Sex-Specific Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Adolescent Brain Development: Insights from the ABCD Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper used Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study data from about 12,000 children aged 9–10 to test how specific adverse childhood experience (ACE) subtypes—emotional, physical, and sexual abuse/neglect—and their interactions with sex relate to structural brain measures in the hippocampus, amygdala, lateral and medial orbitofrontal cortex, and rostral anterior cingulate cortex, using mixed-effects linear models with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. The authors found sex differences in reported ACE exposure and significant ACE-by-sex interactions: sexual abuse was linked to smaller hippocampal volume in boys but not in girls, and emotional abuse related to reduced lOFC volume in boys with a marginal increase in girls. Physical neglect was associated with reduced hippocampal volume regardless of sex. The paper’s main limitation is that it focuses on cross-sectional associations in neuroimaging outcomes rather than establishing causal effects, and the conclusions are constrained to the selected brain regions and measures examined. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are established risk factors for physical and mental health outcomes, yet their associations with pediatric brain development remain underexplored, particularly regarding sex differences. Most studies treat ACEs as a single construct, overlooking the distinct effects of specific subtypes (e.g., sexual abuse, physical neglect) on brain structure and function. This study examines how ACE subtypes and their interaction with sex are linked to brain development in 9-10-year-olds. Methods Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N≈12,000, ages 9–10), we assessed the links between emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect and structural brain measures in the hippocampus, amygdala, lateral orbital frontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC). Mixed-effects linear models tested ACE subtype, sex, and interaction effects, adjusting for multiple comparisons (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction). Results Boys reported higher exposure to emotional abuse ( p =.01), emotional neglect ( p = .037), and physical neglect ( p < .001), while girls had greater exposure to sexual abuse ( p < .001). Significant ACE-by-sex interactions emerged: sexual abuse was associated with smaller hippocampal volume in boys ( p = .003) but showed no significant effect in girls ( p = .433). Emotional abuse was linked to reduced lOFC volume in boys ( p = 0.024), while in girls, it was associated with a marginal increase ( p = .048). Physical neglect was associated with reduced hippocampal volume regardless of sex (pFDR = .05). Conclusion Boys may be particularly vulnerable to hippocampal and lOFC changes following sexual and emotional abuse, while physical neglect broadly impacts hippocampal development. These findings highlight sex-specific neurodevelopmental effects of ACE subtypes, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions and possible biomarkers for treatment and prevention of sequelae.
Full text 4,191 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are established risk factors for physical and mental health outcomes, yet their associations with pediatric brain development remain underexplored, particularly regarding sex differences. Most studies treat ACEs as a single construct, overlooking the distinct effects of specific subtypes (e.g., sexual abuse, physical neglect) on brain structure and function. This study examines how ACE subtypes and their interaction with sex are linked to brain development in 9-10-year-olds.

Methods

Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N≈12,000, ages 9–10), we assessed the links between emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect and structural brain measures in the hippocampus, amygdala, lateral orbital frontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC). Mixed-effects linear models tested ACE subtype, sex, and interaction effects, adjusting for multiple comparisons (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction).

Results

Boys reported higher exposure to emotional abuse (p =.01), emotional neglect (p = .037), and physical neglect (p< .001), while girls had greater exposure to sexual abuse (p < .001). Significant ACE-by-sex interactions emerged: sexual abuse was associated with smaller hippocampal volume in boys (p = .003) but showed no significant effect in girls (p = .433). Emotional abuse was linked to reduced lOFC volume in boys (p = 0.024), while in girls, it was associated with a marginal increase (p = .048). Physical neglect was associated with reduced hippocampal volume regardless of sex (pFDR = .05).

Conclusion

Boys may be particularly vulnerable to hippocampal and lOFC changes following sexual and emotional abuse, while physical neglect broadly impacts hippocampal development. These findings highlight sex-specific neurodevelopmental effects of ACE subtypes, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions and possible biomarkers for treatment and prevention of sequelae. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study was supported by the NIH K01MH122774 and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator (Dr. Zhu Xi) Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Diego gave ethical approval for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Use of this dataset was approved through data use certification from the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes Revised stats result in abstract; Co-author and co-last author notation revision. Data Availability The data used in this study are publicly available from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study through the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA) at https://nda.nih.gov/abcd. Access requires data use certification.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0