Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The objective of this study was to examine the factors linked to all-cause mortality and morbidity from neurological and musculoskeletal injuries in motorcycle accidents. Methods The study was part of a two-armed, parallel, multi-period, cluster-randomized controlled trial of 1003 motorcycle crash victims. Morbidity was assessed using various scoring systems, and mixed effects regression models were employed for analysis. Results 90-day all-cause mortality was 9.2% (82/887). Factors associated with mortality included referral-to-discharge >1 hour [OR 4.215 (1.802-9.858), p =.001), Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) ≤6 [OR 7.696 (1.932-30.653), p =.004], GCS 9-12 [OR 3.432 (1.194-9.870), p =.022], GCS ≤8 [OR 6.919 (2.212-21.645), p =.001], intra-axial lesions [OR 78.647 (9.871-626.587), p <.001], extra-axial lesions [OR 11.933 (1.386-102.750), p =.024], skull fracture [OR 11.366, (1.197-107.977), p =.034], and decompressive craniotomy (DC) [OR 0.260 (.095-.706), p =.008). A proportion of 14.5% had unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale (1-3); associated factors included increasing age [OR 1.02, (1.013-1.045, p <.001], multiple injuries [OR 4.559 (1.185-17.531), p=.027], KTS 7-8 [OR 2.755 (1.285-5.906), p=.009], KTS ≤6 [OR 7.551 (2.815-20.255), p=.001], GCS 9-12 [OR 4.07 (1.901-8.719), p=.001], GCS ≤8 [OR 13.779 (5.643-33.645), p <.001], and DC [OR 0.149 (.075-.295), p <.001]. Factors associated with unfavourable patient-reported musculoskeletal outcomes included being married [OR 1.984 (1.322–2.976), p =.001], multiple injuries [OR 1.762, (1.001–3.100), p =.049], and enrolment after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic [OR 2.095 (1.199–3.659), p=.009]. Conclusions The key determinants of mortality and adverse neurological and musculoskeletal injury outcomes observed in this study are essential for establishing core outcome sets in future research and predictive models. Summary of the Key Messages Existing Knowledge: Motorcycle crashes in low- and middle-income countries represent significant public health issues, exacerbated by low helmet usage and insufficient trauma care resources. Study Contributions: This MOTOR trial ancillary study investigated factors associated with all-cause mortality and morbidity from motorcycle crashes, emphasizing neurological and musculoskeletal injuries as critical targets for enhancing rural trauma care systems. Implications for Research, Practice, and Policy: Our findings indicate that the anatomical nature, multiplicity and severity of injuries, referral-dispatch intervals, operative interventions, and COVID-19-related social conditions significantly influence injury outcomes. These factors may serve as a foundational outcome set for benchmarking future clinical trials and trauma registries.
Full text 56,444 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study View ORCID Profile Herman Lule , View ORCID Profile Micheal Mugerwa , Anne Abio , View ORCID Profile Benson Oguttu , View ORCID Profile Andrew Kakeeto , View ORCID Profile Daniel Asiimwe , Harvé Monka Lekuya , View ORCID Profile Robinson Ssebuufu , View ORCID Profile Patrick Kyamanywa , View ORCID Profile Till Bärnighausen , Michael Lowery Wilson , View ORCID Profile Jussi P. Posti doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.21.25322634 Herman Lule 1 Department of Surgery, Kiryandongo Regional Referral Hospital , Kigumba, Uganda 2 Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (IEP) Research Group, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku , Turku, Finland 3 Center for Health Equity in Surgery and Anaesthesia, University of California , San Francisco, California, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Herman Lule For correspondence: Lule.herman{at}gmail.com Micheal Mugerwa 2 Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (IEP) Research Group, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku , Turku, Finland Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Micheal Mugerwa Anne Abio 4 Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku , Turku, Finland 5 INVEST Research Flagship Centre, University of Turku , Turku, Finland Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Benson Oguttu 6 Department of Surgery, Jinja Regional Referral Hospital , Jinja, Uganda 7 Department of Public Health, Botswana Havard Partnership (BHP) , Gaborone, Botswana Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Benson Oguttu Andrew Kakeeto 8 Department of Surgery, Hoima Regional Referral Hospital , Hoima, Uganda 9 Department of Surgery, Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital , Fort portal, Uganda Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Andrew Kakeeto Daniel Asiimwe 10 Department of Surgery, Kampala International University , Kampala, Uganda 11 Department of Surgery, Mubende Regional Referral Hospital , Mubende, Uganda Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel Asiimwe Harvé Monka Lekuya 12 Department of Neurosurgery, Mulago National Referral Hospital , Kampala, Uganda 13 Department of Human Structure and Repair (GE38), Ghent University , Flanders, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Robinson Ssebuufu 14 Department of Surgery, Mengo Hospital , Kampala, Uganda Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Robinson Ssebuufu Patrick Kyamanywa 15 Mother Kevin Postgraduate Medical School, Uganda Martyr’s University , Nkozi, Uganda Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Patrick Kyamanywa Till Bärnighausen 16 Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital and University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Till Bärnighausen Michael Lowery Wilson 3 Center for Health Equity in Surgery and Anaesthesia, University of California , San Francisco, California, USA 16 Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital and University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jussi P. Posti 17 Neurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku , Turku, Finland Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jussi P. Posti Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT Introduction The objective of this study was to examine the factors linked to all-cause mortality and morbidity from neurological and musculoskeletal injuries in motorcycle accidents. Methods The study was part of a two-armed, parallel, multi-period, cluster-randomized controlled trial of 1003 motorcycle crash victims. Morbidity was assessed using various scoring systems, and mixed effects regression models were employed for analysis. Results 90-day all-cause mortality was 9.2% (82/887). Factors associated