Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy on blood pressure changes in endometrial cancer patients.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients with endometrial cancer treated surgically between 2017 and 2023. Patients undergoing
para-aortic lymphadenectomy, up to the renal artery, in a non-nerve-sparing fashion, were compared with those undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy or
sentinel lymph node mapping. Data collected included age, body mass index, comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery
disease, operative time, number of lymph nodes removed, tumor size, and postoperative complications. Preoperative blood pressure was recorded during
outpatient visits, and postoperative measurements were collected daily during hospitalization and at follow-up visits. Statistical analyses assessed differences
in systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes, operative outcomes, and complications.
Results
A total of 264 patients were analyzed. Patients in the para-aortic group had significantly longer operative times. Tumor size was larger in the para-
aortic group than in another group. Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in the para-aortic group compared to the control group (para-aortic:
-17 mmHg vs. non-para-aortic: -1.10 mmHg, p<0.05), with a similar trend for diastolic pressure (-8.00 mmHg vs. -0.80 mmHg, p<0.05). Chylous ascites
(15.6% vs. 5.6%) and ileus (0% vs. 12%) were more common in the para-aortic group, along with the administration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower in paraaortic group, in both early and late postoperative follow-up measures (p<0.005).
Conclusion
Aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with decreased blood pressure and may have therapeutic potential for hypertensive patients, highlighting
the need for prospective randomized studies to explore this effect further.
Keywords
Cancer of endometrium, hypertension, lymph node excison
Öz
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı sinir koruyucu olmayan paraaortik lenfadenektominin paraaortik ve renal bölgedeki sempatik sinir liflerini etkileyerek kan
basıncı üzerindeki değişimlerini değerlendirmektir.
Impact of sympathetic denervation via paraaortic
lymphadenectomy on blood pressure in endometrial
cancer patients
14
Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22:13-8 Erkılınç et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy and hypertension
Introduction
Hypertension is a common condition in the general population
and a significant cause of morbidity, particularly among older
adults(1). In patients with endometrial cancer, hypertension
is a frequently associated comorbidity, observed both in the
presence and absence of obesity (2). While obesity is a well-
known risk factor for hypertension, the coexistence of metabolic
syndrome further increases the prevalence of both hypertension
and endometrial cancer(2). This suggests that metabolic factors
may create a common underlying pathway between these two
conditions.
Hypertension is a major comorbidity among patients with
endometrial cancer, with approximately 40% of these patients
requiring antihypertensive medication (3,4). The most common
type of hypertension is essential hypertension and underlying
factors include genetic factors, age, lifestyle factors and
stress(5). Initial treatment strategies typically involve dietary
modifications and antihypertensive medications (5). Numerous
studies have demonstrated the involvement of the adrenergic
system in blood pressure regulation. Blocking this system
is a fundamental mechanism underlying antihypertensive
therapy(6). However, sympathetic fibers located in the paraaortic
region, particularly in the perirenal area, have been implicated
as a potential cause of hypertension by increasing sodium
uptake, renin secretion, and renal arterial vasoconstriction (7).
Based on this knowledge, angiographic radiofrequency
ablation has been explored as a treatment option for patients
unresponsive to antihypertensive therapies (8). Studies have
reported that this method can lead to an average reduction in
blood pressure by approximately 20 mmHg. In some cases,
patients no longer required antihypertensive medications (9).
The majority of the studies accumulated after 2020. In patients
with endometrial cancer, especially in those at higher risk,
retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is a standard component of
surgical management when sentinel lymph node mapping is
not available. The cranial boundary of the lymphadenectomy
is typically defined at the level of the renal artery. While nerve-
sparing approaches exist, periaortic neural structures within the
lymphatic tissue are often excised or damaged during systematic
lymphadenectomy.
This study is based on the following hypothesis: if blocking
neural structures in the para-aortic region can lead to a
reduction in blood pressure, it is plausible that para-aortic
lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer patients, may similarly
Result
in decreased postoperative blood pressure levels. Our aim
was to evaluate the changes in blood pressure measurements
between the preoperative and postoperative periods in patients
undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the
renal arteries.
