Trends in Morbidity Mortality Associated with Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disorders in Low Resource Settings

In: Current Women s Health Reviews · 2015 · vol. 11(2) , pp. 152–156 · doi:10.2174/157340481102151218123849 · W2341564829
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions is effective in relieving symptoms but ripple effects do occur. Hysterectomies are being performed for conditions where alternatives are available so there is a trend of more surgeries. Not much is known about India, but hysterectomy is very commonly performed. Aim: Study was carried out to know trends of morbidity, mortality with hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disorders in women of low resource settings. Methods: Study commenced in 1998. Retrospective records were collected and prospective cases were included till completion of 2 decades. Analysis of 4223case records of hysterectomies was done, at rural medical institute where most patients are rural. Overall 3985 (94.4%) hysterectomies were performed for benign gynaecological disorders (noncancerous tumours, inflammatory conditions, displacements, miscellaneous like adenomyosis, dysfunctional uterine hemorrhage). Analyses was done by dividing into four five yearly blocks A,B,C,D to know the trends. Results: Complications rate in abdominal hysterectomy was 19.39%, in Block A 26.42%, B 26.65%, C 18.72% and D 14.2%, 50% reduction in complications from recent past. Postoperative vaginal bleeding occurred in 1.18% in Block A, 0.37% in B, 0.52% in C and 0.7% in Block D. Wound infection rate decreased from 10.14% in Block A, 7.1% in D. Other complications had decreasing trend. In vaginal hysterectomy complications rate was 11.14%, 15% in Block A, 18.61% in B, 10.55% in C and 8.4% in D. Mortality was 0.1% (4 cases) 0.19% (one) in Block A, 0.14%(one) in B and 0.16% (2) in C and no mortality in Block D. Conclusion: Severe complications mortality can occur in hysterectomy for benign conditions also. Preoperative care, intraoperative care can reduce morbidities, mortalities, but not totally eliminate, even in present times. Keywords: Benign, disorders, gynaecological, hysterectomy, morbidity, mortality.
Full text 1,630 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim: Study was carried out to know trends of morbidity, mortality with hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disorders in women of low resource settings.

Methods

Study commenced in 1998. Retrospective records were collected and prospective cases were included till completion of 2 decades. Analysis of 4223case records of hysterectomies was done, at rural medical institute where most patients are rural. Overall 3985 (94.4%) hysterectomies were performed for benign gynaecological disorders (noncancerous tumours, inflammatory conditions, displacements, miscellaneous like adenomyosis, dysfunctional uterine hemorrhage). Analyses was done by dividing into four five yearly blocks A,B,C,D to know the trends.

Results

Complications rate in abdominal hysterectomy was 19.39%, in Block A 26.42%, B 26.65%, C 18.72% and D 14.2%, 50% reduction in complications from recent past. Postoperative vaginal bleeding occurred in 1.18% in Block A, 0.37% in B, 0.52% in C and 0.7% in Block D. Wound infection rate decreased from 10.14% in Block A, 7.1% in D. Other complications had decreasing trend. In vaginal hysterectomy complications rate was 11.14%, 15% in Block A, 18.61% in B, 10.55% in C and 8.4% in D. Mortality was 0.1% (4 cases) 0.19% (one) in Block A, 0.14%(one) in B and 0.16% (2) in C and no mortality in Block D.

Conclusion

Severe complications mortality can occur in hysterectomy for benign conditions also. Preoperative care, intraoperative care can reduce morbidities, mortalities, but not totally eliminate, even in present times.

Keywords

Benign, disorders, gynaecological, hysterectomy, morbidity, mortality.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:33:09.130943+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK