Full text
57,583 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire and non-wildfire PM2.5 in 20 US states | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire and non-wildfire PM 2.5 in 20 US states Min Zhang , Edgar Castro , Minghao Qiu , Mahdieh Danesh Yazdi , Boyuan Li , Rosalind J. Wright , Joel D. Schwartz , Robert O. Wright , Yaguang Wei doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.15.25331618 Min Zhang 1 Department of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: min.zhang{at}mssm.edu Edgar Castro 2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Minghao Qiu 3 School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, NY, USA 4 Program in Public Health, Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, NY, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mahdieh Danesh Yazdi 4 Program in Public Health, Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, NY, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Boyuan Li 5 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University , Brooklyn, NY, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Rosalind J. Wright 1 Department of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA 6 Department of Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA MD, MPH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Joel D. Schwartz 2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA 7 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Robert O. Wright 1 Department of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA MD, MPH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yaguang Wei 1 Department of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Importance Given the increasing wildfire activity in the US, assessment of the health impacts of wildfire-specific fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), a growing source of surface air pollution, and its relative toxicity compared to non-wildfire PM 2.5 is needed to support mitigation strategies. Objective To investigate associations of long-term exposure of wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 with cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks. Design, Setting, and Participants We obtained over 89 million cardiopulmonary hospitalizations for residents across 20 US states from 2006 to 2019 from the State Inpatient Databases. We assigned estimated 2-year average concentrations of wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 to each hospitalization based on residential ZIP codes to characterize exposure levels. We used a self-controlled design, which is robust to unmeasured confounding, to assess the associations. Exposures 2-year moving average exposures to wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 from the year of hospitalization to the prior year. Main Outcomes and Measures The hospitalizations for cardiovascular (ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, arrhythmia, other cardiovascular diseases) and pulmonary diseases (acute respiratory infections, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], asthma, other respiratory diseases) were identified based on the first 3 diagnosis codes at discharge. Results Wildfire-specific PM 2.5 had stronger effects than non-wildfire PM 2.5. Specifically, each 1-µg/m 3 increase in 2-year wildfire-specific PM 2.5 was significantly associated with increased hospitalization risks for all cardiopulmonary diseases, with relative risk ranging from 1.100 (95% CI: 1.091, 1.108) for heart failure to 1.160 (95% CI: 1.142, 1.178) for asthma. In comparison, a 1 µg/m 3 increase in non-wildfire PM 2.5 was associated with increased hospitalization risks for all cardiopulmonary diseases, but with relative risks ranging from 1.047 (95% CI: 1.042, 1.051) for COPD to 1.085 (95% CI: 1.082, 1.088) for hypertension. Stronger effects of both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 were observed among minorities, individuals with obesity or diabetes, and those living in metropolitan areas, those with fewer years of education, and more deprived communities. Conclusions Long-term exposure to wildfire-specific PM 2.5 poses a greater risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalization than PM 2.5 from non-wildfire sources. Greater effort should be placed on wildfire management, with particular focus on strategies to reduce smoke in addition to traditional air quality control strategies. Questions Does long-term exposure to fine particulate matter from wildfire and non-wildfire sources affect the risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalization differently? Findings Based on over 89 million hospitalization records for the residents of 20 US states from 2006 to 2019, exposure to fine particulate matter from wildfire was associated with a greater risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalization, compared to those from non-wildfire sources. Meaning Fine particulate matter from wildfire sources poses a greater health threat than those from non-wildfire sources; greater effort should be placed on wildfire management in addition to relying solely on traditional air quality control strategies. Introduction Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), a major air pollutant, has been identified as the leading environmental risk factor for cardiopulmonary diseases. 1 – 3 PM 2.5 can be drawn deep into the lungs and may pass into the bloodstream, damaging vital organs such as the lungs and heart. 4 Ambient PM 2.5 originates from various sources, including traffic, industrial activities, and agriculture. More recently, wildfires are emerging as a significant source of PM 2.5 due to their increasing frequency and intensity driven by the changing climate, 5 – 7 and the expansion of human activity into fire regions. 