⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04
· read from full text
ⓘ
This preprint studies how the geographic location of routers affects network connectivity and overall user experience in the Invisible Internet Project (I2P), using controlled experiments to observe visibility and record peer distributions. The authors report a direct relationship between where routers are deployed and the distribution of peers observed, with geographic placement influencing node interactions, tunnel establishment, and thus the level of anonymity guaranteed. They compile a comprehensive dataset of node profiles and tunnel behaviors for further analysis of I2P tunnel selection processes and resilience, and note that the work is a preprint that has not been peer reviewed and may be preliminary. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
The geographic location of a router substantially affects connectivity and the overall network experience in the Invisible Internet Project. In this study, we empirically measure the network by designing controlled experiments to observe it and record visibility based on the geographical location of our deployed routers. Our results demonstrated a direct relationship between the distribution of peers observed and the location of the deployed router. The geographic placement of these routers influenced node interactions and, consequently, tunnel establishment, which, in turn, will affect the level of anonymity guaranteed. Following the experiments, we compiled a comprehensive dataset containing node profiles and tunnel behaviors, available. This dataset is the first to consider a location perspective in I2P measurements and serves as a valuable resource for further research into I2Ps tunnel selection processes and resilience.
Full text
6,158 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Mapping I2P: A Location-based Perspective | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 17 November 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Mapping I2P: A Location-based Perspective Authors : Akanbi Kemi 0009-0004-9649-3766 [email protected] , Kemi Akanbi , Tarek Krayem , and Jacques Bou Abdo Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176340958.86250252/v1 223 views 83 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract The geographic location of a router substantially affects connectivity and the overall network experience in the Invisible Internet Project. In this study, we empirically measure the network by designing controlled experiments to observe it and record visibility based on the geographical location of our deployed routers. Our results demonstrated a direct relationship between the distribution of peers observed and the location of the deployed router. The geographic placement of these routers influenced node interactions and, consequently, tunnel establishment, which, in turn, will affect the level of anonymity guaranteed. Following the experiments, we compiled a comprehensive dataset containing node profiles and tunnel behaviors, available. This dataset is the first to consider a location perspective in I2P measurements and serves as a valuable resource for further research into I2Ps tunnel selection processes and resilience. Supplementary Material File (mapping_i2p__a_location_based_perspective.pdf) Download 307.18 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 17 November 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords i2p dataset invisble internet project (i2p) overlay network mapping peer to peer network Authors Affiliations Akanbi Kemi 0009-0004-9649-3766 [email protected] View all articles by this author Kemi Akanbi School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati View all articles by this author Tarek Krayem College of Science and Technology, University of Bordeaux View all articles by this author Jacques Bou Abdo School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 223 views 83 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Akanbi Kemi, Kemi Akanbi, Tarek Krayem, et al. Mapping I2P: A Location-based Perspective. Authorea . 17 November 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176340958.86250252/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176340958.86250252/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fee077bfb7d8650',t:'MTc3OTMwODI5Mg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.