Abstract
ABSTRACT Mosquitoes locate vertebrate hosts by following coherent gradients of carbon dioxide, heat, and humidity. Nevertheless, a persistent empirical observation is that ordinary electric fans drastically reduce mosquito bites, even in the absence of chemical repellents. Here, we introduce a physics-guided, agent-based simulation demonstrating that mosquito host-seeking is not chemically inevitable but physically fragile. The model integrates directional airflow, vortex-induced chaotic mixing, and thermal decoy fields, and tracks 250 autonomous mosquito agents over 600 time-steps under Monte-Carlo sampling with independent randomized initializations. Three aerodynamic mechanisms were quantified. Mild upward airflow already reduces successful host localization by more than 80%, despite not mechanically preventing flight. Increasing vortex circulation produces a continuous, threshold-like collapse, reducing localization probability below 1% at moderate strength. Thermal decoys cause only a linear dilution of success, indicating misinformation alone cannot trigger collapse. A two-dimensional phase map reveals a robust “invisibility region” where airflow and vortex perturbations interact synergistically, eliminating host detection even when neither factor individually reaches threshold. These results show that mosquito host-seeking operates as a gradient-dependent failure system: once scalar fields lose spatial coherence, navigation collapses independent of sensory capability. This provides a quantitative theoretical basis for fan-mediated mosquito protection and suggests that non-chemical, low-energy airflow strategies can induce physical invisibility to hematophagous insects.
Full text
2,202 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
Mosquitoes locate vertebrate hosts by following coherent gradients of carbon dioxide, heat, and humidity. Nevertheless, a persistent empirical observation is that ordinary electric fans drastically reduce mosquito bites, even in the absence of chemical repellents. Here, we introduce a physics-guided, agent-based simulation demonstrating that mosquito host-seeking is not chemically inevitable but physically fragile. The model integrates directional airflow, vortex-induced chaotic mixing, and thermal decoy fields, and tracks 250 autonomous mosquito agents over 600 time-steps under Monte-Carlo sampling with independent randomized initializations. Three aerodynamic mechanisms were quantified. Mild upward airflow already reduces successful host localization by more than 80%, despite not mechanically preventing flight. Increasing vortex circulation produces a continuous, threshold-like collapse, reducing localization probability below 1% at moderate strength. Thermal decoys cause only a linear dilution of success, indicating misinformation alone cannot trigger collapse. A two-dimensional phase map reveals a robust “invisibility region” where airflow and vortex perturbations interact synergistically, eliminating host detection even when neither factor individually reaches threshold. These results show that mosquito host-seeking operates as a gradient-dependent failure system: once scalar fields lose spatial coherence, navigation collapses independent of sensory capability. This provides a quantitative theoretical basis for fan-mediated mosquito protection and suggests that non-chemical, low-energy airflow strategies can induce physical invisibility to hematophagous insects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
This revised version updates several figures to improve clarity and consistency of presentation. Figure layouts and labeling have been refined, and minor visual adjustments were made to better reflect the described results. The reference list has also been updated, including corrections to existing citations and the addition of relevant literature. No changes were made to the main conclusions of the study.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.