8 Globally, the extent of fire-prone areas is expected to expand by 29% towards the late 21st century. 9 In many parts of the US, wildfire smoke has accounted for over half of the annual PM 2.5 concentration in extreme smoke years, and has led to reversal of the declining trend in ambient PM 2.5 over the last two decades due to the Clean Air Act. 10 As a major toxic component of wildfire smoke, PM 2.5 can be transported over hundreds of miles, posing a threat to public health beyond the active fire region. 11 – 13 Wildfire-specific PM 2.5 contains higher levels of submicron particles, carbonaceous material (i.e., elemental and organic carbon), and polar organic compounds compared to non-wildfire PM 2.5 . 14 – 17 Toxicological studies have shown that, at equivalent doses, wildfire-specific PM 2.5 induces greater cardiopulmonary toxicity than PM 2.5 from other sources. 18 , 19 However, large-scale evidence comparing the relative toxicity of wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 is limited. 20 , 21 In addition, most existing studies on health effects of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 have focused on short-term impacts, 13 , 22 , 23 which overlooked the potential accumulation of particles in the body and their sustained effects over time. Addressing these gaps is critical to fully quantify health impacts of wildfires and support the development of long-term strategies to mitigate these impacts in response to the increasing wildfire activity. In this study, we utilized hospitalization data for the residents of 20 US states between 2006 and 2019 to explore the long-term effects of exposure to wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 on hospitalization risks of all major types of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. We linked hospitalization records with two spatiotemporal models of ambient wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 levels to estimate each patient’s exposure levels. We used a self-controlled study design that inherently adjusts for time-invariant unmeasured confounders, such as genetics, while also controlling for measured covariates. Methods Study Population The hospitalization data of 20 US states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin) from 2006 to 2019 was obtained from the State Inpatient Databases (SID). The SID, a set of state-specific databases developed as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), contains inpatient discharge records from community hospitals within each participating state. 24 The SID represents over 95% of all inpatient discharges nationwide. 25 The availability of SID data varies by year and state, and detailed information is provided in the Supplementary Materials (eTable 1 in Supplement 1 ). Individual-level elements, including hospital admission year, age, sex, residential zip code, race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, or other), patient location (metropolitan areas, micropolitan areas, or non-Core Based Statistical Areas [non-CBSA]), diagnosis codes and died during hospitalization (yes vs. no), were extracted from the SID. The cardiopulmonary hospitalizations were identified using the first 3 diagnosis codes at discharge from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision (ICD-9 or ICD-10) . The specific ICD codes can be found in eTable2 ( Supplement 1 ). The cardiopulmonary diseases of interest included ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, arrhythmia, all other cardiovascular diseases, acute respiratory infections, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and other respiratory diseases. In addition, co-existing conditions, including obesity or diabetes, were also identified from all secondary diagnosis codes at discharge. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines. Wildfire-specific PM 2.5 We obtained daily, ground-level wildfire-specific PM 2.5 concentrations at a 10 × 10 km 2 spatial resolution for the contiguous US from 2006–2019 from an open source. These data were estimated using a machine learning model that incorporated ground measurements of PM 2.5 , satellite, and reanalysis data sets 26 . The model achieved reasonable predictive capability, yielding a spatial out-of-sample R 2 of 0.67 and a within-location R 2 of 0.65. The grid-level wildfire-specific PM 2.5 concentrations were aggregated to ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) using population- and intersection area-weighted averages based on TIGER/Line Shapefiles from the US Census Bureau. These estimates were mapped to zip codes and then linked to the subjects based on their residential address recorded in the SID. For each hospitalization, the exposure window of interest was defined as the 2-year averages of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 concentrations, covering both the year of hospitalization and the year before. Non-Wildfire PM 2.5 We subtracted the wildfire-specific PM 2.5 predictions from the all-sourced PM 2.5 concentrations to obtain the estimated non-wildfire PM 2.5 concentrations. Those with negative values, which accounted for less than 0.01% of the data, were excluded from this study. We developed high resolution (1 km × 1 km) daily all-sourced PM 2.5 estimates across the contiguous US during 2006-2019 from a spatio-temporal ensemble model. 