Combined action of salicylic acid and silicon regulates osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzymes to improve drought tolerance and yield in dry-cultivated rice

Combined action of salicylic acid and silicon regulates osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzymes to improve drought tolerance and yield in dry-cultivated rice | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Combined action of salicylic acid and silicon regulates osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzymes to improve drought tolerance and yield in dry-cultivated rice Guan Wang, Yi Wang, Qianqian Liu, Xinru Shen, Anran Sun, Hao Jiang, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Salicylic acid (SA) and silicon (Si) protect against a variety of stresses. Our group found that Si improved the drought tolerance of dry-cultivated rice. No studies are available regarding the synergistic effect of aboveground SA spraying and belowground Si application on the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice, necessitating further research. Two rice types with different levels of drought resistance (Suijing18 and Hongke88) were selected for this study. The optimal SA concentration (1 mM/L) was determined via five different SA spraying treatments at various concentrations. Then SA and Si were combined, which included a Control, 45 kg/hm 2 Si, 1 mM SA, and 1 mM SA + 45 kg/hm 2 Si to examine their synergistic effect on the morphological characteristics, yield, osmotic regulatory substances, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes of two different drought-resistant rice cultivars. The results showed that combined SA + Si application increased the plant height, root length, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight of these two drought-resistant rice types. The yield of which increased by 80.70% and 77.26%, respectively. Compared with the control, while the photosynthetic capacity improved significantly, the minimum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) values increased by 30.97% and 19.17%, while the photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII) values were 29.01% and 29.64% higher, the NPQ values decreased by 67.55% and 39.98%, respectively. Moreover, treatment increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein levels, osmoregulatory capacity, antioxidant enzyme activity, and increased endogenous SA + Si content in the two dry-cultivated rice species. Hence, the combined application of SA and Si improves the drought resistance of dry-cultivated rice by increasing the content of osmoregulatory substances, enhancing the levels of endogenous SA and Si, upregulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and strengthening the photosynthetic capacity of the PSII system. This results in improved drought-resistant capability and increase of the accumulation of dry matter and yield of dry-cultivated rice, which produces a more significant alleviation of the adverse effects of drought stress compared to the application of either substance alone. Biological sciences/Plant sciences Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant breeding Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant hormones Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant physiology Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant stress responses Dry-cultivated rice Salicylic acid Silicon Osmotic regulator Antioxidant oxidase Chlorophyll fluorescence Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 1. Introduction The global rise in the incidence and severity of drought significantly constrains food production. It is critical to prioritize the development of drought-resistant crops to mitigate the negative impact of drought on agricultural yields as global populations increase and water resources are depleted. 1 Dry-cultivated rice has the potential to address the issues of labor and water resource shortages while ensuring the sustainable cultivation of rice. As an efficient, resource-saving, mechanized, climate-smart, and economically viable strategy 2 , it is becoming an alternative to irrigated rice cultivation. 3 However, the drought tolerance of dry rice must be improved to increase yields. Plants are especially susceptible to drought during the reproductive stage. In cereal crops, particularly rice, this stage is highly sensitive to water restrictions. 4 The reduced rice grain yield during this stage in drought conditions is associated with changes in the metabolism and redox state of its apical leaves. 5 The drought-induced decrease in carbon assimilation enhances the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in leaf cells. 6 Excess ROS accumulation can decrease grain yield and leaf senescence due to photosynthetic pigment degradation. 7 The typical positive correlation between photosynthesis and crop production significantly affects the growth and development of rice and reduces yield. 8 Salicylic acid (SA) accumulation was found to play a role in the defense signaling and regulation of cell death. 9 SA is an endogenous small-molecule phenolic compound that acts as a signaling sensor to regulate plant responses. It protects plant cells from ion accumulation toxicity and cell death by managing processes such as antioxidant defense, nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, and water stress. 10 Pretreating rice roots with SA promotes root growth, reduces ROS levels and membrane damage, and increases superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) activity, as well as glutathione (GSH) and chlorophyll content, while reducing MDA levels. 11 Exogenous SA application alleviates oxidative stress in drought-stressed plants by modulating important enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways. 12 In addition, the involvement of SA in glycolytic/TCA cycling, starch and sucrose metabolism, and antioxidant pathways reverses the rice yield and grain weight caused by soil drought. 13 SA can also increase the photosynthetic capacity of plants. 14 Studies have shown that exogenous SA application increases the rate of photosynthesis in sweet potatoes and reduces drought damage. 15 Exogenous SA spraying also significantly elevates the PSI and ETR levels in T. ciliata , which increases the electron transfer and recovery rates of PSII reaction center activity, ultimately enhancing photosynthesis. 16 Silicon (Si), the second most important element in soil, typically accumulates in rice at significantly higher levels than nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. 17 Si improves the resistance of plants to various abiotic stresses by regulating the synthesis and accumulation of endogenous hormones. During abiotic stress-induced adversity, Si helps to control multiple plant metabolic processes, including osmotic stress generation and ROS regulation, via the antioxidant defense system. 18 Si also promotes plant growth by increasing the photosynthetic rate and nutrient uptake, improving plant defense responses, and enhancing tolerance to a range of stresses. 19 Furthermore, Si can increase rice spike formation and grouting rates to enhance rice yields. 20 Since the large consumption of freshwater resources constrains sustainable agricultural development, dry-cultivated rice provides a viable alternative to reduce water utilization during cultivation. Therefore, current research focuses on improving dry-cultivated rice yields. Although both SA and Si can protect plants from biotic and abiotic stresses, minimal studies are available regarding the effect of applying these substances simultaneously to improve the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice. Our research team has previously demonstrated that moderate amounts of Si fertilizer can improve the yield and quality of dry-cultivated rice by regulating source supply capacity and seed starch synthesis. 21 The present study focuses on the impact of combined exogenous SA and Si application on the morphological characteristics, yield, chlorophyll fluorescence, antioxidant enzyme activity, and Si and SA content in dry-cultivated rice. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Plant materials and treatments This study used two high-quality dry-cultivated rice varieties from Jilin Province, namely China-Suijing18 with strong drought resistance and Hongke88 with weak drought resistance. A pot experiment was conducted in 2022–2023 at Jilin Green and High Quality Japonica Rice Engineering Research Center. The soil contained a moderate level of Si at 113.46 mg kg − 1 , an organic carbon content of 9.60 g kg − 1 , an alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content 33.89 mg kg − 1 , an available potassium content of 137.09 mg kg − 1 , an available phosphorus content of 29.42 mg kg − 1 , and a pH value of 6.70. An experiment was conducted in 2022 using small three-holed basins of 14 cm high and 15 cm in diameter, with each hole containing five rice grains. Different SA concentrations (0 mM/L, 0.01 mM/L, 0.5 mM/L, 1 mM/L, 1.5 mM/L, and 2 mM/L) were sprayed onto the leaf surfaces of the rice seedlings during the three-leaf single-phase stage. Measurements were recorded at 3h, 6h, 9h, 12h, 24h, 36h, and 72h. The leaves were only sprayed until moist but not dripping. Then, the changes in the samples were monitored and recorded to determine the optimal SA concentration. The experiment used a fully randomized design with five replicates. In 2023, large basins with heights of 22 cm and diameters of 30 cm were used for rice cultivation. Each basin had three holes, with each hole containing eight rice grains. A random block design was adopted, and each treatment was repeated five times while the growth period was mainly rainfed. The experiment used 75 kg/hm 2 phosphate fertilizer (calcium superphosphate, P 2 O 5 12%) (equivalent to P 2 O 5 ) and potassium fertilizer (potassium chloride, K 2 O 60%) (equivalent to K 2 O), as well as 160 kg/hm 2 nitrogen fertilizer (urea, pure N 46%) (equivalent to pure N). Biolli Russian mineral Si fertilizer was added at an effective level of ≥ 72% and an application amount of 45 kg/hm 2 , while the optimal SA concentration determined in the 2022 experiment was sprayed during the booting stage. Diseases, pests, and grasses were strictly controlled to prevent production loss. The two dry-cultivated rice varieties were divided into four treatment groups: control group, 45 kg/hm 2 Si, 1 mM SA, and 1 mM SA + 45 kg/hm 2 Si. The Suijing18 strain was represented by S1, S2, S3, and S4, while the Hongke88 cultivar was represented by P1, P2, P3, and P4. The experiment used a fully randomized design with five replicates. 2.2 Assessment of the growth and yield parameters Five plants were sampled from each plot at the maturity stage to determine dry matter accumulation. The samples were deoxidized in an oven at 105℃ for 30 min and dried to a constant weight at 80℃, after which the samples were weighed. The dry matter weight was determined using the 1% balance method. The root length measurements were repeated three times for each treatment. Three pots of rice were carefully washed with tap water and then rinsed with pure water. The roots were straightened, and the distance from the root base to the tip was measured using a ruler. The plant height was determined using a tape measure. The distance from the base of the rice plant to the top leaf was measured and averaged. The effective panicle number of each point was measured in each pot at the maturity stage. Five plants with the same average panicle number were selected for seed testing after drying. Furthermore, the total number of grains per spike, the number of solid grains, the 1000-grain weight, and the seed setting rate were determined. After harvesting and drying, the rice quality and water content were measured, and the rice yield was calculated according to a standard water content of 13.5%. 2.3 Chlorophyll fluorescence assay Three plants showing uniform flag leaf growth were selected for each treatment. Following a 24-h spray application of SA treatment, a portable chlorophyll fluorescence analyzer (PAM-2500, Shanghai, China) was used to determine the fluorescence parameters of each labeled pot leaf in the dark from 20:00 to 23:00 on the night before the measurement date. The fluorescence parameters were determined in natural light from 9:00 to 12:00 the next day. The fluorescence indexes included the maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), the photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII), the non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ), and the photochemical quenching coefficient (qP). 2.4 Determination of the soluble sugar and soluble protein content Si, SA, and SA + Si were sprayed during the booting stage, and leaf samples were collected for testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10d, respectively. Next, 0.1 g of the crushed, sifted dried plant samples were weighed into a 2 mL EP tube, after which 80 µL of 80% ethanol was added. The samples were sealed and boiled in a water bath at 80℃ for 30 min. The soluble sugar content of the collected materials was determined using the anthranone sulfate colorimetric method. Next, after Si, SA, and SA + Si spray treatment during the booting stage and leaf-sample testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10d, respectively, 0.1 g was weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground into a powder, and thoroughly mixed after adding 1 mL of TBS. The mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm and 4℃ for 5 min, after which the supernatant was collected as the total soluble protein extract. A Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad) was used to determine the protein concentration, with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The total soluble protein content in one sample was calculated according to the protein concentration and protein extract volume. The average value of the three seedlings in each experiment was determined. 22 2.5 Determination of the antioxidant enzyme activity All the chemical and enzyme reagents used to determine the grain enzyme activity were obtained from Solarbio Chemical Company. Here, 5 mL of 50 mM HEPES buffer (PH7.8, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ASA, 1 mm GSH, 5 mM MgCl 2 , and 1mM DTT were added to a 0.5 g of the leaves. The sample was ground, extracted in an ice bath, homogenized at 4℃, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min, after which the supernatant was collected for analysis to determine the activity of the various enzymes. The SOD activity was determined using a reaction system consisting of 1.5 mL of 0.05 M pH 7.8 HEPES buffer, 0.3 mL of 130 mM methionine, 0.3 mL of 750 mM nitro blue tetrazole, 0.3 mL of 100 µM EDTA, and 0.3 mL of 60 µM riboflavin. Buffer was used as a blank control instead of an enzyme solution. After irradiation at 25℃ and 4,000 lx for 15 min, the blank color changed from yellow to blue. The reaction was terminated immediately in dark conditions, after which the OD 560 absorption value was determined immediately. The mixture for determining the POD consisted of 1 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.95 mL of 0.2% guaiacol, 1 mL of 0.3% H 2 O 2, and 0.05 mL of the enzyme extract. The absorbance was determined at 470 nm for 90 s with an interval of 30 s. One unit of the POD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused the decomposition of 1 mg of the substrate at 470 nm. 23 The ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) activity was determined using an ELISA kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The CAT activity was measured at 25℃ using a reaction system consisting of 1.9 mL of 50 mM pH 7.0 HEPES phosphate buffer, 1 mL of 22 mM H 2 O 2 , and 0.1 mL of the enzyme solution. The OD 240 kinetic change was determined at an interval of 1 min. 24 2.6 Determination of the Si and SA content in the dry-cultivated rice Here, 0.1 g of the plant sample was placed in a heating tube, after which 3 mL nitric acid and 1 mL hydrofluoric acid were added. This was followed by a three-stage heating digestion procedure. Stage 1: The temperature was increased to 120℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 5 min. Stage 2: The temperature was increased to 160℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 5 min. Stage 3: Temperature was increased at 180℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 25 min. The heating tube was placed in a graphite acid drive meter, and the temperature was set at 160℃ for the acid drive. Once the heating tube started emitting yellow smoke followed by white smoke, the solution was considered fully acidified when it reached 1–2 mL and was removed after cooling to room temperature. The acid-treated sample was washed 2–3 times and transferred to a 100 mL volumetric bottle for measurement. The Si content in the solution was determined via ICP (ICP1000II, US), while the SA level was measured using an ELISA kit (Boyan, Nanjing, China). 2.7 Statistical analysis Microsoft Excel 2021 was used for data sorting and processing, while GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 and the ChiPlot online tool were used for plotting. The IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software was used for statistical analysis, and the significance level of each statistical test was expressed as 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05 = *, 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01 = **, 0.0001p < 0.001 = ** *. 3. Results 3.1 The effect of different SA concentrations on the growth of the dry-cultivated rice seedlings SA concentrations of 0 mM/L, 0.01 mM/L, 0.5 mM/L, 1 mM/L, 1.5 mM/L, and 2 mM/L were used for this assessment. After treatment, the SOD activity in the leaves of the two rice seedling cultivars reached the highest level at an SA concentration of 1 mM/L after 24 h. The Suijing18 samples in different treatment groups were compared with the control group. The SOD activity increased by 8.45%, 2.41%, 12.25%, 6.59%, and 8.91%, respectively, while the POD activity was 45.53%, 1.25%, 59.44%, 32.08%, and 17.24% higher. CAT activity rose by 22.03%, 12.04%, 28.94%, 28.51%, and 15.66%, respectively, while the GR activity reached a maximum level at an SA concentration of 1 mM, denoting a 223.29% increase. The APX activity increased by 18.37%, 215.46%, 451.61%, 327.41%, and 240.53%, respectively. These results indicated that the activity of five antioxidant enzymes reached the highest value at an SA concentration of 1 mM (Fig. 1 a). Next, the Hongke88 samples in the different treatment groups were compared to the control group. The SOD activity increased by 2.89%, 1.71%, 13.53%, 3.61%, and 9,21%, respectively, while the POD activity was 22.29%, 17.12%, 33.87%, 13.98%, and 21.51% higher. The CAT activity rose by 15.55%, 11.82%, 18.41%, 6.80%, and 15.83%, respectively, while GR activity increased by 221.57%, 193.80%, 518.30%, 163.11%, and 19.86%. The APX activity was 134.77%, 198.30%, 367.11%, 11.94%, and 240.66% higher (Fig. 1 c). Finally, the concentration of sprayed SA sprayed was determined as 1 mM for subsequent experiments. The SA concentration was determined, and the activity of five antioxidant enzymes was measured at 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 72 h after spraying. The activity of the five enzymes reached maximum levels after 24 h. The Suijing18 and Hongke88 samples displayed maximum SOD activity levels of 857.14 U/g and 826.51 U/g, respectively, which was significantly higher than in the control group. Furthermore, the two varieties exhibited maximum POD activity levels of 140.48 U/g and 124.05 U/g, maximum CAT activity values of 1.23 U/g and 1.14 U/g, and respective maximum APX levels of 4.56 U/g and 4.95 U/g (Figs. 1 b and 1 d). Moreover, the SA content in two dry-cultivated rice varieties was determined at different concentrations and times. The results indicated that the concentration was 1.0mM and the time was 24h, the SA content reached maximum values of 2819.73 U/g and 2881.95 U/g in the Suijing18 and Hongke88, respectively, at 24 h and an SA concentration of 1 mM (Figs. 1 e and 1 f). Therefore, an external SA spraying concentration of 1 mM and a determination time of 24 h were used in the subsequent experiment. 3.2 The Growth and Biomass of Dry-cultivated Rice The two dry-cultivated rice varieties yielded similar growth index values at different treatments. Compared with the control group, exogenous Si, SA, and SA + Si application increased the plant height, root length, aboveground dry weight, and underground dry weight of the rice samples (Table 1 ). Compared with the S1 treatment group, the heights of the plant samples in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased by 15.76%, 14.37%, and 17.76% higher, the root lengths by 43.76%, 28.53%, and 51.86%, the above-ground dry weights by 34.20%, 24.18%, and 40%, and the underground dry weights by 42.52%, 19.02%, and 48.93%, respectively. The S4 group showed the most significant increase (Fig. 2 a). Compared with the P1 treatment group, the heights of the plants in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups increased by 15.96%, 14.76%, and 20.19%, the root lengths by 51.59%, 37.10%, and 57.70%, the above-ground dry weights by 30.92%, 24.02%, and 39.06%, and the underground dry weights by 41.96%, 20.51%, and 53.38% respectively. The most significant increase was evident in the P4 treatment group (Fig. 2 b). The Suijing18 dry-cultivated cultivar exhibited higher drought tolerance than Hongke88. Exogenous SA + Si spraying increased the Hongke88 plant height, root length, and underground dry weight by 2.43%, 5.9%, and 4.45%, respectively, which exceeded the values of the Suijing18 samples. Therefore, compared with individual exogenous Si and SA spraying, combined SA + Si application showed a better effect on the dry-cultivated rice, especially on the cultivar with weak drought resistance. Table 1 Effects of exogenous salicylic acid and silicon on the growth of drought cultivation rice. Variety Treatment Above ground dry weight(g) Underground dry weight(g) Plant height(cm) Root length(cm) Suijing18 S1 40.15 ± 1.23d 4.68 ± 0.32d 82.67 ± 3.62c 30.85 ± 2.35c S2 53.88 ± 4.32ab 6.67 ± 0.65a 95.70 ± 4.53ab 44.35 ± 3.56ab S3 49.86 ± 2.32bc 5.57 ± 0.45bc 94.55 ± 5.23ab 39.65 ± 2.38b S4 56.21 ± 2.64a 6.97 ± 0.44a 97.35 ± 2.54a 46.85 ± 2.36a Hongke88 P1 38.68 ± 3.65d 4.29 ± 0.56d 78.95 ± 4.44d 27.68 ± 5.36c P2 50.64 ± 2.68b 6.09 ± 0.14b 91.55 ± 5.64ab 41.96 ± 4.23ab P3 47.97 ± 2.68c 5.17 ± 0.23c 90.60 ± 4.12b 37.95 ± 4.34b P4 53.79 ± 1.68ab 6.58 ± 0.54a 94.89 ± 4.45ab 43.65 ± 1.25ab Mean values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (T- test, p < 0.05). The data represent the means of five replicates ± the standard error (n = 5). Suijing18 groups: S1 = control, S2 = 45kg/hm 2 Si, S3 = 1 mM SA, S4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm 2 Si; Hongke88 groups༚P1 = control, P2 = 45kg/hm 2 Si, P3 = 1 mM SA, P4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm 2 Si; The sample was detected 10 days after spraying SA at booting stage. 3.3 The Agro-Morphology and Yield of the Dry-cultivated Rice Combined SA + Si application most significantly increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield of the Suijing18 samples. The single-hole panicle number in S4 increased by 17.55% compared with S1, while the grain number per panicle increased by 26.92%. The 1000-grain weight in S4 increased by 2.1% compared with S1, while the setting rate was 15% higher. The output of S2, S3, and S4 increased by 62.34%, 53.48%, and 80.70% respectively (Table 2 ). The single-hole panicle number in the Hongke88 P4 sample increased by 29.27% compared with P1, while the number of grains per panicle increased by 22.59%. The 1000-grain weight of P4 increased by 10% compared with P1, while the setting rate was 1.19% lower. Compared with the P1 treatment, the yield of the P2, P3, and P4 treatments increased by 14.89%, 61.04%, and 77.26%, respectively. Compared with the P1 treatment, P4 significantly increased the number of single-hole panicles, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, and yield of the rice samples (Table 2 ). Due to the weak drought resistance of Hongke88 and the strong drought resistance of Suijing18, the S1 yield was 40.5% higher than P1, while the P4 yield was 5.46% higher than S1 after combined SA + Si application. Table 2 Effect of exogenous salicylic acid and silicon on yield and its components in drought cultivation rice. Variety Treatm-ent Panicles per hill Spikelets perpanicle 1000-grain weight (g) Seeed-setting rate (%) Yield (g/hill) Suijing18 S1 13.33 ± 1.12b 60.67 ± 14.26b 21.59 ± 2.13a 0.78 ± 0.20b 12.64 ± 2.15c S2 13.00 ± 1.00b 75.44 ± 8.88a 22.72 ± 0.86a 0.92 ± 0.02a 20.52 ± 3.78ab S3 15.00 ± 2.29a 66.78 ± 13.05ab 23.22 ± 1.64a 0.86 ± 0.10ab 19.40 ± 2.67b S4 15.67 ± 0.69a 77.00 ± 11.42a 22.04 ± 1.24a 0.85 ± 0.13ab 22.84 ± 1.11a Hongke88 P1 9.67 ± 1.00b 50.78 ± 1.31b 20.01 ± 1.32b 0.84 ± 0.02a 7.52 ± 2.30b P2 10.00 ± 0.89b 61.67 ± 5.92a 17.55 ± 0.68c 0.80 ± 0.03b 8.64 ± 1.89b P3 14.33 ± 0.50a 62.50 ± 5.74a 20.40 ± 0.53b 0.69 ± 0.04c 12.11 ± 0.57a P4 12.50 ± 0.55ab 62.25 ± 5.38a 22.01 ± 0.99a 0.83 ± 0.05ab 13.33 ± 0.26a S1 = control, S2 = 45kg/hm 2 Si, S3 = 1 mM SA, S4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm 2 Si ; P1 = control, P2 = 45kg/hm 2 Si, P3 = 1 mM SA, P4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm 2 Si.The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 5) and the error bar indicates the standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s test). 3.4 The effect of combined SA + Si application on the chlorophyll fluorescence in the dry-cultivated rice Chlorophyll fluorescence provides the most accurate response to the photosynthetic capacity, photosynthetic efficiency, and degree of environmental stress on plant leaves. The photosynthetic capacity and efficiency within dry-cultivated rice are low, but exogenous spraying of SA + Si can effectively reverse this unfavorable effect. Combined SA, Si, and SA + Si application restored the Fv/Fm values of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties to 0.7–0.85. This significantly improved the maximum PSII photochemical efficiency and enhanced the photosynthetic capacity of the rice cultivars, with SA + Si achieving the highest success. The Fv/Fm values of Suijing 18 S2, S3, and S4 increased by 14.71%, 28.33%, and 30.97%, respectively, compared to treatment S1, while the Fv/Fm values of Hongke 88 P2, P3, and P4 increased by 11.69%, 12.08%, and 19.17%, respectively, compared to P1 (Fig. 3 a).The control groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties displayed low actual ΦPSII values and high NPQ values, which represented the response of the dry-cultivated rice to drought stress. However, the actual ΦPSII value increased after exogenous SA, Si, and SA + Si spraying. Compared with S1, the value in S4 increased by 29.01%, while that of P4 was 29.64% higher than P1 (Fig. 3 b). Furthermore, the NPQ decreased after treatment. The value of S4 was 67.55% lower than S1, while that of P4 decreased by 36.98% compared with P1 (Fig. 3 c). qP reflects the proportion of open PSII reaction centers, which is highly correlated with ΦPSII. The Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 groups displayed lower values than S1, while those of the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 increased slightly compared with P1 (Fig. 3 d). These results may be due to the variation in sensitivity to drought in the different dry-cultivated varieties. 3.5 Soluble Sugar and Soluble protein content The presence of soluble sugar can improve the water absorption and retention capacity of plants and enhance the potential of cells to maintain water without interfering with normal metabolism, consequently improving the drought resistance of rice. Si, SA, and SA + Si were sprayed during the boot stage for sampling and testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, respectively. After SA + Si treatment, the soluble sugar content in the Suijing18 samples increased by 14.25% at 2 h and 10.72% at 10 d, respectively, compared with the control group, and decreased slightly at 24 h (Fig. 4 a). However, a significant increase was evident in the Hongke88 samples. After SA + Si spraying, the soluble sugar levels began to increase after 24 h, which were 4.36%, 36.54%, and 32.22% higher in P2, P3, and P4, respectively, increasing to 26.5%, 52.63% and 61.58% after 10 d (Fig. 4 b). After spraying, the soluble protein content in the Suijing18 samples rose substantially after 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The S2, S3, and S4 groups showed 27.96%, 15.35%, and 21.24% higher levels at 2 h, which increased to 30.11%, 17.47%, and 27.82% after 24 h, and 52.2%, 19.18%, and 17.42% after 10 d (Fig. 4 c). SA + Si spraying elevated the soluble protein levels in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 by 24.91%, 21.27%, and 30.91%, respectively, after 24 h, while these values were 27.49%, 18.23%, and 45.28% after 10 d (Fig. 4 d). The SA + Si treatment groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties were horizontally compared. The results indicated that the soluble protein and soluble sugar levels were significantly higher in the Hongke88 samples than in Suijing18 at 24 h and 10 d. Therefore, combined SA + Si application substantially increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in the dry-cultivated rice, consequently improving its drought resistance. 3.6 The effect of combined SA + Si application on the antioxidant enzyme activity in the dry-cultivated rice The two dry-cultivated rice varieties were sprayed during the booting stage and included the Control, Si, SA, and SA + Si treatment groups. The samples were monitored and assessed at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The results showed that the SOD activity in the dry-cultivated rice samples were higher than in the control group at 24 h after Si, SA, and SA + Si spraying. This rise was more significant in the Suijing18 samples. S2, S3, and S4 were 36.35%, 42.74%, and 50.71%, respectively higher than S1 (Fig. 5 a). Furthermore, P2, P3, and P4 were 3.59%, 20.31%, and 48.37%, respectively, higher than P1 (Fig. 5 b). After 10 d of spraying, the detection trend was consistent with that at 24 h, indicating that exogenous SA + Si spraying optimally affected SOD activity at 24 h. The POD activity in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups of Suijing18 was significantly higher than in S1 during the same period, showing a trend of S4 > S3 > S2 > S1 at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. At 24 h, the POD activity in the S2, S3, and S4 increased by 19.49%, 85.67%, and 114.33%, respectively, compared with S1 (Fig. 5 c). The POD activity changes in the Hongke88 samples were consistent with those in Suijing18. At 24 h, the POD activity in P2, P3, and P4 increased by 20.79%, 23.64%, and 36.14%, respectively, compared with P1 (Fig. 5 d). These results indicated that SA + Si treatment improved the antioxidant capacity of dry-cultivated rice by enhancing POD activity, and alleviated the damage caused by drought stress. After Suijing18 sample treatment for 2 h, CAT activity trend was S2 > S4 > S3 > S1 after 2 h and S4 > S3 > S2 > S1 after 24 h and 10 d. Compared with S1, the CAT activity in S2, S3, and S4 increased by 11.93%, 21.62%, and 28.32%, respectively, after 24 h (Fig. 5 e). The Hongke88 treatment groups yielded different results. After 2 h, the CAT activity was higher in P2, P3, and P4 than in P1, with P3 displaying the highest level of 200.30%. After 24 h, the P2 group exhibited the highest CAT activity at 107.76%, while the highest level was evident in the P4 group at 10 d, increasing by 6.33% (Fig. 5 f). The APX activity was higher in all the treatment groups at different detection times than in the control group. Drought stress usually induces H 2 O 2 accumulation in rice. Higher APX activity can accelerate H 2 O 2 removal and maintain the redox balance in cells, consequently improving the drought resistance of rice. At 24 h, the APX activity in S2, S3, and S4 increased by 40.90%, 64.84%, and 104.49%, respectively, compared with S1 (Fig. 5 g), while this value was 40.90%, 64.84%, and 104.49% higher in P2, P3, and P4 than in P1 (Fig. 5 h). GR forms part of the antioxidant defense system and increases the drought resistance of rice at higher levels. The GR activity in the Suijing18 samples showed an order of S4 > S3 > S2 > S1 at 2 h and 10 d. At 24 h, this content was significantly higher in S4 and S2 than S1. At 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, the respective GR levels in S4 increased by 55.00%, 18.18%, and 49.06% compared with S1 (Fig. 5 i). The GR activity in Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups was higher than in P1. The four treatments showed an increasing trend of P4 > P3 > P2 > P1 during the same period. At 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, the GR activity in P4 increased by 17.02%, 21.99%, and 70.43%, respectively, compared with P1 (Fig. 5 j). 3.7 The effect of combined SA + Si application on the endogenous Si and SA content in the dry-cultivated rice The Si content in the stems, leaves, and ears of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties were determined during the booting stage. The Si levels in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased compared to S1, while these values were also higher in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 groups than in P1. The Si content in the stems, leaves, and ears of the two dry-cultivated rice cultivars was the highest after exogenous SA + Si spraying (Fig. 6 a). However, differences were evident between the Si content in different treatment groups. Compared with S1, the Si content in S2, S3, and S4 in the stems increased by 158.97%, 496.42%, and 385.82%, respectively, while these values increased by 66.04%, 182.68%, and 218.05% in the leaves. Si content in S2, S3, and S4 in the ear increased by 160.72%, 570.51% and 542.8% (Fig. 6 b). Compared with P1, the Si content in the P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups increased by 77.73%, 70.01%, and 516.22% in the stems, 65.21%, 56.67%, and 351.66% in the leaves, and 54.95%, 45.10%, and 371.15% in the panicles (Fig. 6 c). In addition, the SA content in the different treatment groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties was recorded at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The results indicated that the SA levels in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased by 6.64%, 25.78%, and 42.02%, respectively, compared to S1 at 2 h. At 24 h, these levels in the S2, S3, and S4 groups increased by 8.90%, 22.70%, and 45.01%, respectively, compared with S1, and were 9.67% and 27.70% higher at 10d in the S3 and S4 groups. The SA content in the S2 group was lower than in S1 (Fig. 6 d). At 2 h, the SA content in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 groups were 1.54%, 24.60%, and 29.98% higher than in P1. At 24 h, these values were 10.22% and 33.26% higher in the P3 and P4 groups than in P1. At 10 d, the SA content in the P3 and P4 groups increased by 16.74% and 29.21% compared with P1, respectively, while this value was lower in the P2 group at 24 h and 10 d than in P1 (Fig. 6 e). 4. Discussion Rice has different mechanisms to cope with drought, such as the activation of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems and the accumulation of compatible osmolytes. 25 Drought stress affects rice osmoregulators such as soluble sugars, which are key osmoprotectors in plants. Osmoregulators maintain and protect plant macromolecules and structures from stress damage and increase their tolerance to drought stress. 26 Drought hinders carbon fixation into sugars via photosynthesis and affects their transport by decreasing the cellular osmotic potential, reprogramming the cellular and subcellular sugar distribution. 27 In addition, drought tolerance in crops is associated with higher protein content, and the concentration of soluble proteins depends on the nature of the plant species and the type of tissue under water stress. 28 Studies have shown that soluble sugar and soluble protein accumulation in rice enhances its drought tolerance adaptation. 29 Therefore, increasing osmoregulatory substance accumulation in rice is essential to enhance its drought tolerance and has attracted significant research attention. The exogenous application of natural endogenous, bioactive compounds (e.g., SA) may be an alternative approach to increase crop productivity. 30 SA is considered as an environmentally friendly and suitable chemical regulator. 31 The use of SA in drought-stressed plants improves of osmoregulator functionality in plants. 32 Our previous research showed that Si maintained normal physiological and biochemical metabolism in rice in drought conditions by regulating soluble sugars, which increased the cytoplasmic concentration and decreased its osmotic potential. This helped to maintain water uptake and cellular expansion, which ensured sustained rice growth in drought conditions and enhanced its adaptability. 33 Considering the foundation of the previous work, the current study used combined SA + Si application to enhance the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice both above and below the ground. Lawan Gana et al. found that individual SA and Si application increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein accumulation in rice seedlings. 34 AliSu Yang et al. revealed that the synergistic effect of SA and Si enhanced the accumulation of soluble sugars and soluble proteins, consequently reducing chromium toxicity in rice. 35 In the current study, the combined application of SA + Si significantly increased the soluble sugar content in the Suijing18 and Hongke88 rice cultivars (Figs. 4 a and 4 b). The soluble sugar content in Suijing18 samples increased by 14.25% at 2 h compared to the control, while the soluble sugar content displayed an initial decline at 24 h, followed by a rise at 10 d, increasing by 10.72% compared to the control (Fig. 4 a). Although the soluble sugar content was low in the Hongke88 samples at 2 h, it increased by 32.22% at 24 h and 61.58% at 10 d compared with the control (Fig. 4 b). The soluble protein levels were higher in both the Suijing18 and Hongke88 treatment groups than in the control (Figs. 4 c and 4 d) after exogenous SA + Si spraying. The Hongke88 variety displays weak drought-resistance while the Suijing18 cultivar exhibits strong tolerance to drought. After exogenous SA + Si spraying, the Hongke88 samples displayed higher soluble sugar and soluble protein levels than the Suijng18 groups at the same detection times and exogenous spraying concentrations. This study demonstrated for the first time that exogenous SA + Si significantly increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in dry-cultivated rice, consequently enhancing its drought resistance. This treatment was more effective in the dry-cultivated rice showing weak drought tolerance. A strong root system facilitates the uptake of water and nutrients from the soil by the crop and promotes its growth. 36 When rice suffers from drought stress, the root system first senses the lack of water in the external environment via changes in water potential, osmotic pressure, and other physical properties, which restricts root system growth. 37 The present study showed that exogenous SA + Si significantly increased the root length, plant height, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight of two dry-cultivated rice cultivars. Moreover, combined SA + Si application was more effective than these substances alone (Table 1 and Fig. 2 ) to increase in the root size and drought tolerance of the rice plants, resulting in higher yields. 38 The yield of the Suijing18 S4 group was 80.70% higher than S1, while the yield of the Hongke88 P4 group was 77.26% higher than P1 (Table 2 ), which were consistent with the results of previous studies. Drought triggers multiple morphological, physiological, and metabolic changes in plants, 8 stimulating the production of ROS. To counteract the effect of ROS, rice plants develop antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, CAT, APX, and GR, which scavenge stress factors such as salinity, drought, and extreme-temperature excess ROS. 39 SOD is the main line of defense against drought-induced oxidative stress 8 while the superoxide (O 2 ⦁− ) produced by the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) or RBOH is converted to H 2 O by SOD. 40 CAT is a key enzymes in the biological defense system during the biological evolution process. It reduces H 2 O 2 overproduction during oxidative stress by converting H 2 O 2 to H 2 O and O 2 , while playing a vital role in plant defense and stress response, delaying plant senescence, and regulating plant cell redox balance. 41 The ascorbate-GSH pathway represents the main HO 22 detoxification system in plant cells, in which APX is an effective ROS regulator since it contributes the most to H 2 O 2 detoxification, utilizing ascorbic acid as an electron donor to convert H 2 O 2 to water. 42 43 GR is a highly conserved enzyme that combines NADPH oxidation and GSH disulfide (GSSG) reduction to decrease GSH, consequently eliminating excessive ROS. 44 Studies have shown that enhancing the activities of ROS-scavenging enzymes such as POD, CAT, APX, GPX, and GR in rice can regulate its drought tolerance. 45 Exogenous SA application induces SA-binding protein 2 gene overexpression, which plays a positive role in regulating the expression of antioxidant enzyme-related genes and activities in tobacco plants, Foliar sprays with appropriate SA concentrations increases the SOD levels and POD activities in leaves, protecting the photosynthesis process. 15 The combined application of SA and Si to the aboveground section of Scrophularia striata L. improves its response to drought stress by reducing the MDA and H 2 O 2 content. 46 In this study, the combined SA + Si application significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzymes in the two dry-cultivated rice species (Fig. 5 ), effectively improving their antioxidant capacity and drought tolerance. 45 In addition, exogenous SA application restored the chlorophyll content and CAT activity in the rice, and further increased the activity of other enzymatic antioxidants to enhance drought resistance. 32 Therefore, combined SA + Si application significantly increased the SA and Si levels in the two dry-cultivated rice cultivars (Fig. 6 ), enhancing their antioxidant defense capacity, reducing the degree of damage caused by drought, and improving crop yield. In recent decades, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has provided a unique method to estimate photosynthetic functional traits in crops. 47 Light energy captured by chlorophyll molecules is used in photochemical reactions to drive photosynthesis, dissipating excess light energy as heat (non-photochemical burst, NPQ) or emitting it as chlorophyll fluorescence. These processes compete with each other, e.g., more significant photosynthesis decreases the dissipation of the additional energy. Therefore, by measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence yield, it is also possible to estimate the efficiency of the photochemical reactions and the heat dissipation. Membrane permeability and vesicle function in chloroplasts are impaired when plant cells are subjected to adversity stress, causing a gradual diminution of photosystem activity and chlorophyll fluorescence. This affects photosystem II repair in plants in adverse conditions, enhances photoinhibition, and reduces photosynthetic efficiency. 48 The chlorophyll fluorescence indexes include the Fv/Fm value, ΦPSII, NPQ, and qP. The chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters reflect the response of total photosynthetic productivity to environmental factors. Flag leaves represent the most important organ source of rice, playing a crucial role in supplying assimilates for seed grain development. 49 This study investigated the genetic factors controlling chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters in rice flag leaves. The Fv/Fm ratios were significantly higher in the two dry-cultivated rice treatment groups than in the control groups, indicating that the functional state of the chlorophyll in these rice cultivars was significantly restored after exogenous SA + Si spraying 50 (Fig. 3 a). The ΦPSII of the two dry-cultivated rice species was also substantially enhanced compared with the control, indicating that exogenous SA + Si spraying improved the energy conversion efficiency of chloroplasts during photosynthesis 51 (Fig. 3 b). The NPQ responds to the regulatory mechanisms in plants under stress, dissipating excess light energy in various ways. 52 In this study, the NPQ values of the two dry-cultivated rice species were lower than in the control group, especially that of Suijing18, indicating that exogenous SA + Si spraying significantly enhanced their drought tolerance (Fig. 3 c). The qP is the photochemical burst coefficient based on the swamp model in which the PSII reaction centers are connected by a common antenna. The qP reflects the portion of light energy absorbed by the pigments in the PSII antennae that can be used for photochemical electron transfer. 53 The qP value decreased in the Suijing18 cultivar, while it displayed a slight decrease in the Hongke88 variety (Fig. 3 d). These results indicated that different drought-resistant cultivars showed varied sensitivity to drought, inducing different qP responses in vivo. 5. Conclusions The combined application of SA and Si improves the drought resistance of two kinds of dry-cultivated rice by increasing the content of osmoregulatory substances, enhancing the levels of endogenous SA and Si, upregulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and strengthening the photosynthetic capacity of the PSII system. This results in improved drought-resistant capability and increase of the accumulation of dry matter and yield of dry-cultivated rice. Declarations Author Contribution GW :Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draf, Funding acquisition. Y W：Draw figures1-2, Q L:Draw figures3-4, XS:Draw figures5-6, AS: Draw tables1-2, HJ:Investigation, XM:Investigation, XW:Investigation, MY:Review manuscript, ZW:Review manuscript, Funding acquisition .All the authors reviewed the manuscript. Data Availability All data for dry-cultivated rice that support the results of this study are included within this paper and its supplementary information files References Kim Y, Chung YS, Lee E, et al. Root Response to Drought Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). International journal of molecular sciences 2020;21(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms21041513 [published Online First: 2020/02/27] Sagare DB, Abbai R, Jain A, et al. More and more of less and less: Is genomics-based breeding of dry direct-seeded rice (DDSR) varieties the need of hour? Plant biotechnology journal 2020;18(11):2173-86. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13454 [published Online First: 2020/07/30] Chen Z, Li P, Jiang S, et al. Evaluation of resource and energy utilization, environmental and economic benefits of rice water-saving irrigation technologies in a rice-wheat rotation system. The Science of the total environment 2021;757:143748. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143748 [published Online First: 2020/12/04] Passioura JB. Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders? Functional plant biology : FPB 2012;39(11):851-59. doi: 10.1071/fp12079 [published Online First: 2012/11/01] Melandri G, AbdElgawad H, Riewe D, et al. Biomarkers for grain yield stability in rice under drought stress. Journal of experimental botany 2020;71(2):669-83. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz221 [published Online First: 2019/05/16] Hussain HA, Hussain S, Khaliq A, et al. Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities. Frontiers in plant science 2018;9:393. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00393 [published Online First: 2018/04/26] Noctor G, Reichheld JP, Foyer CH. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Seminars in cell & developmental biology 2018;80:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013 [published Online First: 2017/07/25] Urmi TA, Islam MM, Zumur KN, et al. Combined Effect of Salicylic Acid and Proline Mitigates Drought Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) through the Modulation of Physiological Attributes and Antioxidant Enzymes. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;12(7) doi: 10.3390/antiox12071438 [published Online First: 2023/07/29] Yang W, Zhou Z, Chu Z. Emerging Roles of Salicylic Acid in Plant Saline Stress Tolerance. International journal of molecular sciences 2023;24(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms24043388 [published Online First: 2023/02/26] Peng Y, Yang J, Li X, et al. Salicylic Acid: Biosynthesis and Signaling. Annual review of plant biology 2021;72:761-91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855 [published Online First: 2021/03/24] Bilal S, Saad Jan S, Shahid M, et al. Novel Insights into Exogenous Phytohormones: Central Regulators in the Modulation of Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Responses in Rice under Metal(loid) Stress. Metabolites 2023;13(10) doi: 10.3390/metabo13101036 [published Online First: 2023/10/27] Prakash V, Singh VP, Tripathi DK, et al. Nitric oxide (NO) and salicylic acid (SA): A framework for their relationship in plant development under abiotic stress. Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) 2021;23 Suppl 1:39-49. doi: 10.1111/plb.13246 [published Online First: 2021/02/17] Kimbembe RER, Li G, Fu G, et al. Proteomic analysis of salicylic acid regulation of grain filling of two near-isogenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties under soil drying condition. Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB 2020;151:659-72. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.006 [published Online First: 2020/04/30] Khalvandi M, Siosemardeh A, Roohi E, et al. Salicylic acid alleviated the effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf protein pattern in winter wheat. Heliyon 2021;7(1):e05908. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05908 [published Online First: 2021/01/26] Huang C, Liao J, Huang W, et al. Salicylic Acid Protects Sweet Potato Seedlings from Drought Stress by Mediating Abscisic Acid-Related Gene Expression and Enhancing the Antioxidant Defense System. International journal of molecular sciences 2022;23(23) doi: 10.3390/ijms232314819 [published Online First: 2022/12/12] Gao Q, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Salicylic Acid Modulates the Osmotic System and Photosynthesis Rate to Enhance the Drought Tolerance of Toona ciliata. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;12(24) doi: 10.3390/plants12244187 [published Online First: 2023/12/23] Pan T, Zhang J, He L, et al. Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 2021;10(4) doi: 10.3390/plants10040767 [published Online First: 2021/05/01] Khan MIR, Ashfaque F, Chhillar H, et al. The intricacy of silicon, plant growth regulators and other signaling molecules for abiotic stress tolerance: An entrancing crosstalk between stress alleviators. Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB 2021;162:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.024 [published Online First: 2021/03/06] Chaiwong N, Rerkasem B, Pusadee T, et al. Silicon application improves caryopsis development and yield in rice. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2021;101(1):220-28. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10634 [published Online First: 2020/07/07] Dhakate P, Kandhol N, Raturi G, et al. Silicon nanoforms in crop improvement and stress management. Chemosphere 2022;305:135165. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135165 [published Online First: 2022/06/07] Jiang H, Xu X, Sun A, et al. Silicon nutrition improves the quality and yield of rice under dry cultivation. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2024;104(4):1897-908. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13098 [published Online First: 2023/11/03] Watanabe A, Hatanaka Y, Takeshima Y, et al. Evaluation of protein production in rice seedlings under dark conditions. Scientific reports 2022;12(1):7759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11672-0 [published Online First: 2022/05/12] Shuochen J, Lihe Z, Fenqin H, et al. Zinc supplementation and light intensity affect 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2AP) formation in fragrant rice. BMC plant biology 2023;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03954-6 [published Online First: 2023/04/12] Islam MM, Jahan K, Sen A, et al. Exogenous Application of Calcium Ameliorates Salinity Stress Tolerance of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Enhances Fruit Quality. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;12(3) doi: 10.3390/antiox12030558 [published Online First: 2023/03/30] Naveed M, Muhammad Ahsan A, Jiahui N, et al. Silicon improves the drought tolerance in pepper plants through the induction of secondary metabolites, GA biosynthesis pathway, and suppression of chlorophyll degradation. 2024;214(0) doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108919 Khaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, et al. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Scientific reports 2019;9(1):19250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55889-y [published Online First: 2019/12/19] Kaur H, Manna M, Thakur T, et al. Imperative role of sugar signaling and transport during drought stress responses in plants. Physiologia plantarum 2021;171(4):833-48. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13364 [published Online First: 2021/02/15] Ozturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal B, García-Caparrós P, et al. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiologia plantarum 2021;172(2):1321-35. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13297 [published Online First: 2020/12/07] Gujjar RS, Roytrakul S, Chuekong W, et al. A synthetic cytokinin influences the accumulation of leaf soluble sugars and sugar transporters, and enhances the drought adaptability in rice. 3 Biotech 2021;11(8):369. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02908-3 [published Online First: 2021/07/24] Janda T, Szalai G, Pál M. Salicylic Acid Signalling in Plants. International journal of molecular sciences 2020;21(7) doi: 10.3390/ijms21072655 [published Online First: 2020/04/16] Chen S, Zhao CB, Ren RM, et al. Salicylic acid had the potential to enhance tolerance in horticultural crops against abiotic stress. Frontiers in plant science 2023;14:1141918. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1141918 [published Online First: 2023/03/07] Nadarajah K, Abdul Hamid NW, Abdul Rahman NSN. SA-Mediated Regulation and Control of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice. International journal of molecular sciences 2021;22(11) doi: 10.3390/ijms22115591 [published Online First: 2021/06/03] Jiang H, Song Z, Su QW, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic reveals silicon enhances adaptation of rice under dry cultivation by improving flavonoid biosynthesis, osmoregulation, and photosynthesis. Frontiers in plant science 2022;13:967537. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.967537 [published Online First: 2022/08/23] Ali LG, Nulit R, Ibrahim MH, et al. Efficacy of KNO(3), SiO(2) and SA priming for improving emergence, seedling growth and antioxidant enzymes of rice (Oryza sativa), under drought. Scientific reports 2021;11(1):3864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83434-3 [published Online First: 2021/02/18] Yang S, Ulhassan Z, Shah AM, et al. Salicylic acid underpins silicon in ameliorating chromium toxicity in rice by modulating antioxidant defense, ion homeostasis and cellular ultrastructure. Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB 2021;166:1001-13. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.07.013 [published Online First: 2021/07/17] Gao J, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, et al. RRS1 shapes robust root system to enhance drought resistance in rice. The New phytologist 2023;238(3):1146-62. doi: 10.1111/nph.18775 [published Online First: 2023/03/03] Yue L, Xie B, Cao X, et al. The Mechanism of Manganese Ferrite Nanomaterials Promoting Drought Resistance in Rice. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;13(9) doi: 10.3390/nano13091484 [published Online First: 2023/05/13] Nadarajah K, Kumar IS. Drought Response in Rice: The miRNA Story. International journal of molecular sciences 2019;20(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms20153766 [published Online First: 2019/08/04] Sohag MAA, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Brestič M, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide attenuate drought stress in rice. 2020;66(1):7-13. Rattanawong K, Koiso N, Toda E, et al. Regulatory functions of ROS dynamics via glutathione metabolism and glutathione peroxidase activity in developing rice zygote. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology 2021;108(4):1097-115. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15497 [published Online First: 2021/09/20] Jiang W, Ye Q, Wu Z, et al. Analysis of CAT Gene Family and Functional Identification of OsCAT3 in Rice. Genes 2023;14(1) doi: 10.3390/genes14010138 [published Online First: 2023/01/22] Jeon YA, Lee HS, Kim SH, et al. Natural variation in rice ascorbate peroxidase gene APX9 is associated with a yield-enhancing QTL cluster. Journal of experimental botany 2021;72(12):4254-68. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab155 [published Online First: 2021/04/09] Ma Y, Ren X, Liang C. Exogenous Ca(2+) enhances antioxidant defense in rice to simulated acid rain by regulating ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase. Planta 2021;254(2):41. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03679-0 [published Online First: 2021/07/31] Diaz JM, Shi X. NOX-like ROS production by glutathione reductase. iScience 2022;25(10):105093. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105093 [published Online First: 2022/10/04] Jia Y, Gu X, Chai J, et al. Rice OsANN9 Enhances Drought Tolerance through Modulating ROS Scavenging Systems. International journal of molecular sciences 2023;24(24) doi: 10.3390/ijms242417495 [published Online First: 2023/12/23] Shohani F, Hosseinin Sarghein S, Fazeli A. Simultaneous application of salicylic acid and silicon in aerial parts of Scrophularia striata L. in response to drought stress. Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB 2023;202:107936. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107936 [published Online First: 2023/08/31] Porcar-Castell A, Malenovský Z, Magney T, et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-system science. Nature plants 2021;7(8):998-1009. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00980-4 [published Online First: 2021/08/11] Tsai YC, Chen KC, Cheng TS, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in diverse rice varieties reveals the positive correlation between the seedlings salt tolerance and photosynthetic efficiency. BMC plant biology 2019;19(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1983-8 [published Online First: 2019/09/15] Liu S, Xiong Z, Zhang Z, et al. Exploration of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics gene regulatory in rice (Oryza sativa L.): a genome-wide association study. Frontiers in plant science 2023;14:1234866. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1234866 [published Online First: 2023/09/25] Wu Y, Jin X, Liao W, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) Alleviated Salinity Stress in Cucumber Seedlings by Enhancing Chlorophyll Synthesis Pathway. Frontiers in plant science 2018;9:635. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00635 [published Online First: 2018/06/06] Moustakas M, Calatayud Á, Guidi L. Editorial: Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Analysis in Biotic and Abiotic Stress. Frontiers in plant science 2021;12:658500. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658500 [published Online First: 2021/05/04] Pashayeva A, Wu G, Huseynova I, et al. Role of Thylakoid Protein Phosphorylation in Energy-Dependent Quenching of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Rice Plants. International journal of molecular sciences 2021;22(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms22157978 [published Online First: 2021/08/08] Xu Y, Yang M, Cheng F, et al. Effects of LED photoperiods and light qualities on in vitro growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Cunninghamia lanceolata. BMC plant biology 2020;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02480-7 [published Online First: 2020/06/11] Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files rawdata.zip Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4948148","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":357951410,"identity":"722d5c38-af79-4341-8345-ea8f0e2a4a66","order_by":0,"name":"Guan Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Guan","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":357951411,"identity":"96ea0ccf-1d9a-4a9c-afc3-62cf0ae254db","order_by":1,"name":"Yi Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yi","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":357951412,"identity":"26ea7c71-ee0d-4238-a361-6fcdca4996ee","order_by":2,"name":"Qianqian Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qianqian","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":357951413,"identity":"f7b88695-733d-4876-8f6e-ac91a969de40","order_by":3,"name":"Xinru Shen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xinru","middleName":"","lastName":"Shen","suffix":""},{"id":357951414,"identity":"a8a49bfc-1ed1-45ec-971e-2ee84b92f86c","order_by":4,"name":"Anran Sun","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anran","middleName":"","lastName":"Sun","suffix":""},{"id":357951415,"identity":"cafa9ac0-9e98-4cf4-adcd-308d559ec776","order_by":5,"name":"Hao Jiang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hao","middleName":"","lastName":"Jiang","suffix":""},{"id":357951416,"identity":"112c43af-215a-42fd-af16-4e03dc0d8257","order_by":6,"name":"Xintong Ma","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xintong","middleName":"","lastName":"Ma","suffix":""},{"id":357951417,"identity":"8c15770b-ba79-4f56-8cae-e59edcba4d8a","order_by":7,"name":"Xiaoshuang Wei","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaoshuang","middleName":"","lastName":"Wei","suffix":""},{"id":357951418,"identity":"e213820a-d468-445c-a79b-d2429864891b","order_by":8,"name":"Meiying Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Meiying","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":357951419,"identity":"267b8204-1ae1-45a5-b37a-8e0e502ebbe2","order_by":9,"name":"Zhihai Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhihai","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-21 02:56:27","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":65818876,"identity":"a94a4e34-f31e-403f-bf55-e09d8f108e77","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 07:06:03","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":4795488,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEffects of different concentrations and times of exogenous SA application on activities of SOD, POD, CAT, GR, APX and SA content in dry-cultivated\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003erice leaves. a.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eSA concentration of 0 mM, 0.01 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, after 24 h, the determination of Suijing18 leaves of SOD, POD, CAT, GR, APX activity changes;\u003cstrong\u003e b.\u003c/strong\u003e With SA concentration of 1mM, the activities of SOD, POD, CAT, GR and APX in Suijing18 leaves were measured after 3h,6h,9h,12h,24h,36h and 72h; \u003cstrong\u003ec.\u003c/strong\u003e SA concentration of 0 mM, 0.01 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, after 24 h, the determination of Hongke88 leaves of SOD, POD, CAT, GR, APX activity changes;\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003ed. With SA concentration of 1mM, the activities of SOD, POD, CAT, GR and APX in Hongke88 leaves were measured after 3h,6h,9h,12h,24h,36h and 72h; e. The SA content in Suijing18 leaves was determined by spraying SA at different concentrations and time; f. The SA content in Hongke88 leaves was determined by spraying SA at different concentrations and time；The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 5) and the error bar indicates the standard errors. *\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.05, **\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.01, ***\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/e6823202b7f86c57ef455350.png"},{"id":65818758,"identity":"f6dd1e18-496b-49b1-b519-cbd524ed7321","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 06:58:03","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":807415,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eComparison of the effects of SA and Si combined spraying on the growth and morphological characteristics of two drought cultivation rice. a.Suijing18,A-Plant height，B-Root length，C-Above ground dry weight，D-Underground dry weight，S1 = control, S2 = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003eSi, S3 = 1 mM SA, S4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si；b; Hongke88, A-Plant height，B-Root length，C-Above ground dry weight，D-Underground dry weight，P1 = control, P2 = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, P3 = 1 mM SA, P4 = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si. The vertical bar indicates the means of five replicates (n = 5) ,Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s\u0026nbsp;test).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/f2e807ce3abda61b1400bc2c.png"},{"id":65819587,"identity":"e05d35ac-10b3-48e1-bb0b-fcc94bf8c181","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 07:14:03","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":745263,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEffect of combined spraying of SA and Si on the ratio of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of two drought\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003ecultivation rice. a. Maximum efficiency of PSII(Fv/Fm)；b. Photosynthetic light use efficiency (ΦPSII); c. Non-Photochemical Quenching(NPQ);d. Photochemical Quenching(qP). Each data point represents the average value of 3 replicates. Red line represents Suijing18; green line represents Hongke88. control, Si = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, SA = 1 mM SA, SA+Si = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si . The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 3) and the error bar indicates the standard errors.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/d362df69e288cf87e92e3fd7.png"},{"id":65818874,"identity":"77cb4907-fe5b-4ce0-879e-ff555b1b8115","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 07:06:03","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1145809,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEffects of SA and Si combined application on soluble sugar and soluble protein in drought\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003ecultivation rice. a. Soluble sugar content in Suijing 18 during the booting stage; b. Soluble sugar content in Hongke 88 during the booting stage; c. Soluble protein content in Suijing 18 during the booting stage; Soluble protein content in Hongke 88 during the booting stage. control, Si = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, SA = 1 mM SA, SA+Si = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si . The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 3) and\u0026nbsp; the error bar indicates the standard errors.\u0026nbsp; Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s\u0026nbsp;test).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/8b9db755db1c7788ae089e44.png"},{"id":65818761,"identity":"50629bb6-609c-4c74-8aa0-d731968ef6db","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 06:58:03","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2045504,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCombined application of SA and Si enhancing the activity of (a,b) SOD, (c,d )POD, (e,f) CAT, (g,h)APX, and (i,j) GR in two rice varieties under drought stress. control, Si = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, SA = 1 mM SA, SA+Si = 1 mM SA + 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si. The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 3) and the error bar indicates the standard errors. *\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.05, **\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.01, ***\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e＜0.001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/dd152303e18301d70d89f2de.png"},{"id":65818765,"identity":"8392ca25-34bf-4ffb-b777-3497f60cfd3e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 06:58:03","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":3106768,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEffects of combined application of SA and Si on the contents of internal silicon and salicylic acid in drought\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003ecultivation rice. a. Determination of Si content in stem, leaf and ear of two kinds of drought\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003ecultivation rice; b. Changes of Si content in stems, leaves and ears of different groups of Suijing18; c. Changes of Si content in stems, leaves and ears of Hongke88 groups; d. Changes of SA content in different groups of Suijing18 after external spraying. e. Changes of SA content of Hongke88 in different groups after external spraying.Control, Si = 45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, SA = 1 mM SA, SA+Si = 1 mM SA +45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si. The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n = 3) and\u0026nbsp; the error bar indicates the standard errors.\u0026nbsp; Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s\u0026nbsp;test).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/9747d2888120d7330ca39109.png"},{"id":79242534,"identity":"aa14210b-9a59-490f-a274-48501488b1fc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-26 06:16:36","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":14948881,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/30a83e4f-e188-4b8e-8542-d6e08b4ba57a.pdf"},{"id":65818877,"identity":"4001850e-ae0b-4f7a-9009-a19f0967b994","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-03 07:06:03","extension":"zip","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":315179,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rawdata.zip","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4948148/v1/a43708ed0092e1ba64def2a6.zip"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Combined action of salicylic acid and silicon regulates osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzymes to improve drought tolerance and yield in dry-cultivated rice","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe global rise in the incidence and severity of drought significantly constrains food production. It is critical to prioritize the development of drought-resistant crops to mitigate the negative impact of drought on agricultural yields as global populations increase and water resources are depleted.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Dry-cultivated rice has the potential to address the issues of labor and water resource shortages while ensuring the sustainable cultivation of rice. As an efficient, resource-saving, mechanized, climate-smart, and economically viable strategy\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, it is becoming an alternative to irrigated rice cultivation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, the drought tolerance of dry rice must be improved to increase yields.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlants are especially susceptible to drought during the reproductive stage. In cereal crops, particularly rice, this stage is highly sensitive to water restrictions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The reduced rice grain yield during this stage in drought conditions is associated with changes in the metabolism and redox state of its apical leaves.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The drought-induced decrease in carbon assimilation enhances the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in leaf cells.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Excess ROS accumulation can decrease grain yield and leaf senescence due to photosynthetic pigment degradation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The typical positive correlation between photosynthesis and crop production significantly affects the growth and development of rice and reduces yield.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Salicylic acid (SA) accumulation was found to play a role in the defense signaling and regulation of cell death.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e SA is an endogenous small-molecule phenolic compound that acts as a signaling sensor to regulate plant responses. It protects plant cells from ion accumulation toxicity and cell death by managing processes such as antioxidant defense, nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, and water stress.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Pretreating rice roots with SA promotes root growth, reduces ROS levels and membrane damage, and increases superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) activity, as well as glutathione (GSH) and chlorophyll content, while reducing MDA levels.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Exogenous SA application alleviates oxidative stress in drought-stressed plants by modulating important enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In addition, the involvement of SA in glycolytic/TCA cycling, starch and sucrose metabolism, and antioxidant pathways reverses the rice yield and grain weight caused by soil drought.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e SA can also increase the photosynthetic capacity of plants.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Studies have shown that exogenous SA application increases the rate of photosynthesis in sweet potatoes and reduces drought damage.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Exogenous SA spraying also significantly elevates the PSI and ETR levels in \u003cem\u003eT. ciliata\u003c/em\u003e, which increases the electron transfer and recovery rates of PSII reaction center activity, ultimately enhancing photosynthesis.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSilicon (Si), the second most important element in soil, typically accumulates in rice at significantly higher levels than nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Si improves the resistance of plants to various abiotic stresses by regulating the synthesis and accumulation of endogenous hormones. During abiotic stress-induced adversity, Si helps to control multiple plant metabolic processes, including osmotic stress generation and ROS regulation, via the antioxidant defense system.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Si also promotes plant growth by increasing the photosynthetic rate and nutrient uptake, improving plant defense responses, and enhancing tolerance to a range of stresses.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Furthermore, Si can increase rice spike formation and grouting rates to enhance rice yields.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSince the large consumption of freshwater resources constrains sustainable agricultural development, dry-cultivated rice provides a viable alternative to reduce water utilization during cultivation. Therefore, current research focuses on improving dry-cultivated rice yields. Although both SA and Si can protect plants from biotic and abiotic stresses, minimal studies are available regarding the effect of applying these substances simultaneously to improve the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice. Our research team has previously demonstrated that moderate amounts of Si fertilizer can improve the yield and quality of dry-cultivated rice by regulating source supply capacity and seed starch synthesis.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The present study focuses on the impact of combined exogenous SA and Si application on the morphological characteristics, yield, chlorophyll fluorescence, antioxidant enzyme activity, and Si and SA content in dry-cultivated rice.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1. Plant materials and treatments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study used two high-quality dry-cultivated rice varieties from Jilin Province, namely China-Suijing18 with strong drought resistance and Hongke88 with weak drought resistance. A pot experiment was conducted in 2022\u0026ndash;2023 at Jilin Green and High Quality Japonica Rice Engineering Research Center. The soil contained a moderate level of Si at 113.46 mg kg\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, an organic carbon content of 9.60 g kg\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, an alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content 33.89 mg kg \u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, an available potassium content of 137.09 mg kg \u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, an available phosphorus content of 29.42 mg kg \u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, and a pH value of 6.70.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn experiment was conducted in 2022 using small three-holed basins of 14 cm high and 15 cm in diameter, with each hole containing five rice grains. Different SA concentrations (0 mM/L, 0.01 mM/L, 0.5 mM/L, 1 mM/L, 1.5 mM/L, and 2 mM/L) were sprayed onto the leaf surfaces of the rice seedlings during the three-leaf single-phase stage. Measurements were recorded at 3h, 6h, 9h, 12h, 24h, 36h, and 72h. The leaves were only sprayed until moist but not dripping. Then, the changes in the samples were monitored and recorded to determine the optimal SA concentration. The experiment used a fully randomized design with five replicates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn 2023, large basins with heights of 22 cm and diameters of 30 cm were used for rice cultivation. Each basin had three holes, with each hole containing eight rice grains. A random block design was adopted, and each treatment was repeated five times while the growth period was mainly rainfed. The experiment used 75 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e phosphate fertilizer (calcium superphosphate, P\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e 12%) (equivalent to P\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e) and potassium fertilizer (potassium chloride, K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO 60%) (equivalent to K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO), as well as 160 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e nitrogen fertilizer (urea, pure N 46%) (equivalent to pure N). Biolli Russian mineral Si fertilizer was added at an effective level of \u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;72% and an application amount of 45 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, while the optimal SA concentration determined in the 2022 experiment was sprayed during the booting stage. Diseases, pests, and grasses were strictly controlled to prevent production loss. The two dry-cultivated rice varieties were divided into four treatment groups: control group, 45 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, 1 mM SA, and 1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si. The Suijing18 strain was represented by S1, S2, S3, and S4, while the Hongke88 cultivar was represented by P1, P2, P3, and P4. The experiment used a fully randomized design with five replicates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Assessment of the growth and yield parameters\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFive plants were sampled from each plot at the maturity stage to determine dry matter accumulation. The samples were deoxidized in an oven at 105℃ for 30 min and dried to a constant weight at 80℃, after which the samples were weighed. The dry matter weight was determined using the 1% balance method. The root length measurements were repeated three times for each treatment. Three pots of rice were carefully washed with tap water and then rinsed with pure water. The roots were straightened, and the distance from the root base to the tip was measured using a ruler. The plant height was determined using a tape measure. The distance from the base of the rice plant to the top leaf was measured and averaged. The effective panicle number of each point was measured in each pot at the maturity stage. Five plants with the same average panicle number were selected for seed testing after drying. Furthermore, the total number of grains per spike, the number of solid grains, the 1000-grain weight, and the seed setting rate were determined. After harvesting and drying, the rice quality and water content were measured, and the rice yield was calculated according to a standard water content of 13.5%.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Chlorophyll fluorescence assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree plants showing uniform flag leaf growth were selected for each treatment. Following a 24-h spray application of SA treatment, a portable chlorophyll fluorescence analyzer (PAM-2500, Shanghai, China) was used to determine the fluorescence parameters of each labeled pot leaf in the dark from 20:00 to 23:00 on the night before the measurement date. The fluorescence parameters were determined in natural light from 9:00 to 12:00 the next day. The fluorescence indexes included the maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), the photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII), the non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ), and the photochemical quenching coefficient (qP).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Determination of the soluble sugar and soluble protein content\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSi, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si were sprayed during the booting stage, and leaf samples were collected for testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10d, respectively. Next, 0.1 g of the crushed, sifted dried plant samples were weighed into a 2 mL EP tube, after which 80 \u0026micro;L of 80% ethanol was added. The samples were sealed and boiled in a water bath at 80℃ for 30 min. The soluble sugar content of the collected materials was determined using the anthranone sulfate colorimetric method.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, after Si, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spray treatment during the booting stage and leaf-sample testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10d, respectively, 0.1 g was weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground into a powder, and thoroughly mixed after adding 1 mL of TBS. The mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm and 4℃ for 5 min, after which the supernatant was collected as the total soluble protein extract. A Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad) was used to determine the protein concentration, with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The total soluble protein content in one sample was calculated according to the protein concentration and protein extract volume. The average value of the three seedlings in each experiment was determined.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Determination of the antioxidant enzyme activity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll the chemical and enzyme reagents used to determine the grain enzyme activity were obtained from Solarbio Chemical Company. Here, 5 mL of 50 mM HEPES buffer (PH7.8, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ASA, 1 mm GSH, 5 mM MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, and 1mM DTT were added to a 0.5 g of the leaves. The sample was ground, extracted in an ice bath, homogenized at 4℃, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min, after which the supernatant was collected for analysis to determine the activity of the various enzymes. The SOD activity was determined using a reaction system consisting of 1.5 mL of 0.05 M pH 7.8 HEPES buffer, 0.3 mL of 130 mM methionine, 0.3 mL of 750 mM nitro blue tetrazole, 0.3 mL of 100 \u0026micro;M EDTA, and 0.3 mL of 60 \u0026micro;M riboflavin. Buffer was used as a blank control instead of an enzyme solution. After irradiation at 25℃ and 4,000 lx for 15 min, the blank color changed from yellow to blue. The reaction was terminated immediately in dark conditions, after which the OD\u003csub\u003e560\u003c/sub\u003e absorption value was determined immediately. The mixture for determining the POD consisted of 1 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.95 mL of 0.2% guaiacol, 1 mL of 0.3% H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2,\u003c/sub\u003e and 0.05 mL of the enzyme extract. The absorbance was determined at 470 nm for 90 s with an interval of 30 s. One unit of the POD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused the decomposition of 1 mg of the substrate at 470 nm.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) activity was determined using an ELISA kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The CAT activity was measured at 25℃ using a reaction system consisting of 1.9 mL of 50 mM pH 7.0 HEPES phosphate buffer, 1 mL of 22 mM H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, and 0.1 mL of the enzyme solution. The OD\u003csub\u003e240\u003c/sub\u003e kinetic change was determined at an interval of 1 min.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Determination of the Si and SA content in the dry-cultivated rice\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere, 0.1 g of the plant sample was placed in a heating tube, after which 3 mL nitric acid and 1 mL hydrofluoric acid were added. This was followed by a three-stage heating digestion procedure. Stage 1: The temperature was increased to 120℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 5 min. Stage 2: The temperature was increased to 160℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 5 min. Stage 3: Temperature was increased at 180℃ for 5 min and stabilized for 25 min. The heating tube was placed in a graphite acid drive meter, and the temperature was set at 160℃ for the acid drive. Once the heating tube started emitting yellow smoke followed by white smoke, the solution was considered fully acidified when it reached 1\u0026ndash;2 mL and was removed after cooling to room temperature. The acid-treated sample was washed 2\u0026ndash;3 times and transferred to a 100 mL volumetric bottle for measurement. The Si content in the solution was determined via ICP (ICP1000II, US), while the SA level was measured using an ELISA kit (Boyan, Nanjing, China).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.7 Statistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicrosoft Excel 2021 was used for data sorting and processing, while GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 and the ChiPlot online tool were used for plotting. The IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software was used for statistical analysis, and the significance level of each statistical test was expressed as 0.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;p\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 = *, 0.001\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;p\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.01 = **, 0.0001p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001 = ** *.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.1 The effect of different SA concentrations on the growth of the dry-cultivated rice seedlings\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSA concentrations of 0 mM/L, 0.01 mM/L, 0.5 mM/L, 1 mM/L, 1.5 mM/L, and 2 mM/L were used for this assessment. After treatment, the SOD activity in the leaves of the two rice seedling cultivars reached the highest level at an SA concentration of 1 mM/L after 24 h. The Suijing18 samples in different treatment groups were compared with the control group. The SOD activity increased by 8.45%, 2.41%, 12.25%, 6.59%, and 8.91%, respectively, while the POD activity was 45.53%, 1.25%, 59.44%, 32.08%, and 17.24% higher. CAT activity rose by 22.03%, 12.04%, 28.94%, 28.51%, and 15.66%, respectively, while the GR activity reached a maximum level at an SA concentration of 1 mM, denoting a 223.29% increase. The APX activity increased by 18.37%, 215.46%, 451.61%, 327.41%, and 240.53%, respectively. These results indicated that the activity of five antioxidant enzymes reached the highest value at an SA concentration of 1 mM (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ea). Next, the Hongke88 samples in the different treatment groups were compared to the control group. The SOD activity increased by 2.89%, 1.71%, 13.53%, 3.61%, and 9,21%, respectively, while the POD activity was 22.29%, 17.12%, 33.87%, 13.98%, and 21.51% higher. The CAT activity rose by 15.55%, 11.82%, 18.41%, 6.80%, and 15.83%, respectively, while GR activity increased by 221.57%, 193.80%, 518.30%, 163.11%, and 19.86%. The APX activity was 134.77%, 198.30%, 367.11%, 11.94%, and 240.66% higher (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ec). Finally, the concentration of sprayed SA sprayed was determined as 1 mM for subsequent experiments.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe SA concentration was determined, and the activity of five antioxidant enzymes was measured at 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 72 h after spraying. The activity of the five enzymes reached maximum levels after 24 h. The Suijing18 and Hongke88 samples displayed maximum SOD activity levels of 857.14 U/g and 826.51 U/g, respectively, which was significantly higher than in the control group. Furthermore, the two varieties exhibited maximum POD activity levels of 140.48 U/g and 124.05 U/g, maximum CAT activity values of 1.23 U/g and 1.14 U/g, and respective maximum APX levels of 4.56 U/g and 4.95 U/g (Figs. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb and \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ed). Moreover, the SA content in two dry-cultivated rice varieties was determined at different concentrations and times. The results indicated that the concentration was 1.0mM and the time was 24h, the SA content reached maximum values of 2819.73 U/g and 2881.95 U/g in the Suijing18 and Hongke88, respectively, at 24 h and an SA concentration of 1 mM (Figs. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ee and \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ef). Therefore, an external SA spraying concentration of 1 mM and a determination time of 24 h were used in the subsequent experiment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.2 The Growth and Biomass of Dry-cultivated Rice\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe two dry-cultivated rice varieties yielded similar growth index values at different treatments. Compared with the control group, exogenous Si, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application increased the plant height, root length, aboveground dry weight, and underground dry weight of the rice samples (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Compared with the S1 treatment group, the heights of the plant samples in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased by 15.76%, 14.37%, and 17.76% higher, the root lengths by 43.76%, 28.53%, and 51.86%, the above-ground dry weights by 34.20%, 24.18%, and 40%, and the underground dry weights by 42.52%, 19.02%, and 48.93%, respectively. The S4 group showed the most significant increase (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). Compared with the P1 treatment group, the heights of the plants in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups increased by 15.96%, 14.76%, and 20.19%, the root lengths by 51.59%, 37.10%, and 57.70%, the above-ground dry weights by 30.92%, 24.02%, and 39.06%, and the underground dry weights by 41.96%, 20.51%, and 53.38% respectively. The most significant increase was evident in the P4 treatment group (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb). The Suijing18 dry-cultivated cultivar exhibited higher drought tolerance than Hongke88. Exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying increased the Hongke88 plant height, root length, and underground dry weight by 2.43%, 5.9%, and 4.45%, respectively, which exceeded the values of the Suijing18 samples. Therefore, compared with individual exogenous Si and SA spraying, combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application showed a better effect on the dry-cultivated rice, especially on the cultivar with weak drought resistance.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffects of exogenous salicylic acid and silicon on the growth of drought cultivation rice.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariety\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTreatment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAbove ground dry weight(g)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnderground dry weight(g)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePlant height(cm)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRoot length(cm)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSuijing18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.23d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.32d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.62c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.35c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.32ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.65a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e95.70\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.53ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.35\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.56ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.32bc\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.57\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.45bc\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.23ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39.65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.38b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56.21\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.64a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.97\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.44a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e97.35\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.54a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.36a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHongke88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.65d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.29\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.56d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e78.95\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.44d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.36c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e50.64\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.68b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.09\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.14b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e91.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.64ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41.96\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.23ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47.97\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.68c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.23c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.12b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e37.95\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.34b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53.79\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.68ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.58\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.54a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94.89\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.45ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e43.65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.25ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMean values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (T- test, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The data represent the means of five replicates\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;the standard error (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5). Suijing18 groups: S1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;control, S2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, S3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA, S4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si; Hongke88 groups༚P1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;control, P2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, P3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA, P4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si; The sample was detected 10 days after spraying SA at booting stage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.3 The Agro-Morphology and Yield of the Dry-cultivated Rice\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCombined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application most significantly increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield of the Suijing18 samples. The single-hole panicle number in S4 increased by 17.55% compared with S1, while the grain number per panicle increased by 26.92%. The 1000-grain weight in S4 increased by 2.1% compared with S1, while the setting rate was 15% higher. The output of S2, S3, and S4 increased by 62.34%, 53.48%, and 80.70% respectively (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The single-hole panicle number in the Hongke88 P4 sample increased by 29.27% compared with P1, while the number of grains per panicle increased by 22.59%. The 1000-grain weight of P4 increased by 10% compared with P1, while the setting rate was 1.19% lower. Compared with the P1 treatment, the yield of the P2, P3, and P4 treatments increased by 14.89%, 61.04%, and 77.26%, respectively. Compared with the P1 treatment, P4 significantly increased the number of single-hole panicles, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight, and yield of the rice samples (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Due to the weak drought resistance of Hongke88 and the strong drought resistance of Suijing18, the S1 yield was 40.5% higher than P1, while the P4 yield was 5.46% higher than S1 after combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffect of exogenous salicylic acid and silicon on yield and its components in drought cultivation rice.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariety\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTreatm-ent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePanicles per hill\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpikelets perpanicle\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1000-grain weight (g)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSeeed-setting rate (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYield\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(g/hill)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSuijing18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.12b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.26b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21.59\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.13a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.20b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.64\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.15c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.44\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.88a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.86a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.02a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.52\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.78ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.29a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66.78\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.05ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.22\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.64a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.10ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.67b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.69a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.42a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.04\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.24a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.13ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.84\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.11a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHongke88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e50.78\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.31b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.32b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.84\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.02a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.52\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.30b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.89b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.92a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.68c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.80\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.64\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.89b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.50a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.74a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.53b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.69\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.11\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.57a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.55ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.38a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.99a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.26a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;control, S2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, S3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA, S4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si ; P1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;control, P2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, P3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA, P4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si.The vertical bar indicates the means of three replicates (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5) and the error bar indicates the standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences at p\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 (Tukey\u0026rsquo;s test).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.4 The effect of combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application on the chlorophyll fluorescence in the dry-cultivated rice\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChlorophyll fluorescence provides the most accurate response to the photosynthetic capacity, photosynthetic efficiency, and degree of environmental stress on plant leaves. The photosynthetic capacity and efficiency within dry-cultivated rice are low, but exogenous spraying of SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si can effectively reverse this unfavorable effect. Combined SA, Si, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application restored the Fv/Fm values of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties to 0.7\u0026ndash;0.85. This significantly improved the maximum PSII photochemical efficiency and enhanced the photosynthetic capacity of the rice cultivars, with SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si achieving the highest success. The Fv/Fm values of Suijing 18 S2, S3, and S4 increased by 14.71%, 28.33%, and 30.97%, respectively, compared to treatment S1, while the Fv/Fm values of Hongke 88 P2, P3, and P4 increased by 11.69%, 12.08%, and 19.17%, respectively, compared to P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea).The control groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties displayed low actual \u0026Phi;PSII values and high NPQ values, which represented the response of the dry-cultivated rice to drought stress. However, the actual \u0026Phi;PSII value increased after exogenous SA, Si, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying. Compared with S1, the value in S4 increased by 29.01%, while that of P4 was 29.64% higher than P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb). Furthermore, the NPQ decreased after treatment. The value of S4 was 67.55% lower than S1, while that of P4 decreased by 36.98% compared with P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ec). qP reflects the proportion of open PSII reaction centers, which is highly correlated with \u0026Phi;PSII. The Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 groups displayed lower values than S1, while those of the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 increased slightly compared with P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ed). These results may be due to the variation in sensitivity to drought in the different dry-cultivated varieties.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.5 Soluble Sugar and Soluble protein content\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe presence of soluble sugar can improve the water absorption and retention capacity of plants and enhance the potential of cells to maintain water without interfering with normal metabolism, consequently improving the drought resistance of rice. Si, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si were sprayed during the boot stage for sampling and testing at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, respectively. After SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si treatment, the soluble sugar content in the Suijing18 samples increased by 14.25% at 2 h and 10.72% at 10 d, respectively, compared with the control group, and decreased slightly at 24 h (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea). However, a significant increase was evident in the Hongke88 samples. After SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying, the soluble sugar levels began to increase after 24 h, which were 4.36%, 36.54%, and 32.22% higher in P2, P3, and P4, respectively, increasing to 26.5%, 52.63% and 61.58% after 10 d (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb). After spraying, the soluble protein content in the Suijing18 samples rose substantially after 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The S2, S3, and S4 groups showed 27.96%, 15.35%, and 21.24% higher levels at 2 h, which increased to 30.11%, 17.47%, and 27.82% after 24 h, and 52.2%, 19.18%, and 17.42% after 10 d (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ec). SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying elevated the soluble protein levels in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 by 24.91%, 21.27%, and 30.91%, respectively, after 24 h, while these values were 27.49%, 18.23%, and 45.28% after 10 d (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ed). The SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si treatment groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties were horizontally compared. The results indicated that the soluble protein and soluble sugar levels were significantly higher in the Hongke88 samples than in Suijing18 at 24 h and 10 d. Therefore, combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application substantially increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in the dry-cultivated rice, consequently improving its drought resistance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.6 The effect of combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application on the antioxidant enzyme activity in the dry-cultivated rice\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe two dry-cultivated rice varieties were sprayed during the booting stage and included the Control, Si, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si treatment groups. The samples were monitored and assessed at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The results showed that the SOD activity in the dry-cultivated rice samples were higher than in the control group at 24 h after Si, SA, and SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying. This rise was more significant in the Suijing18 samples. S2, S3, and S4 were 36.35%, 42.74%, and 50.71%, respectively higher than S1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea). Furthermore, P2, P3, and P4 were 3.59%, 20.31%, and 48.37%, respectively, higher than P1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb). After 10 d of spraying, the detection trend was consistent with that at 24 h, indicating that exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying optimally affected SOD activity at 24 h.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe POD activity in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups of Suijing18 was significantly higher than in S1 during the same period, showing a trend of S4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S3\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S1 at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. At 24 h, the POD activity in the S2, S3, and S4 increased by 19.49%, 85.67%, and 114.33%, respectively, compared with S1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ec). The POD activity changes in the Hongke88 samples were consistent with those in Suijing18. At 24 h, the POD activity in P2, P3, and P4 increased by 20.79%, 23.64%, and 36.14%, respectively, compared with P1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ed). These results indicated that SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si treatment improved the antioxidant capacity of dry-cultivated rice by enhancing POD activity, and alleviated the damage caused by drought stress.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAfter Suijing18 sample treatment for 2 h, CAT activity trend was S2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S3\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S1 after 2 h and S4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S3\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S1 after 24 h and 10 d. Compared with S1, the CAT activity in S2, S3, and S4 increased by 11.93%, 21.62%, and 28.32%, respectively, after 24 h (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ee). The Hongke88 treatment groups yielded different results. After 2 h, the CAT activity was higher in P2, P3, and P4 than in P1, with P3 displaying the highest level of 200.30%. After 24 h, the P2 group exhibited the highest CAT activity at 107.76%, while the highest level was evident in the P4 group at 10 d, increasing by 6.33% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ef).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe APX activity was higher in all the treatment groups at different detection times than in the control group. Drought stress usually induces H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e accumulation in rice. Higher APX activity can accelerate H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e removal and maintain the redox balance in cells, consequently improving the drought resistance of rice. At 24 h, the APX activity in S2, S3, and S4 increased by 40.90%, 64.84%, and 104.49%, respectively, compared with S1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eg), while this value was 40.90%, 64.84%, and 104.49% higher in P2, P3, and P4 than in P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eh).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGR forms part of the antioxidant defense system and increases the drought resistance of rice at higher levels. The GR activity in the Suijing18 samples showed an order of S4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S3\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;S1 at 2 h and 10 d. At 24 h, this content was significantly higher in S4 and S2 than S1. At 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, the respective GR levels in S4 increased by 55.00%, 18.18%, and 49.06% compared with S1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ei). The GR activity in Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups was higher than in P1. The four treatments showed an increasing trend of P4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;P3\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;P2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;P1 during the same period. At 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d, the GR activity in P4 increased by 17.02%, 21.99%, and 70.43%, respectively, compared with P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ej).