Morphological characteristics and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy

Morphological characteristics and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Morphological characteristics and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy Yong-Ping Li, Hai-Yan Zhou, Hui Ye, Robert A. Haack, Yuan Yang, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in Zoomorphology → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a major agricultural pest, primarily in Asia and Oceania. Chemical odor-based trapping is a major method used to control S. litura , and thus understanding the antennal sensilla of S. litura is critical for improving the efficacy of the attractants used in the pest control. In the present study, the S. litura antennal sensillum types were examined by low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscopy, and morphological descriptions were provided. A total of eight types and two subtypes of the antennal sensilla were identified, namely Böhm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia (I and II), and sensilla auricillica (I and II). Among them, sensilla squamiformia II, and sensilla auricillica II are reported for the first time in S. litura . This study provides morphological information to aid in future electrophysiological tests on the antennal sensilla of S. litura . Spodoptera litura antennal sensilla scanning electron microscopy sensilla morphology Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Introduction Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a significant agricultural pest in Asia and Oceania (Bragard et al. 2019). As an omnivorous insect, it can feed on hundreds of plant species from 40 families, including economically important crops such as beans, crucifers, cucurbits, and others in the families Gramineae, Malvaceae, and Solanaceae (Du et al. 2022; Sharma et al. 2022). S. litura occurs throughout China, especially in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and South China, where it impacts primarily tobacco and cruciferous vegetables (Zhou 2009; Yang et al. 2011). Historically, chemical pesticides have been the predominant method for controlling this moth (Yushima et al. 1974; Singh and Sachan 1993; Guerrero et al. 2014). However, varying levels of pesticide resistance have developed in this insect, leading to excessive spraying and environmental pollution (Ahmad et al. 2007; Bragard et al. 2019). In recent years, China has begun implementing pheromone trapping to monitor and control this pest (Yang et al. 2011; Sang et al. 2013). Pheromone trapping has proven to be environmentally friendly and has led to reduced reliance on chemical pesticides. Therefore, developing more effective odor-based trapping attractants has become an important focus to improve management of S. litura . Antennal sensilla are the biological sensory organs that allow insects to detect and perceive external environmental information such as air flow, air temperature, and pheromones (Galizia and Rössler 2010; Schmidt and Benton 2020; Li et al. 2024). Identifying the types of antennal sensilla is an important prerequisite to clarify the function of antennal sensors, and also to improve the efficacy of pheromone or other odor-based attractants. Nevertheless, relatively few studies have focused on the antennal sensilla of S. litura . Liu et al. (2009) conducted the first study of antennal sensilla of S. litura and recorded five types: sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica. Thereafter, Aruna et al. (2019) also identified five types of antennal sensilla on S. litura (sensilla trichoidea, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla auricillica, and sensilla styloconica) with sensilla styloconica being newly recorded in this insect. However, the number of sensilla types reported for S. litura in the above two studies (6 types), is relatively low when compared to many other Noctuidae. For example, as many as 15 sensilla types have been reported for Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (J. E. Smith) (Li et al. 2024). Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the sensillum types of S. litura and describe their characteristics. The main objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination and classification of the antennal sensilla of S. litura , using low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscopy. For each sensilla type, we described its morphological characteristics and distribution, as well as present one or more high-resolution photos. Providing such information will facilitate future research to improve odor attractants for this major agricultural pest. Materials and Methods Sampling insects Newly emerged 1- to 2-day-old S. litura adults, both male and female, were used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations. The adults were reared in the Insect Laboratory of Yunnan University. The rearing conditions were set at a temperature of 27 ± 1°C, relative humidity of 70 ± 10%, and a light/dark cycle of L12 h: D12 h. Larvae were fed an artificial diet following the formula described by Li et al. (1998). Fully mature larvae were put individually in a circular plastic box (30 mm diameter at bottom, 40 mm diameter at top, 30 mm in height) containing sand which they entered to pupate. Newly emerged adults were transferred to plastic boxes of the same size. Adult male and female moths were provided with a diet of 10% honey water to meet their nutritional needs until they were used for the antennal sensillum studies. Sample preparation and SEM observation SEM observations were conducted at the Modern Analytical Testing Center of Yunnan University. After being killed, the antennae were dissected from male and female S. litura adults under a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ1500, Nikon Instrument, Japan). The treatment of the antennae was slightly modified from the steps given in Guo et al. (2022). Briefly, the dissected antennae were soaked in a 75% ethanol solution and subjected to ultrasonic cleaning for 30 s to remove surface contaminants. Afterwards, the antennae were rinsed with n-hexane for cleaning, with the process repeated three times for 15 min each. Subsequently, a series of dehydration steps were carried out using 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol, with each step lasting 15 min. After the samples were dried, they were affixed to sample holders using conductive adhesive, and a thin layer of gold was sputter-coated on the samples using a BAL-TEC SCD005 under conditions of 30 mA for 300s. The prepared samples were then observed and photographed using an advanced low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscope (LVSEM) (Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI, USA) operating at voltages between 3–10 kV and magnifications ranging from 250 − 60,000x. Terminology, measurements and statistical analysis The identification and classification of the antennal sensilla were based on the external morphology and surface features according to Schneider (1964) and Zacharuk (1980). Antennal measurements were taken on 20 intact male and 20 intact female antennae, including total length, basal diameter, and the number of subsegments. The length and basal diameter of each sensillum type were measured using Image J 1.38 software (National Institutes of Health) and reported as the mean ± SE (standard error). For each type of sensillum found, we attempted to measure 30 replicates for both males and females. However, for some sensillum types that were found beneath scales (e.g., sensilla squamiformia Ⅱ), it was not possible to reach this goal. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM). Differences between males and females for various sensilla measurements were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test, with an alpha level of P < 0.05. Similarly, size differences among the lateral sensilla chaetica (LSC), central sensilla chaetica (CSC), and dorsal sensilla chaetica (DSC) of both males and females were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s mean separation test, with an alpha level of P < 0.05. Microscopic and electron microscopic images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software (Adobe Systems). Results The basic morphology of the antennae The antennae of Spodoptera litura were filamentous and composed of three segments: a scape, a pedicel, and a flagellum (Fig. 1 ). The scape segment was connected to the head; followed by the pedicel and then the flagellum (Figs. 1 ; 2 a, b). Both the scape and the pedicel had muscle structure, indicating that they were able to rotate. These first two segments were totally covered by scales and had two sensilla types: Böhm's bristles (BB) and sensilla squamiformia II (SSQ II) (Figs. 4 a, b; 9 c, d). Böhm's bristles were located at the basal portion of the scape; while sensilla squamiformia II were scattered on the surface of the pedicels. These sensilla types are both regarded as mechanical sensilla, and likely play a role in regulating the spatial orientation of the antennae (Schneider 1964). The average length and basal diameters of the scape and pedicel were significantly longer and larger in males compared to females (Table 1 ). Table 1 Mean (SE) length and basal diameter of the antennal segments of male (N = 20) and female (N = 20) Spodoptera litura. Antennal segments Mean lengths (µm) Mean basal diameters (µm) Female Male Female Male Scape 350.50 ± 7.58 b 393.35 ± 10.85 a 260.30 ± 7.75 a 278.25 ± 5.93 a Pedicel 171.05 ± 4.88 b 187.50 ± 4.46 a 197.95 ± 3.31 b 222.00 ± 6.40 a Flagellum 8.89 ± 1.70 b 9.86 ± 0.66 a NA NA Total 9.38 ± 0.17 b 10.45 ± 0.07 a NA NA For length and diameter measurements separately, values comparing sexes within a row followed by different letters were significantly different (paired t-test, p < 0.05). The flagellum was composed of several subsegments (Fig. 1 ), gradually becoming thinner towards the tip. The flagellum consisted of 83.0 ± 0.5 subsegments (n = 20) on average in females and 83.2 ± 0.6 subsegments (n = 20) in males, with no significant difference between the sexes (t = 0.249, df = 38, p = 0.805). However, there was a significant difference in flagellum length between sexes (t = 5.51, df = 38, p < 0.001), being longer on average in males than females (Table 1 ). At the distal end of the flagellum, there were conical structures covered with petal-like folds, and the tip was adorned with 2 or 3 small cones, which were sensilla styloconica (SS) (Fig. 2 c). Scales were the most prominent structures on the antennal surface, covering the entire surface of the scape and the pedicel, as well as the dorsal side of the flagellum, occupying almost 50% of the antennal surface area (Figs. 2 a, 2 b, 2 d). Most of the sensilla found on S. litura were primarily distributed on the ventral side of the flagellum, with a few sensilla located under the scales (Fig. 3 a). Each subsegment had two rows of scales arranged in an overlapping tile pattern, where the scales of the previous subsegment covered the base of the next subsegment (Fig. 2 d). The scales looked somewhat like shields protecting the antenna, with parallel vertical ridges on their surfaces (Fig. 2 d). The average length of scales was significantly different between the sexes, being 71.01 ± 0.91 µm in females and 80.99 ± 1.15 µm in males (t = 6.95, df = 58, p < 0.001). Types of antennal sensilla Eight types of antennal sensilla and two subtypes were identified in the present study, namely Böhm’s bristles (BB), sensilla trichoidea (ST), sensilla basiconica (SB), sensilla chaetica (SC), sensilla coeloconica (SCO), sensilla styloconica (SS), sensilla squamiformia I and II (SSQ I and SSQ II), and sensilla auricillica I and II (SAU I and SAU II). Böhm's bristles Böhm's bristles (BB) were only found on the surface of the scape and pedicel, distributed in clusters at the base of the two segments, near the intersegmental region (Fig. 4 a). These sensilla looked like thorns in appearance, arising from a socket-like depression, gradually tapering from the base to the tip, and ending in a sharp point. They had a smooth surface without surface pores, suggesting their role was mostly mechanical (Fig. 4 b, Table 2 ). Average BB basal diameter was not significantly different between the sexes (t = 1.22, df = 58, p = 0.227); while the mean BB length was significantly (t = 5.54, df = 58, p < 0.001) longer in males than that in females (Table 3 ). Table 2 Morphological features and location of the antennal sensilla observed on Spodoptera litura adult moths Sensilla types Shape Wall surface Pores Locations* Böhm's bristles, BB Thorn Smooth Aporous S, P Sensilla trichoidea ST Slender hair Helical ridges Multiporous Flv Sensilla basiconica, SB Small cone Longitudinal ridges Multiporous Flv Sensilla chaetica, SCh Upright spine Striped Multiporous Fld, Flv, Fll, Flt Sensilla coeloconica, SCO Chrysanthemum-like Longitudinal ridges Multiporous Flv, Flt Sensilla styloconica, SS Cylindrical Intricate ridges Multiporous Flv, Flt Sensilla squamiformia I, SSQ I Narrow willow leaf Longitudinal grooves Aporous Fld Sensilla squamiformia II, SSQ II Spindle Vertical stripes Aporous S, P Sensilla auricillica I, SAU I Rabbit ear-like Longitudinal ridges Multiporous Flv Sensilla auricillica II, SAU II Enlarged ears-like Smooth Aporous Flv * S = scape, P = pedicel, Fld = dorsal side of flagellomeres, Flv = ventral side of flagellomeres, Fll = lateral side of flagellomeres, Flt = terminal flagellomere. Table 3 Mean length and basal diameter of the antennal sensilla present on adult female and male Spodoptera litura moths Sensilla types Mean lengths (µm) Mean basal diameters (µm) Female Male Female Male Böhm's bristles, BB 16.77 ± 0.36 b 22.72 ± 0.62 a 2.18 ± 0.05 a 2.28 ± 0.53 a Sensilla trichoidea ST 67.17 ± 1.12 b 81.60 ± 3.00 a 2.98 ± 0.08 b 3.76 ± 0.11 a Sensilla basiconica, SB 12.46 ± 0.51 a 13.42 ± 0.54 a 2.38 ± 0.47 b 2.60 ± 0.08 a Sensilla Chaetica, Central, CSC 74.34 ± 1.02 a3 75.65 ± 1.63 a2 4.54 ± 0.08 b2 5.17 ± 0.17 a2 Sensilla Chaetica, Dorsal, DSC 79.62 ± 1.44 a2 79.86 ± 1.09 a2 4.22 ± 0.99 b2 4.78 ± 0.11 a2 Sensilla Chaetica, Lateral, LSC 87.05 ± 1.29 b1 102.49 ± 2.38 a1 5.36 ± 0.12 b1 6.77 ± 0.14 a1 Sensilla coeloconica, SCO NA* NA 9.84 ± 0.19 b 10.68 ± 0.97 a Sensilla styloconica, SS 21.83 ± 0.35 a 22.55 ± 0.40 a 6.20 ± 1.15 a 6.28 ± 0.19 a Sensilla squamiformia I, SSQ I 49.37 ± 0.51 b 53.32 ± 0.68 a 2.07 ± 0.05 a 2.21 ± 0.05 a Sensilla squamiformia II, SSQ II 66.27 ± 2.25 a 70.81 ± 1.96 a 2.01 ± 0.07 a 2.13 ± 0.06 a Sensilla auricillica I, SAU I 14.13 ± 0.74 a 14.47 ± 0.75 a 2.60 ± 0.11 a 2.86 ± 0.12 a Sensilla auricillica II, SAU II 12.18 ± 0.17 a 12.37 ± 0.29 a NA* NA Values comparing sexes within a row for either length or basal diameter and followed by different letters were significantly different (paired t-test, p < 0.05). Mean values within a column for CSC, DSC and LSC followed by the same letter were not significantly different (ANOVA and Tukey mean separation test, p < 0.05). * NA = Not available. The mean lengths of SCO and basal diameters of SAU II were not measured. Numerous microtrichia were observed around BB (Fig. 4 b). The microtrichia did not have structures or a socket-like depression at their base, were angled with the surface at approximately 90 degrees, and were shorter and much slender compared to BB (Fig. 4 b). Sensilla trichoidea Sensilla trichoidea (ST) were the most abundant sensilla type found on the antennae of S. litura , accounting for approximately 70% of all sensilla found. ST were primarily located on the ventral side of the flagellum (Figs. 3 a, 5 a). ST gradually tapered from base to tip, ending with a rounded and blunt apex (Fig. 5 b). The ST angled away from the antenna surface