Materials and methods
Our study received approval from the Institutional Review Board
(İzmir Democracy University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training
and Research Hospital, Non-Interventional Research Ethics
Committee - no: 2023/211, date: 27.12.2023). The study had
been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and had been
performed in accordance with the ethical standards described
in an appropriate version of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki,
as revised in 2000. Patients treated for endometrial cancer
were identified through the hospital database. The records of
patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and 2023 were
reviewed. A total of 289 patients with endometrial cancer were
initially included in the study. Seven patients who underwent
bulky lymph node dissection for cytoreduction in advanced-
stage endometrial cancer, and ten patients who underwent para-
aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the inferior mesenteric
artery were excluded from the study. Additionally, eight patients
with missing postoperative blood pressure monitoring data
were excluded. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the study. Data
collected from patient files included age, gravida, parity, history
of previous surgeries, presence of diabetes, coronary artery
disease, body mass index, endometrial biopsy results, findings
from preoperative imaging studies, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and
paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Additionally, those with conditions
affecting blood pressure, such as bleeding, hypovolemia, and
arrhythmia were excluded from the study. All persons gave their
informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma, 2017-2023 yılları arasında cerrahi tedavi uygulanan endometrium kanseri hastalarını içermektedir. Renal arter
seviyesine kadar sinir koruyucu olmayan paraaortik lenfadenektomi yapılan hastalar, pelvik lenfadenektomi veya sentinel lenf nodu haritalaması yapılan
hastalarla karşılaştırılmıştır. Toplanan veriler arasında yaş, vücut kitle indeksi, hipertansiyon, diyabet, koroner arter hastalığı gibi komorbiditeler, operasyon
süresi, çıkarılan lenf nodu sayısı, tümör boyutu ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar yer almaktadır. Preoperatif kan basıncı ölçümleri ameliyat öncesi poliklinik
değerlendirmesinde, postoperatif ölçümler ise hastanede yatış süresince ve onkolojik takip sırasında kaydedilmiştir. Kan basıncı değişimleri, operasyon
sonuçları ve komplikasyonlar arasındaki farklar istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Toplam 264 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Paraaortik grupta operasyon süresi daha uzun ve tümör boyutları daha büyük bulunmuştur. Sistolik
kan basıncı paraaortik grupta kontrol grubuna kıyasla anlamlı olarak daha fazla düşmüştür (-17 mmHg vs. -1,10 mmHg, p<0,05). Benzer şekilde, diyastolik
kan basıncı da paraaortik grupta daha fazla düşmüştür (-8,00 mmHg vs. -0,80 mmHg, p<0,05). Şilöz asit (%15,6 vs. %5,6), ileus (%12 vs. %0) ve adjuvan
radyoterapi/kemoterapi uygulaması paraaortik grupta daha sık gözlenmiştir. Postoperatif erken dönemde ve uzun vadeli takiplerde sistolik ve diyastolik kan
basınçlarındaki düşüşler anlamlı şekilde korunmuştur (p<0,005).
Sonuç: Paraaortik lenfadenektomi, sistolik ve diastolik kan basınçlarında anlamlı düşüşlerle ilişkilidir ve hipertansif hastalar için tedavi edici potansiyele
sahip olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Endometriyum kanseri, hipertansiyon, lenf nodu diseksiyonu
15
Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22:13-8Erkılınç et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy and hypertension
The study group comprised patients with endometrial cancer
who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the
level of the renal vein via either laparoscopic transperitoneal,
extraperitoneal, or laparotomy approaches. Patients who
did not undergo lymphadenectomy; and who underwent
pelvic lymphadenectomy, pelvic lymph node sampling, or
sentinel lymph node mapping were included in the control
group. Preoperative blood pressure measurements were taken
during outpatient visits, which typically occurred two weeks
prior to surgery. Blood pressure measurements were taken
under ideal conditions, with patients seated comfortably in a
quiet environment, their back supported, legs uncrossed, and
arms at heart level. A properly calibrated and validated blood
pressure monitor was used, and measurements were obtained
after a 5-minute rest period, avoiding recent physical activity,
caffeine, or smoking. Postoperative blood pressure readings
were collected daily from the hospital system. On the first
postoperative day, measurements were taken hourly, while on
subsequent days, they were recorded every six hours unless an
unusual situation arose. The daily postoperative blood pressure
values reported in our analysis was presented as the average of
all measurements taken throughout each day. Patients’ blood
pressure data were collected throughout their hospitalisation
and at follow-up outpatient clinic visits.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package
for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk,
NY, USA). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess
the normality of the data distribution. Comparisons between
groups for normally distributed continuous variables were
performed using the independent samples t-test, while the
Mann-Whitney U test was used for variables without normal
distribution. Categorical variables were analyzed using the
chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. The mean
differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes
between the groups were calculated, and their effect sizes were
assessed using Cohen’s d. Effect sizes were interpreted as small
(0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8), based on Cohen’s criteria.
