A Dynamical Systems Equivalence Model of Brain and Transformer-Based Language Models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper presents a dynamical systems equivalence framework linking biological neural systems to transformer-based large language models, and empirically tests representational equivalence across five transformer architectures using ZuCo naturalistic reading EEG (Task-NR). The authors formalize both systems as high-dimensional nonlinear state-space models and apply layer-wise representational similarity analysis plus linear encoding models between EEG measures and transformer residual-stream activations, using a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) on transformer features. Dense model variants show low peak RSA alignment (ρ ≈ 0.054–0.055) with negative cross-validated encoding model R2, which the authors interpret as a geometric mismatch, whereas sparse monosemantic SAE features from Qwen3.5-9B yield higher RSA alignment (ρ = 0.221 at layer 0) with positive cross-validated R2 (0.15–0.27 across channels). The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract In this study, a dynamical systems framework for biological neural systems and transformer-based large language models (LLMs) is presented along with a systematic empirical test of brain-transformer representational equivalence across five distinct model architectures. Both the brain and LLMs are formalised as high-dimensional nonlinear state-space dynamical systems, with structural mappings between neural population activity, EEG observables, transformer residual-stream activations, and output logits. Using the ZuCo naturalistic reading (Task-NR) EEG dataset, a layer-wise Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and linear encoding modelling are conducted on GPT-2, BERT-Large, Mistral-7B, DeepSeek-7B, and Qwen3.5-9B equipped with a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE). Dense model architectures produced peak RSA alignment of ρ ≈ 0.054-0.055 with EEG theta and alpha bands, and negative cross-validated encoding model R2, indicating a fundamental geometric mismatch between polysemantic dense representations and neural codes. In contrast, sparse, monosemantic SAE features extracted from Qwen3.5-9B yielded a peak RSA alignment of ρ = 0.221 at layer 0 of a 32-layer sweep, representing a 4.3x improvement in biological alignment and saturating the lower noise ceiling (ρ_half = 0.221, ρ_upper = 0.362). The SAE encoding model achieves positive cross-validated R2 (0.15-0.27 across EEG channels), confirming linearly decodable neural predictions. Partial RSA controlling for sentence length and word length yields ρ = 0.044 (p = 1.8 x 10^-26) with a suppressor effect, ruling out surface-level confounds. It is argued that this improvement reflects a deep convergence. Biological brains and SAE-disentangled transformers both implement sparse distributed codes over a high-dimensional state space, and this shared representational geometry underpins the observed equivalence. The results of this study could have implications for AI interpretability, the mechanistic basis of machine psychology, and the neuroscience of semantic processing.
Full text 11,877 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Dynamical Systems Equivalence Model of Brain and Transformer-Based Language Models | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Dynamical Systems Equivalence Model of Brain and Transformer-Based Language Models Karthik Gokuladas Menon This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract In this study, a dynamical systems framework for biological neural systems and transformer-based large language models (LLMs) is presented along with a systematic empirical test of brain-transformer representational equivalence across five distinct model architectures. Both the brain and LLMs are formalised as high-dimensional nonlinear state-space dynamical systems, with structural mappings between neural population activity, EEG observables, transformer residual-stream activations, and output logits. Using the ZuCo naturalistic reading (Task-NR) EEG dataset, a layer-wise Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and linear encoding modelling are conducted on GPT-2, BERT-Large, Mistral-7B, DeepSeek-7B, and Qwen3.5-9B equipped with a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE). Dense model architectures produced peak RSA alignment of ρ ≈ 0.054-0.055 with EEG theta and alpha bands, and negative cross-validated encoding model R2, indicating a fundamental geometric mismatch between polysemantic dense representations and neural codes. In contrast, sparse, monosemantic SAE features extracted from Qwen3.5-9B yielded a peak RSA alignment of ρ = 0.221 at layer 0 of a 32-layer sweep, representing a 4.3x improvement in biological alignment and saturating the lower noise ceiling (ρ_half = 0.221, ρ_upper = 0.362). The SAE encoding model achieves positive cross-validated R2 (0.15-0.27 across EEG channels), confirming linearly decodable neural predictions. Partial RSA controlling for sentence