and had helical ridges along their length (Fig. 5 a, b, Table 2 ). Average ST length (t = 5.75, df = 58, p < 0.001) and basal diameter (t = 5.50, df = 58, p < 0.001) were significantly larger in males than females (Table 3 ). Sensilla basiconica Sensilla basiconica (SB) were the second most abundant sensilla type, being located on the ventral side of the flagellum, with 5–12 SB per subsegment. The SB were widest at their base, short, and with a slender and blunt tip (Fig. 6 a, b). The SB surface was characterized by longitudinal ridges with numerous pores between ridges (Fig. 6 b, Table 2 ). SB are often regarded as chemical sensilla (Chapman, 1982; Nation, 2001; Schneider, 1964). Average SB length did not differ significantly between the sexes (t = 1.30, df = 58, p = 0.201); however, average SB basal diameter was greater in males than females (t = 2.40, df = 58, p = 0.021) (Table 3 ). Sensilla chaetica Sensilla chaetica (SCh) resembled an upright spine, with its base arising from a socket-like depression, then tapering slightly and ending with a blunt, rounded, multiporous tip (Fig. 7 a, b) (Table 2 ). SCh were distributed on all subsegments of the flagellum, with slightly longer SCh being located near the flagellum tip. There were 6 SCh per subsegment near the middle of flagellum in both females and males (n = 15 females and 15 males). Pores were clearly visible at the SCh tip (Fig. 7 c, d). Based on their location around each subsegment, SCh are often classified as lateral sensilla chaetica (LSC), central sensilla chaetica (CSC), and dorsal sensilla chaetica (DSC) (Fig. 3 a, b; Table 3 ) (Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). Average length (F = 65.596, df = 2, p < 0.001) and basal diameter (F = 54.818, df = 2, p < 0.001) differed significantly among LSC, CSC and DSC in males. For example, in males, average LSC length was significantly longer than either CSC or DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC) (Table 3 ). Similarly, average LSC basal diameter was significantly thicker than either CSC or DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC. In females, average LSC length was significantly longer than either DSC or CSC, and DSC were longer than CSC (Table 3 ; F = 25.697, df = 2, p < 0.001). Likewise, in females, average LSC basal diameter was significantly thicker than both CSC and DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC (Table 3 ; F = 35.266, df = 2, p < 0.001). Sensilla coeloconica Sensilla coeloconica (SCO) were the most complex sensilla found in S. litura , consisting of a central cone (CP), surrounded by multiple spines (SP) (Fig. 8 a). The central cone (CP), was conical in shape with longitudinal ridges on its surface and a pore at the tip, and was surrounded by approximately 12–15 spines (Fig. 8 a, Table 2 ). The spines (SP) had longitudinal ridges and were significantly longer than the central cone, bending inward from their base and forming a dome-like structure that enveloped the central cone, similar to a chrysanthemum flower (Fig. 8 a). Two to eight SCO were present on the ventral side of each flagellum subsegment and at the terminal end (Table 2 ). The size of SCO varied significantly between the sexes, with the basal diameter being significantly larger in males than females (t = 3.90, df = 58, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ). Sensilla styloconica Sensilla styloconica (SS) were present at the distal end of each subsegment, usually one per subsegment along the ventral side (Figs. 3 a; 8 b). The SS were cylindrical in shape, with 1–3 blunt protrusions at the tip that were angled at about 45 degrees to the surface (Fig. 8 b, c, d; Table 2 ). SS with three blunt protrusions were found only in the terminal subsegments, while SS with 1–2 blunt protrusions appeared in the other subsegments. Several small pores were irregularly distributed on the surface of SS (Fig. 8 d). There were no significant differences between sexes in average SS length (t = 1.35, df = 58, p = 0.181) or basal diameter (t = 0.33, df = 58, p = 0.745) (Table 3 ). Sensilla squamiformia I Sensilla squamiformia I (SSQ I) were found in all subsegments of the flagellum, located in socket-like depressions that appeared to be connected with the antenna through the membrane within the depression. SSQ I were widest near their center, gradually narrowing towards the base and tip (Fig. 9 a, b). The SSQ I surface had a serrated longitudinal ridge structure (Fig. 9 a). No pores were detected on SSQ I (Fig. 9 a, Table 2 ). There were 3–5 SSQ I on each subsegment of the flagellum, primarily on the dorsal side (Fig. 9 b). The base of each SSQ I was covered by scales, with just the upper part appearing above the scale surface. The average length of SSQ I was significantly longer in males than females (t = 4.68, df = 58, p < 0.001), while average basal diameters did not differ significantly between the sexes (t = 1.92, df = 58, p = 0.06). Sensilla squamiformia II Sensilla squamiformia II (SSQ II) were another subtype of sensilla detected on S. litura (Fig. 9 c). SSQ II were similar in morphology to SSQ I, but different in their distribution and size. SSQ II were abundant and distributed over the entire scape but found only sparsely on the lateral sides of the pedicel; whereas, SSQ I were present only on the subsegments of the flagellum (Fig. 9 d) (Table 2 ). In addition, SSQ II had longitudinal ridges similar to SSQ I, but the SSQ II were much slender with a slightly curved tip (Fig. 9 a, c; Table 2 ). Moreover, the average length of SSQ II was significantly longer than SSQ I in both males (t = 9.907, df = 47, p < 0.001) and females (t = 8.935, df = 47, p < 0.001) (Table 3 ). However, there were no significant differences between the sexes regarding SSQ II average length (t = 1.52, df = 36, p = 0.137) or average basal diameter (t = 1.27, df = 36, p = 0.211). Sensilla auricillica I Sensilla auricillica I (SAU I) rose from socket-like depressions and had the shape of a rabbit’s ear (Fig. 10 a). There were pores on the SAU I surface. Average SAU I length (t = 1.66, df = 58, p = 0.103) and basal diameter (t = 0.33, df = 58, p = 0.743) did not differ significantly between the sexes (Table 3 ). There was a large depression in these sensilla that gradually narrowed toward the tip (Fig. 10 a). There were longitudinal ridges along the length of these sensilla (Fig. 10 a). The pores on SAU I were scattered sparsely on the ventral side of the flagellum (Fig. 10 a, Table 2 ). Sensilla auricillica II Sensilla auricillica II (SAU II) showed obvious differences in morphology and distribution from SAU I (Fig. 10 ; Table 2 ). The SAU II had an overall tongue-like shape, with its tip being only slightly narrower than its central region, and having 3 small protrusions at the tip (Fig. 10 b). SAU II had some longitudinal ridges on their surface but they were not as prominent as on SAU I (Fig. 10 b). SAU II were present in all subsegments of the flagellum, near the junction of the ventral and lateral surfaces, and usually with 1–4 SAU II being found in each subsegment. Average SAU II length did not differ significantly between the sexes (t = 0.57, df = 58, p = 0.569) (Table 3 ). Discussion Antennal sensilla are important sensory organs for insects, allowing them to receive and perceive external information, locate host plants, avoid predators, and seek mates (Schneider 1964; Chapman 1982; Nation 2001). The needs of insects to perceive these various types of external information promoted the evolution of the complex variety of insect antennal sensilla types (Schneider 1964; Chapman 1982; Li et al. 2024). Identifying the types of the antennal sensilla on a given insect facilitates our understanding of the mechanisms by which an insect can sense environmental stimuli, as well as possibly contributing to the development of innovative odor attractants, which can be used in insect pest control (Malo et al. 2004; Ansebo et al. 2005). Prior to the present study, six types of the antennal sensilla had been recorded in Spodoptera litura , namely sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, and sensilla auricillica (Liu et al. 2009; Aruna et al. 2019). In the current study, we identified a total of eight antennal sensilla and two subtypes, of which sensilla squamiformia II, and sensilla auricillica II were recorded for the first time. From an evolutionary perspective, the types of antennal sensilla present on a given insect species are often similar, but not necessarily the same, as those found on closely related species (Schneider, 1964). In the moth family Noctuidae, nine types of antennal sensilla have been recorded to date: Böhm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia, sensilla auricillica, sensilla basiconica, and uniporous peg sensilla. These types of antennal sensilla have been observed in Athetis lepigone (Noctuidae) (Hu et al. 2021), Copitarsia consueta (Noctuidae) (Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999), Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae) (Rani et al. 2021a), H. assulta (Noctuidae) (Koh et al. 1995), Mythimna separata (Noctuidae) (Chang et al. 2015), S. frugiperda (Noctuidae) (Malo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2024) and S. littoralis (Seada 2015). The antennal sensilla recorded in the current study were shared with many of the above noctuids, except for sensilla squamiformia II and sensilla auricillica II. This similarity in the antennal sensilla types among most several noctuids indicates a common evolutionary origin and similar requirements for receiving and perceiving external information. The sensilla and scales are the most obvious features on the antennal surface in S. litura . The antennal sensilla are primarily distributed on the ventral side of the flagellum, with the scales being the most widespread and abundant non-sensory structures present, being found on the scape, pedicel, and dorsal side of the flagellum. This distribution pattern of sensilla and scales in the antenna of S. litura is consistent with many other Noctuidae (Koh et al. 1995; Chang et al. 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a). Koh et al. (1995) proposed that the arrangement of scales helped prevent mechanical damage to the antenna and the antennal sensilla. Others have suggested that the scales could help capture and concentrate odors, thus enhancing the insect’s ability to perceive and accurately locate the odor (Van der Pers et al. 1980; Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999). In terms of function, the antennal sensilla of S. litura can be classified into three categories: mechanical sensilla, chemical sensilla, and temperature and humidity sensilla. Both Böhm's bristles and sensilla squamiformia are considered mechanical sensilla, responsible for detecting mechanical stimuli derived from the external environment (Schneider 1964; Kristensen 2003). Böhm's bristles are mainly found on the intersegmental membranes between the scape and pedicel, allowing for the orientation of the antenna to be adjusted (Koh et al. 1995; Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999). Numerous microtrichia were also observed around Böhm’s bristles (Fig. 4 b) and are generally considered to have no sensory function (Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a). Sensilla squamiformia, another mechanical sensilla, has been widely recorded in species of Noctuidae, such as A. lepigone (Hu et al. 2021), H. armigera (Rani et al. 2021a), M. separata (Chang et al. 2015), S. frugiperda (Malo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2024), and S. littoralis (Seada 2015). Because sensilla squamiformia are in sockets with no surface pores, some researchers suggested that these sensilla may sense air vibrations rather than perceive chemical molecules (Steinbrecht 1997; Bawin et al. 2017). Sensilla squamiformia I and sensilla squamiformia II were similar in shape but were significantly different in size in the present study. Considering that sensilla squamiformia I and II were located on different parts of the antenna (Table 2 , Fig. 9 b, d), we classified sensilla squamiformia II as a separate subtype of sensilla squamiformia. The chemosensory antennal sensilla identified in S. litura include sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica. Pores on the surface of the antennal sensilla are the key feature that defines these sensilla as having a chemosensory function, given that they serve as channels for external chemicals to enter and interact with internal sensory receptors (Schneider 1964; Zacharuk 1980). Sensilla trichoidea are one of the most common antennal sensilla types found in Lepidoptera (Malo et al. 2004; Seada 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021b). Sensilla trichoidea can perceive sex pheromones and plant odors, indicating that these sensilla are essential for insects to locate mates and their host plants (Seada 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a). Pores on the surface of sensilla trichoidea have been recorded in several moths species such as Cydia pomonella (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), C. succedana (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), Diaphania angustalis (Crambidae) (Zhang et al. 2019), Dioryctria rubella (Pyralidae) (Xu et al. 2021), H. armigera (Rani et al. 2021a), M. separata (Chang et al. 2015), and S. littoralis (Seada 2015). In our study, numerous pores were observed on the surface of sensilla trichoidea (Fig. 5 c), indicating that they likely serve as chemosensory organs. Sensilla basiconica have been recorded in almost all Lepidoptera with filiform antennae, and their distribution pattern on the antennal surface is generally the same in all Noctuidae studied to date (Liu and Liu 1984; Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a). The surface of sensilla basiconica is characterized by numerous small pores and grooves, suggesting that these sensilla have an olfactory function such as pheromone and plant odor detection (Liu and Liu 1984; Chang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a). Koh et al. (1995) reported that the sensilla basiconica of H. assulta are porous, fluted, and thin-walled, and have a role in odor detection. Sensilla chaetica are very common in the antennae of the noctuid moths, being found in each subsegment of the flagellum (Malo et al. 2004; Seada 2015; Hu et al. 2021). These sensilla had the widest distribution on the antennae of S. litura compared to the others types found, being present on the dorsal, lateral and ventral sides of the flagellum. In some studies, sensilla chaetica are referred to as central chaetica, lateral chaetica, and dorsal chaetica according to their locations on the surface of the flagellum (Malo et al. 2004; Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). This naming method was adopted in our study. The size, shape and distribution of sensilla chaetica are similar among all Noctuidae studied to date, suggesting they have a similar perception function among species (Chang et al. 2015; Yuan et al. 2017; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021b). In several studies of Lepidoptera, sensilla chaetica have been the longest sensilla detected (Faucheux 1991; Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a, 2021b; Li et al. 2024). Some authors have proposed that sensilla chaetica help protect other sensilla on the same antenna (Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a), while others have suggested that they may have a taste function in addition to perceiving odors (Popescu et al. 2013; Seada 2015; Bawin et al. 2017; Li et al. 2024). Sensilla coeloconica exhibit a distinctive morphology among the many types of antennal sensilla of