Non-instrumental actions can communicate roles and relationships, not just rituals

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

Non-instrumental actions like bowing and kissing can communicate commitment to dyadic relationships, but it is unclear when these actions are interpreted as ritual versus relational.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Actions that do not have instrumental goals can communicate social goals that are not rituals. Many non-instrumental actions such as bowing or kissing communicate a commitment to or roles in dyadic relationships. What is unclear is when people understand such actions in terms of ritual and when they understand them in terms of relationships. [commentary on Jagiello et al.: Tradition and invention forthcoming in BBS].

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: Public-Domain