Comparative genomics indicate multiple genetic routes to the evolution of torpor in placental mammals

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This study used comparative genomics across 190 placental mammal genomes to test how evolutionary events in individual protein-coding genes—such as gene loss, positive selection, and evolutionary rate shifts—track with shifts in torpor use across the mammalian phylogeny. The authors found that gene–torpor associations were highly clade-specific, with no single gene explaining most torpor transitions, while limited convergence was detectable at the pathway level rather than across individual genes. A key caveat is that the approach identifies associations between genomic evolution and torpor use patterns, but does not establish a single shared genetic mechanism. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Torpor is a key survival strategy that many avian and mammalian lineages evolved in response to challenging environmental conditions. Whether the independent evolution of torpor in different lineages involved changes in the same genes remains poorly understood. Here, we performed comparative screens across 190 placental mammal genomes to comprehensively examine associations between loss, positive selection and evolutionary rate shifts in individual protein-coding genes and evolutionary shifts in torpor use. We find that gene-torpor associations are highly clade-specific, with no gene being able to explain the majority of torpor shifts across the phylogeny of placental mammals. Instead, a relatively higher but limited extent of evolutionary convergence can be detected at the pathway level. Our results suggest that torpor emerged through several genetic routes in placental mammals, which likely explains the vast diversity of torpor use patterns that can be observed among torpor-capable species today. Significance A fundamental question in evolutionary genomics is whether independent gains and losses of a convergent trait may be achieved through similar or distinct genetic paths. Here, we address this question by focusing on the evolution of torpor across placental mammals, a key trait that likely emerged independently in several lineages. By conducting multiple comparative genomics screens across 190 placental mammal species, we find that individual protein-coding genes have a low explanatory power for evolutionary shifts in torpor. In contrast, there is slightly stronger evidence for pathway-level convergence. Our findings suggest that the wide diversity of patterns of torpor use across placental mammals may, in part, be due to the existence of multiple genetic paths to torpor.
Full text 1,100 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Torpor is a key survival strategy that many avian and mammalian lineages evolved in response to challenging environmental conditions. Whether the independent evolution of torpor in different lineages involved changes in the same genes remains poorly understood. Here, we performed comparative screens across 190 placental mammal genomes to comprehensively examine associations between loss, positive selection and evolutionary rate shifts in individual protein-coding genes and evolutionary shifts in torpor use. We find that gene-torpor associations are highly clade-specific, with no gene being able to explain the majority of torpor shifts across the phylogeny of placental mammals. Instead, a relatively higher but limited extent of evolutionary convergence can be detected at the pathway level. Our results suggest that torpor emerged through several genetic routes in placental mammals, which likely explains the vast diversity of torpor use patterns that can be observed among torpor-capable species today. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0