Attitudes, knowledge and prescribing habits of Brazilian gynecologists regarding extended-cycle oral contraceptives
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
A survey of 1097 Brazilian gynecologists reveals that most prescribe extended-cycle oral contraceptives for endometriosis and dysmenorrhea, with higher prescription rates among those holding postgraduate degrees.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Extended-cycle and continuous use combined oral contraceptives (COC) have been widely investigated; however, gynecologists' prescribing habits are largely unknown. This study evaluated the opinions and prescribing habits of Brazilian gynecologists regarding extended/continuous COC. Gynecologists caring for reproductive-age women and used to prescribing COC were recruited to an online survey. Overall, 1097 physicians were included. Of these, 93.0% stated that patients requested extended/continuous COC, with 93.9% of the physicians having already prescribed these regimens at least once. Only 67 physicians reported never having prescribed extended/continuous COC. The most common reasons for prescribing extended/continuous COC were "dysmenorrhea", "endometriosis" and "convenience of menstrual suppression". Physicians reported prescribing extended/continuous regimens for 20.7 ± 17.2% of their patients with an indication for COC, postgraduate degree holders being more likely to prescribe extended/continuous regimens than physicians without postgraduate degree (23.6 ± 19.1% versus 20.0 ± 16.7%; p = 0.014). In conclusion, the vast majority of gynecologists prescribe extended/continuous COC. Women often request information from their doctors on the subject. "Convenience of menstrual suppression" is a common reason given for prescribing extended/continuous COC. According to the physicians, the great majority of extended/continuous COC users are satisfied or very satisfied with the regimen prescribed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-19T06:15:14.566301+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:53.335890+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-19T06:31:22.526400+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine