Temporal Discounting and Financial Decision-Making Among Generation Z Women in Bangkok's Creative Economy: A Qualitative Exploration of Behavioral Economics and Family Planning

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This qualitative research investigates the financial decision-making patterns and temporal discounting behaviors among Generation Z women employed in Bangkok's creative economy sectors. Drawing on behavioral economics frameworks and employing in-depth semi-structured interviews with twenty-five participants aged 24-28 years, this study explores how young professional women navigate the complex interplay between immediate financial needs, long-term planning objectives, and family formation decisions. The findings reveal that Generation Z women in creative industries exhibit distinct temporal discounting patterns characterized by heightened present bias due to income volatility, career uncertainty, and the prioritization of experiential investments over traditional savings mechanisms. Thematic analysis identified five major themes including financial autonomy conflicts, digital-native financial behaviors, career-family trade-offs, peer influence dynamics, and institutional distrust. Participants demonstrated sophisticated awareness of behavioral biases yet struggled to implement consistent long-term financial strategies due to structural constraints within the creative economy including irregular income streams, limited employer-provided benefits, and the gig economy's inherent precarity. The research contributes to understanding how cultural contexts, particularly in rapidly developing Asian metropolitan areas, shape financial decision-making among young women professionals. Implications for financial literacy programs, policy interventions, and workplace benefit structures are discussed alongside recommendations for future research examining generational differences in economic behavior within creative industries.
Full text 983 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e190798 (09 Mar 2026) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e190798 (09 Mar 2026) Submitted to Population and Economics Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e190798 First posted 09 Mar 2026 Authors Khwanchol Hasayotin - Corresponding author Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Disclaimer: This article is (co-)authored by any of the Editors-in-Chief, Managing Editors or their deputies in this journal. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0