CRHP Advanced Risk Calculator  Risk assessment in skin-cancer prevention: The CRHP Advanced Algorithm vs. dermatoscopy. Which is more reliable?

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Skin cancer, especially malignant melanoma, can vary greatly in appearance and usually develops very quickly. Therefore, the ABCDE rule (also known as the ABCD rule in some countries) was propagated many years ago to help medical laymen to recognize for themselves when it is time to see a dermatologist. But how effective is this rule? Our previous work clearly demonstrates that another self-monitoring protocol has a higher sensitivity and better results than the outdated ABCDE rule: the C-Rapid-H-Plus Protocol. Based on this, a simple algorithm was developed which appeared to give quite promising results. Now we can present a completely new algorithm that has proven to be more reliable than dermatoscopy in predicting the need for excisional biopsy in a collective of 421 patients. The CRHP Advanced Risk Calculator, also based on the C-Rapid-H-Plus protocol, is of great value for both, in-person and telemedicine settings.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00