27 , 28 In brief, a set of predictors from satellite observations, land-use regression, meteorological data, and chemical transport models was used as input for three machine learning algorithms to estimate PM 2.5 concentrations. The outputs from these models were then integrated using a geographically weighted generalized additive model, which accounts for spatial heterogeneity. The final model demonstrated well performance, with an average cross-validation R 2 of 0.82. These grid-level estimates were aggregated to the zip code level, and 2-year averages were assigned to each hospitalization. Covariates We extracted neighborhood-level characteristics from databases generated by US Decennial Census for 2000, 2010, and 2020. 29 – 32 For the remaining years, values were estimated using linear interpolation. The following zip code-level variables were included in this study: percentage of White, percentage of Black, percentage of the population aged ≥65 years who graduated high school, median household income, and Townsend Deprivation Index (TDI). TDI, an indicator of overall deprivation, is calculated based on four key elements: unemployment, overcrowded households, non-ownership of a car, and non-ownership of a home. A higher score indicates a greater level of deprivation. 33 These variables were adjusted as potential confounders. Previous studies have linked ambient temperature to cardiopulmonary outcomes. 24 , 34 , 35 Temperature also directly influences wildfire activity and therefore acts as a confounder. The daily maximum and minimum temperatures (℃) at 1-km 2 grid cells from 2006 to 2019 were derived from Daymet V4, which was developed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 36 Daily average temperatures were obtained by averaging the minimum and maximum values. Using daily average temperatures, we calculated the seasonal mean and standard deviation for summer (June, July, and August) and winter (December of the previous year, January, and February) in each year. These meteorological data were aggregated to the zip code level to align with the spatial resolution of hospitalization records. Statistical Analysis The self-controlled design adjusts for all time-invariant and slowly varying confounders through self-matching, regardless of whether these confounders are measured or not. In this study, we extended the traditional case-crossover design, a self-controlled design originally developed for studying short-term effects and widely used, to evaluate long-term effects of 2-year average exposures to wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 on cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks. Specifically, for each case year (year of hospitalization), the years before and after served as that hospitalization’s own controls. With this self-controlled design, unmeasured time-invariant and slowly varying confounders, such as genetics, chronic coexisting conditions (e.g., diabetes), and smoking status, are inherently adjusted by design. The symmetric bidirectional selection of control years before and after a case year removed the unmeasured confounding from long-term temporal trends (e.g., gradual changes in population-level wildfire smoke level). Selecting one single year before and after the case minimized temporal variations in unmeasured confounders. We constructed a dataset for each disease and fitted a conditional logistic regression to estimate the simultaneous effects of long-term wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 on the hospitalization risk, adjusting for measured time-varying confounders, including neighborhood-level covariates, temperatures, and calendar year. Computational details for the fast implementation of conditional logistic regression are provided in supplement 1. We further conducted stratified analyses based on individual-level factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, patient location, comorbidity with obesity, and comorbidity with diabetes), disease severity (died/not died during hospitalization) and neighborhood-level characteristics (upper or lower quartiles of percentage of the population who graduated high school and TDI) to determine whether the associations varied across different groups. The differences between subgroups were assessed by the Z-test or the Wald test, as appropriate. We reported estimated relative risk (RR) of cardiopulmonary hospitalization associated with a 1 μg/m 3 increase in 2-year average wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 concentrations. Considering the increased risk of false positives from multiple testing, we applied a Bonferroni correction to adjust 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 57,264,966 hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases and 32,691,394 for pulmonary diseases were included in this study ( Table 1 ). The largest proportion of hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases and pulmonary diseases were hypertension (27.5%) and other respiratory diseases (42.4%), respectively. Patients hospitalized for acute respiratory diseases and asthma were younger than those for other diseases. The majority of patients were White and residents of metropolitan areas. Comorbidity with obesity was most prevalent among patients hospitalized for asthma (12.0%), while diabetes was most prevalent among those hospitalized for heart failure (32.8%). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Characteristics for hospitalized patients. Among the 20 US states studied, California recorded the highest concentrations of both wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and non-wildfire PM 2.5 ( Figure 1 ). During the study period, the annual mean wildfire-specific PM 2.5 was 0.29 (range: 0.00-11.15) μg/m 3 , and 7.78 (range: 0.005-22.78) μg/m 3 for non-wildfire PM 2.5 ( Table 1 ). The highest temperature in summer was 35.53 ℃, while the lowest temperature in winter is -19.26 ℃. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Average concentrations of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and non-wildfire PM 2.5 (μg/m 3 ) in the contiguous United States from 2006-2019. The states marked with abbreviations in the box are the ones included in our study. Compared to non-wildfire PM 2.5 , wildfire-specific PM 2.5 was associated with greater risks of hospitalizations for all the examined cardiopulmonary diseases ( Figure 2 ). Each 1-μg/m 3 increase in 2-year average wildfire-specific PM 2.5 concentrations was significantly associated with increased hospitalization risks for cerebrovascular disease (RR, 1.131; 95% CI, 1.119–1.143), ischemic heart disease (RR, 1.129; 95% CI, 1.119–1.139), hypertension (RR, 1.122; 95% CI, 1.115–1.129), arrhythmia (RR, 1.117; 95% CI, 1.108–1.127), other cardiovascular diseases (RR, 1.117; 95% CI, 1.109–1.126), and heart failure (RR, 1.100; 95% CI, 1.091–1.108). For pulmonary diseases, wildfire-specific PM 2.5 had the greatest impact on asthma, with an RR of 1.160 (95% CI, 1.142–1.178), and a smaller effect on pneumonia, with an RR of 1.109 (95% CI, 1.099–1.118). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. The hospitalization risks of cardiopulmonary diseases associated with a 1-μg/m 3 increase in 2-year average of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and non-wildfire PM 2.5 concentrations. The model was adjusted for calendar year, percentage of White, percentage of Black, percentage of the population who graduated high school, median household income, townsend deprivation index, mean temperature of summer and winter, and standard deviation of summer and winter temperature. Positive associations were also observed between non-wildfire PM 2.5 and hospitalization risks of all cardiopulmonary diseases ( Figure 2 ). A 1-μg/m 3 increase in 2-year average non-wildfire PM 2.5 concentrations was significantly associated with increased risks of cardiovascular hospitalization: 1.085 (95% CI, 1.082–1.088) for hypertension, 1.071% (95% CI, 1.067–1.076) for cerebrovascular disease, 1.065 (95% CI, 1.061–1.069) for ischemic heart disease, 1.062 (95% CI, 1.059–1.066) for other cardiovascular diseases, 1.055 (95% CI, 1.051–1.058) for heart failure, and 1.052 (95% CI, 1.048–1.055) for arrhythmia. Among all pulmonary diseases, the association was the largest for other respiratory diseases (RR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.063–1.069), followed by asthma (RR, 1.060; 95% CI, 1.054–1.066), and pneumonia (RR, 1.0576; 95% CI, 1.052–1.060). These results remained robust after changing the degrees of freedom for temperature up to 9, adjusting for annual precipitation and vapor pressure, or identifying hospitalizations based on the principal diagnosis code at discharge (eTable 3-5 in Supplement 1 ). Hispanic individuals and those from other racial/ethnic groups experienced greater cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks ( Figure 3 ). Stronger particle associated risk was observed among people who lived in metropolitan areas ( Figure 3 ), communities with lower education attainment, or communities with greater deprivation level ( Figure 4 ). Moreover, the presence of co-existing obesity or diabetes increased particle-related hospitalization risks for most types of cardiopulmonary diseases ( Figure 4 ). There were few differences in PM 2.5 -related cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks across subpopulations defined by age, sex, and disease severity ( Figure 3 - 4 ; eTable 6-14 in Supplement 1 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Heatmap of relative risks from subgroup analyses by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and patient location. Different colors in the heatmap represent different values of relative risks. Values equal to 1 are shown in white, and the deeper the color, the further the value is from 1. Boxes marked with a cross symbol (×) denote that the 95% confidence interval contains 1. Age was stratified at 18 years for acute respiratory infections and asthma, and at 65 years for all other disease outcomes. All numerical results, as well as the results of between-group comparisons, can be found in Supplementary eTables 5-8. The Z-test was used when comparing two subgroups, and the Wald test was applied when comparing more than two subgroups. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Scatter plot of relative risks from subgroup analyses based on comorbidities, disease severity, and community-level factors. The greater the distance of a point from the diagonal line, the higher the relative risk it represents within a specific subgroup. All relative risks shown have 95% confidence intervals entirely above 1. The percentage of the population who graduated high school was divided into two groups based on the lower quartile (25th percentile): lower and higher educational attainment. Townsend deprivation index was categorized into two groups based on the upper quartile (75th percentile): lower and higher deprivation levels. Detailed numerical results, as well as the results of between-group comparisons, are provided in Supplementary eTables 9–13. The Z-test was used when comparing two subgroups. Discussion In this study across 20 US states, a 2-year average exposure to both wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and non-wildfire PM 2.5 was associated with increased hospitalization risks for all major types of cardiopulmonary diseases. Although most wildfires are abrupt events, our findings suggest that their health effects are persistent, and there is a need for long-term wildfire management strategies and protective measures to reduce exposure to smoke. Importantly, we found that wildfire-specific PM 2.5 posed greater hospitalization risks per unit exposure, suggesting greater effort should be placed on wildfire management in addition to relying solely on traditional air quality control strategies. Currently, these strategies largely exempt wildfire smoke from determining attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 37 Moreover, traditional wildfire management approaches, such as controlled burns, have primarily focused on protecting property rather than minimizing population exposure to smoke–an aspect that should be more fully integrated in future efforts. Greater susceptibility to both wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and non-wildfire PM 2.5 was found among minorities, those with co-existing obesity or diabetes, individuals in metropolitan areas, and communities with lower education attainment and greater deprivation level. We used a self-controlled design to evaluate the long-term effects of exposure. Unlike the conventional case-crossover design, which is primarily used to assess short-term effects, 38 our design selects control years both before and after the case year to carry out the assessment over a longer time horizon. To account for potential confounding introduced by the extended time frame, we adjusted for a wide range of time-varying confounders, such as calendar year, seasonal temperature, and neighborhood-level statistics. This approach preserves the strengths of the case-crossover design, in particular its ability to control for time-invariant individual-level confounders, while expanding its applicability to study long-term effects. Our findings are consistent with the emerging evidence on the associations between exposure to wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and increased risks of pulmonary diseases, especially asthma. 21 , 39 , 40 We observed that a 1-μg/m 3 increase in wildfire-specific PM 2.5 concentrations was associated with a 10.9%–16.0% increase in pulmonary hospitalization risks, a magnitude generally greater than that reported in previous studies. A study of eight countries and territories found a 0.25% (RR= 1.0025, 95% CI: 1.0023, 1.0028) increase in all-cause pulmonary hospitalizations per 1-μg/m 3 increase in the 2-day average concentration of wildfire smoke PM 2.5 . 21 Another study of 16 US states reported a 2.1%–2.3% increase in hospitalizations for COPD, asthma, and other respiratory diseases associated with a 1-μg/m 3 increase in 3-month moving average exposure to wildfire smoke PM 2.5 . 41 The larger magnitudes of associations might be due to the longer exposure window than previous studies. Our earlier work showed that chronic exposure to ambient air toxicants posed substantially larger risks than acute exposures over a few days, potentially due to the accumulation of toxicants in the body and their sustained adverse effects on various organs over time. 42 For the effects of wildfire emissions on cardiovascular diseases, existing evidence remains less conclusive. 43 – 46 Wei et al. found significant associations between 3-month average exposure to wildfire-specific PM 2.5 and increased hospitalization risks of cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases in US. 41 Alexeeff et al. observed that exposure to elevated PM 2.5 levels during the Mendocino Complex wildfire was associated with increased cardiovascular hospitalization risks, whereas no significant association was observed during the Camp Fire. Several studies have found little evidence of increased risk during wildfire episodes 47 – 51 or in association with short-term exposure to wildfire-specific PM 2.5 . 39 , 40 , 52 – 54 Previous studies used short exposure windows (typically within one week), which may fail to capture the long-term health impacts of smoke on cardiovascular outcomes. One study suggested that the increase in emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases associated with high levels of wildfire-related PM 2.5 exposure appeared on lag day 10, considerably later than the effect observed for pulmonary diseases, which began on lag day 0. 55 Differences in exposure assessment, study population, and study design may explain varied results across studies. Our research demonstrated that wildfire-specific PM 2.5 was associated with a greater risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations compared to non-wildfire PM 2.5 . Similar results were reported in a multi-city study across eight countries and territories 21 and in another US study from Southern California, 20 which suggested that wildfire-specific PM 2.5 led to 3 to 10 times higher risk of pulmonary hospital admissions compared to PM 2.5 from non-wildfire sources. Aligned with these findings, a mouse model study showed that exposure to wildfire-derived PM at doses equivalent to ambient PM induced stronger pulmonary inflammation and histological lung damage. 19 In mice exposed to PM from smoldering peat fire, lung inflammation associated with endotoxins and reactive oxygen species, reduced cardiac function, and post-ischemia-associated myocardial infarction were observed. 18 This elevated risk associated with wildfire-specific PM 2.5 may be attributed to its unique chemical composition, which tends to contain a higher proportion of submicron and ultrafine particles, as well as elevated concentrations of oxidative and pro-inflammatory substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 14 – 17 , 23 , 56 – 58 Because components of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 are smaller in size, they may more easily penetrate the human body, which facilitate their adverse effects. We found that vulnerable subgroups were similar for wildfire and non-wildfire PM 2.5 . Greater susceptibility to both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 observed among minorities, residents of communities with lower education attainment, and communities with greater deprivation level can be attributed to structural racism and socioeconomic disparities. Compared to those identifying as white or persons with higher social class, both minorities and persons with lower social class face multiple inequities, including poorer healthcare access, higher pollution burden, fewer neighborhood resources, and fewer resources to mitigate the health impacts of PM 2.5 . 59 – 61 In addition, individuals residing in metropolitan areas were more susceptible than those residing in micropolitan areas or non-CBSA. This may be explained by higher levels of social stress in metropolitan areas, which can negatively impact immune responses 62 , 63 and thereby increase vulnerability to environmental stressors. Moreover, both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 had stronger effects among individuals with co-existing obesity or diabetes, highlighting the synergistic effect of PM 2.5 exposure and cardiopulmonary risk factors. 64 – 66 Notably, individuals with obesity were generally more sensitive to PM 2.5 exposure than those with diabetes. One possible explanation is that individuals with obesity often have reduced cardiopulmonary function, along with systemic chronic inflammation and elevated oxidative stress, all of which may exacerbate the burden of PM 2.5 exposure. 66 Our results also support the finding that both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 were associated with deaths caused by hospitalization for cardiopulmonary diseases, although the difference in risk between patients who died during hospitalization and those who survived was minimal. Our study has several strengths. First, we included a large sample covering residents of all ages from 20 US states, including those most heavily affected by wildfires, such as California, Oregon, and Washington. Additional strength include comprehensive coverage of all major cardiopulmonary conditions and the use of a novel self-controlled design that minimizes bias from unmeasured confounders. Our study also has a few limitations. First, the spatial resolution and predictive performance of our wildfire-specific PM 2.5 prediction model were suboptimal, which may introduce exposure measurement error. This error for each individual within a zip code should mainly be Berksonian, which may not bias our estimates but may widen the confidence intervals. Second, the most recent data used in this study are nearly six years old, and since the climate has been changing rapidly and wildfires have been worsening, it is unclear whether the effects of wildfires would be the same using more current data. Conclusions This study demonstrates that long-term exposure to wildfire-specific PM 2.5 poses a greater risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalization than non-wildfire PM 2.5 . Furthermore, both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM 2.5 had stronger effects among minorities, those with co-existing obesity or diabetes, and residents of metropolitan areas, communities with lower lower education attainment, and greater deprivation level. Considering the reversal of air quality improvements driven by rapidly increasing wildfire activity and the greater toxicity of wildfire-specific PM 2.5 compared to non-wildfire PM 2.5 , greater efforts should be placed on wildfire management in addition to relying solely on traditional air quality control strategies. Data Availability The SID are available upon request to the HCUP. The ZIP code-level wildfire-specific PM2.5 and non-wildfire PM2.5 data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The originally predicted, grid level PM2.5 from all-sourced data are available at https://zenodo.org/records/7884640. Meteorological data, including temperature, precipitation, and vapor pressure, are available at https://daac.ornl.gov/DAYMET/guides/Daymet_Daily_V4.html. Other covariate data are publicly available with sources described in the manuscript. Article Information Author Contributions Zhang, Danesh Yazdi, Schwartz, and Wei had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: Zhang, Wei. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Zhang, Wei, Castro, Qiu. Drafting of the manuscript: Zhang. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Zhang. Obtained funding: Schwartz, Wright, Wei. Administrative, technical, or material support: Wei, Schwartz, Castro. Supervision: Wei. Conflict of Interest Disclosures None. Funding/Support This study was funded by the National Institute of Health grants P30ES023515, UL1TR004419, and R01ES036566. Role of the Funder/Sponsor The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Disclaimer The authors take sole responsibility for all data analyses, interpretations, and views expressed in this work. Data Sharing Statement see Supplement 2. Additional Contributions We thank the following individuals for their suggestions on drawing heatmap: Jie Yin, Yue-Yan Zhu, Jia-Xing Wang, and Hao Hu. These individuals were not compensated for their role in the study. References 1. ↵ Li T , Zhang Y , Jiang N , et al. Ambient fine particulate matter and cardiopulmonary health risks in China . Chinese medical journal . 2023 ; 136 ( 3 ): 287 – 294 . OpenUrl PubMed 2. Sun Y , Milando CW , Spangler KR , et al. Short term exposure to low level ambient fine particulate matter and natural cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory morbidity among US adults with health insurance: case time series study . BMJ (Clinical research ed ). 2024 ; 384 : e076322 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 3. ↵ Wei Y , Feng Y , Danesh Yazdi M , et al. Exposure-response associations between chronic exposure to fine particulate matter and risks of hospital admission for major cardiovascular diseases: population based cohort study . BMJ (Clinical research ed ). 2024 ; 384 : e076939 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 4. ↵ Sangkham S , Phairuang W , Sherchan SP , et al. An update on adverse health effects from exposure to PM2.5 . Environmental Advances . 2024 ; 18 : 100603 . OpenUrl 5. ↵ Law BE , Abatzoglou JT , Schwalm CR , Byrne D , Fann N , Nassikas NJ . Anthropogenic climate change contributes to wildfire particulate matter and related mortality in the United States . Communications earth & environment . 2025 ; 6 ( 1 ): 336 . OpenUrl PubMed 6. Qiu M , Li J , Gould CF , et al. Mortality Burden From Wildfire Smoke Under Climate Change . National Bureau of Economic Research ; 2024 . Working Paper No. 32307. 7. ↵ Zhong Q , Shen G , Wang B , Ma J , Tao S . Climate-Driven Escalation of Global PM(2.5) Health Burden from Wildland Fires . Environmental science & technology . 2025 ; 59 ( 6 ): 3131 – 3142 . OpenUrl PubMed 8. ↵ Radeloff VC , Helmers DP , Kramer HA , et al. Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2018 ; 115 ( 13 ): 3314 – 3319 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 9. ↵ Senande-Rivera M , Insua-Costa D , Miguez-Macho G . Spatial and temporal expansion of global wildland fire activity in response to climate change . Nature communications . 2022 ; 13 ( 1 ): 1208 . OpenUrl PubMed 10. ↵ Zhang D , Wang W , Xi Y , et al. Wildland Fires Worsened Population Exposure to PM(2.5) Pollution in the Contiguous United States . Environmental science & technology . 2023 ; 57 ( 48 ): 19990 – 19998 . OpenUrl PubMed 11. ↵ Hadley MB , Henderson SB , Brauer M , Vedanthan R . Protecting Cardiovascular Health From Wildfire Smoke . Circulation . 2022 ; 146 ( 10 ): 788 – 801 . OpenUrl PubMed 12. Kollanus V , Tiittanen P , Niemi JV , Lanki T . Effects of long-range transported air pollution from vegetation fires on daily mortality and hospital admissions in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland . Environmental research . 2016 ; 151 : 351 – 358 . OpenUrl 13. ↵ Xu R , Yu P , Abramson MJ , et al. Wildfires, Global Climate Change, and Human Health . The New England journal of medicine . 2020 ; 383 ( 22 ): 2173 – 2181 . OpenUrl PubMed 14. ↵ Adetona O , Reinhardt TE , Domitrovich J , et al. Review of the health effects of wildland fire smoke on wildland firefighters and the public . Inhalation toxicology . 2016 ; 28 ( 3 ): 95 – 139 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. Makkonen U , Hellén H , Anttila P , Ferm M . Size distribution and chemical composition of airborne particles in south-eastern Finland during different seasons and wildfire episodes in 2006 . The Science of the total environment . 2010 ; 408 ( 3 ): 644 – 651 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. Verma V , Polidori A , Schauer JJ , Shafer MM , Cassee FR , Sioutas C . Physicochemical and toxicological profiles of particulate matter in Los Angeles during the October 2007 southern California wildfires . Environmental science & technology . 2009 ; 43 ( 3 ): 954 – 960 . OpenUrl PubMed 17. ↵ Wu W , Jin Y , Carlsten C . Inflammatory health effects of indoor and outdoor particulate matter . The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology . 2018 ; 141 ( 3 ): 833 – 844 . OpenUrl CrossRef 18. ↵ Kim YH , Tong H , Daniels M , et al. Cardiopulmonary toxicity of peat wildfire particulate matter and the predictive utility of precision cut lung slices . Particle and fibre toxicology . 2014 ; 11 : 29 . 19. ↵ Wegesser TC , Pinkerton KE , Last JA. California wildfires of 2008: coarse and fine particulate matter toxicity . Environmental health perspectives . 2009 ; 117 ( 6 ): 893 – 897 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 20. ↵ Aguilera R , Corringham T , Gershunov A , Benmarhnia T . Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California . Nature communications . 2021 ; 12 ( 1 ): 1493 . OpenUrl PubMed 21. ↵ Zhang Y , Xu R , Huang W , et al. Respiratory risks from wildfire-specific PM2.5 across multiple countries and territories . Nature Sustainability . 2025 . 22. ↵ Li L , Wang W , Chang HH , Alonso A , Liu Y . Wildland Fire-Related Smoke PM (2.5) and Cardiovascular Disease ED Visits in the Western United States . medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences . 2024 . 23. ↵ Williams VA , Perreault LR , Yazbeck CT , Micovic NA , Oakes JM , Bellini C . Impact of Wildfires on Cardiovascular Health . Circulation research . 2024 ; 134 ( 9 ): 1061 – 1082 . OpenUrl PubMed 24. ↵ Wei Y , Amini H , Qiu X , et al. Grouped mixtures of air pollutants and seasonal temperature anomalies and cardiovascular hospitalizations among U . S. Residents. Environment international . 2024 ; 187 : 108651 . OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Qiu X , Wei Y , Weisskopf M , et al. Air pollution, climate conditions and risk of hospital admissions for psychotic disorders in U . S. residents. Environmental research . 2023 ; 216 (Pt 2 ): 114636 . OpenUrl PubMed 26. ↵ Childs ML , Li J , Wen J , et al. Daily Local-Level Estimates of Ambient Wildfire Smoke PM(2.5) for the Contiguous US . Environmental science & technology . 2022 ; 56 ( 19 ): 13607 – 13621 . OpenUrl PubMed 27. ↵ Di Q , Amini H , Shi L , et al. An ensemble-based model of PM(2.5) concentration across the contiguous United States with high spatiotemporal resolution . Environment international . 2019 ; 130 : 104909 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Yazdi MD , Wang Y , Di Q , et al. Long-term effect of exposure to lower concentrations of air pollution on mortality among US Medicare participants and vulnerable subgroups: a doubly-robust approach . The Lancet Planetary health . 