length and word length yields ρ = 0.044 (p = 1.8 x 10^-26) with a suppressor effect, ruling out surface-level confounds. It is argued that this improvement reflects a deep convergence. Biological brains and SAE-disentangled transformers both implement sparse distributed codes over a high-dimensional state space, and this shared representational geometry underpins the observed equivalence. The results of this study could have implications for AI interpretability, the mechanistic basis of machine psychology, and the neuroscience of semantic processing. Computational Neuroscience Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Dynamical Systems Transformer Architecture Neural Dynamics Representational Similarity Analysis Sparse Autoencoders Interpretability Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9603032","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":633762971,"identity":"b5dfd8a2-63e5-4d50-8371-fd77cd6f8e58","order_by":0,"name":"Karthik Gokuladas Menon","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5820-4474","institution":"Independent Researcher","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Karthik","middleName":"Gokuladas","lastName":"Menon","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-05-04 00:48:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108517812,"identity":"4bd81559-4ef0-40ad-b22f-3a49371052b0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-05 13:49:22","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1753841,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"BrainTransformersPaper.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9603032/v1_covered_3d2478a7-f5f8-4785-baa1-eb7d1b0673ea.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eA Dynamical Systems Equivalence Model of Brain and Transformer-Based Language Models\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Independent Researcher","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Dynamical Systems, Transformer Architecture, Neural Dynamics, Representational Similarity Analysis, Sparse Autoencoders, Interpretability","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn this study, a dynamical systems framework for biological neural systems and transformer-based large language models (LLMs) is presented along with a systematic empirical test of brain-transformer representational equivalence across five distinct model architectures. Both the brain and LLMs are formalised as high-dimensional nonlinear state-space dynamical systems, with structural mappings between neural population activity, EEG observables, transformer residual-stream activations, and output logits. Using the ZuCo naturalistic reading (Task-NR) EEG dataset, a layer-wise Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and linear encoding modelling are conducted on GPT-2, BERT-Large, Mistral-7B, DeepSeek-7B, and Qwen3.5-9B equipped with a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE). Dense model architectures produced peak RSA alignment of ρ ≈ 0.054-0.055 with EEG theta and alpha bands, and negative cross-validated encoding model R2, indicating a fundamental geometric mismatch between polysemantic dense representations and neural codes. In contrast, sparse, monosemantic SAE features extracted from Qwen3.5-9B yielded a peak RSA alignment of ρ = 0.221 at layer 0 of a 32-layer sweep, representing a 4.3x improvement in biological alignment and saturating the lower noise ceiling (ρ_half = 0.221, ρ_upper = 0.362). The SAE encoding model achieves positive cross-validated R2 (0.15-0.27 across EEG channels), confirming linearly decodable neural predictions. Partial RSA controlling for sentence length and word length yields ρ = 0.044 (p = 1.8 x 10^-26) with a suppressor effect, ruling out surface-level confounds. It is argued that this improvement reflects a deep convergence. Biological brains and SAE-disentangled transformers both implement sparse distributed codes over a high-dimensional state space, and this shared representational geometry underpins the observed equivalence. The results of this study could have implications for AI interpretability, the mechanistic basis of machine psychology, and the neuroscience of semantic processing.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Dynamical Systems Equivalence Model of Brain and Transformer-Based Language Models","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-05-05 13:49:01","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9603032/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c6878317-23c5-44c3-b13b-9451f18dad66","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 5th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":67448374,"name":"Computational Neuroscience"},{"id":67448375,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-05T13:49:01+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-05-05 13:49:01","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9603032","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9603032","identity":"rs-9603032","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0