A Machine Learning Model for Algorithmic Optimization of Superannuation Schemes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study developed and evaluated machine learning models, including K-means clustering and genetic algorithms, for optimizing superannuation asset portfolios, finding a K-means cluster focused on government securities yielded an 11.16% return and 7.11 Sharpe ratio.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This paper develops a machine-learning recommendation model to optimize pension superannuation portfolio asset selection and allocation under financial market uncertainty, using annual pension asset reports (cost, market value, and asset income) from July 2013 to June 2023. Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, K-means clustering, and Mean-Variance Optimization are used to construct portfolios and are evaluated by portfolio return and Sharpe ratio, with the K-means cluster emphasizing government securities yielding the highest risk-adjusted performance (11.16% return, Sharpe 7.11), while GA and PSO produce more diversified conservative allocations (mean returns 7.63%/6.61% with Sharpe 3.91/3.16). A limitation explicitly noted is that the work is a Research Square preprint and not peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This paper sought to address the challenge of designing a superannuation pension scheme by developing a machine learning-based recommendation model for optimal asset portfolio selection and allocation. Pension schemes face challenges in dealing with the uncertainties associated with financial markets, especially in selecting an appropriate assets portfolio that can optimize the Return-on-Investment. This study used various machine learning algorithms to build optimal portfolios, which were evaluated based on the portfolio’s return and Sharpe ratio. Data used was obtained from the annual financial reports on pension assets’ cost and market value as well as asset income for the period of July 2013 to June 2023. The Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, K-means clustering, and Mean-Variance Optimization techniques were employed to construct optimal portfolios. Evaluation based on portfolio return and Sharpe ratio revealed the K-means cluster focused on government securities as a high-performing, low-risk option with 11.16% return and 7.11 Sharpe ratio. Conversely, the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimized portfolio demonstrated a more diversified conservative asset allocation, leading to a mean return of 7.63% with a Sharpe ratio of 3.91, and a mean return of 6.61% with a 3.16 Sharpe ratio respectively. Comparing these constructed portfolios with OECD (2022) which reported that Kenya achieved a real investment return of 2.9% in 2021, signifies that 7/10 of the constructed optimal superannuation portfolios would have resulted in better performance.
Full text 11,063 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Machine Learning Model for Algorithmic Optimization of Superannuation Schemes | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Machine Learning Model for Algorithmic Optimization of Superannuation Schemes Winfred Katile MUKUNZI, Brian Wesley MUGANDA, Bernard Shibwabo KASAMANI This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This paper sought to address the challenge of designing a superannuation pension scheme by developing a machine learning-based recommendation model for optimal asset portfolio selection and allocation. Pension schemes face challenges in dealing with the uncertainties associated with financial markets, especially in selecting an appropriate assets portfolio that can optimize the Return-on-Investment. This study used various machine learning algorithms to build optimal portfolios, which were evaluated based on the portfolio’s return and Sharpe ratio. Data used was obtained from the annual financial reports on pension assets’ cost and market value as well as asset income for the period of July 2013 to June 2023. The Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, K-means clustering, and Mean-Variance Optimization techniques were employed to construct optimal portfolios. Evaluation based on portfolio return and Sharpe ratio revealed the K-means cluster focused on government securities as a high-performing, low-risk option with 11.16% return and 7.11 Sharpe ratio. Conversely, the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimized portfolio demonstrated a more diversified conservative asset allocation, leading to a mean return of 7.63% with a Sharpe ratio of 3.91, and a mean return of 6.61% with a 3.16 Sharpe ratio respectively. Comparing these constructed portfolios with OECD (2022) which reported that Kenya achieved a real investment return of 2.9% in 2021, signifies that 7/10 of the constructed optimal superannuation portfolios would have resulted in better performance. Machine Learning Algorithmic Optimization Portfolio Optimization Genetic Algorithms Particle Swarm Optimization Superannuation Pension Scheme Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5280421","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":368097696,"identity":"26686b78-b18c-4dcf-9d12-373435c078a8","order_by":0,"name":"Winfred Katile MUKUNZI","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Retirement Benefits Authority","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Winfred","middleName":"Katile","lastName":"MUKUNZI","suffix":""},{"id":368097697,"identity":"81d87161-e55d-48a1-a0ba-d75ff954a804","order_by":1,"name":"Brian Wesley MUGANDA","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Strathmore University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Brian","middleName":"Wesley","lastName":"MUGANDA","suffix":""},{"id":368097698,"identity":"61644b33-6523-440e-a9b9-1bd6b7ce0a82","order_by":2,"name":"Bernard Shibwabo KASAMANI","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Strathmore University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bernard","middleName":"Shibwabo","lastName":"KASAMANI","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-17 07:08:31","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":76212596,"identity":"3015a4b7-826f-4670-a20a-4436f9100b78","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-13 13:47:16","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":623761,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptMachineLearningSuperannuationReviewedandUpdatedSubmitted.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5280421/v1_covered_178b9f80-162b-49ab-94f7-303245ab97cc.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"A Machine Learning Model for Algorithmic Optimization of Superannuation Schemes","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Machine Learning, Algorithmic Optimization, Portfolio Optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization, Superannuation Pension Scheme","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper sought to address the challenge of designing a superannuation pension scheme by developing a machine learning-based recommendation model for optimal asset portfolio selection and allocation. Pension schemes face challenges in dealing with the uncertainties associated with financial markets, especially in selecting an appropriate assets portfolio that can optimize the Return-on-Investment. This study used various machine learning algorithms to build optimal portfolios, which were evaluated based on the portfolio\u0026rsquo;s return and Sharpe ratio. Data used was obtained from the annual financial reports on pension assets\u0026rsquo; cost and market value as well as asset income for the period of July 2013 to June 2023. The Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, K-means clustering, and Mean-Variance Optimization techniques were employed to construct optimal portfolios. Evaluation based on portfolio return and Sharpe ratio revealed the K-means cluster focused on government securities as a high-performing, low-risk option with 11.16% return and 7.11 Sharpe ratio. Conversely, the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimized portfolio demonstrated a more diversified conservative asset allocation, leading to a mean return of 7.63% with a Sharpe ratio of 3.91, and a mean return of 6.61% with a 3.16 Sharpe ratio respectively. Comparing these constructed portfolios with OECD (2022) which reported that Kenya achieved a real investment return of 2.9% in 2021, signifies that 7/10 of the constructed optimal superannuation portfolios would have resulted in better performance.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Machine Learning Model for Algorithmic Optimization of Superannuation Schemes","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-21 11:30:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280421/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9dc5b648-7a17-41ee-ba6b-8fb88d2e347a","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 21st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-02-13T13:39:03+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-21 11:30:57","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5280421","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5280421","identity":"rs-5280421","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0