Abstract
Protein language models, and models that incorporate structure or homologous sequences, estimate sequence likelihood p(sequence) that reflects the protein fitness landscape and is commonly used in mutation effect prediction and protein design. It is widely believed in deep learning field that larger model performs better across tasks. However, for fitness prediction, language model performance declines beyond a certain size, raising concerns about their scalability. Here, we showed that model size, training dataset, and stochastic elements can bias the predicted p(sequence) away from real fitness. Model performance on fitness prediction depends on how well p(sequence) matches evolutionary patterns in homologs, which is best achieved at a moderate p(sequence) level for most proteins. At extreme predicted wild-type sequence likelihoods, models predict uniformly low or high likelihoods for nearly all mutations, failing to reflect the real fitness landscape. Notably, larger models tend to predict proteins with higher p(sequence) , which may exceed the moderate range and thus reduce performance. Our findings clarify the scaling behavior of protein models on fitness prediction and provide practical guidelines for their application and future development.
Full text
1,500 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Protein language models, and models that incorporate structure or homologous sequences, estimate sequence likelihood p(sequence) that reflects the protein fitness landscape and is commonly used in mutation effect prediction and protein design. It is widely believed in deep learning field that larger model performs better across tasks. However, for fitness prediction, language model performance declines beyond a certain size, raising concerns about their scalability. Here, we showed that model size, training dataset, and stochastic elements can bias the predicted p(sequence) away from real fitness. Model performance on fitness prediction depends on how well p(sequence) matches evolutionary patterns in homologs, which is best achieved at a moderate p(sequence) level for most proteins. At extreme predicted wild-type sequence likelihoods, models predict uniformly low or high likelihoods for nearly all mutations, failing to reflect the real fitness landscape. Notably, larger models tend to predict proteins with higher p(sequence), which may exceed the moderate range and thus reduce performance. Our findings clarify the scaling behavior of protein models on fitness prediction and provide practical guidelines for their application and future development.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
updated main figures 1-6 and supplementary figures during the revision in a journal. also added more analyses to support our conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.