A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The mean age of the patients was similar between the groups
(61±12 vs. 62±10 years, p=0.528), and there was no significant
difference in terms of gravida, platelet count or CA-125 levels
(p>0.05).
The operation time was longer in paraaortic group (4±1 vs.
3±1 hours, p<0.001) and a greater number of pelvic lymph
nodes removed (39±17 vs. 21±20, p<0.001) as well as number
paraaortic lymph nodes collected (42±24 vs. 0±0, p<0.001).
Tumor size at final pathology was larger in the paraaortic
group (4±2 vs. 3±2, p<0.001), and hospital stays were longer
(p<0.001).
Suspicious lymph nodes were more frequent in the paraaortic
group (22.9% vs. 9.7%, p=0.016). Additionally, the paraaortic
group had significantly higher rates of radiotherapy (65.6%
vs. 31.9%, p<0.001); chemotherapy (36.5% vs. 11.1%,
p<0.001). While overall complications like evisceration were
not significantly different, chylous ascites was more frequent
in the paraaortic group (15.6% vs. 5.6%, p=0.030). Similarly,
ileus was more frequent in the paraaortic group. Demographic
and clinical characteristics of the patients were given in Table
1 and Table 2.
Blood pressure changes were significantly greater in the
paraaortic group, with systolic blood pressure showing a mean
change of -17.20 compared to -1.10 in the no paraaortic group
(p<0.001, Cohen’s d=3.52); and diastolic blood pressure a mean
change of -8.00 compared to -0.80 (p<0.001, Cohen’s d=2.89).
These findings indicate that paraaortic lymphadenectomy is
associated with longer operative times, greater lymph node
Figure 1. Patient selection process for the study, showing
exclusions and final cohort of 264 patients
Table 1. Demographic and laboratory parameters of patients
underwent paraaortic lymphadenectomy and no paraaortic
lymphadenectomy
No paraaortic
(n=72)
Paraaortic
(n=192) p-value
Age 61±12 62±10 0.528
Gravida 2 (0-12) 2 (0-8) 0.916
BMI 33±7 32±6 0.167
Plt 288±71 298±83 0.358
CA-125 32±70 63±304 0.393
Preop tumor size 3±2 4±6 0.055
Op. time 3±1 4±1 0.000
Pelvic LN 21±20 39±17 0.000
Paraaortic LN 0±0 42±24 0.000
Tumor size 3±2 4±2 0.000
Hospital stay 5 (2-31) 9 (2-65) 0.000
BMI: Body mass index, Plt: Platelet, Op.: Operation, LN: Lymph node
16
Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22:13-8 Erkılınç et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy and hypertension
dissection, higher utilization of adjuvant therapies, significant
changes in blood pressure, and an increased risk of developing
chylous ascites (Table 3).
For systolic blood pressure, the paraaortic group showed a greater
reduction compared to the no paraaortic group throughout the
10 days, as depicted by the downward trend in the blue line in
Figure 1. The mean systolic blood pressure in the no paraaortic
group remained relatively stable around the preoperative mean,
while the paraaortic group showed significant decreases. These
differences reflect the earlier reported mean changes (-1.10 vs.
-17.20, p<0.001, Cohen’s d=3.52).