Lepidoptera, characterized by a central cone surrounded numerous spines (Flower and Helson 1974; Bawin et al. 2017; Rani et al. 2021a). Sensilla coeloconica have been mostly found on the ventral surface of the flagellum, but their number and shape vary among moth species (Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Rani et al. 2021b). For example, sensilla coeloconica of S. frugiperda have a distinct petal-like structure that encloses the sensilla in a cavity, and the upper part of the spines bends more inward to form a distinct dome-like structure (Li et al. 2024). Many authors have suggested that the surrounding spines serve to protect the central cone from mechanical damage (Yang et al. 2009; Rani et al. 2021a). In addition, Binyameen et al. (2012) suggested that sensilla coeloconica have an olfactory function in S. littorali . Moreover, in several recent studies, sensilla coeloconica were considered multifunctional, i.e., capable of perceiving temperature, humidity, water vapor, pheromones, and plant odors (Seada 2015; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a, 2021b). Sensilla auricillica have been widely reported in Lepidoptera, including Earias vittella (Nolidae) (Rani et al. 2021b), Athetis lepigone (Hu et al. 2021), and Cydia succedana (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), and S. frugiperda (Li et al. 2024). Two subtypes of sensilla auricillica were observed in our study of S. litura . These two subtypes have been also recorded in the tortricids C. pomonella and C. succedana (Roh et al. 2016). Sensilla auricillica are porous sensilla and considered involved in detection of host volatiles and pheromones (Faucheux 2006). Hu et al. (2021) also proposed that sensilla auricillica had an olfactory function in A. lepigone . Electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that sensilla auricillica of the tortricid C. pomonella can respond to phytochemicals and sex pheromones (Ansebo et al. 2005). Sensilla styloconica are commonly found on the filiform antennae of Lepidoptera (Koh et al. 1995; Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024;). Sensilla styloconica have usually been found on the ventral distal portion of each subsegment of the flagellum. Overall, the number, morphological characteristics and distribution of sensilla styloconica are similar in the Noctuidae (Gómez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Castrejón- Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a; Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). The blunt protrusions at the tip of sensilla styloconica are a distinguishing feature of this sensilla type. The number of blunt protrusions in S. litura varied from one to three in our study, which was also consistent with the report by Aruna et al. (2019). A similar pattern has been reported in other Noctiudae (Koh et al. 1995; Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024). Based on the number of the blunt protrusions, Rani et al. (2021a) and Zheng et al. (2014) classified these sensilla into two subtypes, but all other authors did not use the number of blunt protrusions as a morphological feature to assign subtype classification (Koh et al. 1995; Castrejón-Gómez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Galizia and Rössler 2010; Zheng et al. 2014; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024). Although we noted variation in the number of blunt protrusions, we did not classify sensilla styloconica into subtypes. Sensilla styloconica are often categorized as humidity and temperature sensing sensilla, given that no pores are generally observed on their surface (Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Rani et al. 2021b). However, pores have been recorded on sensilla styloconica in the noctuid M. separata , suggesting that these sensilla may perceive chemical stimuli (Chang et al. 2015). In our study of S. litura , we observed pores irregularly distributed on the surface of sensilla styloconica (Fig. 8 d). Such observations suggest that there may be multiple types of sensilla styloconica, some of which can perceive only humidity and temperature, and others that can perceive chemical stimuli as well. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that Spodoptera litura possess eight types and two subtypes of the antennal sensilla: Böhm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia (I and II), and sensilla auricillica (I and II). Sensilla squamiformia II and sensilla auricillica II were reported for the first time. Detailed low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscope images and descriptions were provided for each sensillum type. This study provided the morphological information to aid in future neurophysiological testing of the antennal sensilla of S. litura . Declarations Author Contributions Conceptualization: Y-P. Li, J. Cao, H. Ye; Methodology: H-Y. Zhou, Q-L.Hu, M-M. Jiang, Y-Yang, Y-P. Li; Investigation: H-Y. Zhou, Q-L.Hu, M-M. Jiang; Writing—original draft preparation: Y-P. Li, H. Ye, R.A. Haack, H-Y. Zhou; Writing—review and editing, Y-P. Li, H. Ye, R. A. Haack; Funding acquisition: H. Ye; J. Cao; Supervision: J. Cao; Project administration: J. Cao; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.” Funding This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 32271563, 32471568; Science and Technology Planning Project in Key Areas of Yunnan Province, Grant No. 202001BB050002; Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Province, Grant No.202401AS070151. Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. References Ahmad M, Iqbal Arif M, Ahmad M (2007) Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Prot 26:809-817 Ansebo L, Ignell R, Löfqvist J, Hansson BS, (2005) Responses to sex pheromone and plant odours by olfactory receptor neurons housed in sensilla auricillica of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Insect Physiol 51:1066-1074 Aruna R, Jeyarani S, Mohankumar S, Durairaj C (2019) Documentation and validation of chemosensory structures in antennae of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) through Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Indian J Agric Res 53:554-559. https://doi:10.18805/IJARe.A-5084 Bawin T, Collard F, De Backer L, Yarou BB, Compère P, Francis F, Verheggen FJ (2017) Structure and distribution of the sensilla on the antennae of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Micron 96:16-28 Binyameen M, Anderson P, Ignell R, Seada MA, Hansson BS, Schlyter F (2012) Spatial organization of antennal olfactory sensory neurons in the female Spodoptera littoralis moth: differences in sensitivity and temporal characteristics. Chem Senses 37:613-629 Bragard C, Dehnen‐Schmutz K, Di Serio F, Gonthier P, Jacques MA, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, Magnusson CS, Milonas P (2019) Pest categorisation of Spodoptera litura . EFSA Journal 17:e05765 Castrejón-Gómez VR, Valdez-Carrasco J, Cibrian-Tovar J, Camino-Lavin M, Osorio R (1999) Morphology and distribution of the sense organs on the antennae of Copitarsia consueta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Fla Entomol 82:546-555 Chang XQ, Zhang S, Lv L, Wang MQ (2015) Insight into the ultrastructure of antennal sensilla of Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Insect Sci 15:124 Chapman R (1982) Chemoreception: the significance of receptor numbers. Adv Insect Physiol 16:247-356 Du Y-W, Shi X-B, Zhao L-C, Yuan G-G, Zhao W-W, Huang G-H, Chen G (2022) Chinese cabbage changes its release of volatiles to defend against Spodoptera litura . Insects 13:73. https://doi:10.3390/insects13010073 Faucheux MJ (1991) Morphology and distribution of sensilia on the cephalic appendages, tarsi and ovipositor of the European sunflower moth, Homoeosoma nebulella Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int J Insect Morphol 20:291-307 Faucheux MJ (2006) Antennal sensilla of male Lophocorona pediasia Common 1973 and their phylogenetic implications (Lepidoptera: Lophocoronidae), Annales de la Société entomologique de France. Taylor & Francis, pp 113-118 Flower NE, Helson GAH (1974) Variation in antennal sensilla of some noctuid moths; a scanning electron microscope study. New Zeal J Zool 1:59-66 Galizia CG, Rössler W (2010) Parallel olfactory systems in insects: anatomy and function. Annu Rev Entomol 55: 399-420 Gargi C, Kennedy, JS, Jayabal TD (2022) Morphometrics and distribution of antennal sensillae of both sexes of Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Appl Nat Sci 14:41-48 Guerrero A, Malo EA, Coll J, Quero C (2014) Semiochemical and natural product-based approaches to control Spodoptera spp.(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Pest Sci 87:231-247 Guo K-F, Peng X-M, Tu J-Y, Jin C, Zhang W-R, Chen X-Z, Liu Y-J, Zha H-G, Shi W, Cao J (2022) Abnormal antennal olfactory sensilla phenotypes involved in olfactory deficit in Bactrocera correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects 13:535. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13060535 Hu GL, Zhang CM, Wang ZQ, Chen QX, Lu JQ (2021) Sensilla of the antenna and proboscis of Athetis lepigone (Möschler)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Morphol 282:733-745 Koh YH, Park KC, Boo KS (1995) Antennal sensilla in adult Helicoverpa assulta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): morphology, distribution, and ultrastructure. Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:519-530 Kristensen N (2003) Handbook of Zoology. Volume IV Arthropoda: Insecta, Part 36 Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Volume 2: Morphology, Physiology, and De-velopment, de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, pp 267-288 Li GH, Chen QJ, Pang Y (1998) Studies of artificial diets for the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua . Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni 37:1-5 Li Y-P, Zhou H-Y, Yang Y, Ye H, Haack RA, Cao J (2024) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24644 Liu H, Liu T (1984) Sensilla on the antennal flagellum of the bertha armyworm moth, Mamestra configurata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a scanning electron microscope study. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:236-245 Liu J-X, Zhong G-H, Chen X-F, Hu L-M, Hu M-Y (2009) Ultrastructures of the Sensilla of Spodoptera litura . J Southwest Univ 6:35-40 Malo EA, Castrejón-Gómez VR, Cruz-López L, Rojas JC (2004) Antennal sensilla and electrophysiological response of male and female Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to conspecific sex pheromone and plant odors. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:1273-1284 Nation JL (2001) Insect physiology and biochemistry. CRC press, New York, USA, pp 353-371 Popescu A, Couton L, Almaas T-J, Rospars J-P, Wright GA, Marion-Poll F, Anton S (2013) Function and central projections of gustatory receptor neurons on the antenna of the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis . J Comp Physiol A 199:403-416 Rani AT, Pathour S, Meshram N, Kammar V, Majumder S, Srivastava C, Pandey K, Singh J (2021a) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 85:1371-1391 Rani AT, Shashank PR, Meshram NM, Sagar D, Srivastava C, Pandey KK, Singh J (2021b) Morphological characterization of antennal sensilla of Earias vittella (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae). Micron 140:102957 Roh HS, Park KC, Oh HW, Park CG (2016) Morphology and distribution of antennal sensilla of two tortricid moths, Cydia pomonella and C. succedana (Lepidoptera). Microsc Res Tech 79:1069-1081 Sang S, Wang Z, Qi J, Shu B, Zhong G (2013) Research progress on pesticide resistance of Spodoptera litura . J Environ Entomol 35:808-814 Schmidt HR, Benton R (2020) Molecular mechanisms of olfactory detection in insects: beyond receptors. Open Biology 10. https:// doi:10.1098/rsob.200252 Schneider D (1964) Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol 9: 103-122 Seada MA (2015) Antennal morphology and sensillum distribution of female cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Basic Appl Zool 68:10-18 Sharma S, Upadhayaya S, Tiwari S (2022) Biology and integrated management of tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura Fab.: A systematic review. J Agri Appl Biol 3:28-39 Singh K, Sachan G (1993) Asessment of the use of sex pheromone traps in the management of Spodoptera litura F. Indian J Plant Prot 21:7-13 Steinbrecht RA (1997) Pore structures in insect olfactory sensilla: a review of data and concepts. International Int J Insect Morphol 26:229-245 Van der Pers J, Cuperus P, Den Otter C (1980) Distribution of sense organs on male antennae of small ermine moths, Yponomeuta spp. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 9:15-23 Xu J, Deng C, Lu W, Wu S (2021) Ultrastructure of antennal sensilla in adults of Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insects 12:821. https://doi:10.3390/insects12090821 Yang H, Yan S-C, Liu D (2009) Ultrastructural observations on antennal sensilla of Coleophora obducta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). Micron 40:231-238 Yang M, He Y, Zhang K, Peng G, Wang J, Xu Y (2011) Control of tobacco cutworm moth Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) by mass trapping with the synthetic pheromone lures. J Anhui Agric Sci 28:17314-17316 Yang S, Liu H, Zhang J, Liu J, Zheng H, Ren Y (2017) Scanning electron microscopy study of the antennal sensilla of Monema flavescens Walker (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Neotrop Entomol 46:175-181 Yuan H, Zhao X, Ge S, Huang X, Liu J, Wang Y (2017) A new type of Mythimna Separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) antennal sensilla. Entomol News 127:11-20 Yushima T, Tamaki Y, Kamano S, Oyama M (1974) Field evaluation of a synthetic sex pheromone," litlure", as an attractant for males of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 9:147-152 Zacharuk RY (1980) Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annu Rev Entomol 25:27-47 Zhang YJ, Chen DY, Chao XT, Dong ZS, Huang ZY, Zheng XL, Lu W (2019) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of Diaphania angustalis Snellen (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Microsc Res Tech 82:1632-1641 Zheng H, Liu H, Guo S, Yan Y, Zong S, Zhang J (2014) Scanning electron microscopy study of the antennal sensilla of Catocala remissa . B Insectol 67:63-71 Zhou ZS (2009) A review on control of tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura . Chinese J Appl Entomol 46:354-361 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in Zoomorphology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 22 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 19 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 06 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 28 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Oct, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 20 Oct, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 19 Oct, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 19 Oct, 2024 First submitted to journal 17 Oct, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5285978","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":371194261,"identity":"257d2c42-dd46-4afc-b88a-aeb29b0b0ffe","order_by":0,"name":"Yong-Ping Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yong-Ping","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":371194262,"identity":"80c5c639-5e08-4f31-b6ed-be1b757d537f","order_by":1,"name":"Hai-Yan Zhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hai-Yan","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhou","suffix":""},{"id":371194263,"identity":"f4732e43-2cd9-4b8c-b164-9f83c76cfd69","order_by":2,"name":"Hui Ye","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hui","middleName":"","lastName":"Ye","suffix":""},{"id":371194264,"identity":"bbd14c73-490e-406d-b675-2567274974d4","order_by":3,"name":"Robert A. Haack","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Northern Research Station","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Robert","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Haack","suffix":""},{"id":371194265,"identity":"ed0319f2-7a5c-46f6-a4a6-7eb9de153ee3","order_by":4,"name":"Yuan Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuan","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":371194266,"identity":"d6f1a40d-0660-4a74-8e20-952dfe5099c3","order_by":5,"name":"Qiu-Lian Hu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qiu-Lian","middleName":"","lastName":"Hu","suffix":""},{"id":371194268,"identity":"bca67b90-3ef7-424d-bb8d-31688c2760f9","order_by":6,"name":"Ming-Min Jiang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ming-Min","middleName":"","lastName":"Jiang","suffix":""},{"id":371194269,"identity":"543bcec9-0476-4864-9a88-9c24823a5ee7","order_by":7,"name":"Jun Cao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yunnan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jun","middleName":"","lastName":"Cao","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-18 03:08:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00694-z","type":"published","date":"2025-01-07T15:57:11+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67855067,"identity":"f67f982d-ace6-427d-bf77-355d6fd37022","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:17","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2414466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eTypical appearance of the adult antennae from \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e moths: (a) male and (b) female.