A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating Preventive Etanercept on Postoperative Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects between 5% and 70% of surgical patients, depending on the surgery. There is no reliable treatment for CPSP, which has led to an increased emphasis on prevention. In this study, we sought to determine whether preventive etanercept can decrease the magnitude of postoperative pain and reduce the incidence of CPSP. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized study in 77 patients comparing subcutaneous etanercept 50 mg administered 90 minutes before inguinal hernia surgery with saline. Patients, surgeons, anesthesiologists, the injecting physician, nursing staff, and evaluators were blinded. The primary outcome measure was a 24-hour numerical rating scale pain score. Secondary outcome measures were postanesthesia care unit pain scores, 24-hour opioid requirements, time to first analgesic, and pain scores recorded at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: Mean 24-hour pain scores were 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.6) in the etanercept and 3.9 (95% CI, 2.6-4.0) in the control group (P=0.22). The mean number of analgesic pills used in the first 24 hours was 4.0 (SD, 2.8) in the treatment versus 5.8 (SD, 4.2) in the control group (P=0.03). At 1 month, 10 patients (29%) in the treatment group reported pain versus 21 (49%) control patients (P=0.08). The presence of pain at 1 month was significantly associated with pain at 3 months (hazard ratio, 0.74; 99% CI, 0.52-0.97; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Although preventive etanercept was superior to saline in reducing postoperative pain on some measures, the effect sizes were small, transient, and not statistically significant. Different dosing regimens in a larger population should be explored in future studies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (38)
- W162324909 via openalex
- W203339925 via openalex
- W377849966 via openalex
- W1964647709 via openalex
- W1966988376 via openalex
- W1969721646 via openalex
- W1977192281 via openalex
- W1984632338 via openalex
- W1997484220 via openalex
- W2006343056 via openalex
- W2006785548 via openalex
- W2006957372 via openalex
- W2007985716 via openalex
- W2008234012 via openalex
- W2016735320 via openalex
- W2019875673 via openalex
- W2023610081 via openalex
- W2030279898 via openalex
- W2041499812 via openalex
- W2051342343 via openalex
- W2065542926 via openalex
- W2069724916 via openalex
- W2079768180 via openalex
- W2090996835 via openalex
- W2108244230 via openalex
- W2111928590 via openalex
- W2112458858 via openalex
- W2115592924 via openalex
- W2119733361 via openalex
- W2127638069 via openalex
- W2130141996 via openalex
- W2132660566 via openalex
- W2137085579 via openalex
- W2156830886 via openalex
- W2160361051 via openalex
- W2288800904 via openalex
- W2410249905 via openalex
- W6696250752 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK