Abstract
Background: Footedness and its potential role still remains largely underexplored in terms of
laterality of lower extremity diseases.
Materials and methods
Podiatric medicine patients’ electronic health/medical records were
explored based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification
(ICD-10-CM) codes billed from October 1, 2015-September 30, 2021 for pain in right foot (ICD-
10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.671) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code
M72.2) vs. for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) as well as for plantar
fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2).
Results
During the six-year period, 1077 patients were only billed for pain in right foot vs. 921
patients were only billed for pain in left foot (p=0.0005) but only 362 patients with pain in right
foot were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis while only 372 patients with pain in left foot
were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis (p=0.71).
Conclusion
Although there was no significance difference between right vs. left plantar fasciitis
incidence, the incidental finding of significant difference between right vs. left foot pain
incidence warrants future investigations.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 3 of 10
Introduction
The potential role of footedness in relation to incidence of lower extremity diseases was recently
explored in terms of lower extremity arthroplasty’s incidence [1]. However, footedness and its
potential role still remains largely underexplored despite enormous databases of orthopedic and
podiatric medicine patients [2] awaiting clinical researchers to ask the right questions about the
laterality of their lower extremity diseases warranting medical interventions and/or surgical
procedures therein.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 4 of 10
Materials and methods
As institutional review board approved exempt research, podiatric medicine patients’ electronic
health/medical records’ (EHR/EMR) database (NextGen Office, NextGen Healthcare, Inc,
Atlanta, GA) at private clinic of author (HAK) were explored based on International
Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes billed
from October 1, 2015-September 30, 2021 (six-year period). The total numbers of unique patient
visits were quantified in terms of whether patients were billed for pain in right foot (ICD-10-CM
Diagnosis Code M79.671) as well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2)
vs. whether patients were billed for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M79.672) as
well as for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code M72.2). These patient visits were also
quantified and compared in terms of patients’ age and gender.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 5 of 10
Results
During the six-year period, 3629 patients were billed for pain in right foot (ICD-10-CM
Diagnosis Code M79.671) and 3473 patients were billed for pain in left foot (ICD-10-CM
Diagnosis Code M79.672) while 3432 patients were billed for plantar fasciitis (ICD-10-CM
Diagnosis Code M72.2). However, on further analysis, it was determined that 2552 patients were
billed for pain in right foot as well as pain in left foot so they were removed from the analysis as
it could not be ascertained which sided pain might be related to plantar fasciitis. Among
remaining 1077 patients who were only billed for pain in right foot vs. remaining 921 patients
who were only billed for pain in left foot (p=0.0005), only 362 patients with pain in right foot
were concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis while only 372 patients with pain in left foot were
concurrently billed for plantar fasciitis (p=0.71). Demographic differences were also not
statistically significant between these 362 right plantar fasciitis patients vs. 372 left plantar
fasciitis patients (Table 1).
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 6 of 10
Discussion
Contrary to our expectation of discovering right plantar fasciitis being more common than left
plantar fasciitis due to right footedness’s preponderance in general population as well as right
foot movements’ preponderance during automatic transmission vehicular driving [3-7], the
podiatric medicine patients at private clinic of author (HAK) had insignificantly different
incidence between right plantar fasciitis and left plantar fasciitis even though right foot pain
incidence was significantly more common than left foot pain as per billed ICD-10-CM Diagnosis
Codes’ data. This raises the question if planned future prospective clinical trials to ascertain
incidence of laterality among plantar fasciitis patients at the author’s clinic will validate these
findings or refute them.
There were some study limitations. Due to EHR/EMR inability to retrieve multiple visits by
unique patients, it was not possible to discover any differences in frequency of follow-up visits
between right plantar fasciitis patients and left plantar fasciitis patients. Moreover, as there is no
separate ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for right plantar fasciitis or left plantar fasciitis or
bilateral plantar fasciitis, the billed data retrieved was an indirect analysis to compare the
incidence of right plantar fasciitis vs. the incidence of left plantar fasciitis. Additionally, 2552
patients with billing for pain in right foot as well as pain in left foot (including 1508 patients with
billing for plantar fasciitis as well) who were deleted from the final analysis might have validated
or refuted the current results only if there were separate ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for right
plantar fasciitis and left plantar fasciitis. Moreover, 1190 patients who were billed for plantar
fasciitis had no concurrent billing for pain in right foot or pain in left foot and hence could not be
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 7 of 10
included in the final analysis due to missing data about laterality. Future retrospective and
prospective studies by authors or global readers may be able to address and overcome these
limitations.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 8 of 10
Conclusion
Although there was no significance difference between right vs. left plantar fasciitis incidence,
the incidental finding of significant difference between right vs. left foot pain incidence warrants
future investigations to refute or validate the hypothesis that predominance of right footedness
and right foot based universal driving may be the underlying mechanism if right foot pain and/or
right plantar fasciitis are found to be universally more common by researchers globally.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 9 of 10
References
1. Gupta D. Is Footedness Driving Right Lower Extremity Arthroplasty Becoming
Commoner Than Left Lower Extremity Arthroplasty? medRxiv (pre-print).
2021.11.22.21266672. doi:10.1101/2021.11.22.21266672
2. Nahin RL. Prevalence and Pharmaceutical Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in United States
Adults. J Pain. 2018;19(8):885-896. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.03.003
3. Widmar A. Is Driving a Car Difficult for a Left-Handed Person?
https://thenewswheel.com/is-driving-a-car-difficult-for-a-left-handed-person/
Accessed
May 2, 2022.
4. Xin Z. Left-Handed Drivers vs Right-Handed Drivers: Who Has it Easier?
https://www.motorist.sg/article/115/left-handed-drivers-vs-right-handed-drivers-who-has-
it-easier Accessed May 2, 2022.
5. Cunha M. Plantar fasciitis & Achilles tendonitis from driving.
https://www.gothamfootcare.com/blog/plantar-fasciitis-achilles-tendonitis-from-driving/
Accessed May 2, 2022
6. Promsri A, Haid T, Werner I, Federolf P. Leg Dominance Effects on Postural Control
When Performing Challenging Balance Exercises. Brain Sci. 2020;10(3):128. Published
2020 Feb 25. doi:10.3390/brainsci10030128
7. van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel
REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and
observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189876. Published
2017 Dec 29. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189876
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 10 of 10
Table 1: Incidence Of Laterality In Plantar Fasciitis Per Billed Unique Patient Visits
Right Plantar Fasciitis
Left Plantar Fasciitis
P-Value
Patients’ Number (n) 362 372 0.71
Patients’ Age (years)
(Mean ±SD)
57.8 ±13.1 57.7 ±13.8 0.92
Patients’ Gender
(Females %)
69% 65% 0.24
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 14, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.09.22276198doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.