Kinetics and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies – a comparison of 3 different assays
preprint
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Purpose: Comparing seroprevalence and antibody kinetics in three different commercially available assays for SARS-CoV-2. Methods: : Serostatus of COVID-19 patients was analyzed 5 months and 10 months after their infection, using three different assays: Diasorin LIAISON®, Euroimmun®, Abbott Diagnostics® ARCHITECT. Results: : Seropositivity at baseline differed significantly depending on the assay (Diasorin 81%, Euroimmun 83%, Abbott 59%). At follow-up antibody levels detected in the Diasorin assay were stable, while there was a significant loss in seropositivity in the Euroimmun and Abbott assays. Conclusion: There are significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 antibody kinetics based on the specific assay used. Trial registration number, date of registration DRKS00022549, 29.07.2020 “retrospectively registered”
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0