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/73aa04e2595f947efe9b8ce4.png"},{"id":67855856,"identity":"7573609e-2e28-4381-9657-f6e7ae676efe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:30:18","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":15757908,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScanning electron micrographs of the antennal scape, pedicel and flagellum of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) the scape and pedicel after removing some scales, (b) the scape and pedicel with scales present, (c) the tip of the flagellum, and (d) scale arrangement on flagellum subsegments. SCh: sensilla chaetica; SS: sensilla styloconica; and SSQ I: sensilla squamiformia I.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/be957031e03ca3b984c82819.png"},{"id":67855074,"identity":"68f61af4-0387-4b6f-82ce-3f65c004e5b7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:18","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":16192738,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological characteristics and distribution of various sensilla on the flagellum of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) ventral side of flagellum, and (b) lateral side of flagellum. ST: sensilla trichoidea; SB: sensilla basiconica; LSC: lateral sensilla chaetica; CSC: central sensilla chaetica; DSC: dorsal sensilla chaetica; SAU: sensilla auricillica; and SS: sensilla styloconica.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/21d9fd68c4c61425eecc15fa.png"},{"id":67855072,"identity":"b438de5a-001f-4be2-beb9-4d4c4ab99fef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:17","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":10695920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological characteristics and distribution of Böhm's bristles on the antennae of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) BB: Böhm's bristles; and (b) microtrichia\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/caa101d1181f3d15b283a1f0.png"},{"id":67855853,"identity":"0b5ab61b-4303-44ba-837b-571033daa610","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:30:17","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":14943900,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological characteristics of sensilla trichoidea of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) overall appearance and basal structure of sensilla trichoidea, and (b) the morphological characteristics of sensilla trichoidea. ST: sensilla trichoidea.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/1b1f032c05648615029b9ec6.png"},{"id":67855852,"identity":"87accf34-d726-4792-aaff-4f11ad6e166e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:30:17","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":11479493,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological characteristics of sensilla basiconica of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) overall appearance and morphological characteristics of sensilla basiconica, and (b) the morphological characteristics of sensilla basiconica at greater magnification. SB: sensilla basiconica.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/4ab4b67f4e126119d4385003.png"},{"id":67855855,"identity":"e7488865-18ec-468d-a854-9a7760d90ad7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:30:17","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":14299073,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScanning electron micrographs of sensilla chaetica of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) overall appearance of sensilla chaetica, (b) morphological characteristics of sensilla chaetica, (c) tip details of sensilla chaetica, and (d) details of the tip of sensilla chaetica. SCh: sensilla chaetica.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/a75b625f8282d5c2be31b52a.png"},{"id":67855075,"identity":"3453eda0-5740-4910-be6c-2650f25731f5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:18","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":16568104,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScanning electron micrographs of two sensilla of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) overall appearance of sensilla coeloconica (SCO), with surrounding spines (SP) and central peg (CP), (b) sensilla styloconica with one pointed cone, (c) sensilla styloconica with two blunt protrusions, and (d) pores on the sensilla styloconica. SCO: sensilla coeloconica; SS: sensilla styloconica; SP: spine; CP: central peg.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/4f42c61d73ac4b63fd0e7075.png"},{"id":67855068,"identity":"17663ed0-2795-46a2-88f6-ab10b3e97ff2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:17","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":15590335,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScanning electron micrographs of sensilla squamiformia of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) morphological characteristics of sensilla squamiformia I, (b) distribution and overall appearance of sensilla squamiformia I, (c) morphological characteristics of sensilla squamiformia II, and (d) distribution and overall appearance of sensilla squamiformia II. SSQ I: sensilla squamiformia I; and SSQ II: sensilla squamiformia II.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/77db043f9cb3399289f6f1d2.png"},{"id":67855070,"identity":"c00d38fd-e1ad-42ed-b79b-130e16cbcc22","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:17","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":11686887,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScanning electron micrographs of sensilla auricillica of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e: (a) morphological characteristics of sensilla auricillica I, and (b) morphological characteristics of sensilla auricillica II. SAU I: sensilla auricillica I; and SAU II: sensilla auricillica II.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/5949c8c6fc8247929a6c9619.png"},{"id":67855066,"identity":"b04d8295-52ce-4fac-8703-1aa830d1ec2c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-30 11:22:17","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":628116,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5285978/v1/02f357ff-b28d-49d0-8baa-edf2b3bc4bcb.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Morphological characteristics and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a significant agricultural pest in Asia and Oceania (Bragard et al. 2019). As an omnivorous insect, it can feed on hundreds of plant species from 40 families, including economically important crops such as beans, crucifers, cucurbits, and others in the families Gramineae, Malvaceae, and Solanaceae (Du et al. 2022; Sharma et al. 2022). \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e occurs throughout China, especially in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and South China, where it impacts primarily tobacco and cruciferous vegetables (Zhou 2009; Yang et al. 2011). Historically, chemical pesticides have been the predominant method for controlling this moth (Yushima et al. 1974; Singh and Sachan 1993; Guerrero et al. 2014). However, varying levels of pesticide resistance have developed in this insect, leading to excessive spraying and environmental pollution (Ahmad et al. 2007; Bragard et al. 2019). In recent years, China has begun implementing pheromone trapping to monitor and control this pest (Yang et al. 2011; Sang et al. 2013). Pheromone trapping has proven to be environmentally friendly and has led to reduced reliance on chemical pesticides. Therefore, developing more effective odor-based trapping attractants has become an important focus to improve management of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntennal sensilla are the biological sensory organs that allow insects to detect and perceive external environmental information such as air flow, air temperature, and pheromones (Galizia and R\u0026ouml;ssler 2010; Schmidt and Benton 2020; Li et al. 2024). Identifying the types of antennal sensilla is an important prerequisite to clarify the function of antennal sensors, and also to improve the efficacy of pheromone or other odor-based attractants. Nevertheless, relatively few studies have focused on the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e. Liu et al. (2009) conducted the first study of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e and recorded five types: sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica. Thereafter, Aruna et al. (2019) also identified five types of antennal sensilla on \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e (sensilla trichoidea, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla auricillica, and sensilla styloconica) with sensilla styloconica being newly recorded in this insect. However, the number of sensilla types reported for \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e in the above two studies (6 types), is relatively low when compared to many other Noctuidae. For example, as many as 15 sensilla types have been reported for \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (J. E. Smith) (Li et al. 2024). Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the sensillum types of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e and describe their characteristics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe main objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination and classification of the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e, using low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscopy. For each sensilla type, we described its morphological characteristics and distribution, as well as present one or more high-resolution photos. Providing such information will facilitate future research to improve odor attractants for this major agricultural pest.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSampling insects\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNewly emerged 1- to 2-day-old S. litura adults, both male and female, were used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations. The adults were reared in the Insect Laboratory of Yunnan University. The rearing conditions were set at a temperature of 27\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026deg;C, relative humidity of 70\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10%, and a light/dark cycle of L12 h: D12 h. Larvae were fed an artificial diet following the formula described by Li et al. (1998). Fully mature larvae were put individually in a circular plastic box (30 mm diameter at bottom, 40 mm diameter at top, 30 mm in height) containing sand which they entered to pupate. Newly emerged adults were transferred to plastic boxes of the same size. Adult male and female moths were provided with a diet of 10% honey water to meet their nutritional needs until they were used for the antennal sensillum studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSample preparation and SEM observation\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSEM observations were conducted at the Modern Analytical Testing Center of Yunnan University. After being killed, the antennae were dissected from male and female S. litura adults under a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ1500, Nikon Instrument, Japan). The treatment of the antennae was slightly modified from the steps given in Guo et al. (2022). Briefly, the dissected antennae were soaked in a 75% ethanol solution and subjected to ultrasonic cleaning for 30 s to remove surface contaminants. Afterwards, the antennae were rinsed with n-hexane for cleaning, with the process repeated three times for 15 min each. Subsequently, a series of dehydration steps were carried out using 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol, with each step lasting 15 min. After the samples were dried, they were affixed to sample holders using conductive adhesive, and a thin layer of gold was sputter-coated on the samples using a BAL-TEC SCD005 under conditions of 30 mA for 300s. The prepared samples were then observed and photographed using an advanced low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscope (LVSEM) (Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI, USA) operating at voltages between 3\u0026ndash;10 kV and magnifications ranging from 250\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;60,000x.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eTerminology, measurements and statistical analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe identification and classification of the antennal sensilla were based on the external morphology and surface features according to Schneider (1964) and Zacharuk (1980). Antennal measurements were taken on 20 intact male and 20 intact female antennae, including total length, basal diameter, and the number of subsegments. The length and basal diameter of each sensillum type were measured using Image J 1.38 software (National Institutes of Health) and reported as the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE (standard error). For each type of sensillum found, we attempted to measure 30 replicates for both males and females. However, for some sensillum types that were found beneath scales (e.g., sensilla squamiformia Ⅱ), it was not possible to reach this goal.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM). Differences between males and females for various sensilla measurements were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test, with an alpha level of P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Similarly, size differences among the lateral sensilla chaetica (LSC), central sensilla chaetica (CSC), and dorsal sensilla chaetica (DSC) of both males and females were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey\u0026rsquo;s mean separation test, with an alpha level of P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Microscopic and electron microscopic images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software (Adobe Systems).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eThe basic morphology of the antennae\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe antennae of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e were filamentous and composed of three segments: a scape, a pedicel, and a flagellum (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The scape segment was connected to the head; followed by the pedicel and then the flagellum (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e; \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea, b). Both the scape and the pedicel had muscle structure, indicating that they were able to rotate. These first two segments were totally covered by scales and had two sensilla types: B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles (BB) and sensilla squamiformia II (SSQ II) (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea, b; \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ec, d). B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles were located at the basal portion of the scape; while sensilla squamiformia II were scattered on the surface of the pedicels. These sensilla types are both regarded as mechanical sensilla, and likely play a role in regulating the spatial orientation of the antennae (Schneider 1964). The average length and basal diameters of the scape and pedicel were significantly longer and larger in males compared to females (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean (SE) length and basal diameter of the antennal segments of male (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;20) and female (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;20) \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntennal segments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean lengths (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean basal diameters (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScape\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e350.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.58 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e393.35\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.85 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e260.30\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.75 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e278.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.93 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePedicel\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e171.05\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.88 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e187.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.46 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e197.95\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.31 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e222.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.40 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlagellum\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.89\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.70 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.66 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.38\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.17 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.07 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eFor length and diameter measurements separately, values comparing sexes within a row followed by different letters were significantly different (paired t-test, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe flagellum was composed of several subsegments (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), gradually becoming thinner towards the tip. The flagellum consisted of 83.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.5 subsegments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;20) on average in females and 83.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.6 subsegments (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;20) in males, with no significant difference between the sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.249, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.805). However, there was a significant difference in flagellum length between sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.51, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), being longer on average in males than females (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). At the distal end of the flagellum, there were conical structures covered with petal-like folds, and the tip was adorned with 2 or 3 small cones, which were sensilla styloconica (SS) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ec).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScales were the most prominent structures on the antennal surface, covering the entire surface of the scape and the pedicel, as well as the dorsal side of the flagellum, occupying almost 50% of the antennal surface area (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ed). Most of the sensilla found on \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e were primarily distributed on the ventral side of the flagellum, with a few sensilla located under the scales (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Each subsegment had two rows of scales arranged in an overlapping tile pattern, where the scales of the previous subsegment covered the base of the next subsegment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ed). The scales looked somewhat like shields protecting the antenna, with parallel vertical ridges on their surfaces (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ed). The average length of scales was significantly different between the sexes, being 71.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.91 \u0026micro;m in females and 80.99\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.15 \u0026micro;m in males (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6.95, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eTypes of antennal sensilla\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEight types of antennal sensilla and two subtypes were identified in the present study, namely B\u0026ouml;hm\u0026rsquo;s bristles (BB), sensilla trichoidea (ST), sensilla basiconica (SB), sensilla chaetica (SC), sensilla coeloconica (SCO), sensilla styloconica (SS), sensilla squamiformia I and II (SSQ I and SSQ II), and sensilla auricillica I and II (SAU I and SAU II).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eBöhm's bristles\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eB\u0026ouml;hm's bristles (BB) were only found on the surface of the scape and pedicel, distributed in clusters at the base of the two segments, near the intersegmental region (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea). These sensilla looked like thorns in appearance, arising from a socket-like depression, gradually tapering from the base to the tip, and ending in a sharp point. They had a smooth surface without surface pores, suggesting their role was mostly mechanical (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Average BB basal diameter was not significantly different between the sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.22, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.227); while the mean BB length was significantly (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.54, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) longer in males than that in females (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMorphological features and location of the antennal sensilla observed on \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e adult moths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla types\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShape\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWall surface\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePores\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLocations*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eB\u0026ouml;hm's bristles, BB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThorn\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmooth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eS, P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla trichoidea ST\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSlender hair\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHelical ridges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla basiconica, SB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall cone\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal ridges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla chaetica, SCh\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpright spine\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStriped\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFld, Flv, Fll, Flt\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla coeloconica, SCO\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChrysanthemum-like\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal ridges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv, Flt\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla styloconica, SS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCylindrical\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntricate ridges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv, Flt\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia I, SSQ I\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNarrow willow leaf\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal grooves\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFld\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia II, SSQ II\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpindle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVertical stripes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eS, P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica I, SAU I\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRabbit ear-like\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal ridges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica II, SAU II\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnlarged ears-like\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmooth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAporous\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlv\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003e* S\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;scape, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;pedicel, Fld\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;dorsal side of flagellomeres, Flv\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;ventral side of flagellomeres, Fll\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;lateral side of flagellomeres, Flt\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;terminal flagellomere.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean length and basal diameter of the antennal sensilla present on adult female and male \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e moths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla types\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean lengths (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean basal diameters (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eB\u0026ouml;hm's bristles, BB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.36 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22.72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.62 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.53 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla trichoidea ST\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e67.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.12 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e81.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.00 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.98\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.08 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.76\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.11 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla basiconica, SB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.51 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.42\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.54 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.38\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.47 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.08 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla Chaetica, Central, CSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.02 a3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75.65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.63 a2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.54\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.08 b2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.17 a2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla Chaetica, Dorsal, DSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e79.62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.44 a2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e79.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.09 a2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.22\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.99 b2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.78\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.11 a2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla Chaetica, Lateral, LSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e87.05\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.29 b1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e102.49\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.38 a1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.36\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.12 b1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.14 a1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla coeloconica, SCO\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.84\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.19 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.97 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla styloconica, SS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.83\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.35 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.40 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.15 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.19 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia I, SSQ I\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.51 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53.32\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.68 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.07\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.21\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia II, SSQ II\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e66.27\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.25 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70.81\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.96 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.07 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.13\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.06 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica I, SAU I\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.13\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.74 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.47\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.75 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.11 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.86\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.12 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica II, SAU II\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.17 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.29 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eValues comparing sexes within a row for either length or basal diameter and followed by different letters were significantly different (paired t-test, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Mean values within a column for CSC, DSC and LSC followed by the same letter were not significantly different (ANOVA and Tukey mean separation test, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). * NA\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Not available. The mean lengths of SCO and basal diameters of SAU II were not measured.