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.7 The effect of combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application on the endogenous Si and SA content in the dry-cultivated rice\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe Si content in the stems, leaves, and ears of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties were determined during the booting stage. The Si levels in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased compared to S1, while these values were also higher in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 groups than in P1. The Si content in the stems, leaves, and ears of the two dry-cultivated rice cultivars was the highest after exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ea). However, differences were evident between the Si content in different treatment groups. Compared with S1, the Si content in S2, S3, and S4 in the stems increased by 158.97%, 496.42%, and 385.82%, respectively, while these values increased by 66.04%, 182.68%, and 218.05% in the leaves. Si content in S2, S3, and S4 in the ear increased by 160.72%, 570.51% and 542.8% (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eb). Compared with P1, the Si content in the P2, P3, and P4 treatment groups increased by 77.73%, 70.01%, and 516.22% in the stems, 65.21%, 56.67%, and 351.66% in the leaves, and 54.95%, 45.10%, and 371.15% in the panicles (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ec). In addition, the SA content in the different treatment groups of the two dry-cultivated rice varieties was recorded at 2 h, 24 h, and 10 d. The results indicated that the SA levels in the Suijing18 S2, S3, and S4 treatment groups increased by 6.64%, 25.78%, and 42.02%, respectively, compared to S1 at 2 h. At 24 h, these levels in the S2, S3, and S4 groups increased by 8.90%, 22.70%, and 45.01%, respectively, compared with S1, and were 9.67% and 27.70% higher at 10d in the S3 and S4 groups. The SA content in the S2 group was lower than in S1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ed). At 2 h, the SA content in the Hongke88 P2, P3, and P4 groups were 1.54%, 24.60%, and 29.98% higher than in P1. At 24 h, these values were 10.22% and 33.26% higher in the P3 and P4 groups than in P1. At 10 d, the SA content in the P3 and P4 groups increased by 16.74% and 29.21% compared with P1, respectively, while this value was lower in the P2 group at 24 h and 10 d than in P1 (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ee).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eRice has different mechanisms to cope with drought, such as the activation of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems and the accumulation of compatible osmolytes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Drought stress affects rice osmoregulators such as soluble sugars, which are key osmoprotectors in plants. Osmoregulators maintain and protect plant macromolecules and structures from stress damage and increase their tolerance to drought stress.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Drought hinders carbon fixation into sugars via photosynthesis and affects their transport by decreasing the cellular osmotic potential, reprogramming the cellular and subcellular sugar distribution.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In addition, drought tolerance in crops is associated with higher protein content, and the concentration of soluble proteins depends on the nature of the plant species and the type of tissue under water stress.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Studies have shown that soluble sugar and soluble protein accumulation in rice enhances its drought tolerance adaptation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Therefore, increasing osmoregulatory substance accumulation in rice is essential to enhance its drought tolerance and has attracted significant research attention. The exogenous application of natural endogenous, bioactive compounds (e.g., SA) may be an alternative approach to increase crop productivity.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e SA is considered as an environmentally friendly and suitable chemical regulator.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The use of SA in drought-stressed plants improves of osmoregulator functionality in plants.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Our previous research showed that Si maintained normal physiological and biochemical metabolism in rice in drought conditions by regulating soluble sugars, which increased the cytoplasmic concentration and decreased its osmotic potential. This helped to maintain water uptake and cellular expansion, which ensured sustained rice growth in drought conditions and enhanced its adaptability.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Considering the foundation of the previous work, the current study used combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application to enhance the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice both above and below the ground. Lawan Gana et al. found that individual SA and Si application increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein accumulation in rice seedlings.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e AliSu Yang et al. revealed that the synergistic effect of SA and Si enhanced the accumulation of soluble sugars and soluble proteins, consequently reducing chromium toxicity in rice.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In the current study, the combined application of SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si significantly increased the soluble sugar content in the Suijing18 and Hongke88 rice cultivars (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb). The soluble sugar content in Suijing18 samples increased by 14.25% at 2 h compared to the control, while the soluble sugar content displayed an initial decline at 24 h, followed by a rise at 10 d, increasing by 10.72% compared to the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea). Although the soluble sugar content was low in the Hongke88 samples at 2 h, it increased by 32.22% at 24 h and 61.58% at 10 d compared with the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb). The soluble protein levels were higher in both the Suijing18 and Hongke88 treatment groups than in the control (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ec and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ed) after exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying. The Hongke88 variety displays weak drought-resistance while the Suijing18 cultivar exhibits strong tolerance to drought. After exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying, the Hongke88 samples displayed higher soluble sugar and soluble protein levels than the Suijng18 groups at the same detection times and exogenous spraying concentrations. This study demonstrated for the first time that exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si significantly increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in dry-cultivated rice, consequently enhancing its drought resistance. This treatment was more effective in the dry-cultivated rice showing weak drought tolerance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA strong root system facilitates the uptake of water and nutrients from the soil by the crop and promotes its growth.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e When rice suffers from drought stress, the root system first senses the lack of water in the external environment via changes in water potential, osmotic pressure, and other physical properties, which restricts root system growth.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The present study showed that exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si significantly increased the root length, plant height, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight of two dry-cultivated rice cultivars. Moreover, combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application was more effective than these substances alone (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) to increase in the root size and drought tolerance of the rice plants, resulting in higher yields.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The yield of the Suijing18 S4 group was 80.70% higher than S1, while the yield of the Hongke88 P4 group was 77.26% higher than P1 (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e), which were consistent with the results of previous studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrought triggers multiple morphological, physiological, and metabolic changes in plants,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e stimulating the production of ROS. To counteract the effect of ROS, rice plants develop antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, CAT, APX, and GR, which scavenge stress factors such as salinity, drought, and extreme-temperature excess ROS.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e SOD is the main line of defense against drought-induced oxidative stress\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e while the superoxide (O\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e \u003csup\u003e⦁\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e) produced by the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) or RBOH is converted to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO by SOD.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e CAT is a key enzymes in the biological defense system during the biological evolution process. It reduces H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e overproduction during oxidative stress by converting H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO and O\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, while playing a vital role in plant defense and stress response, delaying plant senescence, and regulating plant cell redox balance.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The ascorbate-GSH pathway represents the main HO\u003csub\u003e22\u003c/sub\u003e detoxification system in plant cells, in which APX is an effective ROS regulator since it contributes the most to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e detoxification, utilizing ascorbic acid as an electron donor to convert H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to water.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e GR is a highly conserved enzyme that combines NADPH oxidation and GSH disulfide (GSSG) reduction to decrease GSH, consequently eliminating excessive ROS.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Studies have shown that enhancing the activities of ROS-scavenging enzymes such as POD, CAT, APX, GPX, and GR in rice can regulate its drought tolerance.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Exogenous SA application induces SA-binding protein 2 gene overexpression, which plays a positive role in regulating the expression of antioxidant enzyme-related genes and activities in tobacco plants, Foliar sprays with appropriate SA concentrations increases the SOD levels and POD activities in leaves, protecting the photosynthesis process.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The combined application of SA and Si to the aboveground section of \u003cem\u003eScrophularia striata\u003c/em\u003e L. improves its response to drought stress by reducing the MDA and H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e content.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In this study, the combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzymes in the two dry-cultivated rice species (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e), effectively improving their antioxidant capacity and drought tolerance.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In addition, exogenous SA application restored the chlorophyll content and CAT activity in the rice, and further increased the activity of other enzymatic antioxidants to enhance drought resistance.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Therefore, combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application significantly increased the SA and Si levels in the two dry-cultivated rice cultivars (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e), enhancing their antioxidant defense capacity, reducing the degree of damage caused by drought, and improving crop yield.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn recent decades, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has provided a unique method to estimate photosynthetic functional traits in crops.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Light energy captured by chlorophyll molecules is used in photochemical reactions to drive photosynthesis, dissipating excess light energy as heat (non-photochemical burst, NPQ) or emitting it as chlorophyll fluorescence. These processes compete with each other, e.g., more significant photosynthesis decreases the dissipation of the additional energy. Therefore, by measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence yield, it is also possible to estimate the efficiency of the photochemical reactions and the heat dissipation. Membrane permeability and vesicle function in chloroplasts are impaired when plant cells are subjected to adversity stress, causing a gradual diminution of photosystem activity and chlorophyll fluorescence. This affects photosystem II repair in plants in adverse conditions, enhances photoinhibition, and reduces photosynthetic efficiency.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The chlorophyll fluorescence indexes include the Fv/Fm value, ΦPSII, NPQ, and qP. The chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters reflect the response of total photosynthetic productivity to environmental factors. Flag leaves represent the most important organ source of rice, playing a crucial role in supplying assimilates for seed grain development.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This study investigated the genetic factors controlling chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters in rice flag leaves. The Fv/Fm ratios were significantly higher in the two dry-cultivated rice treatment groups than in the control groups, indicating that the functional state of the chlorophyll in these rice cultivars was significantly restored after exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). The ΦPSII of the two dry-cultivated rice species was also substantially enhanced compared with the control, indicating that exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying improved the energy conversion efficiency of chloroplasts during photosynthesis\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb). The NPQ responds to the regulatory mechanisms in plants under stress, dissipating excess light energy in various ways.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In this study, the NPQ values of the two dry-cultivated rice species were lower than in the control group, especially that of Suijing18, indicating that exogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si spraying significantly enhanced their drought tolerance (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ec). The qP is the photochemical burst coefficient based on the swamp model in which the PSII reaction centers are connected by a common antenna. The qP reflects the portion of light energy absorbed by the pigments in the PSII antennae that can be used for photochemical electron transfer.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The qP value decreased in the Suijing18 cultivar, while it displayed a slight decrease in the Hongke88 variety (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ed). These results indicated that different drought-resistant cultivars showed varied sensitivity to drought, inducing different qP responses in vivo.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe combined application of SA and Si improves the drought resistance of two kinds of dry-cultivated rice by increasing the content of osmoregulatory substances, enhancing the levels of endogenous SA and Si, upregulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and strengthening the photosynthetic capacity of the PSII system. This results in improved drought-resistant capability and increase of the accumulation of dry matter and yield of dry-cultivated rice.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eGW :Writing \u0026ndash; review \u0026amp; editing, Writing \u0026ndash; original draf, Funding acquisition. Y W：Draw figures1-2, Q L:Draw figures3-4, XS:Draw figures5-6, AS: Draw tables1-2, HJ:Investigation, XM:Investigation, XW:Investigation, MY:Review manuscript, ZW:Review manuscript, Funding acquisition .All the authors reviewed the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll data for dry-cultivated rice that support the results of this study are included within this paper and its supplementary information files\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim Y, Chung YS, Lee E, et al. Root Response to Drought Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2020;21(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms21041513 [published Online First: 2020/02/27]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSagare DB, Abbai R, Jain A, et al. More and more of less and less: Is genomics-based breeding of dry direct-seeded rice (DDSR) varieties the need of hour? \u003cem\u003ePlant biotechnology journal\u003c/em\u003e 2020;18(11):2173-86. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13454 [published Online First: 2020/07/30]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen Z, Li P, Jiang S, et al. Evaluation of resource and energy utilization, environmental and economic benefits of rice water-saving irrigation technologies in a rice-wheat rotation system. \u003cem\u003eThe Science of the total environment\u003c/em\u003e 2021;757:143748. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143748 [published Online First: 2020/12/04]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePassioura JB. Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders? \u003cem\u003eFunctional plant biology : FPB\u003c/em\u003e 2012;39(11):851-59. doi: 10.1071/fp12079 [published Online First: 2012/11/01]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMelandri G, AbdElgawad H, Riewe D, et al. Biomarkers for grain yield stability in rice under drought stress. \u003cem\u003eJournal of experimental botany\u003c/em\u003e 2020;71(2):669-83. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz221 [published Online First: 2019/05/16]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHussain HA, Hussain S, Khaliq A, et al. Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2018;9:393. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00393 [published Online First: 2018/04/26]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNoctor G, Reichheld JP, Foyer CH. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. \u003cem\u003eSeminars in cell \u0026amp; developmental biology\u003c/em\u003e 2018;80:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013 [published Online First: 2017/07/25]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUrmi TA, Islam MM, Zumur KN, et al. Combined Effect of Salicylic Acid and Proline Mitigates Drought Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) through the Modulation of Physiological Attributes and Antioxidant Enzymes. \u003cem\u003eAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)\u003c/em\u003e 2023;12(7) doi: 10.3390/antiox12071438 [published Online First: 2023/07/29]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang W, Zhou Z, Chu Z. Emerging Roles of Salicylic Acid in Plant Saline Stress Tolerance. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2023;24(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms24043388 [published Online First: 2023/02/26]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeng Y, Yang J, Li X, et al. Salicylic Acid: Biosynthesis and Signaling. \u003cem\u003eAnnual review of plant biology\u003c/em\u003e 2021;72:761-91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855 [published Online First: 2021/03/24]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBilal S, Saad Jan S, Shahid M, et al. Novel Insights into Exogenous Phytohormones: Central Regulators in the Modulation of Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Responses in Rice under Metal(loid) Stress. \u003cem\u003eMetabolites\u003c/em\u003e 2023;13(10) doi: 10.3390/metabo13101036 [published Online First: 2023/10/27]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePrakash V, Singh VP, Tripathi DK, et al. Nitric oxide (NO) and salicylic acid (SA): A framework for their relationship in plant development under abiotic stress. \u003cem\u003ePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)\u003c/em\u003e 2021;23 Suppl 1:39-49. doi: 10.1111/plb.13246 [published Online First: 2021/02/17]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKimbembe RER, Li G, Fu G, et al. Proteomic analysis of salicylic acid regulation of grain filling of two near-isogenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties under soil drying condition. \u003cem\u003ePlant physiology and biochemistry : PPB\u003c/em\u003e 2020;151:659-72. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.006 [published Online First: 2020/04/30]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhalvandi M, Siosemardeh A, Roohi E, et al. Salicylic acid alleviated the effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf protein pattern in winter wheat. \u003cem\u003eHeliyon\u003c/em\u003e 2021;7(1):e05908. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05908 [published Online First: 2021/01/26]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang C, Liao J, Huang W, et al. Salicylic Acid Protects Sweet Potato Seedlings from Drought Stress by Mediating Abscisic Acid-Related Gene Expression and Enhancing the Antioxidant Defense System. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2022;23(23) doi: 10.3390/ijms232314819 [published Online First: 2022/12/12]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGao Q, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Salicylic Acid Modulates the Osmotic System and Photosynthesis Rate to Enhance the Drought Tolerance of Toona ciliata. \u003cem\u003ePlants (Basel, Switzerland)\u003c/em\u003e 2023;12(24) doi: 10.3390/plants12244187 [published Online First: 2023/12/23]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePan T, Zhang J, He L, et al. Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress. \u003cem\u003ePlants (Basel, Switzerland)\u003c/em\u003e 2021;10(4) doi: 10.3390/plants10040767 [published Online First: 2021/05/01]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhan MIR, Ashfaque F, Chhillar H, et al. The intricacy of silicon, plant growth regulators and other signaling molecules for abiotic stress tolerance: An entrancing crosstalk between stress alleviators. \u003cem\u003ePlant physiology and biochemistry : PPB\u003c/em\u003e 2021;162:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.024 [published Online First: 2021/03/06]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChaiwong N, Rerkasem B, Pusadee T, et al. Silicon application improves caryopsis development and yield in rice. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the science of food and agriculture\u003c/em\u003e 2021;101(1):220-28. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10634 [published Online First: 2020/07/07]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDhakate P, Kandhol N, Raturi G, et al. Silicon nanoforms in crop improvement and stress management. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere\u003c/em\u003e 2022;305:135165. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135165 [published Online First: 2022/06/07]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang H, Xu X, Sun A, et al. Silicon nutrition improves the quality and yield of rice under dry cultivation. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the science of food and agriculture\u003c/em\u003e 2024;104(4):1897-908. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13098 [published Online First: 2023/11/03]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWatanabe A, Hatanaka Y, Takeshima Y, et al. Evaluation of protein production in rice seedlings under dark conditions. \u003cem\u003eScientific reports\u003c/em\u003e 2022;12(1):7759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11672-0 [published Online First: 2022/05/12]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShuochen J, Lihe Z, Fenqin H, et al. Zinc supplementation and light intensity affect 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2AP) formation in fragrant rice. \u003cem\u003eBMC plant biology\u003c/em\u003e 2023;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03954-6 [published Online First: 2023/04/12]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam MM, Jahan K, Sen A, et al. Exogenous Application of Calcium Ameliorates Salinity Stress Tolerance of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Enhances Fruit Quality. \u003cem\u003eAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)\u003c/em\u003e 2023;12(3) doi: 10.3390/antiox12030558 [published Online First: 2023/03/30]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNaveed M, Muhammad Ahsan A, Jiahui N, et al. Silicon improves the drought tolerance in pepper plants through the induction of secondary metabolites, GA biosynthesis pathway, and suppression of chlorophyll degradation. 2024;214(0) doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108919\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, et al. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. \u003cem\u003eScientific reports\u003c/em\u003e 2019;9(1):19250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55889-y [published Online First: 2019/12/19]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKaur H, Manna M, Thakur T, et al. Imperative role of sugar signaling and transport during drought stress responses in plants. \u003cem\u003ePhysiologia plantarum\u003c/em\u003e 2021;171(4):833-48. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13364 [published Online First: 2021/02/15]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOzturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal B, Garc\u0026iacute;a-Caparr\u0026oacute;s P, et al. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. \u003cem\u003ePhysiologia plantarum\u003c/em\u003e 2021;172(2):1321-35. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13297 [published Online First: 2020/12/07]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGujjar RS, Roytrakul S, Chuekong W, et al. A synthetic cytokinin influences the accumulation of leaf soluble sugars and sugar transporters, and enhances the drought adaptability in rice. \u003cem\u003e3 Biotech\u003c/em\u003e 2021;11(8):369. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02908-3 [published Online First: 2021/07/24]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJanda T, Szalai G, P\u0026aacute;l M. Salicylic Acid Signalling in Plants. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2020;21(7) doi: 10.3390/ijms21072655 [published Online First: 2020/04/16]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen S, Zhao CB, Ren RM, et al. Salicylic acid had the potential to enhance tolerance in horticultural crops against abiotic stress. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2023;14:1141918. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1141918 [published Online First: 2023/03/07]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNadarajah K, Abdul Hamid NW, Abdul Rahman NSN. SA-Mediated Regulation and Control of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2021;22(11) doi: 10.3390/ijms22115591 [published Online First: 2021/06/03]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang H, Song Z, Su QW, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic reveals silicon enhances adaptation of rice under dry cultivation by improving flavonoid biosynthesis, osmoregulation, and photosynthesis. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2022;13:967537. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.967537 [published Online First: 2022/08/23]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAli LG, Nulit R, Ibrahim MH, et al. Efficacy of KNO(3), SiO(2) and SA priming for improving emergence, seedling growth and antioxidant enzymes of rice (Oryza sativa), under drought. \u003cem\u003eScientific reports\u003c/em\u003e 2021;11(1):3864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83434-3 [published Online First: 2021/02/18]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang S, Ulhassan Z, Shah AM, et al. Salicylic acid underpins silicon in ameliorating chromium toxicity in rice by modulating antioxidant defense, ion homeostasis and cellular ultrastructure. \u003cem\u003ePlant physiology and biochemistry : PPB\u003c/em\u003e 2021;166:1001-13. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.07.013 [published Online First: 2021/07/17]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGao J, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, et al. RRS1 shapes robust root system to enhance drought resistance in rice. \u003cem\u003eThe New phytologist\u003c/em\u003e 2023;238(3):1146-62. doi: 10.1111/nph.18775 [published Online First: 2023/03/03]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYue L, Xie B, Cao X, et al. The Mechanism of Manganese Ferrite Nanomaterials Promoting Drought Resistance in Rice. \u003cem\u003eNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)\u003c/em\u003e 2023;13(9) doi: 10.3390/nano13091484 [published Online First: 2023/05/13]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNadarajah K, Kumar IS. Drought Response in Rice: The miRNA Story. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2019;20(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms20153766 [published Online First: 2019/08/04]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSohag MAA, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Brestič M, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide attenuate drought stress in rice. 2020;66(1):7-13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRattanawong K, Koiso N, Toda E, et al. Regulatory functions of ROS dynamics via glutathione metabolism and glutathione peroxidase activity in developing rice zygote. \u003cem\u003eThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology\u003c/em\u003e 2021;108(4):1097-115. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15497 [published Online First: 2021/09/20]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang W, Ye Q, Wu Z, et al. Analysis of CAT Gene Family and Functional Identification of OsCAT3 in Rice. \u003cem\u003eGenes\u003c/em\u003e 2023;14(1) doi: 10.3390/genes14010138 [published Online First: 2023/01/22]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJeon YA, Lee HS, Kim SH, et al. Natural variation in rice ascorbate peroxidase gene APX9 is associated with a yield-enhancing QTL cluster. \u003cem\u003eJournal of experimental botany\u003c/em\u003e 2021;72(12):4254-68. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab155 [published Online First: 2021/04/09]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa Y, Ren X, Liang C. Exogenous Ca(2+) enhances antioxidant defense in rice to simulated acid rain by regulating ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase. \u003cem\u003ePlanta\u003c/em\u003e 2021;254(2):41. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03679-0 [published Online First: 2021/07/31]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDiaz JM, Shi X. NOX-like ROS production by glutathione reductase. \u003cem\u003eiScience\u003c/em\u003e 2022;25(10):105093. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105093 [published Online First: 2022/10/04]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJia Y, Gu X, Chai J, et al. Rice OsANN9 Enhances Drought Tolerance through Modulating ROS Scavenging Systems. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2023;24(24) doi: 10.3390/ijms242417495 [published Online First: 2023/12/23]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShohani F, Hosseinin Sarghein S, Fazeli A. Simultaneous application of salicylic acid and silicon in aerial parts of Scrophularia striata L. in response to drought stress. \u003cem\u003ePlant physiology and biochemistry : PPB\u003c/em\u003e 2023;202:107936. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107936 [published Online First: 2023/08/31]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePorcar-Castell A, Malenovsk\u0026yacute; Z, Magney T, et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-system science. \u003cem\u003eNature plants\u003c/em\u003e 2021;7(8):998-1009. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00980-4 [published Online First: 2021/08/11]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTsai YC, Chen KC, Cheng TS, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in diverse rice varieties reveals the positive correlation between the seedlings salt tolerance and photosynthetic efficiency. \u003cem\u003eBMC plant biology\u003c/em\u003e 2019;19(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1983-8 [published Online First: 2019/09/15]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu S, Xiong Z, Zhang Z, et al. Exploration of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics gene regulatory in rice (Oryza sativa L.): a genome-wide association study. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2023;14:1234866. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1234866 [published Online First: 2023/09/25]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWu Y, Jin X, Liao W, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) Alleviated Salinity Stress in Cucumber Seedlings by Enhancing Chlorophyll Synthesis Pathway. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2018;9:635. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00635 [published Online First: 2018/06/06]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoustakas M, Calatayud \u0026Aacute;, Guidi L. Editorial: Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Analysis in Biotic and Abiotic Stress. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science\u003c/em\u003e 2021;12:658500. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658500 [published Online First: 2021/05/04]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePashayeva A, Wu G, Huseynova I, et al. Role of Thylakoid Protein Phosphorylation in Energy-Dependent Quenching of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Rice Plants. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of molecular sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2021;22(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms22157978 [published Online First: 2021/08/08]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu Y, Yang M, Cheng F, et al. Effects of LED photoperiods and light qualities on in vitro growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Cunninghamia lanceolata. \u003cem\u003eBMC plant biology\u003c/em\u003e 2020;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02480-7 [published Online First: 2020/06/11]\u003c/li\u003e\n\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Dry-cultivated rice, Salicylic acid, Silicon, Osmotic regulator, Antioxidant oxidase, Chlorophyll fluorescence","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eSalicylic acid (SA) and silicon (Si) protect against a variety of stresses. Our group found that Si improved the drought tolerance of dry-cultivated rice. No studies are available regarding the synergistic effect of aboveground SA spraying and belowground Si application on the drought tolerance and yield of dry-cultivated rice, necessitating further research. Two rice types with different levels of drought resistance (Suijing18 and Hongke88) were selected for this study. The optimal SA concentration (1 mM/L) was determined via five different SA spraying treatments at various concentrations. Then SA and Si were combined, which included a Control, 45 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si, 1 mM SA, and 1 mM SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;45 kg/hm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Si to examine their synergistic effect on the morphological characteristics, yield, osmotic regulatory substances, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes of two different drought-resistant rice cultivars. The results showed that combined SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si application increased the plant height, root length, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight of these two drought-resistant rice types. The yield of which increased by 80.70% and 77.26%, respectively. Compared with the control, while the photosynthetic capacity improved significantly, the minimum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) values increased by 30.97% and 19.17%, while the photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII) values were 29.01% and 29.64% higher, the NPQ values decreased by 67.55% and 39.98%, respectively. Moreover, treatment increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein levels, osmoregulatory capacity, antioxidant enzyme activity, and increased endogenous SA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Si content in the two dry-cultivated rice species. Hence, the combined application of SA and Si improves the drought resistance of dry-cultivated rice by increasing the content of osmoregulatory substances, enhancing the levels of endogenous SA and Si, upregulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and strengthening the photosynthetic capacity of the PSII system. This results in improved drought-resistant capability and increase of the accumulation of dry matter and yield of dry-cultivated rice, which produces a more significant alleviation of the adverse effects of drought stress compared to the application of either substance alone.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Combined action of salicylic acid and silicon regulates osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzymes to improve drought tolerance and yield in dry-cultivated rice","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-03 06:57:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4948148/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"09938eda-31ca-43d0-818d-2a2cea5bc873","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 3rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":38079780,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences"},{"id":38079781,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant breeding"},{"id":38079782,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant hormones"},{"id":38079783,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant physiology"},{"id":38079784,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences/Plant stress responses"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-26T06:08:13+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-03 06:57:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4948148","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4948148","identity":"rs-4948148","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}