with mortality included referral-to-discharge >1 hour [OR 4.215 (1.802-9.858), p =.001), Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) ≤6 [OR 7.696 (1.932-30.653), p =.004], GCS 9-12 [OR 3.432 (1.194-9.870), p =.022], GCS ≤8 [OR 6.919 (2.212-21.645), p =.001], intra-axial lesions [OR 78.647 (9.871-626.587), p <.001], extra-axial lesions [OR 11.933 (1.386-102.750), p =.024], skull fracture [OR 11.366, (1.197-107.977), p =.034], and decompressive craniotomy (DC) [OR 0.260 (.095-.706), p =.008). A proportion of 14.5% had unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale (1-3); associated factors included increasing age [OR 1.02, (1.013-1.045, p <.001], multiple injuries [OR 4.559 (1.185-17.531), p=.027], KTS 7-8 [OR 2.755 (1.285-5.906), p=.009], KTS ≤6 [OR 7.551 (2.815-20.255), p=.001], GCS 9-12 [OR 4.07 (1.901-8.719), p=.001], GCS ≤8 [OR 13.779 (5.643-33.645), p <.001], and DC [OR 0.149 (.075-.295), p <.001]. Factors associated with unfavourable patient-reported musculoskeletal outcomes included being married [OR 1.984 (1.322–2.976), p =.001], multiple injuries [OR 1.762, (1.001–3.100), p =.049], and enrolment after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic [OR 2.095 (1.199–3.659), p=.009]. Conclusions The key determinants of mortality and adverse neurological and musculoskeletal injury outcomes observed in this study are essential for establishing core outcome sets in future research and predictive models. Summary of the Key Messages Existing Knowledge: Motorcycle crashes in low- and middle-income countries represent significant public health issues, exacerbated by low helmet usage and insufficient trauma care resources. Study Contributions: This MOTOR trial ancillary study investigated factors associated with all-cause mortality and morbidity from motorcycle crashes, emphasizing neurological and musculoskeletal injuries as critical targets for enhancing rural trauma care systems. Implications for Research, Practice, and Policy: Our findings indicate that the anatomical nature, multiplicity and severity of injuries, referral-dispatch intervals, operative interventions, and COVID-19-related social conditions significantly influence injury outcomes. These factors may serve as a foundational outcome set for benchmarking future clinical trials and trauma registries. INTRODUCTION Motorcycle crashes represent a major global public health challenge, with associated injuries affecting both high-income and low-income countries (LICs) [ 1 ]. These accidents account for nearly half of emergency department admissions following road traffic incidents [ 2 ]. The resulting injuries often involve neurological damage or musculoskeletal trauma, with vulnerable road users, such as riders, passengers, and pedestrians, disproportionately impacted [ 3 ]. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) from motorcycle crashes lead to mortality rate of 3-6%, with higher rates among non-helmet users [ 4 ]. Survivors may experience substantial disability and financial burden [ 5 ]. In low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), especially Africa, motorcycle crash-related injuries result in higher mortality and morbidity compared to high-income countries (HICs) [ 2 ], [ 3 ]. Factors include lower helmet usage (30.6% in Africa compared to a global average of 44.8%) [ 1 ], [ 2 ] and inadequate road safety legislation [ 6 ]. The continent’s high commercial motorcycle usage, driven by a favourable climate, exacerbates the problem. Additionally, limited access to post-crash care, due to a shortage of skilled healthcare workers and a weak prehospital system, worsens injury outcomes [ 7 ]. Africa has only 0.15 neurosurgeons per 100,000 people, far below the WHO recommendation [ 8 ]. Uganda, a low-income country, has a low helmet wearing rate of 19% [ 1 ] and faces a high burden of fatal motorcycle crashes, especially on rural low-capacity roads [ 9 ]. The inefficiency of the rural trauma care system, long transport distances, and ineffective referral protocols worsen injury outcomes [ 10 ]. Recognizing local factors affecting injury outcomes and barriers to post-crash care is essential for reducing negative impacts. Prior research has often combined all road traffic crash outcomes, neglecting the specificities of motorcycle incidents [ 11 ]. This study examined factors related to 90-day mortality and morbidity of neurological and musculoskeletal injuries in motorcycle accidents, which is crucial for improving rural trauma care in Uganda [ 12 ]. METHODS This study was nested within a larger cluster randomized trial which assessed the impact of rural trauma team development on outcomes of motorcycle-crash related injuries (Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202308851460352). The parent trial was a two-armed, parallel, multi-period, cluster-randomized controlled trial of 1003 motorcycle crash victims (501 intervention, 502 control) enrolled at 3 intervention and 3 control trauma centres in Uganda [ 9 ]. Frontline care providers in the intervention group participated in the Rural Trauma Team Development Course of the American College of Surgeons, in conjunction with the establishment of rural trauma networks, in contrast to the control group [ 9 ]. Clusters were randomly assigned 1:1 using permuted block codes. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocation. The present ancillary study utilized patient-participant data on covariates collected from the motorcycle trauma outcome registry (MOTOR) project, which was executed in parallel to the trial [ 9 ]. The data were collected during August 2019 to August 2023, and the analyses were completed in Spring 2024. Study settings The study was conducted in six level III trauma centres including Jinja, Hoima, Fort portal, Mubende, Kiryandongo and Kampala International University Teaching Hospitals. All referrals were handled at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, which is the country’s comprehensive level I trauma centre. The level of specialized care and detailed patient work flow processes employed at these facilities have been comprehensively described in prior literature [ 9 ], [ 10 ]. Eligibility criteria The study population comprised patients aged 2 to 80 years who presented to six sites within 24 hours of a motorcycle crash-related injury. Pregnant women, mentally incapacitated individuals unable to consent, and stroke patients were excluded to limit reported morbidity to trauma. Sample size determination There were 1003 participants (501 in the intervention group vs. 502 control group). The detailed sample size calculations, assumptions and eligibility for study sites were published in the main trial protocol [ 9 ]. Study