Urinary steroid profile in early pregnancy after in vitro fertilization
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the levels of urinary steroid metabolites of patients with successful in vitro fertilization and patients who failed to achieve pregnancy. DESIGN: Comparison of urinary steroid profiles prior to oocyte pick-up and three weeks after embryo transfer. SETTING: University hospital. SAMPLE: Eleven women in the same age range with pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and eleven women who failed to achieve pregnancy. METHODS: The standard "long" protocol was used for ovarian stimulation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for assisted in vitro fertilization. The steroid metabolites in urine samples collected for 24 h were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Steroid metabolite levels in urine samples determined in the early pregnancy period. RESULTS: The levels of androsterone, etiocholanolone, pregnanediol, tetrahydro-11-dehydrocorticosterone and tetrahydro-corticosterone were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the urine of women with successful pregnancy three weeks after the embryo transfer, while the levels of tetrahydrocortisone, tetrahydrocortisol, allo-tetrahydrocortisol and α-cortolone became higher in the group of patients with unsuccessful pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The production of androgens, progesterone and corticoid steroid metabolites is altered in the early pregnancy period after in vitro fertilization.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
References (27)
- Effects of luteectomy and progesterone replacement therapy in early pregnant patients via openalex
- Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of postoperative adhesions: an overview via openalex
- Uterine contractility and embryo implantation via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138317 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.tem.2006.05.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1507/endocrj.50.783 via openalex
- doi:10.1677/joe.0.1430183 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60942-x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3026-7_8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00024-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem-62-5-904 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ajhb.20057 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54963-2 via openalex
- W4285719527 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem-21-9-1119 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138043 via openalex
- doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0390195 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.8.2296 via openalex
- doi:10.1365/s10337-008-0710-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/10253890290027912 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod45.4.523 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00007-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1385/endo:19:1:3 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12978.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0009-8981(76)90505-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(72)90181-0 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:56:47.744056+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK