains especially from the Klebsormidiophyceae, for stimulating activity of beneficial plant growth promoting fungi. Thus, Cyanobacteria can potentially be developed as effective agricultural tools for environmentally-friendly disease management.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Microalgae strains of the Mosonmagyaróvár Algal Culture Collection with activity against plant fungal pathogens","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-08-24 17:32:13","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1907982/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2022-09-27T12:29:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2022-09-09T10:34:01+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"93c5bbe2-c26d-4720-a504-de5b39327119","date":"2022-09-01T10:56:49+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2022-08-29T10:13:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2022-08-23T14:24:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2022-08-22T23:20:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Phytoparasitica","date":"2022-07-29T07:35:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"phytoparasitica","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pypa","sideBox":"Learn more about [Phytoparasitica](http://link.springer.com/journal/12597)","snPcode":"12600","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12600/3","title":"Phytoparasitica","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d776e153-2846-43ba-a403-56de84af2cbc","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 24th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-10-16T18:33:23+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-1907982","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01045-2","journal":{"identity":"phytoparasitica","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Phytoparasitica"},"publishedOn":"2023-01-18 18:23:18","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 18th, 2023"},"versionCreatedAt":"2022-08-24 17:32:13","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s12600-023-01045-2","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01045-2","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1907982","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1907982","identity":"rs-1907982","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.