Right Or Left: Laterality Incidence Of Billed Plantar Fasciitis Plus Foot Pain

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study analyzed electronic health records and found a statistically significant difference in billed right foot pain compared to left foot pain, but no significant difference in the incidence of plantar fasciitis between the two feet.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

The paper used a six-year electronic health/medical record dataset from a private podiatric clinic (NextGen Office) to assess laterality by counting unique patients billed with ICD-10-CM codes for right foot pain (M79.671) versus left foot pain (M79.672) and concurrent plantar fasciitis (M72.2) from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021. After excluding 2552 patients who were billed for both right and left foot pain (so plantar fasciitis laterality could not be assigned), 1077 patients were only billed for right foot pain and 921 for left foot pain (p=0.0005), but right and left plantar fasciitis co-billing was not significantly different (362 vs 372; p=0.71). The study explicitly notes limitations including reliance on billing data because there are no separate ICD-10 codes for right vs left plantar fasciitis, inability to evaluate follow-up frequency, and exclusion of additional patients with missing laterality information. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Footedness and its potential role still remains largely underexplored in terms of laterality of lower extremity diseases. Materials and Methods Podiatric medicine patients’ electronic health/medical records were explored based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes billed from October 1, 2015-September 30, 2021 for pain in right foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.671) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2) vs. for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2). Results During the six-year period, 1077 patients were only billed for pain in right foot vs. 921 patients were only billed for pain in left foot (p=0.0005) but only 362 patients with pain in right foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis while only 372 patients with pain in left foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis (p=0.71). Conclusion Although there was no significance difference between right vs. left plantar fasciitis incidence, the incidental finding of significant difference between right vs. left foot pain incidence warrants future investigations.
Full text 12,851 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 10 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Footedness and its potential role still remains largely underexplored in terms of laterality of lower extremity diseases.

Materials and methods

Podiatric medicine patients’ electronic health/medical records were explored based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes billed from October 1, 2015-September 30, 2021 for pain in right foot (ICD- 10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.671) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2) vs. for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2).

Results

During the six-year period, 1077 patients were only billed for pain in right foot vs. 921 patients were only billed for pain in left foot (p=0.0005) but only 362 patients with pain in right foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis while only 372 patients with pain in left foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis (p=0.71).

Conclusion

Although there was no significance difference between right vs. left plantar fasciitis incidence, the incidental finding of significant difference between right vs. left foot pain incidence warrants future investigations. . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 3 of 10

Introduction

The potential role of footedness in relation to incidence of lower extremity diseases was recently explored in terms of lower extremity arthroplasty’s incidence [1]. However, footedness and its potential role still remains largely underexplored despite enormous databases of orthopedic and podiatric medicine patients [2] awaiting clinical researchers to ask the right questions about the laterality of their lower extremity diseases warranting medical interventions and/or surgical procedures therein. . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 4 of 10

Materials and methods

As institutional review board approved exempt research, podiatric medicine patients’ electronic health/medical records’ (EHR/EMR) database (NextGen Office, NextGen Healthcare, Inc, Atlanta, GA) at private clinic of author (HAK) were explored based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes billed from October 1, 2015-September 30, 2021 (six-year period). The total numbers of unique patient visits were quantified in terms of whether patients were billed for pain in right foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.671) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2) vs. whether patients were billed for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2). These patient visits were also quantified and compared in terms of patients’ age and gender. . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 5 of 10

Results

During the six-year period, 3629 patients were billed for pain in right foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.671) and 3473 patients were billed for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) while 3432 patients were billed for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2). However, on further analysis, it was determined that 2552 patients were billed for pain in right foot as well as pain in left foot so they were removed from the analysis as it could not be ascertained which sided pain might be related to plantar fasciitis. Among remaining 1077 patients who were only billed for pain in right foot vs. remaining 921 patients who were only billed for pain in left foot (p=0.0005), only 362 patients with pain in right foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis while only 372 patients with pain in left foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis (p=0.71). Demographic differences were also not statistically significant between these 362 right plantar fasciitis patients vs. 372 left plantar fasciitis patients (Table 1). . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 6 of 10

Discussion

Contrary to our expectation of discovering right plantar fasciitis being more common than left plantar fasciitis due to right footedness’s preponderance in general population as well as right foot movements’ preponderance during automatic transmission vehicular driving [3-7], the podiatric medicine patients at private clinic of author (HAK) had insignificantly different incidence between right plantar fasciitis and left plantar fasciitis even though right foot pain incidence was significantly more common than left foot pain as per billed ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes’ data. This raises the question if planned future prospective clinical trials to ascertain incidence of laterality among plantar fasciitis patients at the author’s clinic will validate these findings or refute them. There were some study limitations. Due to EHR/EMR inability to retrieve multiple visits by unique patients, it was not possible to discover any differences in frequency of follow-up visits between right plantar fasciitis patients and left plantar fasciitis patients. Moreover, as there is no separate ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for right plantar fasciitis or left plantar fasciitis or bilateral plantar fasciitis, the billed data retrieved was an indirect analysis to compare the incidence of right plantar fasciitis vs. the incidence of left plantar fasciitis. Additionally, 2552 patients with billing for pain in right foot as well as pain in left foot (including 1508 patients with billing for plantar fasciitis as well) who were deleted from the final analysis might have validated or refuted the current results only if there were separate ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for right plantar fasciitis and left plantar fasciitis. Moreover, 1190 patients who were billed for plantar fasciitis had no concurrent billing for pain in right foot or pain in left foot and hence could not be . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 7 of 10 included in the final analysis due to missing data about laterality. Future retrospective and prospective studies by authors or global readers may be able to address and overcome these limitations. . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 8 of 10

Conclusion

Although there was no significance difference between right vs. left plantar fasciitis incidence, the incidental finding of significant difference between right vs. left foot pain incidence warrants future investigations to refute or validate the hypothesis that predominance of right footedness and right foot based universal driving may be the underlying mechanism if right foot pain and/or right plantar fasciitis are found to be universally more common by researchers globally. . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 9 of 10

References

1. Gupta D. Is Footedness Driving Right Lower Extremity Arthroplasty Becoming Commoner Than Left Lower Extremity Arthroplasty? medRxiv (pre-print). 2021.11.22.21266672. doi:10.1101/2021.11.22.21266672 2. Nahin RL. Prevalence and Pharmaceutical Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in United States Adults. J Pain. 2018;19(8):885-896. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.03.003 3. Widmar A. Is Driving a Car Difficult for a Left-Handed Person? https://thenewswheel.com/is-driving-a-car-difficult-for-a-left-handed-person/ Accessed May 2, 2022. 4. Xin Z. Left-Handed Drivers vs Right-Handed Drivers: Who Has it Easier? https://www.motorist.sg/article/115/left-handed-drivers-vs-right-handed-drivers-who-has- it-easier Accessed May 2, 2022. 5. Cunha M. Plantar fasciitis & Achilles tendonitis from driving. https://www.gothamfootcare.com/blog/plantar-fasciitis-achilles-tendonitis-from-driving/ Accessed May 2, 2022 6. Promsri A, Haid T, Werner I, Federolf P. Leg Dominance Effects on Postural Control When Performing Challenging Balance Exercises. Brain Sci. 2020;10(3):128. Published 2020 Feb 25. doi:10.3390/brainsci10030128 7. van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189876. Published 2017 Dec 29. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189876 . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint Page 10 of 10 Table 1: Incidence Of Laterality In Plantar Fasciitis Per Billed Unique Patient Visits Right Plantar Fasciitis Left Plantar Fasciitis P-Value Patients’ Number (n) 362 372 0.71 Patients’ Age (years) (Mean ±SD) 57.8 ±13.1 57.7 ±13.8 0.92 Patients’ Gender (Females %) 69% 65% 0.24 . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0