On correctness of gene tree tagging under a unified model of gene duplication, loss, and coalescence

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,431 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract ASTRAL-pro is the leading method for reconstructing species trees under complex evolutionary scenarios involving gene duplication, loss, and coalescence, commonly modeled by DLCoal. A unique aspect of A-pro is that it utilizes rooted gene trees, with internal vertices labeled as duplications or speciations, to modify its objective function compared to the traditional ASTRAL method. Although there is a natural event-based definition of correct tagging when genes evolve with only gene duplications and losses, it cannot be applied when there is deep coalescence. Here, we introduce a definition of correct tagging that is broadly applicable, proposing that a gene tree vertex is correctly tagged as a duplication if it is the most recent common ancestor of at least one pair of gene copies related via a duplication event. Using this definition, we study some statistical properties of ASTRAL-pro’s objective function under the DLCoal model and evaluate the accuracy of ASTRAL-pro’s tagging algorithm in simulations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes After submitting to bioRxiv, we noticed that one of our claims was incorrect and a more delicate argument is needed to prove the consistency of Apro. This revision makes it clear that the consistency of Apro is still an open conjecture; instead focuses on our contributions of the correctness of gene tree tagging.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00