⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16
· read from full text
ⓘ
This study investigated how delay-period activity in the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) supports working memory robustness when dlPFC neuronal activity is directly perturbed. Monkeys implanted with multi-electrode arrays performed a memory-guided saccade task while researchers applied patterned microstimulation to different dlPFC electrodes, measuring effects on single-neuron delay activity and on task performance. Microstimulation altered spatial working memory-related signals in individual neurons, yet behavioral performance was largely unaffected; the authors attribute this to a dissociation between dlPFC population activity dimensions that evolve over time versus those with time-stable working memory signals, where perturbations had minimal impact. A caveat is that the main conclusions depend on analyzing population activity dimensions rather than asserting that all neural measures remain unchanged. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Delay period activity in the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been linked to the maintenance and control of sensory information in working memory. The stability of working memory related signals found in such delay period activity is believed to support robust memory-guided behavior during sensory perturbations, such as distractors. Here, we directly probed dlPFC’s delay period activity with a diverse set of activity perturbations, and measured their consequences on neural activity and behavior. We applied patterned microstimulation to the dlPFC of monkeys implanted with multi-electrode arrays by electrically stimulating different electrodes in the array while the monkeys performed a memory-guided saccade task. We found that the microstimulation perturbations affected spatial working memory-related signals in individual dlPFC neurons. However, task performance remained largely unaffected. These apparently contradictory observations could be understood by examining different dimensions of the dlPFC population activity. In dimensions where working memory related signals naturally evolved over time, microstimulation impacted neural activity. In contrast, in dimensions containing working memory related signals that were stable over time, microstimulation minimally impacted neural activity. This dissociation explained how working memory-related information could be stably maintained in dlPFC despite the activity changes induced by microstimulation. Thus, working memory processes are robust to a variety of activity perturbations in the dlPFC. Significance statement Memory-guided behavior is remarkably robust to sensory perturbations such as distractions. The dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is believed to underlie this robustness, given that it stably maintains working memory-related information in the presence of distractors. Here, we sought to understand the extent to which dlPFC circuits can robustly maintain working memory information during memory-guided behavior. We found that behavior was robust to microstimulation perturbations in dlPFC, and that working memory signals were stably maintained in dlPFC despite widespread changes in the neural activity caused by the perturbations. Our findings indicate that working memory is robust to direct activity perturbations in the dlPFC, an ability that may be due to the processes that mediate similar robustness in the face of distraction.
Full text
2,526 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Delay period activity in the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been linked to the maintenance and control of sensory information in working memory. The stability of working memory related signals found in such delay period activity is believed to support robust memory-guided behavior during sensory perturbations, such as distractors. Here, we directly probed dlPFC’s delay period activity with a diverse set of activity perturbations, and measured their consequences on neural activity and behavior. We applied patterned microstimulation to the dlPFC of monkeys implanted with multi-electrode arrays by electrically stimulating different electrodes in the array while the monkeys performed a memory-guided saccade task. We found that the microstimulation perturbations affected spatial working memory-related signals in individual dlPFC neurons. However, task performance remained largely unaffected. These apparently contradictory observations could be understood by examining different dimensions of the dlPFC population activity. In dimensions where working memory related signals naturally evolved over time, microstimulation impacted neural activity. In contrast, in dimensions containing working memory related signals that were stable over time, microstimulation minimally impacted neural activity. This dissociation explained how working memory-related information could be stably maintained in dlPFC despite the activity changes induced by microstimulation. Thus, working memory processes are robust to a variety of activity perturbations in the dlPFC.
Significance statement Memory-guided behavior is remarkably robust to sensory perturbations such as distractions. The dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is believed to underlie this robustness, given that it stably maintains working memory-related information in the presence of distractors. Here, we sought to understand the extent to which dlPFC circuits can robustly maintain working memory information during memory-guided behavior. We found that behavior was robust to microstimulation perturbations in dlPFC, and that working memory signals were stably maintained in dlPFC despite widespread changes in the neural activity caused by the perturbations. Our findings indicate that working memory is robust to direct activity perturbations in the dlPFC, an ability that may be due to the processes that mediate similar robustness in the face of distraction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.