Similarly, the diastolic blood pressure graph indicates a more
prominent reduction in the paraaortic group compared to the
no paraaortic group, consistent with the reported mean changes
(-0.80 vs. -8.00, p<0.001, Cohen’s d=2.89). The preoperative
mean diastolic pressure is marked as a reference, and the trends
show that the paraaortic group deviates significantly from
this baseline over time. Figure 2 and Figure 3 showed blood
pressure changes over time.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that para-aortic lymphadenectomy,
performed up to the level of the renal artery in patients with
endometrial cancer, is associated with a significant reduction
in postoperative blood pressure levels. The findings align with
existing evidence on the role of neural structures within the
para-aortic region in blood pressure regulation. Extending
lymphadenectomy to include the para-aortic area may disrupt
sympathetic fibers that contribute to renal vasoconstriction,
sodium uptake, and renin secretion, thereby reducing blood
Table 2. Comorbidities and postoperative complications in
paraaortic and no paraaortic lymphadenectomy groups
No
paraaortic
(n=72)
Paraaortic
(n=192) p-value
Hypertension
No 30 (41.7%) 68 (35.4%) 0.349
Yes 42 (58.3%) 124 (64.6%)
Diabetes mellitus
No 50 (69.4%) 128 (66.7%) 0.668
Yes 22 (30.6%) 64 (33.3%)
Suspicious lymph node
No 65 (90.3%) 148 (77.1%) 0.016
Yes 7 (9.7%) 44 (22.9%)
Radiotherapy
No 49 (68.1%) 66 (34.4%) 0.000
Yes 23 (31.9%) 126 (65.6%)
Chemotherapy
No 64 (88.9%) 122 (63.5%) 0.000
Yes 8 (11.1%) 70 (36.5%)
Evisceration
No 72 (100%) 187 (97.4%) 0.167
Yes 0 (0.0%) 5 (2.6%)
Ileus
No 72 (100%) 186 (93.8%) 0.001
Yes 0 (0.0%) 12 (6.2%)
Chylous ascites
No 68 (94.4%) 162 (84.4%) 0.030
Yes 4 (5.6%) 30 (15.6%)
Table 3. The comparison of sistolic and diastolic blood changes in
paraaortic and no paraaortic groups
No
paraaortic Paraaortic
Mann-
Whitney U
statistic
Cohen’s d
Systolic
change -1.10 -17.20 p<0.001 3.52
Diastolic
change -0.80 -8.00 p<0.001 2.89
Figure 2. A. Systolic blood pressure trends over 10 days in patients
undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy compared to controls.
Preoperative systolic blood pressure levels are indicated by the
green dashed line, B. Diastolic blood pressure trends over 10 days
for the same groups, showing a similar pattern to systolic pressure.
Preoperative diastolic levels are marked with a green dashed line
A.
B.
17
Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22:13-8Erkılınç et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy and hypertension
pressure. These results are consistent with prior studies
evaluating interventions such as renal sympathetic denervation,
which have similarly shown significant blood pressure
reductions through targeted disruption of neural pathways.
The aorticorenal splanchnic nerves are constituted by the
least and lesser splanchnic nerves, which play a critical role
in regulating renal vascular tone and renin secretion (10).
Sympathetic activation via these nerves induces renal
vasoconstriction, reducing blood flow and glomerular filtration
rate to maintain systemic hemodynamic stability. Additionally,
their adrenergic signaling stimulates renin release, activating the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to support blood pressure
and fluid balance(11). The sympathetic nerves give fibers to the
renal plexus and reach the kidney, traversing the renal artery.
Renal denervation has emerged as a promising interventional
therapy for hypertension, targeting the renal sympathetic
nervous system to achieve blood pressure reduction. This
procedure disrupts sympathetic efferent and sensory afferent
fibers, reducing renin secretion, sodium reabsorption, and
systemic sympathetic outflow, which collectively contribute to
regulation(12). Similar mechanisms may explain blood pressure
reductions observed following para-aortic lymphadenectomy,
where the renal nerves could usually be affected due to their
anatomical proximity to the para-aortic lymphatic structures.