variables The study captured key variables known to influence outcomes of TBI in accordance with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and orthopaedic injuries, aligned with the global surgery agenda to enhance national surgical care plans [ 13 ], [ 14 ]. These variables included history of head trauma, head CT findings, intraoperative details, definitive surgical treatment, demographic factors, comorbidities, commute distance, injury mechanisms, road user categories, helmet use, prehospital care and transport, referral intervals, multiplicity of injuries, and injury severity as assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) [ 15 ]. The outcome variables were all-cause 90-day mortality and morbidity related TBI and musculoskeletal injuries. Mortality was defined as the death rate within the population. TBI morbidity was evaluated using the 5-point Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), while musculoskeletal morbidity was measured through the Trauma Outcome Measure Score (TOMS) at 90 days, compared to the Trauma Expectation Factor Score (TEFS) at admission. These instruments gauge patients’ recovery concerning pain, physical function, disability, satisfaction, and overall quality of life [ 16 ], [ 17 ]. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse participants’ baseline characteristics. Following established methodologies, the GOS was categorized into unfavourable (scores 1-3) and favourable (scores 4-5) outcomes [ 16 ]. Musculoskeletal injury outcomes were similarly classified as unfavourable (TOMS < TEFS) and favourable (TOMS ≥ TEFS) [ 17 ]. Mixed-effects logistic regression models, specifically the “melogit” command, were used to identify factors related to 90-day mortality and unfavourable morbidity outcomes, while adjusting for confounding variables. This approach accounted for baseline variations, intervention effects, and potential imbalances due to loss to follow-up, assuming that missing data were random. The treatment allocation (intervention vs. control) served as the fixed effect unit of analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported as effect size estimates. The intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using the “estat icc” command in the mixed-effects restricted maximum likelihood (REML) regression model, as the ratio of between-cluster outcome variance to total outcome variance between and within clusters. Covariates were assessed for confounding and effect modification using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics. Statistically significant variables in bivariate analysis, but not in Mantel-Haenszel strata, were excluded from the multivariable model. Relevant random variables with p<0.2 and those with biological plausibility such as KTS and GCS were retained. Analyses were conducted in Stata 15.0 at a 95% confidence interval, with significance at p <0.05. Ethical consideration The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology approved the study (Ref: SS 5082), and all participants or their legally authorised representatives gave written informed consent before enrolment. RESULTS The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of study participants are detailed in the main trial report [preprint]. Briefly, of the 1003 participants, 82% (n=817) were male and 18.5% (n=186) were female, with a median age of 28 years (IQR: 22-37 years). Musculoskeletal injuries were present in 79.7% (799/1003), and head trauma in 94.6% (949/1003). Only 25.3% (254/1003) used helmets, and symptomatic TBI was present in 69.7% (699/1003). The overall median KTS and GCS were 8 (IQR: 7-9), and 14 (IQR: 11-15) respectively. Factors associated with 90-day all-cause mortality Bivariate analyses of factors associated with 90-day all-cause mortality is presented in ( Table 1 ). Of the 1003 participants, 88.4% (n=887) had complete 90-day follow-up data, of whom 9.2% (n=82/887) died. Variables associated with mortality included mode of arrival, multiplicity of injuries, injury severity based on KTS and GCS, head and brain CT diagnosis, and type of neurosurgical intervention ( Table 1 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1: Bivariate analyses of factors associated with all-cause 90-day mortality. Multivariable mixed-effects regression analysis, adjusting for confounding, identified several statistically significant predictors of 90-day all-cause mortality ( Table 2 ). These included: referral to hospital dispatch interval >1 hour [OR 4.215, 95% CI (1.802-9.858)], KTS ≤6 [OR 7.696, 95% CI (1.932-30.653)], GCS 9-12 [OR 3.432, 95% CI (1.194-9.870)], and GCS ≤8 [OR 6.919, 95% CI (2.212-21.645)]. Compared to participants with negative CT scans, the highest odds of mortality were among those with intra-axial lesions [OR 78.647, 95% CI (9.871-626.587)], followed by extra-axial lesions [OR 11.933, 95% CI (1.386-102.750)] and skull fractures [OR 11.366, 95% CI (1.197-107.977)]. Conversely, decompressive craniotomy was associated with lower odds of 90-day mortality [OR .260, 95% CI (.0954-.706)] ( Table 2 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 2: Multivariable analyses of factors associated with all-cause 90-day mortality. Factors associated with morbidity of neurological injuries Table 3 summarises the bivariate analysis of factors associated with unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. The median GOS was 5 (IQR: 4-5), and the proportion of participants with unfavourable GOS (scores 1-3) was 14.5% (129/887). Statistically significant factors associated with unfavourable GOS included age, marital status, mode of prehospital transportation, prehospital interval, number of injuries, injury severity based on KTS and GCS, head and brain CT findings, neurosurgical treatment, and presence of comorbidities. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3: Bivariate analysis of factors associated with unfavourable Glasgow outcome scale. Multivariable mixed-effects regression analysis, adjusting for confounding, identified several key factors associated with unfavourable GOS scores ( Table 4 ). These included: increasing age [OR 1.029, 95% CI (1.013-1.045)], sustaining more than one injury [OR 4.559, 95% CI (1.185-17.531)], KTS 7-8 [OR 2.755, 95% CI (1.285-5.906)], KTS ≤6 [OR 7.551, 95% CI (2.815-20.255)], GCS 9-12 [OR 4.071, 95% CI (1.901-8.719)], and GCS ≤8 [OR 13.779, 95% CI (5.643-33.645)]. Conversely, craniotomy was associated with reduced odds of unfavourable GOS [OR .490, 95% CI (.075-.295)] ( Table 4 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 4: Multivariable analyses of factors associated with unfavourable Glasgow outcome scale. Factors associated with morbidity of musculoskeletal injuries Among the 637 of 799 (79.7%) patients with musculoskeletal injuries who had complete Trauma Expectations Factor (TEFS) and Trauma Outcome Measure (TOMS) scores at 90 days, the majority (75.0%, 478/637) had a favourable outcome, with trauma outcome scores equal to or exceeding their trauma expectation scores. As shown in Table 5 , factors associated with unfavourable TOMS scores in the bivariate analysis included: increasing age, being married and presence of comorbidities. View this table: View inline View popup Table 5: Bivariate analysis of factors associated with unfavourable TOMS for musculoskeletal injuries. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis of factors associated with unfavourable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for musculoskeletal injuries is summarized in Table 6 . The results indicate that being married [OR 1.984, 95% CI (1.322–2.976)], sustaining multiple injuries [OR 1.762, 95% CI (1.001–3.100)], and being enrolled after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic [OR 2.095, 95% CI (1.199–3.659)] were associated with higher odds of unfavourable PROM scores. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 6: Multivariable mixed effects regression analysis of factors associated with unfavourable trauma outcome measure scores for musculoskeletal injuries. Discussion This study investigated factors associated with all-cause mortality and patient-related morbidity associated withto motorcycle crash injuries. It found that patients referred from a level III to level I trauma centre who experienced a delay of over one hour between referral decision and dispatch were four times more likely to die than those transferred within one hour. Corroborating findings from a Ugandan study found increased mortality for neurosurgical referrals arriving more than 4 hours post-injury [ 18 ], and our study has identified delayed referral decision execution as a critical contributor to these delays. Consistent with a Dutch study of 22,525 moderately to severely injured patients [ 19 ], we observed no association between pre-hospital transportation time exceeding one hour and mortality. Evidence from systematic reviews indicate injury-intervention interval impact mortality for neurological and hemodynamically unstable orthopaedic injuries, while prehospital care is desirable over expedited transport for more stable trauma patients [ 20 ]. The present study expands the evidence base regarding the effect of prehospital time on mortality of time-dependent injuries in LMICs context, given most existing literature has emerged from HICs [ 20 ]. This study found helmet utilization at a mere 25%, insufficient to establish a statistically significant correlation with mortality and GOS outcomes. Notably, this rate exceeds the 20% usage documented in neighbouring Kenya but far below the global average [ 4 ]. We observed that injury severity based on KTS≤6 was nearly associated with eightfold mortality at 90-days. On the other hand, there was more than threefold and sevenfold increased mortality for participants with admission GCS score of 9-12 and ≤8, respectively. Both KTS [ 21 ] and GCS [ 22 ] have previously demonstrated the ability to predict mortality in multiply injured and TBI patients respectively. The TRACK-TBI cohort study of 1196 patients aged ≥17 years from 18 level I trauma centres found nearly four-fold increased mortality in those with GCS≤12 versus GCS 13-15 at 5-year follow-up [ 23 ]. Similarly, a retrospective cohort study from the American College of Surgeons’ National Trauma Data Bank identified admission GCS<9 as a strong predictor of mortality in motorcycle-related injuries [ 24 ]. In a Ugandan tertiary hospital cohort of 324 TBI patients, GCS score of <8 and 9-12 were associated with 6.6 and 2.4 increased risk of deaths respectively compared to GCS score of 13-15 [ 11 ]. In addition to mortality, we found both KTS and GCS predicted unfavourable GOS for functional independence. Participants with KTS 7-8 had 3 times the increase in the likelihood of worse GOS 1-3, rising to 7.5 times for KTS ≤6. Similarly, admission GCS score of 9-12 was associated with 4 times higher odds of unfavourable GOS at 90 days, increasing to 13-fold for GCS score of ≤8. Studies have found the GCS to be superior to the KTS in discriminating outcomes of TBI, although the primary focus has largely been on mortality rather than functional independence measures [ 25 ]. Our results demonstrate injury severity as the strongest predictor of TBI outcomes, corroborating with existing literature. In the USA TRACK-TBI study, only 72% of patients were functionally independent at 1-year post-TBI, with significantly lower odds of functional independence and complete recovery for patients with GCS score of 9-12 and <8 than in patients with GCS score of 13-15 [ 23 ]. However, evidence from the European CENTER-TBI study of 2376 subjects found even those with GCS score of 13-15 previously presumed to be mild injury severity had only 50% return to pre-injury functional independence by 6 months [ 26 ], obviating the need to contextualize trauma scores along with clinical evaluation, biomarkers, imaging and psychosocial-environmental modifiers. We identified increasing age and the number of serious injuries per KTS as modifiers of adverse functional outcomes. Observational evidence from Norway corroborate young age ≤16 with favourable GOS while elderly ≥75 have worse prognosis [ 27 ]. Further, our study found participants with more than one acute injury had a 4.5-fold increase in the likelihood of unfavourable GOS. Emerging evidence demonstrate that TBI could enhance the healing of extra-cranial injuries such as fractures by modulating the immune system and bone metabolism [ 28 ]. However, multiplicity of injuries not only increases severity, but also imposes added stress from surgery and anaesthesia for associated injuries, elevating disability risk. The TRACK-TBI retrospective analysis of 1835 patients found those undergoing extra-cranial surgery and anaesthesia had worse functional outcomes at 6 months [ 29 ]. These findings underscore documenting extra-cranial injuries as essential for risk stratification to enhance trauma triage and registry protocols. We found that, compared to individuals with negative head and brain CT scans, the presence of a skull fracture was associated with an 11-fold increased risk of 90-day mortality. This risk further escalated to 12 times in the presence of extra-axial lesions such as acute epidural, subdural or subarachnoid haemorrhages, and increased dramatically to 78 times if axial lesions such as contusions, intraventricular haemorrhage or traumatic axonal injury were detected. The study’s findings substantiate the hypothesis that surgically accessible extra-axial lesions are associated with lower mortality compared to more inaccessible axial lesions associated with cerebral oedema, elevated intracranial pressure, and brain herniation [ 30 ]. However, in agreement with Quach et al [ 31 ], the intra-axial/extra-axial classification failed to predict functional outcomes related to morbidity, as most patients with extra-axial lesions, including diffuse axial injuries, ultimately succumbed to death in our resource-limited environment. While we observed decompressive craniotomy decreased 90-day mortality by 74.0% and unfavourable functional outcomes by 85.1%, the respective reductions were less pronounced at 41.5% and 20.6% for decompressive craniectomy relative to those managed conservatively. This discrepancy may stem from a larger proportion of our participants receiving craniotomy (23.5%) versus craniectomy (2.5%), as the majority of lesions were epidural (17.4%) rather than subdural hematomas (9.5%), but the results also conform to existing literature on the relative occurrence of intracranial haematomas, application, and benefits of the respective surgical approaches [ 11 ], [ 32 ]. Moreover, the results can also be interpreted so that decompressive craniectomy was performed in patients who had more severe and diffuse parenchymal intracranial injuries on head CT compared to patients treated with craniotomy for focal lesions, which may explain part of the difference. The optimal surgical management of intracranial haemorrhage has been contentious over the past decade with variable practice [ 33 ]. Proponents of decompressive craniectomy in which part of the skull bone flap is removed temporarily have emphasized its ability to control post-operative swelling and reduce intracranial pressure, which may otherwise be difficult to adequately manage in limited resource settings [ 33 ], [ 34 ]. The international RESCUE-ASDH randomized trial of 228 acute subdural hematoma patients found no difference in 6-month functional independence between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy, although the craniectomy group trended towards higher one-year mortality, vegetative state, and wound infection rates [ 32 ]. The 24-month results of the RESCUEicp study showed that decompressive craniectomy significantly reduces the mortality rate in patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension compared to standard medical treatment. In addition, a higher percentage of patients in the surgical group showed functional improvement over time compared to patients treated medically alone, indicating a sustained survival benefit and some functional recovery [ 35 ]. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 4,269 subdural hematoma patients found more favourable outcomes in the craniotomy group in terms of mortality, functional independence, and reoperation rates, compared to decompressive craniectomy [ 36 ]. However, craniectomy was associated with lower likelihood of residual hematomas. Moreover, the considerably worse outcomes observed with decompressive craniectomy were linked to worse baseline pre-operative injury characteristics in the patients requiring more aggressive surgical intervention [ 36 ]. Another meta-analysis of 6,848 patients found craniotomy was associated with a 20% reduction in mortality rates and 1.3 times higher likelihood of good functional outcomes compared to decompressive craniectomy [ 33 ]. However, the authors recommended a tailored, patient-centred approach to decision-making, since other factors such as extra-cranial injuries, concurrent epidural hematoma, and intracranial pressure also influenced the outcomes [ 33 ]. Based on the evidence from the CENTER-TBI study, patients with GCS 12 and hematomas < 30 cc do well when managed conservatively [ 37 ]. The 2020 brain trauma foundation guidelines recommend a large decompressive craniectomy for late refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation to reduce ICP, mortality and duration of intensive care, though favourable functional recovery may not be guaranteed [ 38 ]. Thus, the existing evidence suggests that optimal surgical approach should be considered in the context of the individual patient’s unique clinical presentation and injury profile which provides helpful context for interpreting the discrepancies seen in our own findings between the two surgical approaches,but identifying the ideal patient profile who would benefit the most from decompressive craniectomy should be the subject of future research. After adjusting for confounding variables, factors associated with unfavourable patient-reported trauma outcomes for musculoskeletal injuries were multiple injuries [OR 1.762], being married [OR 1.983], and sustaining the injury during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period [OR 2.095]. Comorbid lower extremity injuries are associated with higher injury severity and poorer health-related quality of life following major trauma [ 39 ]. While physical function and pain improve over time, social health lags behind, especially for lower extremity trauma [ 40 ]. Failure to meet psychosocial demands and family commitments, such as marital and financial responsibilities, can contribute to unfavourable patient-reported outcomes among married individuals. The socioeconomic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have exacerbated this phenomenon in family-oriented participants. These findings underscore the need for patient-centred, injury-specific approaches during rehabilitation to promote full recovery, as definitions of good outcomes vary across cultural and family contexts. Thus, psychosocial patient-reported outcomes should be included as indicators when evaluating functional musculoskeletal care systems to better assess return to pre-injury status. Study limitations This study was not without limitations. First, the smaller numbers of some injuries made analyses of individual lesions statistically unsound, and aggregating TBI and dichotomizing trauma outcomes could have resulted in loss of information. The use of predictive models and neural networks with machine learning algorithms is an emerging approach to addressing this challenge. Secondly, 90-day follow-up was considered short-term, as functional improvements may not be detected by the Glasgow Outcome Scale until 6-12 months post-injury, moreover mortality may occur beyond this period [ 27 ]. Thirdly, the study population was limited to motorcycle crash-related injuries, so the results may not generalize to other injury mechanisms such as penetrating TBI which present distinct outcome characteristics. Moreover, the study was restricted to clinical assessment and head CT, excluding prognostically informative MRI and blood biomarkers. Lastly, 11.6% of participants had missing data on outcome variables which may introduce bias following exclusion from the analysis. Additionally, the potential for interobserver variations in data acquisition could not be ruled out. Nevertheless, this is one of the largest studies to evaluate mortality and patient-reported morbidity outcomes of neurological and musculoskeletal injuries unique to motorcycle crashes in Uganda. Moreover, our analyses were robust given risk adjustment, and all experiments were reviewed and approved by authors of the parent trial. Conclusions The research findings indicate that several key factors were determinants of 90-day mortality and unfavourable outcome, including referral decision to dispatch interval, presence of axial and extra-axial lesions, skull fractures, multiplicity of injuries, and injury severity based on the KTS and GCS. Conversely, decompressive craniotomy was identified as a protective factor. For patient-reported outcomes related to musculoskeletal injuries, the key determinants were multiplicity of injuries, marital status, and sustaining injuries during the post-pandemic period. These critical factors should be incorporated into future prospective trials, trauma registries, and predictive machine learning models that incorporate demographic, injury mechanism, clinical, and CT imaging data. Additionally, long-term trials evaluating similar outcomes for diverse injury mechanisms such as motor vehicle crashes, falls, and assaults should be conducted. Data Availability All data produced are available online at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/bgpmkpcwdt/1 The anonymized data underlying the findings of this ancillary study are available within this article. Additionally, the dataset and analysis code pertaining to both the ancillary study and the parent trial, which is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202308851460352), are publicly accessible [ 41 ]. Author contributions HL was the lead researcher who conceived, designed, and implemented the study, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. RS, PK, AK, BO and HML assisted with administrative tasks, data acquisition, and participant follow-up, and provided critical review of the manuscript. HL, MM, and AA were responsible for data analysis and cross-validation. BT critiqued the study methods. Funding for the project was obtained by JPP, MLW, BT and HL. MLW and JPP supervised the study and provided critical review of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding The study was supported through funding and fellowships to HL provided by the University of Turku Graduate School, Turku University Hospital (TYKS) Foundation, TYKS Neurocenter, and the Center for Health Equity in Surgery and Anaesthesia (CHESA) at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), as well as through grants to JPP from the Academy of Finland (Grant No. 60063) and the Maire Taponen Foundation. The funders did not play any role in the design, execution, or reporting of the research findings. Competing interests The authors have disclosed that they do not have any conflicts of interest to declare. The opinions and perspectives expressed within the manuscript are solely those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official positions or views of their respective institutional affiliations. Patient consent for publication Not applicable Ethical approval Ethical approval for this research involving human participants was granted by the Research and Ethics Committees of Mbarara University of Science and Technology (Ref: 1/7; 05/5-9) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (Ref: SS 5082). Provenance and peer review Not commissioned, pending peer review Acknowledgements The authors express gratitude to the staff at medical referral institutions in Uganda, including Jinja, Mbarara, Hoima, Mubende, Kiryandongo, and Kampala International University Teaching Hospitals, for providing facilities that enabled data collection for this study. Additionally, the authors thank the study participants for dedicating their time to take part in the investigation. List of abbreviations GCS Glasgow Coma Score GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale GOSE Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended KTS Kampala Trauma Score LMICs Low-Middle-Income Countries HICS High-Income Countries CENTER-TBI Collaborative European Neuro Trauma Effective Research in Traumatic Brain Injury TRACK-TBI Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury STITCH Surgical Trial in Traumatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage References [1]. ↵ S. Shool et al. , “ The prevalence of helmet use in motorcyclists around the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,006,476 participants .,” Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot ., pp. 1 – 39 , Apr. 2024 , doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2335509 . OpenUrl CrossRef [2]. ↵ W. Cholo , W. Odero , and J. Ogendi , “ The Burden of Motorcycle Crash Injuries on the Public Health System in Kisumu City, Kenya .,” Glob. Heal. Sci. Pract ., vol. 11 , no. 1 , Feb. 2023 , doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00197 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text [3]. ↵ L. A. Brockhus , P. Liasidis , M. Lewis , D. A. Jakob , and D. Demetriades , “ Injury patterns and outcomes in motorcycle driver crashes in the United States: The effect of helmet use .,” Injury , vol. 55 , no. 3 , p. 111196, Mar. 2024 , doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111196 . OpenUrl CrossRef [4]. ↵ E. Giovannini et al. , “ Motorcycle injuries: a systematic review for forensic evaluation .,” Int. J. Legal Med ., May 2024 , doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03250-y . OpenUrl CrossRef [5]. ↵ V. Ponkilainen , I. Kuitunen , R. Liukkonen , M. Vaajala , A. Reito , and M. Uimonen , “ The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis .,” Bone Joint Res ., vol. 11 , no. 11 , pp. 814 – 825 , Nov. 2022 , doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.1111.BJR-2022-0181.R1 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [6]. ↵ J. R. Lepard et al. , “ Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis .,” PLoS Med ., vol. 18 , no. 9 , p. e1003795 , Sep. 2021 , doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003795 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [7]. ↵ N. Abdi , T. Robertson , P. Petrucka , and A. M. Crizzle , “ Do motorcycle helmets reduce road traffic injuries, hospitalizations and mortalities in low and lower-middle income countries in Africa? A systematic review and meta-analysis .,” BMC Public Health , vol. 22 , no. 1 , p. 824, Apr. 2022 , doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13138-4 . OpenUrl CrossRef [8]. ↵ A.-E. K. Ukachukwu et al. , “ Fulfilling the specialist neurosurgical workforce needs in Africa: a systematic review and projection toward 2030 .,” J. Neurosurg ., vol. 138 , no. 4 , pp. 1102 – 1113 , Apr. 2023 , doi: 10.3171/2022.2.JNS211984 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [9]. ↵ H. Lule et al. , “ Effect of Rural Trauma Team Development on the Outcomes of Motorcycle Accident–Related Injuries (Motor Registry Project): Protocol for a Multicenter Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial ,” JMIR Res. Protoc ., vol. 13 , p. e55297 , May 2024 , doi: 10.2196/55297 . OpenUrl CrossRef [10]. ↵ H. Lule , M. Mugerwa , R. SSebuufu , P. Kyamanywa , J. P. Posti , and M. L. Wilson , “ Rural trauma team development training amongst medical trainees and traffic law enforcement professionals in a low-income country: a protocol for a prospective multicenter interrupted time series ,” Int. J. Surg. Protoc ., vol. 28 , no. 1 , pp. 12 – 19 , 2024 , doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000013 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [11]. ↵ L. K. Kamabu et al. , “ Burden, risk factors, neurosurgical evacuation outcomes, and predictors of mortality among traumatic brain injury patients with expansive intracranial hematomas in Uganda: a mixed methods study design .,” BMC Surg ., vol. 23 , no. 1 , p. 326, Oct. 2023 , doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02227-9 . OpenUrl CrossRef [12]. ↵ D. J. Zheng , P. J. Sur , M. G. Ariokot , C. Juillard , M. M. Ajiko , and R. A. Dicker , “ Epidemiology of injured patients in rural Uganda: A prospective trauma registry’s first 1000 days ,” PLoS One , vol. 16 , no. 1 , pp. e0245779 – e0245779 , Jan. 2021 , doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245779 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [13]. ↵ M. K. Ssebakumba , H. Lule , F. Olweny , J. Mabweijano , and J. Kiryabwire , “ Thirty-day clinical outcome of traumatic brain injury patients with acute extradural and subdural hematoma: a cohort study at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda,” Egypt . J. Neurosurg ., vol. 35 , no. 1 , p. 3, 2020 , doi: 10.1186/s41984-020-0073-4 . OpenUrl CrossRef [14]. ↵ L. Roa , D. T. Jumbam , E. Makasa , and J. G. Meara , “ Global surgery and the sustainable development goals .,” Br. J. Surg ., vol. 106 , no. 2 , pp. e44 – e52 , Jan. 2019 , doi: 10.1002/bjs.11044 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [15]. ↵ L. Rosenkrantz , N. Schuurman , M. S. Hameed , R. Boniface , and R. Lett , “ The Kampala Trauma Score: A 20-year track record ,” J. Trauma Acute Care Surg ., vol. 92 , no. 6 , 2022 . [16]. ↵ E. Fitzgerald et al. , “ Methods of functional outcome assessment in neurocritical care trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis .,” Aust. Crit. care Off. J. Confed. Aust. Crit. Care Nurses , p. 101124, Nov. 2024 , doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.009 . OpenUrl CrossRef [17]. ↵ C. Fang et al. , “ Evaluation of an expectation and outcome measurement questionnaire in ankle fracture patients: The Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcomes Measure (TEFTOM) Eurasia study .,” J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong ) , vol. 28 , no. 1 , p. 2309499019890140, 2020 , doi: 10.1177/2309499019890140 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [18]. ↵ S. D. Vaca et al. , “ Temporal delays along the neurosurgical care continuum for traumatic brain injury patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kampala, Uganda ,” Clinical Neurosurgery , vol. 84 , no. 1 . pp. 95 – 103 , 2019 , doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy004 . OpenUrl CrossRef [19]. ↵ J. F. Waalwijk et al. , “ The impact of prehospital time intervals on mortality in moderately and severely injured patients .,” J. Trauma Acute Care Surg ., vol. 92 , no. 3 , pp. 520 – 527 , Mar. 2022 , doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003380 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [20]. ↵ A. F. Bedard et al. , “ A scoping review of worldwide studies evaluating the effects of prehospital time on trauma outcomes ,” Int. J. Emerg. Med ., vol. 13 , no. 1 , p. 64, 2020 , doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00324-7 . OpenUrl CrossRef [21]. ↵ Z. Hakimzadeh , S. S. Vahdati , A. Ala , F. Rahmani , R. R. Ghafouri , and M. Jaberinezhad , “ The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS) ,” BMC Emerg. Med ., vol. 24 , no. 1 , p. 82, 2024 , doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00989-w . OpenUrl CrossRef [22]. ↵ A. Eghzawi , A. Alsabbah , S. Gharaibeh , I. Alwan , A. Gharaibeh , and A. V Goyal , “ Mortality Predictors for Adult Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: A Literature Review .,” Neurol. Int ., vol. 16 , no. 2 , pp. 406 – 418 , Apr. 2024 , doi: 10.3390/neurolint16020030 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [23]. ↵ L. D. Nelson et al. , “ Functional Recovery, Symptoms, and Quality of Life 1 to 5 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury.,” JAMA Netw . open , vol. 6 , no. 3 , p. e233660 , Mar. 2023 , doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3660 . OpenUrl CrossRef [24]. ↵ P. Liasidis , E. Benjamin , D. Jakob , M. Lewis , and D. Demetriades , “ Injury patterns and outcomes in motorcycle passengers .,” Eur. J. trauma Emerg. Surg. Off. Publ. Eur. Trauma Soc ., vol. 49 , no. 6 , pp. 2447 – 2457 , Dec. 2023 , doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02296-8 . OpenUrl CrossRef [25]. ↵ D. Basak et al. , “ Glasgow coma scale compared to other trauma scores in discriminating in-hospital mortality of traumatic brain injury patients admitted to urban Indian hospitals: A multicentre prospective cohort study .,” Injury , vol. 54 , no. 1 , pp. 93 – 99 , Jan. 2023 , doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.035 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [26]. ↵ A. Mikolić et al. , “ Prognostic Models for Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study .,” J. Neurotrauma , vol. 40 , no. 15–16 , pp. 1651 – 1670 , Aug. 2023 , doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0320 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [27]. ↵ R. I. Pantelatos et al. , “ Improvement in Functional Outcome from 6 to 12 Months After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Is Frequent, But May Not Be Detected With the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended .,” Neurotrauma reports , vol. 5 , no. 1 , pp. 139 – 149 , 2024 , doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0109 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [28]. ↵ W. Liu et al. , “ Traumatic brain injury stimulates sympathetic tone-mediated bone marrow myelopoiesis to favor fracture healing .,” Signal Transduct. Target. Ther ., vol. 8 , no. 1 , p. 260, Jul. 2023 , doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01457-w . OpenUrl CrossRef [29]. ↵ C. J. Roberts et al. , “ Clinical Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury and Exposure to Extracranial Surgery: A TRACK-TBI Study .,” JAMA Surg ., vol. 159 , no. 3 , pp. 248 – 259, Mar. 2024 , doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6374 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [30]. ↵ D. J. Cooper et al. , “ Patient Outcomes at Twelve Months after Early Decompressive Craniectomy for Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury in the Randomized DECRA Clinical Trial .,” J. Neurotrauma , vol. 37 , no. 5 , pp. 810 – 816 , Mar. 2020 , doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6869 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [31]. ↵ N. Quach et al. , “ The Prognosis of Axial vs. Extra-Axial Lesions on Functional Status After Traumatic Brain Injury .,” Front. Neurol ., vol. 10 , p. 1167, 2019 , doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01167 . OpenUrl CrossRef [32]. ↵ P. J. Hutchinson et al. , “ Decompressive Craniectomy versus Craniotomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma .,” N. Engl. J. Med ., vol. 388 , no. 24 , pp. 2219 – 2229 , Jun. 2023 , doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214172 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [33]. ↵ A. Nadeem et al. , “ Comparing surgical outcomes: Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy in acute subdural hematoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis .,” World Neurosurg. X , vol. 23 , p. 100368, Jul. 2024 , doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100368 . OpenUrl CrossRef [34]. ↵ T. A. van Essen et al. , “ Comparative effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study .,” EClinicalMedicine , vol. 63 , p. 102161, Sep. 2023 , doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102161 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [35]. ↵ A. G. Kolias et al. , “ Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial .,” JAMA Neurol ., vol. 79 , no. 7 , pp. 664 – 671 , Jul. 2022 , doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1070 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [36]. ↵ M. A. Shafique et al. , “ Surgical strategies in acute subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis of decompressive craniectomy vs. craniotomy .,” Acta Neurochir. (Wien ). , vol. 166 , no. 1 , p. 121, Mar. 2024 , doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06013-1 . OpenUrl CrossRef [37]. ↵ I. A. M. van Erp et al. , “ Early surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with traumatic intracerebral hematoma: a CENTER-TBI study .,” Acta Neurochir. (Wien ). , vol. 165 , no. 11 , pp. 3217 – 3227 , Nov. 2023 , doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05797-y . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [38]. ↵ G. W. J. Hawryluk et al. , “ Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2020 Update of the Decompressive Craniectomy Recommendations .,” Neurosurgery , vol. 87 , no. 3 , pp. 427 – 434 , Sep. 2020 , doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa278 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [39]. ↵ A. Lotfalla , J. A. Halm , T. Schepers , and G. F. Giannakópoulos , “ Parameters influencing health-related quality of life after severe trauma: a systematic review (part II) .,” Eur. J. trauma Emerg. Surg. Off. Publ. Eur. Trauma Soc ., vol. 50 , no. 1 , pp. 93 – 106, Feb. 2024 , doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02276-y . OpenUrl CrossRef [40]. ↵ T. Houwen , M. H. J. Verhofstad , P. W. van Egmond , M. Enting , K. W. W. Lansink , and M. A. C. de Jongh , “ Using PROM(I)S to measure health-related quality of life in patients with a bone fracture: An observational cohort study .,” Injury , vol. 55 , no. 3 , p. 111278, Mar. 2024 , doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111278 . OpenUrl CrossRef [41]. ↵ H. Lule et al. , “Motorcycle Trauma Outcome Registry (MOTOR) Trial Dataset.” Mendeley Data , 2025 , doi: 10.17632/BGPMKPCWDT.1 . OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 23, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study Herman Lule , Micheal Mugerwa , Anne Abio , Benson Oguttu , Andrew Kakeeto , Daniel Asiimwe , Harvé Monka Lekuya , Robinson Ssebuufu , Patrick Kyamanywa , Till Bärnighausen , Michael Lowery Wilson , Jussi P. Posti medRxiv 2025.02.21.25322634; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.21.25322634 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Factors Associated with All-cause Mortality and Morbidity of Motorcycle Crash-Related Neurological and Musculoskeletal Injuries: The MOTOR Trial Ancillary Study Herman Lule , Micheal Mugerwa , Anne Abio , Benson Oguttu , Andrew Kakeeto , Daniel Asiimwe , Harvé Monka Lekuya , Robinson Ssebuufu , Patrick Kyamanywa , Till Bärnighausen , Michael Lowery Wilson , Jussi P. Posti medRxiv 2025.02.21.25322634; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.21.25322634 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Surgery Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (299) Cardiovascular Medicine (4422) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (607) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1507) Epidemiology (15217) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1122) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6583) Geriatric Medicine (667) Health Economics (996) Health Informatics (4524) Health Policy (1367) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1611) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15908) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (622) Medical Ethics (145) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6581) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1143) Occupational and Environmental Health (956) Oncology (3330) Ophthalmology (970) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1690) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5436) Public and Global Health (9218) Radiology and Imaging (2194) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1369) Respiratory Medicine (1195) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ff720444d73dfa9',t:'MTc3OTQwMzY3OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0