Task-irrelevant stimuli boost phasic pupil-linked arousal but not memory formation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study examined how task-irrelevant white-noise sounds influence phasic pupil-linked arousal, and whether this arousal causally affects later memory formation and memory-based decisions. In experiments where white noise was played before, during, or after presentation of memoranda (images or spoken words), pupil dilation during encoding was tracked, with recognition and free recall measured the next day. Trial-to-trial pupil dilation amplitude during word encoding without task-irrelevant sounds predicted later memory success, but adding task-irrelevant sounds robustly increased pupil dilation without improving memory for words or images. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A bstract Brainstem arousal systems including the locus coeruleus noradrenaline system, respond transiently to behaviorally relevant events. Locus coeruleus activity also drives dilations of the pupil, which are often observed during cognitive tasks. The strength of pupil responses during encoding of stimulus material predicts the success of its later retrieval, which might reflect the impact of noradrenaline on synaptic plasticity and memory formation. The pupil also dilates in response to task-irrelevant sounds, which could therefore serve as a valuable tool for investigating causal effects of phasic, pupil-linked arousal on cognition. Here, we evaluated whether task-irrelevant white noise sounds affect memory formation and memory-based decisions. These sounds were played before, during or after the presentation of memoranda (images or spoken words). Memory success was measured in recognition and free recall tasks the day after. Trial-to-trial variations in the amplitude of pupil dilations during word encoding without task-irrelevant sounds predicted memory success. Task-irrelevant white-noise sounds also robustly dilated the pupil but did not improve memory formation for the words or the images. We conclude that pupil-linked arousal processes triggered by task-irrelevant sounds differ from those recruited endogenously during memory formation, for example in states of increased emotionality or attention.
Full text 1,651 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Brainstem arousal systems including the locus coeruleus noradrenaline system, respond transiently to behaviorally relevant events. Locus coeruleus activity also drives dilations of the pupil, which are often observed during cognitive tasks. The strength of pupil responses during encoding of stimulus material predicts the success of its later retrieval, which might reflect the impact of noradrenaline on synaptic plasticity and memory formation. The pupil also dilates in response to task-irrelevant sounds, which could therefore serve as a valuable tool for investigating causal effects of phasic, pupil-linked arousal on cognition. Here, we evaluated whether task-irrelevant white noise sounds affect memory formation and memory-based decisions. These sounds were played before, during or after the presentation of memoranda (images or spoken words). Memory success was measured in recognition and free recall tasks the day after. Trial-to-trial variations in the amplitude of pupil dilations during word encoding without task-irrelevant sounds predicted memory success. Task-irrelevant white-noise sounds also robustly dilated the pupil but did not improve memory formation for the words or the images. We conclude that pupil-linked arousal processes triggered by task-irrelevant sounds differ from those recruited endogenously during memory formation, for example in states of increased emotionality or attention. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The manuscript has been updated to include additional results regarding the confidence ratings that were part of the recognition task.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0