Evidence from experimental studies indicates that ablative or
inhibitory interventions targeting renal nerves can significantly
alter sympathetic activity, suggesting that such surgical
approaches could share mechanistic similarities with renal
denervation procedures in modulating blood pressure(13,14).
We observed in our study a significant reduction in blood
pressure following paraaortic lymphadenectomy, with systolic
blood pressure showing a mean decrease of 17.20 mmHg in
the paraaortic group. This reduction exceeds the systolic blood
pressure decrease of approximately 13 mmHg reported in renal
denervation studies(15), which involve angiographic ablation of
sympathetic nerves as a treatment for resistant hypertension.
While renal denervation has been widely studied, with long-
term follow-up data demonstrating sustained blood pressure
reductions, there is currently no comparable data in the literature
to show the impact of paraaortic lymphadenectomy on blood
pressure changes. The lack of studies exploring the disruption
of sympathetic nerves during paraaortic lymphadenectomy and
its effects on blood pressure highlights the originality of our
findings. This suggests that surgical interruption of sympathetic
pathways during lymphadenectomy may play a role in
postoperative blood pressure regulation, offering a new area for
future research.
The findings from the study conducted Wen et al. (16) highlight
the potential adverse effects of para-aortic lymphadenectomy,
particularly in non-nerve-sparing procedures. Complications
such as lymphorrhea, lymphocele, and acute intestinal
obstruction were observed more frequently in the para-
aortic group compared to the nerve sparing para-aortic
lymphadenectomy group, consistent with our study’s findings
of increased rates of ileus, chylous ascites, and longer hospital
stays in the para-aortic lymphadenectomy cohort. Despite these
complications, our study revealed a significant reduction in
systolic blood pressure following para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
These results indicate a dual perspective: while para-aortic
lymphadenectomy carries a risk of postoperative complications,
it also offers a potential therapeutic benefit for hypertension
management.
In our study, significant reductions in both systolic and
diastolic blood pressure were observed following para-aortic
lymphadenectomy, with consistent effects seen in both short-
term and long-term follow-ups. The changes in blood pressure
align with findings from renal denervation studies, where
sustained systolic blood pressure reductions of approximately
12.7 mmHg were reported over 36 months, and similar long-
term decreases were observed over 10 years (17). However,
the magnitude of blood pressure reduction in our study,
particularly during the early postoperative period, was more
pronounced, with systolic blood pressure showing a median
decrease of approximately 17 mmHg. This suggests that the
Figure 3. A. Distribution of diastolic blood pressure differences
(preoperative vs. follow-up) in patients undergoing para-aortic
lymphadenectomy and controls, B. Distribution of systolic blood
pressure differences (preoperative vs. follow-up) in the same
groups, highlighting significant reductions in the para-aortic group
A.
B.
18
Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22:13-8 Erkılınç et al. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy and hypertension
surgical disruption of para-aortic sympathetic nerves during
lymphadenectomy may result in both immediate and sustained
antihypertensive effects. While renal denervation has been
widely studied as a therapy for resistant hypertension, our
findings highlight a potential additional benefit of para-aortic
lymphadenectomy in reducing blood pressure.
Study Limitations
The limitation of the study is it’s retrospective design inherently
introduces potential biases and limits the ability to establish
causal relationships. The variability in follow-up periods
among patients may have influenced the consistency of the
results. Additionally, the absence of ambulatory blood pressure
monitoring, such as Holter measurements, restricts the ability
to evaluate more detailed fluctuations and patterns in blood
pressure changes over time. However, the study also has
notable strengths. The inclusion of a strictly defined cohort of
patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to
the renal vein level ensures a high degree of consistency in the
surgical approach. This uniformity strengthens the validity of
the observed blood pressure changes as an independent effect
of para-aortic lymphadenectomy on the sympathetic nerves,
enhancing the reliability of the findings in demonstrating the
direct impact of the procedure on blood pressure regulation
Conclusion
Para-aortic lymphadenectomy has a blood pressure-lowering
effect and may reduce the need for antihypertensive medication
in hypertensive patients.