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumerous microtrichia were observed around BB (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb). The microtrichia did not have structures or a socket-like depression at their base, were angled with the surface at approximately 90 degrees, and were shorter and much slender compared to BB (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSensilla trichoidea\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSensilla trichoidea (ST) were the most abundant sensilla type found on the antennae of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e, accounting for approximately 70% of all sensilla found. ST were primarily located on the ventral side of the flagellum (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea). ST gradually tapered from base to tip, ending with a rounded and blunt apex (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb). The ST angled away from the antenna surface and had helical ridges along their length (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea, b, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Average ST length (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.75, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and basal diameter (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.50, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) were significantly larger in males than females (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla basiconica\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla basiconica (SB) were the second most abundant sensilla type, being located on the ventral side of the flagellum, with 5\u0026ndash;12 SB per subsegment. The SB were widest at their base, short, and with a slender and blunt tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ea, b). The SB surface was characterized by longitudinal ridges with numerous pores between ridges (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eb, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). SB are often regarded as chemical sensilla (Chapman, 1982; Nation, 2001; Schneider, 1964). Average SB length did not differ significantly between the sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.30, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.201); however, average SB basal diameter was greater in males than females (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.40, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.021) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla chaetica\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla chaetica (SCh) resembled an upright spine, with its base arising from a socket-like depression, then tapering slightly and ending with a blunt, rounded, multiporous tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003ea, b) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). SCh were distributed on all subsegments of the flagellum, with slightly longer SCh being located near the flagellum tip. There were 6 SCh per subsegment near the middle of flagellum in both females and males (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15 females and 15 males). Pores were clearly visible at the SCh tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003ec, d). Based on their location around each subsegment, SCh are often classified as lateral sensilla chaetica (LSC), central sensilla chaetica (CSC), and dorsal sensilla chaetica (DSC) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea, b; Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) (Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). Average length (F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;65.596, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and basal diameter (F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;54.818, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) differed significantly among LSC, CSC and DSC in males. For example, in males, average LSC length was significantly longer than either CSC or DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, average LSC basal diameter was significantly thicker than either CSC or DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC. In females, average LSC length was significantly longer than either DSC or CSC, and DSC were longer than CSC (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e; F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;25.697, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Likewise, in females, average LSC basal diameter was significantly thicker than both CSC and DSC, with no significant difference found between CSC and DSC (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e; F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35.266, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla coeloconica\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla coeloconica (SCO) were the most complex sensilla found in \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e, consisting of a central cone (CP), surrounded by multiple spines (SP) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003ea). The central cone (CP), was conical in shape with longitudinal ridges on its surface and a pore at the tip, and was surrounded by approximately 12\u0026ndash;15 spines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003ea, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The spines (SP) had longitudinal ridges and were significantly longer than the central cone, bending inward from their base and forming a dome-like structure that enveloped the central cone, similar to a chrysanthemum flower (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003ea). Two to eight SCO were present on the ventral side of each flagellum subsegment and at the terminal end (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The size of SCO varied significantly between the sexes, with the basal diameter being significantly larger in males than females (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.90, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla styloconica\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla styloconica (SS) were present at the distal end of each subsegment, usually one per subsegment along the ventral side (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea; \u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eb). The SS were cylindrical in shape, with 1\u0026ndash;3 blunt protrusions at the tip that were angled at about 45 degrees to the surface (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eb, c, d; Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). SS with three blunt protrusions were found only in the terminal subsegments, while SS with 1\u0026ndash;2 blunt protrusions appeared in the other subsegments. Several small pores were irregularly distributed on the surface of SS (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003ed). There were no significant differences between sexes in average SS length (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.35, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.181) or basal diameter (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.33, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.745) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla squamiformia I\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia I (SSQ I) were found in all subsegments of the flagellum, located in socket-like depressions that appeared to be connected with the antenna through the membrane within the depression. SSQ I were widest near their center, gradually narrowing towards the base and tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ea, b). The SSQ I surface had a serrated longitudinal ridge structure (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ea). No pores were detected on SSQ I (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ea, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). There were 3\u0026ndash;5 SSQ I on each subsegment of the flagellum, primarily on the dorsal side (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003eb). The base of each SSQ I was covered by scales, with just the upper part appearing above the scale surface. The average length of SSQ I was significantly longer in males than females (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.68, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), while average basal diameters did not differ significantly between the sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.92, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.06).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla squamiformia II\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia II (SSQ II) were another subtype of sensilla detected on S. litura (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ec). SSQ II were similar in morphology to SSQ I, but different in their distribution and size. SSQ II were abundant and distributed over the entire scape but found only sparsely on the lateral sides of the pedicel; whereas, SSQ I were present only on the subsegments of the flagellum (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ed) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, SSQ II had longitudinal ridges similar to SSQ I, but the SSQ II were much slender with a slightly curved tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003ea, c; Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, the average length of SSQ II was significantly longer than SSQ I in both males (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;9.907, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and females (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8.935, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). However, there were no significant differences between the sexes regarding SSQ II average length (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.52, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.137) or average basal diameter (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.27, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.211).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla auricillica I\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica I (SAU I) rose from socket-like depressions and had the shape of a rabbit\u0026rsquo;s ear (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003ea). There were pores on the SAU I surface. Average SAU I length (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.66, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.103) and basal diameter (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.33, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.743) did not differ significantly between the sexes (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). There was a large depression in these sensilla that gradually narrowed toward the tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003ea). There were longitudinal ridges along the length of these sensilla (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003ea). The pores on SAU I were scattered sparsely on the ventral side of the flagellum (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003ea, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSensilla auricillica II\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica II (SAU II) showed obvious differences in morphology and distribution from SAU I (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e; Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The SAU II had an overall tongue-like shape, with its tip being only slightly narrower than its central region, and having 3 small protrusions at the tip (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003eb). SAU II had some longitudinal ridges on their surface but they were not as prominent as on SAU I (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003eb). SAU II were present in all subsegments of the flagellum, near the junction of the ventral and lateral surfaces, and usually with 1\u0026ndash;4 SAU II being found in each subsegment. Average SAU II length did not differ significantly between the sexes (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.57, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.569) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAntennal sensilla are important sensory organs for insects, allowing them to receive and perceive external information, locate host plants, avoid predators, and seek mates (Schneider 1964; Chapman 1982; Nation 2001). The needs of insects to perceive these various types of external information promoted the evolution of the complex variety of insect antennal sensilla types (Schneider 1964; Chapman 1982; Li et al. 2024). Identifying the types of the antennal sensilla on a given insect facilitates our understanding of the mechanisms by which an insect can sense environmental stimuli, as well as possibly contributing to the development of innovative odor attractants, which can be used in insect pest control (Malo et al. 2004; Ansebo et al. 2005).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrior to the present study, six types of the antennal sensilla had been recorded in \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e, namely sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, and sensilla auricillica (Liu et al. 2009; Aruna et al. 2019). In the current study, we identified a total of eight antennal sensilla and two subtypes, of which sensilla squamiformia II, and sensilla auricillica II were recorded for the first time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom an evolutionary perspective, the types of antennal sensilla present on a given insect species are often similar, but not necessarily the same, as those found on closely related species (Schneider, 1964). In the moth family Noctuidae, nine types of antennal sensilla have been recorded to date: B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia, sensilla auricillica, sensilla basiconica, and uniporous peg sensilla. These types of antennal sensilla have been observed in \u003cem\u003eAthetis lepigone\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Hu et al. 2021), \u003cem\u003eCopitarsia consueta\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999), \u003cem\u003eHelicoverpa armigera\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Rani et al. 2021a), \u003cem\u003eH. assulta\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Koh et al. 1995), \u003cem\u003eMythimna separata\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Chang et al. 2015), \u003cem\u003eS. frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Noctuidae) (Malo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2024) and \u003cem\u003eS. littoralis\u003c/em\u003e (Seada 2015). The antennal sensilla recorded in the current study were shared with many of the above noctuids, except for sensilla squamiformia II and sensilla auricillica II. This similarity in the antennal sensilla types among most several noctuids indicates a common evolutionary origin and similar requirements for receiving and perceiving external information.