⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06
· read from full text
ⓘ
This paper describes the development and methods of the Epistemonikos Database of Trials (ED-Trials), a continuously updated repository of randomized controlled trial (RCT) records assembled from more than 30 sources including bibliographic databases, preprint servers, and international trial registries. The authors report that ED-Trials includes over 1.5 million unique trial records, many not indexed in MEDLINE or other conventional databases, and they outline key features of the database search interface and its status as of October 2025. A major caveat is that authorship and funding are tied to the Epistemonikos Foundation, which may introduce academic conflicts of interest. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based healthcare, providing the most reliable means of assessing the efficacy and safety of health interventions. However, their rapidly growing volume and dispersion across diverse sources, such as bibliographic databases, preprint servers, and trial registries, pose major challenges for evidence synthesis, clinical guideline development, and health technology assessment. Despite longstanding recognition of their importance and multiple initiatives to improve accessibility, there is still no comprehensive, freely available, and continuously updated resource of trial records. To address this gap, the Epistemonikos Foundation developed the Epistemonikos Database of Trials (ED-Trials), a continuously updated repository of RCTs identified from more than 30 sources, including bibliographic databases, preprint servers, international trial registries, and other search sources. This paper describes the methods used to identify and classify trial records, outlines the key features of the search interface, and reports the database status as of October 2025. ED-Trials now includes more than 1.5 million unique trial records, many of which are not indexed in MEDLINE or other conventional bibliographic databases. It represents a significant scholarly and technical achievement, offering a freely accessible and user-friendly resource that enables more efficient, comprehensive, and up-to-date identification of randomized controlled trials, thereby strengthening the foundation of evidence-based healthcare.
Full text
3,657 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based healthcare, providing the most reliable means of assessing the efficacy and safety of health interventions. However, their rapidly growing volume and dispersion across diverse sources, such as bibliographic databases, preprint servers, and trial registries, pose major challenges for evidence synthesis, clinical guideline development, and health technology assessment. Despite longstanding recognition of their importance and multiple initiatives to improve accessibility, there is still no comprehensive, freely available, and continuously updated resource of trial records.
To address this gap, the Epistemonikos Foundation developed the Epistemonikos Database of Trials (ED-Trials), a continuously updated repository of RCTs identified from more than 30 sources, including bibliographic databases, preprint servers, international trial registries, and other search sources. This paper describes the methods used to identify and classify trial records, outlines the key features of the search interface, and reports the database status as of October 2025.
ED-Trials now includes more than 1.5 million unique trial records, many of which are not indexed in MEDLINE or other conventional bibliographic databases. It represents a significant scholarly and technical achievement, offering a freely accessible and user-friendly resource that enables more efficient, comprehensive, and up-to-date identification of randomized controlled trials, thereby strengthening the foundation of evidence-based healthcare.
Competing Interest Statement
Epistemonikos Database of Trials was developed and is maintained by Epistemonikos Foundation, a non-profit organisation with a strict policy to avoid financial conflict of interests. Details about this policy and financial support can be found on the website of the Foundation (https://foundation.epistemonikos.org/). All authors, as developers of the database, have some degree of academic conflict of interests with this article.
Funding Statement
The salary of all the authors is totally or partially paid by Epistemonikos Foundation. The authors received no additional financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.