Ethics
Ethics Committee Approval: Our study received approval
from the Institutional Review Board ( İzmir Democracy
University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital,
Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee - no: 2023/211,
date: 27.12.2023).
Informed Consent: All persons gave their informed consent
prior to their inclusion in the study.
Footnotes
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: S.E., B. Ö., C.A., İ.Ç., Concept:
S.E., S.Ö., U.A., C.A., H.A.A., T.B.B., İ. Ç., Design: S.E., S.C.İ.,
S.Ö., B.Ö., U.A., T.B.B., Data Collection or Processing: S.C. İ.,
U.A., H.A.A., T.B.B., İ. Ç., Analysis or Interpretation: S.E.,
S.C.İ., S. Ö., B. Ö., H.A.A., İ. Ç., Literature Search: S.E., B.B.,
Writing: S.E., S.Ö., C.A.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by
the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study
received no financial support.
References
1. Zhang X, Yuan Y, Li C, Feng X, Wang H, Qiao Q, et al. Effect of a
salt substitute on incidence of hypertension and hypotension
among normotensive adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83:711-22.
2. Yang X, Wang J. The role of metabolic syndrome in endometrial cancer:
a review. Front Oncol. 2019;9:744.
3. Wang L, Du Z-H, Qiao J-M, Gao S. Association between metabolic
syndrome and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-
analysis of observational studies. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:9825.
4. Habeshian TS, Peeri NC, De Vivo I, Schouten LJ, Shu X-o, Cote ML,
et al. Hypertension and risk of endometrial cancer: a pooled analysis
in the epidemiology of endometrial cancer consortium (E2C2). Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024;33:788-95.
5. Black HR, Elliott W. Hypertension: a companion to Braunwald’s heart
disease e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
6. Polimeni A, Curcio A, Indolfi C. Renal sympathetic denervation for
treating resistant hypertension. Circ J. 2013;77:857-63.
7. Passmore JC, Joshua IG, Rowell PP, Tyagi SC, Falcone JC. Reduced
alpha adrenergic mediated contraction of renal preglomerular blood
vessels as a function of gender and aging. J Cell Biochem. 2005;96:672-
81.
8. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J, Bartus
K, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant
hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study.
Lancet. 2009;373:1275-81.
9. Investigators SH-. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for
resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24
months. Hypertension. 2011;57:911-7.
10. Ehrhardt JD, Weber C, Carey FJ, Lopez-Ojeda W. Anatomy, thorax,
greater splanchnic nerves. 2024. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure
Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. 2024 Jan 31.
11. Sharabi AF, Carey FJ. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, splanchnic
nerves. 2024. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls
Publishing; 2025 Jan. 2024 Mar 5.
12. Katsurada K, Shinohara K, Aoki J, Nanto S, Kario K. Renal denervation:
basic and clinical evidence. Hypertens Res. 2022;45:198-209.
13. Foss JD, Wainford RD, Engeland WC, Fink GD, Osborn JW. A novel
Method
of selective ablation of afferent renal nerves by periaxonal
application of capsaicin. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol.
2015;308:R112-22.
14. Zheng H, Katsurada K, Liu X, Knuepfer MM, Patel KP. Specific afferent
renal denervation prevents reduction in neuronal nitric oxide synthase
within the paraventricular nucleus in rats with chronic heart failure.
Hypertension. 2018;72:667-75.
15. Sesa-Ashton G, Nolde JM, Muente I, Carnagarin R, Macefield VG,
Dawood T, et al. Long-term blood pressure reductions following
catheter-based renal denervation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hypertension. 2024;81:e63-70.
16. Wen Q, Zhu Y, Zhou H, Yang L, Shao F, Zhu T, et al. Para-aortic
lymph node dissection with or without nerve-sparing in gynecological
malignancies. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024;36:e9.
17. do Carmo LV, Pereira KD, Goulart MA, Laurinavicius AG, Souza J,
Junior OP, et al. Blood pressure control and clinical outcomes after
renal denervation through irrigated catheter radiofrequency ablation in
patients with resistant hypertension: a case series with up to 10 years of
follow-up. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024;31:687-94.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.