Comparing educational effects between role-play and gatekeeper training in Crisis-management, Anti-stigma, and Mental Health Literacy Program for University Students (CAMPUS)

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Aims: We compare the educational effects of role-play and discussion and gatekeeper training to develop an evidence-based suicide prevention education program for university students. Methods: Participants comprised 145 medical students. “Crisis-management, Anti-stigma and Mental Health Literacy Program for University Students” (CAMPUS) was designed and developed, which included a lecture and a parallel session for role-play or gatekeeper training. Students attended a lecture and were randomly assigned to the role-play group or gatekeeper training group. Questionnaires were filled before the module, immediately after the module, and three months after the program. Results: The role-play group learned more appropriate coping skills, whereas the gatekeeper training group improved their self-efficacy as gatekeepers. The students’ depressive state had decreased at three months after the program, along with the reduced suicide probability in students with suicide risk. Conclusions: Role-play and gatekeeper training evinced different educational effects. However, CAMPUS was comprehensively effective in preventing suicide in university students.Note: A peer-reviewed version of this manuscript has now been published at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.111002.2

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00