Understanding Language Model Scaling on Protein Fitness Prediction

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Protein language models, and models that incorporate structure or homologous sequences, estimate sequence likelihood p(sequence) that reflects the protein fitness landscape and is commonly used in mutation effect prediction and protein design. It is widely believed in deep learning field that larger model performs better across tasks. However, for fitness prediction, language model performance declines beyond a certain size, raising concerns about their scalability. Here, we showed that model size, training dataset, and stochastic elements can bias the predicted p(sequence) away from real fitness. Model performance on fitness prediction depends on how well p(sequence) matches evolutionary patterns in homologs, which is best achieved at a moderate p(sequence) level for most proteins. At extreme predicted wild-type sequence likelihoods, models predict uniformly low or high likelihoods for nearly all mutations, failing to reflect the real fitness landscape. Notably, larger models tend to predict proteins with higher p(sequence) , which may exceed the moderate range and thus reduce performance. Our findings clarify the scaling behavior of protein models on fitness prediction and provide practical guidelines for their application and future development.
Full text 1,500 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Protein language models, and models that incorporate structure or homologous sequences, estimate sequence likelihood p(sequence) that reflects the protein fitness landscape and is commonly used in mutation effect prediction and protein design. It is widely believed in deep learning field that larger model performs better across tasks. However, for fitness prediction, language model performance declines beyond a certain size, raising concerns about their scalability. Here, we showed that model size, training dataset, and stochastic elements can bias the predicted p(sequence) away from real fitness. Model performance on fitness prediction depends on how well p(sequence) matches evolutionary patterns in homologs, which is best achieved at a moderate p(sequence) level for most proteins. At extreme predicted wild-type sequence likelihoods, models predict uniformly low or high likelihoods for nearly all mutations, failing to reflect the real fitness landscape. Notably, larger models tend to predict proteins with higher p(sequence), which may exceed the moderate range and thus reduce performance. Our findings clarify the scaling behavior of protein models on fitness prediction and provide practical guidelines for their application and future development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes updated main figures 1-6 and supplementary figures during the revision in a journal. also added more analyses to support our conclusion

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0