Barriers and facilitators to integrating tuberculosis treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative study

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This qualitative study examined barriers and facilitators to integrating tuberculosis treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Kampala, Uganda, using framework-guided interviews and framework analysis mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants across six public health facilities included TB and HIV focal persons, pharmacy healthcare providers, Ministry of Health experts, and people with TB/HIV (47 total). Key facilitators were convenience of single-location access to both TB and HIV care, increased privacy and reduced stigma, improved accessibility (extended hours, shorter waits, proximity), pharmacy readiness for TB care, willingness of people to engage in self-managed care, and training for pharmacy staff; major barriers were unclear eligibility criteria, lack of pharmacy-based TB counseling, inadequate infrastructure for TB drug storage, limited pharmacy confidence in TB care, and unclear implementation logistics. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Community pharmacies (private retail drug shops or pharmacies) have proven successful for delivering anti-retroviral therapy to people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Leveraging this model for tuberculosis (TB) treatment integration could improve access to both TB and HIV treatment among people with TB/HIV. We identified the barriers and facilitators to integrating TB treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Kampala, Uganda, using a qualitative study across six public health facilities. Participants included people with TB/HIV; healthcare providers (HCPs) from the six facilities and their affiliated community pharmacies; and experts from the Ministry of Health. Data were collected through interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We performed framework analysis and mapped the emergent sub-themes to the relevant CFIR domains. We enrolled 47 participants: six TB focal persons, six HIV focal persons, nine pharmacy HCPs, three Ministry of Health staff, and 23 people with TB/HIV. Major facilitators included the convenience of accessing both TB and HIV treatment at a single location; enhanced privacy and reduced stigma; improved accessibility through extended hours, shorter wait times, and proximity; readiness of community pharmacy HCPs to deliver TB treatment; willingness of people with TB/HIV to engage in self-managed care; and training of pharmacy HCPs in TB care. Key barriers included unclear eligibility criteria for enrolling people with TB/HIV, absence of TB counseling services at pharmacies, inadequate infrastructure for TB drug storage, limited confidence among pharmacy HCPs in delivering TB care, and unclear logistics and operational procedures for implementation. Therefore, context-specific interventions that are developed in collaboration with key stakeholders, address barriers like eligibility criteria refinement, enhanced pharmacy HCP training, and financial incentives, and leverage facilitators like policy support and stakeholder readiness, are needed for the successful integration of TB treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Uganda.
Full text 4,306 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Community pharmacies (private retail drug shops or pharmacies) have proven successful for delivering anti-retroviral therapy to people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Leveraging this model for tuberculosis (TB) treatment integration could improve access to both TB and HIV treatment among people with TB/HIV. We identified the barriers and facilitators to integrating TB treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Kampala, Uganda, using a qualitative study across six public health facilities. Participants included people with TB/HIV; healthcare providers (HCPs) from the six facilities and their affiliated community pharmacies; and experts from the Ministry of Health. Data were collected through interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We performed framework analysis and mapped the emergent sub-themes to the relevant CFIR domains. We enrolled 47 participants: six TB focal persons, six HIV focal persons, nine pharmacy HCPs, three Ministry of Health staff, and 23 people with TB/HIV. Major facilitators included the convenience of accessing both TB and HIV treatment at a single location; enhanced privacy and reduced stigma; improved accessibility through extended hours, shorter wait times, and proximity; readiness of community pharmacy HCPs to deliver TB treatment; willingness of people with TB/HIV to engage in self-managed care; and training of pharmacy HCPs in TB care. Key barriers included unclear eligibility criteria for enrolling people with TB/HIV, absence of TB counseling services at pharmacies, inadequate infrastructure for TB drug storage, limited confidence among pharmacy HCPs in delivering TB care, and unclear logistics and operational procedures for implementation. Therefore, context-specific interventions that are developed in collaboration with key stakeholders, address barriers like eligibility criteria refinement, enhanced pharmacy HCP training, and financial incentives, and leverage facilitators like policy support and stakeholder readiness, are needed for the successful integration of TB treatment into community pharmacies for people with TB/HIV in Uganda. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K43TW012839. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Not Applicable The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethical approval was granted by the Makerere University Infectious Diseases Institute Research Ethics Committee (Ref: IDI-REC-2024-98) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (Ref: HS4397ES). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Not Applicable I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Not Applicable I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Not Applicable Data Availability All relevant data are within the paper.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: Public-Domain