Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Human Resource Management

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This systematic and bibliometric review analyzed the literature on AI adoption in HRM, revealing rapid growth, four key research areas, and a recurring gap between AI's technical potential and organizational realities.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This preprint systematically reviews and bibliometrically analyzes scientific literature on the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM), using a PRISMA-guided approach with a Scopus-derived corpus and bibliometric tools (Bibliometrix and VOSviewer) for co-occurrence and author-network mapping. The authors report rapid growth of AI/HRM research, concentrated in the United States, Europe, and Asia, and identify four thematic areas: technological optimization, strategic HR transformation, employee experience, and paradoxical tensions related to algorithmic systems. A recurring gap is described between AI’s technical promises and organizational realities, especially in emerging contexts, with ethics (e.g., bias, transparency) and employee trust highlighted as central concerns. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This study conducts a systematic and bibliometric review of scientific research on the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM). It examines how the literature conceptualizes determinants, obstacles, and paradoxical tensions linked to AI adoption, while proposing an integrative interpretation that goes beyond descriptive approaches. Design/Methodology/ approach: A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA protocol. The corpus was extracted from Scopus using precise search equations. Bibliometric techniques (Bibliometrix, VOSviewer) enabled co-occurrence analysis, author-network mapping, and the identification of thematic clusters and emerging trends. Results: Findings show rapid growth of AI-related studies in HRM, mainly from the United States, Europe, and Asia. Four major research areas emerge: technological optimization, strategic transformation of the HR function, employee experience, and paradoxical tensions associated with algorithmic systems. A recurrent gap appears between AI’s technical promises and organizational realities, particularly in emerging contexts. Practical implications: The study highlights limits of linear adoption models and emphasizes the importance of aligning strategy, culture, data governance, and change management. Socially, it underscores ethical concerns such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and employee trust. Originality / Value: By combining PRISMA and bibliometric analysis, this review proposes an innovative interpretive model and identifies future research directions centered on ethics, emerging contexts, and the evolving role of HR professionals in the AI era.
Full text 11,025 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Human Resource Management | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Human Resource Management Nahid ABADI, Said OUTMANE This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Objective: This study conducts a systematic and bibliometric review of scientific research on the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM). It examines how the literature conceptualizes determinants, obstacles, and paradoxical tensions linked to AI adoption, while proposing an integrative interpretation that goes beyond descriptive approaches. Design/Methodology/ approach: A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA protocol. The corpus was extracted from Scopus using precise search equations. Bibliometric techniques (Bibliometrix, VOSviewer) enabled co-occurrence analysis, author-network mapping, and the identification of thematic clusters and emerging trends. Results: Findings show rapid growth of AI-related studies in HRM, mainly from the United States, Europe, and Asia. Four major research areas emerge: technological optimization, strategic transformation of the HR function, employee experience, and paradoxical tensions associated with algorithmic systems. A recurrent gap appears between AI’s technical promises and organizational realities, particularly in emerging contexts. Practical implications: The study highlights limits of linear adoption models and emphasizes the importance of aligning strategy, culture, data governance, and change management. Socially, it underscores ethical concerns such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and employee trust. Originality / Value: By combining PRISMA and bibliometric analysis, this review proposes an innovative interpretive model and identifies future research directions centered on ethics, emerging contexts, and the evolving role of HR professionals in the AI era. Artificial Intelligence Human Resource Management Technology Adoption Organi-zational Paradox Bibliometrics Systematic Literature Review Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8570465","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":586298530,"identity":"e967307c-e15a-4ac0-9edf-4fa9f2872a60","order_by":0,"name":"Nahid ABADI","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nahid","middleName":"","lastName":"ABADI","suffix":""},{"id":586298532,"identity":"f9ce5dc4-7986-4c3b-ab69-68d959e21c84","order_by":1,"name":"Said OUTMANE","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Said","middleName":"","lastName":"OUTMANE","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-10 21:08:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":107705729,"identity":"bf19fdf9-b8f0-47ab-bbe5-e5782f957b7f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-24 09:14:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":702366,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscritrevised.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8570465/v1_covered_fe944131-b9f7-4111-8c7a-7540c946203d.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Human Resource Management","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Artificial Intelligence, Human Resource Management, Technology Adoption, Organi-zational Paradox, Bibliometrics, Systematic Literature Review","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eObjective: This study conducts a systematic and bibliometric review of scientific research on the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM). It examines how the literature conceptualizes determinants, obstacles, and paradoxical tensions linked to AI adoption, while proposing an integrative interpretation that goes beyond descriptive approaches.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDesign/Methodology/ approach: A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA protocol. The corpus was extracted from Scopus using precise search equations. Bibliometric techniques (Bibliometrix, VOSviewer) enabled co-occurrence analysis, author-network mapping, and the identification of thematic clusters and emerging trends.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResults: Findings show rapid growth of AI-related studies in HRM, mainly from the United States, Europe, and Asia. Four major research areas emerge: technological optimization, strategic transformation of the HR function, employee experience, and paradoxical tensions associated with algorithmic systems. A recurrent gap appears between AI’s technical promises and organizational realities, particularly in emerging contexts.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePractical implications: The study highlights limits of linear adoption models and emphasizes the importance of aligning strategy, culture, data governance, and change management. Socially, it underscores ethical concerns such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and employee trust.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOriginality / Value: By combining PRISMA and bibliometric analysis, this review proposes an innovative interpretive model and identifies future research directions centered on ethics, emerging contexts, and the evolving role of HR professionals in the AI era.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Human Resource Management","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-09 12:19:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8570465/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"91a6f576-b799-4c08-aa56-d88ba233c29d","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 9th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-22T08:42:16+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-09 12:19:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8570465","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8570465","identity":"rs-8570465","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0