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sensilla and scales are the most obvious features on the antennal surface in \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e. The antennal sensilla are primarily distributed on the ventral side of the flagellum, with the scales being the most widespread and abundant non-sensory structures present, being found on the scape, pedicel, and dorsal side of the flagellum. This distribution pattern of sensilla and scales in the antenna of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e is consistent with many other Noctuidae (Koh et al. 1995; Chang et al. 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a). Koh et al. (1995) proposed that the arrangement of scales helped prevent mechanical damage to the antenna and the antennal sensilla. Others have suggested that the scales could help capture and concentrate odors, thus enhancing the insect\u0026rsquo;s ability to perceive and accurately locate the odor (Van der Pers et al. 1980; Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn terms of function, the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e can be classified into three categories: mechanical sensilla, chemical sensilla, and temperature and humidity sensilla. Both B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles and sensilla squamiformia are considered mechanical sensilla, responsible for detecting mechanical stimuli derived from the external environment (Schneider 1964; Kristensen 2003). B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles are mainly found on the intersegmental membranes between the scape and pedicel, allowing for the orientation of the antenna to be adjusted (Koh et al. 1995; Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999). Numerous microtrichia were also observed around B\u0026ouml;hm\u0026rsquo;s bristles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb) and are generally considered to have no sensory function (Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla squamiformia, another mechanical sensilla, has been widely recorded in species of Noctuidae, such as \u003cem\u003eA. lepigone\u003c/em\u003e (Hu et al. 2021), \u003cem\u003eH. armigera\u003c/em\u003e (Rani et al. 2021a), \u003cem\u003eM. separata\u003c/em\u003e (Chang et al. 2015), \u003cem\u003eS. frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Malo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2024), and \u003cem\u003eS. littoralis\u003c/em\u003e (Seada 2015). Because sensilla squamiformia are in sockets with no surface pores, some researchers suggested that these sensilla may sense air vibrations rather than perceive chemical molecules (Steinbrecht 1997; Bawin et al. 2017). Sensilla squamiformia I and sensilla squamiformia II were similar in shape but were significantly different in size in the present study. Considering that sensilla squamiformia I and II were located on different parts of the antenna (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003eb, d), we classified sensilla squamiformia II as a separate subtype of sensilla squamiformia.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe chemosensory antennal sensilla identified in \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e include sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica. Pores on the surface of the antennal sensilla are the key feature that defines these sensilla as having a chemosensory function, given that they serve as channels for external chemicals to enter and interact with internal sensory receptors (Schneider 1964; Zacharuk 1980).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla trichoidea are one of the most common antennal sensilla types found in Lepidoptera (Malo et al. 2004; Seada 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021b). Sensilla trichoidea can perceive sex pheromones and plant odors, indicating that these sensilla are essential for insects to locate mates and their host plants (Seada 2015; Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a). Pores on the surface of sensilla trichoidea have been recorded in several moths species such as \u003cem\u003eCydia pomonella\u003c/em\u003e (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), \u003cem\u003eC. succedana\u003c/em\u003e (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), \u003cem\u003eDiaphania angustalis\u003c/em\u003e (Crambidae) (Zhang et al. 2019), \u003cem\u003eDioryctria rubella\u003c/em\u003e (Pyralidae) (Xu et al. 2021), \u003cem\u003eH. armigera\u003c/em\u003e (Rani et al. 2021a), \u003cem\u003eM. separata\u003c/em\u003e (Chang et al. 2015), and \u003cem\u003eS. littoralis\u003c/em\u003e (Seada 2015). In our study, numerous pores were observed on the surface of sensilla trichoidea (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ec), indicating that they likely serve as chemosensory organs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla basiconica have been recorded in almost all Lepidoptera with filiform antennae, and their distribution pattern on the antennal surface is generally the same in all Noctuidae studied to date (Liu and Liu 1984; Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a). The surface of sensilla basiconica is characterized by numerous small pores and grooves, suggesting that these sensilla have an olfactory function such as pheromone and plant odor detection (Liu and Liu 1984; Chang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a). Koh et al. (1995) reported that the sensilla basiconica of \u003cem\u003eH. assulta\u003c/em\u003e are porous, fluted, and thin-walled, and have a role in odor detection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla chaetica are very common in the antennae of the noctuid moths, being found in each subsegment of the flagellum (Malo et al. 2004; Seada 2015; Hu et al. 2021). These sensilla had the widest distribution on the antennae of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e compared to the others types found, being present on the dorsal, lateral and ventral sides of the flagellum. In some studies, sensilla chaetica are referred to as central chaetica, lateral chaetica, and dorsal chaetica according to their locations on the surface of the flagellum (Malo et al. 2004; Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). This naming method was adopted in our study. The size, shape and distribution of sensilla chaetica are similar among all Noctuidae studied to date, suggesting they have a similar perception function among species (Chang et al. 2015; Yuan et al. 2017; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021b). In several studies of Lepidoptera, sensilla chaetica have been the longest sensilla detected (Faucheux 1991; Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a, 2021b; Li et al. 2024). Some authors have proposed that sensilla chaetica help protect other sensilla on the same antenna (Chang et al. 2015; Rani et al. 2021a), while others have suggested that they may have a taste function in addition to perceiving odors (Popescu et al. 2013; Seada 2015; Bawin et al. 2017; Li et al. 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla coeloconica exhibit a distinctive morphology among the many types of antennal sensilla of Lepidoptera, characterized by a central cone surrounded numerous spines (Flower and Helson 1974; Bawin et al. 2017; Rani et al. 2021a). Sensilla coeloconica have been mostly found on the ventral surface of the flagellum, but their number and shape vary among moth species (Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Rani et al. 2021b). For example, sensilla coeloconica of \u003cem\u003eS. frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e have a distinct petal-like structure that encloses the sensilla in a cavity, and the upper part of the spines bends more inward to form a distinct dome-like structure (Li et al. 2024). Many authors have suggested that the surrounding spines serve to protect the central cone from mechanical damage (Yang et al. 2009; Rani et al. 2021a). In addition, Binyameen et al. (2012) suggested that sensilla coeloconica have an olfactory function in \u003cem\u003eS. littorali\u003c/em\u003e. Moreover, in several recent studies, sensilla coeloconica were considered multifunctional, i.e., capable of perceiving temperature, humidity, water vapor, pheromones, and plant odors (Seada 2015; Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a, 2021b).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla auricillica have been widely reported in Lepidoptera, including \u003cem\u003eEarias vittella\u003c/em\u003e (Nolidae) (Rani et al. 2021b), \u003cem\u003eAthetis lepigone\u003c/em\u003e (Hu et al. 2021), and \u003cem\u003eCydia succedana\u003c/em\u003e (Tortricidae) (Roh et al. 2016), and \u003cem\u003eS. frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Li et al. 2024). Two subtypes of sensilla auricillica were observed in our study of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e. These two subtypes have been also recorded in the tortricids \u003cem\u003eC. pomonella\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. succedana\u003c/em\u003e (Roh et al. 2016). Sensilla auricillica are porous sensilla and considered involved in detection of host volatiles and pheromones (Faucheux 2006). Hu et al. (2021) also proposed that sensilla auricillica had an olfactory function in \u003cem\u003eA. lepigone\u003c/em\u003e. Electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that sensilla auricillica of the tortricid \u003cem\u003eC. pomonella\u003c/em\u003e can respond to phytochemicals and sex pheromones (Ansebo et al. 2005).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla styloconica are commonly found on the filiform antennae of Lepidoptera (Koh et al. 1995; Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024;). Sensilla styloconica have usually been found on the ventral distal portion of each subsegment of the flagellum. Overall, the number, morphological characteristics and distribution of sensilla styloconica are similar in the Noctuidae (G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Castrej\u0026oacute;n- Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Rani et al. 2021a; Gargi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2024). The blunt protrusions at the tip of sensilla styloconica are a distinguishing feature of this sensilla type. The number of blunt protrusions in \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e varied from one to three in our study, which was also consistent with the report by Aruna et al. (2019). A similar pattern has been reported in other Noctiudae (Koh et al. 1995; Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024). Based on the number of the blunt protrusions, Rani et al. (2021a) and Zheng et al. (2014) classified these sensilla into two subtypes, but all other authors did not use the number of blunt protrusions as a morphological feature to assign subtype classification (Koh et al. 1995; Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 1999; Malo et al. 2004; Galizia and R\u0026ouml;ssler 2010; Zheng et al. 2014; Chang et al. 2015; Seada 2015; Aruna et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021a; Li et al. 2024). Although we noted variation in the number of blunt protrusions, we did not classify sensilla styloconica into subtypes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSensilla styloconica are often categorized as humidity and temperature sensing sensilla, given that no pores are generally observed on their surface (Roh et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017; Rani et al. 2021b). However, pores have been recorded on sensilla styloconica in the noctuid \u003cem\u003eM. separata\u003c/em\u003e, suggesting that these sensilla may perceive chemical stimuli (Chang et al. 2015). In our study of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e, we observed pores irregularly distributed on the surface of sensilla styloconica (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003ed). Such observations suggest that there may be multiple types of sensilla styloconica, some of which can perceive only humidity and temperature, and others that can perceive chemical stimuli as well.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur study demonstrated that \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e possess eight types and two subtypes of the antennal sensilla: B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia (I and II), and sensilla auricillica (I and II). Sensilla squamiformia II and sensilla auricillica II were reported for the first time. Detailed low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscope images and descriptions were provided for each sensillum type. This study provided the morphological information to aid in future neurophysiological testing of the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e Conceptualization: Y-P. Li, J. Cao, H. Ye; Methodology: H-Y. Zhou, Q-L.Hu, M-M. Jiang, Y-Yang, Y-P. Li; Investigation: H-Y. Zhou, Q-L.Hu, M-M. Jiang; Writing\u0026mdash;original draft preparation: Y-P. Li, H. Ye, R.A. Haack, H-Y. Zhou; Writing\u0026mdash;review and editing, Y-P. Li, H. Ye, R. A. Haack; Funding acquisition: H. Ye; J. Cao; Supervision: J. Cao; Project administration: J. Cao; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 32271563, 32471568; Science and Technology Planning Project in Key Areas of Yunnan Province, Grant No. 202001BB050002; Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Province, Grant No.202401AS070151.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAhmad M, Iqbal Arif M, Ahmad M (2007) Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Prot 26:809-817\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAnsebo L, Ignell R, L\u0026ouml;fqvist J, Hansson BS, (2005) Responses to sex pheromone and plant odours by olfactory receptor neurons housed in sensilla auricillica of the codling moth, \u003cem\u003eCydia pomonella\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Insect Physiol 51:1066-1074\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAruna R, Jeyarani S, Mohankumar S, Durairaj C (2019) Documentation and validation of chemosensory structures in antennae of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e (Fabricius) through Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Indian J Agric Res 53:554-559. https://doi:10.18805/IJARe.A-5084\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBawin T, Collard F, De Backer L, Yarou BB, Comp\u0026egrave;re P, Francis F, Verheggen FJ (2017) Structure and distribution of the sensilla on the antennae of \u003cem\u003eTuta absoluta\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Micron 96:16-28\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBinyameen M, Anderson P, Ignell R, Seada MA, Hansson BS, Schlyter F (2012) Spatial organization of antennal olfactory sensory neurons in the female \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera littoralis\u003c/em\u003e moth: differences in sensitivity and temporal characteristics. Chem Senses 37:613-629\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBragard C, Dehnen‐Schmutz K, Di Serio F, Gonthier P, Jacques MA, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, Magnusson CS, Milonas P (2019) Pest categorisation of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e. EFSA Journal 17:e05765\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCastrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez VR, Valdez-Carrasco J, Cibrian-Tovar J, Camino-Lavin M, Osorio R (1999) Morphology and distribution of the sense organs on the antennae of \u003cem\u003eCopitarsia consueta\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Fla Entomol 82:546-555\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChang XQ, Zhang S, Lv L, Wang MQ (2015) Insight into the ultrastructure of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eMythimna separata\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Insect Sci 15:124\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChapman R (1982) Chemoreception: the significance of receptor numbers. Adv Insect Physiol 16:247-356\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDu Y-W, Shi X-B, Zhao L-C, Yuan G-G, Zhao W-W, Huang G-H, Chen G (2022) Chinese cabbage changes its release of volatiles to defend against \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e. Insects 13:73. https://doi:10.3390/insects13010073\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFaucheux MJ (1991) Morphology and distribution of sensilia on the cephalic appendages, tarsi and ovipositor of the European sunflower moth, \u003cem\u003eHomoeosoma nebulella\u003c/em\u003e Den. \u0026amp; Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int J Insect Morphol 20:291-307\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFaucheux MJ (2006) Antennal sensilla of male \u003cem\u003eLophocorona pediasia\u003c/em\u003e Common 1973 and their phylogenetic implications (Lepidoptera: Lophocoronidae), Annales de la Soci\u0026eacute;t\u0026eacute; entomologique de France. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, pp 113-118\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFlower NE, Helson GAH (1974) Variation in antennal sensilla of some noctuid moths; a scanning electron microscope study. New Zeal J Zool 1:59-66\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGalizia CG, R\u0026ouml;ssler W (2010) Parallel olfactory systems in insects: anatomy and function. Annu Rev Entomol 55:\u0026nbsp;399-420\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGargi C, Kennedy, JS, Jayabal TD (2022) Morphometrics and distribution of antennal sensillae of both sexes of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Appl Nat Sci 14:41-48\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGuerrero A, Malo EA, Coll J, Quero C (2014) Semiochemical and natural product-based approaches to control Spodoptera spp.(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Pest Sci 87:231-247\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGuo K-F, Peng X-M, Tu J-Y, Jin C, Zhang W-R, Chen X-Z, Liu Y-J, Zha H-G, Shi W, Cao J (2022) Abnormal antennal olfactory sensilla phenotypes involved in olfactory deficit in \u003cem\u003eBactrocera correcta\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects 13:535. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13060535\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHu GL, Zhang CM, Wang ZQ, Chen QX, Lu JQ (2021) Sensilla of the antenna and proboscis of\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Athetis lepigone\u003c/em\u003e (M\u0026ouml;schler)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Morphol 282:733-745\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKoh YH, Park KC, Boo KS (1995) Antennal sensilla in adult \u003cem\u003eHelicoverpa assulta\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): morphology, distribution, and ultrastructure. Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:519-530\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKristensen N (2003) Handbook of Zoology. Volume IV Arthropoda: Insecta, Part 36 Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Volume 2: Morphology, Physiology, and De-velopment, de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, pp 267-288\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLi GH, Chen QJ, Pang Y (1998) Studies of artificial diets for the beet armyworm, \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera exigua\u003c/em\u003e. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni 37:1-5\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLi Y-P, Zhou H-Y, Yang Y, Ye H, Haack RA, Cao J (2024) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24644\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLiu H, Liu T (1984) Sensilla on the antennal flagellum of the bertha armyworm moth, \u003cem\u003eMamestra configurata\u003c/em\u003e Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a scanning electron microscope study. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:236-245\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLiu J-X, Zhong G-H, Chen X-F, Hu L-M, Hu M-Y (2009) Ultrastructures of the Sensilla of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e. J Southwest Univ 6:35-40\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMalo EA, Castrej\u0026oacute;n-G\u0026oacute;mez VR, Cruz-L\u0026oacute;pez L, Rojas JC (2004) Antennal sensilla and electrophysiological response of male and female \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera frugiperda\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to conspecific sex pheromone and plant odors. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:1273-1284\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNation JL (2001) Insect physiology and biochemistry. CRC press, New York, USA, pp 353-371\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePopescu A, Couton L, Almaas T-J, Rospars J-P, Wright GA, Marion-Poll F, Anton S (2013) Function and central projections of gustatory receptor neurons on the antenna of the noctuid moth \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera littoralis\u003c/em\u003e. J Comp Physiol A 199:403-416\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRani AT, Pathour S, Meshram N, Kammar V, Majumder S, Srivastava C, Pandey K, Singh J (2021a) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eHelicoverpa armigera\u003c/em\u003e (H\u0026uuml;bner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 85:1371-1391\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRani AT, Shashank PR, Meshram NM, Sagar D, Srivastava C, Pandey KK, Singh J (2021b) Morphological characterization of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eEarias vittella\u003c/em\u003e (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae). Micron 140:102957\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRoh HS, Park KC, Oh HW, Park CG (2016) Morphology and distribution of antennal sensilla of two tortricid moths, \u003cem\u003eCydia pomonella\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand \u003cem\u003eC. succedana\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera). Microsc Res Tech 79:1069-1081\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSang S, Wang Z, Qi J, Shu B, Zhong G (2013) Research progress on pesticide resistance of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e. J Environ Entomol 35:808-814\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchmidt HR, Benton R (2020) Molecular mechanisms of olfactory detection in insects: beyond receptors. Open Biology 10. https:// doi:10.1098/rsob.200252\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchneider D (1964) Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol 9:\u0026nbsp;103-122\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSeada MA (2015) Antennal morphology and sensillum distribution of female cotton leaf worm\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Spodoptera littoralis\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Basic Appl Zool 68:10-18\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSharma S, Upadhayaya S, Tiwari S (2022) Biology and integrated management of tobacco caterpillar, \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e Fab.: A systematic review. J Agri Appl Biol 3:28-39\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSingh K, Sachan G (1993) Asessment of the use of sex pheromone traps in the management of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e F. Indian J Plant Prot 21:7-13\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSteinbrecht RA (1997) Pore structures in insect olfactory sensilla: a review of data and concepts. International Int J Insect Morphol 26:229-245\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVan der Pers J, Cuperus P, Den Otter C (1980) Distribution of sense organs on male antennae of small ermine moths, Yponomeuta spp. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 9:15-23\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eXu J, Deng C, Lu W, Wu S (2021) Ultrastructure of antennal sensilla in adults of \u003cem\u003eDioryctria rubella\u003c/em\u003e Hampson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insects 12:821. https://doi:10.3390/insects12090821\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYang H, Yan S-C, Liu D (2009) Ultrastructural observations on antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eColeophora obducta\u003c/em\u003e (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). Micron 40:231-238\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYang M, He Y, Zhang K, Peng G, Wang J, Xu Y (2011) Control of tobacco cutworm moth \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) by mass trapping with the synthetic pheromone lures. J Anhui Agric Sci 28:17314-17316\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYang S, Liu H, Zhang J, Liu J, Zheng H, Ren Y (2017) Scanning electron microscopy study of the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eMonema flavescens\u003c/em\u003e Walker (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Neotrop Entomol 46:175-181\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYuan H, Zhao X, Ge S, Huang X, Liu J, Wang Y (2017) A new type of \u003cem\u003eMythimna Separata\u003c/em\u003e (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) antennal sensilla. Entomol News 127:11-20\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYushima T, Tamaki Y, Kamano S, Oyama M (1974) Field evaluation of a synthetic sex pheromone,\u0026quot; litlure\u0026quot;, as an attractant for males of \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 9:147-152\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZacharuk RY (1980) Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annu Rev Entomol 25:27-47\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang YJ, Chen DY, Chao XT, Dong ZS, Huang ZY, Zheng XL, Lu W (2019) Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eDiaphania angustalis\u003c/em\u003e Snellen (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Microsc Res Tech 82:1632-1641\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZheng H, Liu H, Guo S, Yan Y, Zong S, Zhang J (2014) Scanning electron microscopy study of the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eCatocala remissa\u003c/em\u003e. B Insectol 67:63-71\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhou ZS (2009) A review on control of tobacco caterpillar, \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e. Chinese J Appl Entomol 46:354-361\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"zoomorphology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"zomo","sideBox":"Learn more about [Zoomorphology](http://link.springer.com/journal/435)","snPcode":"435","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/435/3","title":"Zoomorphology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Spodoptera litura, antennal sensilla, scanning electron microscopy, sensilla morphology","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eSpodoptera litura\u003c/em\u003e Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a major agricultural pest, primarily in Asia and Oceania. Chemical odor-based trapping is a major method used to control \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e, and thus understanding the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e is critical for improving the efficacy of the attractants used in the pest control. In the present study, the \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e antennal sensillum types were examined by low-voltage field emission scanning electron microscopy, and morphological descriptions were provided. A total of eight types and two subtypes of the antennal sensilla were identified, namely B\u0026ouml;hm's bristles, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla styloconica, sensilla squamiformia (I and II), and sensilla auricillica (I and II). Among them, sensilla squamiformia II, and sensilla auricillica II are reported for the first time in \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e. This study provides morphological information to aid in future electrophysiological tests on the antennal sensilla of \u003cem\u003eS. litura\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Morphological characteristics and distribution of antennal sensilla of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using scanning electron microscopy","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-30 11:22:12","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5285978/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-11-22T19:45:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-19T14:42:06+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-06T16:21:23+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-28T10:48:16+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"270413083868682950941381225870704715089","date":"2024-10-23T17:58:57+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"274932430142780435747387817794752397403","date":"2024-10-21T11:21:59+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"15639110440008013551342709957420526063","date":"2024-10-21T08:52:38+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-10-20T17:50:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-10-19T09:08:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-10-19T09:08:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Zoomorphology","date":"2024-10-18T02:57:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"zoomorphology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"zomo","sideBox":"Learn more about [Zoomorphology](http://link.springer.com/journal/435)","snPcode":"435","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/435/3","title":"Zoomorphology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"77e95090-383d-4d32-a8e0-1e25858cb19b","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 30th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-13T16:00:23+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5285978","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00694-z","journal":{"identity":"zoomorphology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Zoomorphology"},"publishedOn":"2025-01-07 15:57:11","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 7th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-30 11:22:12","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s00435-024-00694-z","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00694-z","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5285978","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5285978","identity":"rs-5285978","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}