Unpredictable intermittent access exacerbates loss of control over ethanol drinking

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Loss of control over drinking is a hallmark feature of alcohol use disorder (AUD) that is modeled preclinically through escalation of ethanol consumption and aversion-resistant drinking. Prior work with other reinforcers suggests that within-session unpredictable, intermittent access (uIntA) promotes these phenotypes. However, the effect of uIntA on voluntary ethanol consumption is unknown. Methods Male and female Long-Evans rats ( n =9-10/group) underwent seven weeks of daily voluntary ethanol (20% v/v) drinking sessions under either a continuous access (ContA) or uIntA schedule. Following four weeks of baseline, rats were rendered dependent using a two-week chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure procedure. Daily testing was maintained through one week into withdrawal from vapor exposure. On the final day of testing, ethanol was adulterated with quinine (30 mg/L) to assess aversion-resistant drinking. Results Rats drinking under ContA and uIntA exhibited similar levels of average daily ethanol consumption at baseline. However, uIntA elicited a more robust dependence-induced escalation of ethanol consumption compared to ContA, with uIntA sustaining escalation through early withdrawal. Additionally, while rats with ContA to ethanol remained sensitive to quinine even after chronic ethanol vapor exposure, uIntA promoted aversion-resistant drinking in ethanol dependent rats. Conclusions These results demonstrate that, compared to ContA, uIntA maintains ethanol drinking and exacerbates dependence-induced escalation and aversion-resistant ethanol consumption. This work positions uIntA as a powerful tool to assess psychological and neurobiological factors that underlie loss of control over drinking.
Full text 2,031 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Loss of control over drinking is a hallmark feature of alcohol use disorder (AUD) that is modeled preclinically through escalation of ethanol consumption and aversion-resistant drinking. Prior work with other reinforcers suggests that within-session unpredictable, intermittent access (uIntA) promotes loss of control over intake. However, the effect of uIntA on voluntary ethanol consumption is unknown.

Methods

Male and female Long-Evans rats (n=9-10/group) underwent seven weeks of daily voluntary ethanol (20% v/v) drinking sessions under either a continuous access (ContA) or uIntA schedule. Following four weeks of baseline, rats were rendered dependent using a two-week chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure procedure. Daily testing was maintained through one week into withdrawal from vapor exposure. On the final day of testing, ethanol was adulterated with quinine (30 mg/L) to assess aversion-resistant drinking.

Results

Rats drinking under ContA and uIntA exhibited similar levels of average daily ethanol consumption at baseline. However, uIntA elicited a more robust dependence-induced escalation of ethanol consumption compared to ContA, with uIntA sustaining escalation through early protracted withdrawal. Additionally, while rats with ContA to ethanol remained sensitive to quinine even after chronic ethanol vapor exposure, uIntA promoted aversion-resistant drinking in ethanol dependent rats.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that, compared to ContA, uIntA maintains ethanol drinking and exacerbates AUD-related symptomatology while also providing researchers with the ability to capture additional measures of motivation and drinking patterns without increasing experimental burden. This work positions uIntA as a powerful tool to assess psychological and neurobiological factors underlying loss of control over drinking. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The revised version contains edits to shorten the Discussion section.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0