The elusive abscopal effect after radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background The abscopal effect is a phenomenon where a tumor that is not the intended site of treatment also shrinks in response to therapy; and is one of the most coveted and rare effects of cancer therapies. Previous attempts to summarize literature on the abscopal effect have focused on specific disease sites or been done on a limited basis. We performed a comprehensive review of every publication and case report regarding the abscopal effect induced by radiotherapy from the 1950s to February 2023 to identify potential trends and patterns in its induction based on specific disease/ treatment site, radiation dose, and other factors. Methods Literature that described the abscopal effect was identified through search of online databases: Pubmed, Medline, and Google Scholar for all published articles from 1953 leading to February of 2023 that included the terms “Abscopal Effect” and “Radiation” or “Radiotherapy.” Demographics (patient and tumor characteristics), radiation and abscopal effect analysis, outcome and treatment analysis, and risk of bias were reported and summarized. Results A final total of 92 papers corresponding to 99 separate lesions or cases were included in the meta-analysis. The most common site of induction of the abscopal effect and of the target of the abscopal effect was the lung. One manuscript reported a nonstandard treatment protocol, the remainder of cases received radiation within reasonable treatment guidelines. The majority of manuscripts included most important information (cancer site, number of prior treatments, histopathology, outcome information, and dose). Conclusion Additional research is urgently needed to understand how and why some treatment regimes are able to induce the abscopal effect. For the time being, this remains a rare phenomenon.
Full text 3,307 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background The abscopal effect is a phenomenon where a tumor that is not the intended site of treatment also shrinks in response to therapy; and is one of the most coveted and rare effects of cancer therapies. Previous attempts to summarize literature on the abscopal effect have focused on specific disease sites or been done on a limited basis. We performed a comprehensive review of every publication and case report regarding the abscopal effect induced by radiotherapy from the 1950s to February 2023 to identify potential trends and patterns in its induction based on specific disease/ treatment site, radiation dose, and other factors.

Methods

Literature that described the abscopal effect was identified through search of online databases: Pubmed, Medline, and Google Scholar for all published articles from 1953 leading to February of 2023 that included the terms “Abscopal Effect” and “Radiation” or “Radiotherapy.” Demographics (patient and tumor characteristics), radiation and abscopal effect analysis, outcome and treatment analysis, and risk of bias were reported and summarized.

Results

A final total of 92 papers corresponding to 99 separate lesions or cases were included in the meta-analysis. The most common site of induction of the abscopal effect and of the target of the abscopal effect was the lung. One manuscript reported a nonstandard treatment protocol, the remainder of cases received radiation within reasonable treatment guidelines. The majority of manuscripts included most important information (cancer site, number of prior treatments, histopathology, outcome information, and dose).

Conclusion

Additional research is urgently needed to understand how and why some treatment regimes are able to induce the abscopal effect. For the time being, this remains a rare phenomenon. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes dprovenzano23{at}gwu.edu; loew{at}gwu.edu; shgoyal{at}mfa.gwu.edu; yrao{at}mfa.gwu.edu Data Availability All data produced are available online at citations listed within the article.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0