Bridging Automation and Conventional Methods: A Comparative Hematological Analysis of Selected CBC Parameters in captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) and Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar)

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Reliable hematological profiling in avian species remains challenging due to species specific cellular characteristics and limited validation of automated analyzers. The present study evaluated the analytical performance of an automated veterinary hematology analyzers (Biobase BK-5000, Vet, China) for blood samples obtained from Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) and captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), using manual hematological techniques as the reference standard. Red blood cell count, hemoglobin and platelet count were determined by both automated and manual method, and comparative assessment was performed using correlation, regression, agreement and accuracy analysis. Results showed no significant differences in red blood cell counting between methods, whereas Hb and PLT values differed significantly (P≤ 0.0.5) across both species. Hemoglobin exhibited strong correlation, high predictive accuracy and narrow limits of agreement, indicating robust analyzer performance for this parameter. In contrast, platelet count demonstrated marked variability, weaker concordance and broader limits of agreements, particularly in chukar partridge. Species specific differences were evident across statistical models, underscoring variable analyzer performance among avian taxa. Overall, automated hematology analysis proved dependable for RBC and Hb estimation in the studied species, while Platelet enumeration necessitates cautious interpretation confirmatory manual assessment. The findings highlight the importance of species adopted reference intervals and routine analyzer validation to improve the reliability of avian diagnostics.
Full text 7,950 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Bridging Automation and Conventional Methods: A Comparative Hematological Analysis of Selected CBC Parameters in captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) and Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar) | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 22 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Bridging Automation and Conventional Methods: A Comparative Hematological Analysis of Selected CBC Parameters in captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) and Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar) Authors : Arfa Nishat , Shamsa Ahmad , Mushtaq Lashari 0009-0001-4496-9302 [email protected] , Maryam Chaudhary , Sumama Qayyum , Warda Amjad , Saba Sattar , Aroosa Ishfaq , Musfira Qanwal , and Anoosha Waheed Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176904010.05312082/v1 118 views 56 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Reliable hematological profiling in avian species remains challenging due to species specific cellular characteristics and limited validation of automated analyzers. The present study evaluated the analytical performance of an automated veterinary hematology analyzers (Biobase BK-5000, Vet, China) for blood samples obtained from Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) and captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), using manual hematological techniques as the reference standard. Red blood cell count, hemoglobin and platelet count were determined by both automated and manual method, and comparative assessment was performed using correlation, regression, agreement and accuracy analysis. Results showed no significant differences in red blood cell counting between methods, whereas Hb and PLT values differed significantly (P≤ 0.0.5) across both species. Hemoglobin exhibited strong correlation, high predictive accuracy and narrow limits of agreement, indicating robust analyzer performance for this parameter. In contrast, platelet count demonstrated marked variability, weaker concordance and broader limits of agreements, particularly in chukar partridge. Species specific differences were evident across statistical models, underscoring variable analyzer performance among avian taxa. Overall, automated hematology analysis proved dependable for RBC and Hb estimation in the studied species, while Platelet enumeration necessitates cautious interpretation confirmatory manual assessment. The findings highlight the importance of species adopted reference intervals and routine analyzer validation to improve the reliability of avian diagnostics. Supplementary Material File (main text file.docx) Download 103.57 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 22 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords chukar partridge complete blood count hematology hemoglobin red blood cells turkeys Authors Affiliations Arfa Nishat The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Shamsa Ahmad The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Mushtaq Lashari 0009-0001-4496-9302 [email protected] The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Maryam Chaudhary The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Sumama Qayyum The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Warda Amjad The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Saba Sattar The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Aroosa Ishfaq The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Musfira Qanwal The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Anoosha Waheed The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 118 views 56 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Arfa Nishat, Shamsa Ahmad, Mushtaq Lashari, et al. Bridging Automation and Conventional Methods: A Comparative Hematological Analysis of Selected CBC Parameters in captive Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) and Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar). Authorea . 22 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176904010.05312082/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176904010.05312082/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe205ae3f3909d6',t:'MTc3OTE4MjM4OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00