“Toupee or not Toupee?” Sic (et Non). Social perceptions of Male Pattern Baldness (Androgenetic Alopecia)

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

13 men aged between their early 30s and early 70s with full-blown male pattern baldness (male androgenetic alopecia) were photographed once bald and once with a high-quality, custom-made toupee. In an online experiment, one sample rated the photos according to attractiveness, another according to self-assurance and another according to health. The attractiveness ratings were extraordinarily low. The men appeared considerably more attractive with a toupee than with a bald head (effect size Cohen’s d = 0.67). The women’s attractiveness ratings were more negative than those of the male judges (d = 0.58). When the men wore their toupee, they were rated higher by older judges than by younger ones. The men appeared somewhat healthier with a toupee than with a bald head (d = 0.14). Overall, neither the hair status nor the sex of the judges played a role in the assessment of self-assurance. A special feature of the study is the analysis at the level of the individual stimulus persons. Under both hair conditions, each individual received higher attractiveness ratings from men than from women. In terms of self-assurance, some were rated more favorably by women and others by men. In terms of health, men and women only differed for a few targets. In line with the attractiveness stereotype „What is beautiful is good“, more attractive men were judged to be more self-assured and healthier.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0