Non-instrumental actions can communicate roles and relationships, not just rituals
preprint
OA: closed
Public-Domain
AI-generated summary
Non-instrumental actions like bowing and kissing can communicate commitment to dyadic relationships, but it is unclear when these actions are interpreted as ritual versus relational.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Actions that do not have instrumental goals can communicate social goals that are not rituals. Many non-instrumental actions such as bowing or kissing communicate a commitment to or roles in dyadic relationships. What is unclear is when people understand such actions in terms of ritual and when they understand them in terms of relationships. [commentary on Jagiello et al.: Tradition and invention forthcoming in BBS].
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: Public-Domain