2021 ; 5 ( 10 ): e689 – e697 . OpenUrl 29. ↵ Census 2000 Summary File 1 . United States Census Bureau ; 2001 . https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2000/dec/summary-file-3.html . 30. 2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary File . United States Census Bureau ; 2011 . https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2010/dec/demographic-profile-with-geos.html . 31. 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Summary File 3 . United States Census Bureau ; 2002 . https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2000/dec/summary-file-3.html . 32. ↵ 2020 Census Demographic Profile . United States Census Bureau ; 2021 . https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2023/dec/2020-census-demographic-profile.html . 33. ↵ Townsend P , Phillimore P , Beattie A. Health and deprivation: inequality and the North . 1st Edition ed. London : Routledge ; 1988 . 34. ↵ Achebak H , Rey G , Lloyd SJ , Quijal-Zamorano M , Méndez-Turrubiates RF , Ballester J . Ambient temperature and risk of cardiovascular and respiratory adverse health outcomes: a nationwide cross-sectional study from Spain . European journal of preventive cardiology . 2024 ; 31 ( 9 ): 1080 – 1089 . OpenUrl PubMed 35. ↵ Danesh Yazdi M , Wei Y , Di Q , et al. The effect of long-term exposure to air pollution and seasonal temperature on hospital admissions with cardiovascular and respiratory disease in the United States: A difference-in-differences analysis . The Science of the total environment . 2022 ; 843 : 156855 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Thornton MM , Shrestha R , Wei Y , Thornton PE , Kao SC . Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version 4 R1 . In: ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center ; 2022 . 37. ↵ Burke M , Childs ML , de la Cuesta B , et al. The contribution of wildfire to PM(2.5) trends in the USA . Nature . 2023 ; 622 (7984): 761 – 766 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Maclure M . The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events . American journal of epidemiology . 1991 ; 133 ( 2 ): 144 – 153 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 39. ↵ Hutchinson JA , Vargo J , Milet M , et al. The San Diego 2007 wildfires and Medi-Cal emergency department presentations, inpatient hospitalizations, and outpatient visits: An observational study of smoke exposure periods and a bidirectional case-crossover analysis . PLoS medicine . 2018 ; 15 ( 7 ): e1002601 . OpenUrl 40. ↵ Stowell JD , Geng G , Saikawa E , et al. Associations of wildfire smoke PM(2.5) exposure with cardiorespiratory events in Colorado 2011-2014 . Environment international . 2019 ; 133 (Pt A ): 105151 . OpenUrl PubMed 41. ↵ Wei Y , Castro E , Yin K , et al. Medium-term exposure to wildfire smoke PM2.5 and cardiorespiratory hospitalization risks . Epidemiology ( Cambridge , Mass ). 2025 . 42. ↵ Wei Y , Wang Y , Wu X , et al. Causal Effects of Air Pollution on Mortality Rate in Massachusetts . American journal of epidemiology . 2020 ; 189 ( 11 ): 1316 – 1323 . OpenUrl PubMed 43. ↵ Kazi DS , Katznelson E , Liu CL , et al. Climate Change and Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review . JAMA cardiology . 2024 ; 9 ( 8 ): 748 – 757 . OpenUrl PubMed 44. Khraishah H , Alahmad B , Ostergard RL , Jr. , et al. Climate change and cardiovascular disease: implications for global health . Nature reviews Cardiology . 2022 ; 19 ( 12 ): 798 – 812 . OpenUrl PubMed 45. Wang Y , Chen J , Huang Y , et al. Associations of wildfire-derived particulate matter with hospitalization, emergency department visits and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Environmental research . 2025 ; 273 : 121221 . OpenUrl 46. ↵ Wettstein ZS , Hoshiko S , Fahimi J , Harrison RJ , Cascio WE , Rappold AG . Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Emergency Department Visits Associated With Wildfire Smoke Exposure in California in 2015 . Journal of the American Heart Association . 2018 ; 7 ( 8 ). 47. ↵ Alman BL , Pfister G , Hao H , et al. The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study . Environmental health : a global access science source . 2016 ; 15 ( 1 ): 64 . OpenUrl PubMed 48. Chen H , Kaufman JS , Chen C , et al. Impact of the 2023 wildfire smoke episodes in Ontario, Canada, on asthma and other health outcomes: an interrupted time-series analysis . CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne . 2025 ; 197 ( 17 ): E465 – e477 . OpenUrl 49. Cleland SE , Serre ML , Rappold AG , West JJ . Estimating the Acute Health Impacts of Fire-Originated PM(2.5) Exposure During the 2017 California Wildfires: Sensitivity to Choices of Inputs . GeoHealth . 2021 ; 5 ( 7 ):e2021GH000414. 50. Delfino RJ , Brummel S , Wu J , et al. The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of 2003 . Occupational and environmental medicine . 2009 ; 66 ( 3 ): 189 – 197 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 51. ↵ Liu JC , Wilson A , Mickley LJ , et al. Wildfire-specific Fine Particulate Matter and Risk of Hospital Admissions in Urban and Rural Counties. Epidemiology (Cambridge , Mass ). 2017 ; 28 ( 1 ): 77 – 85 . OpenUrl 52. ↵ Rodopoulou S , Chalbot MC , Samoli E , Dubois DW , San Filippo BD , Kavouras IG . Air pollution and hospital emergency room and admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in Doña Ana County, New Mexico . Environmental research . 2014 ; 129 : 39 – 46 . OpenUrl 53. Vega SL , Childs ML , Aggarwal S , Nethery RC . Wildfire Smoke Exposure and Cause-Specific Hospitalization in Older Adults . JAMA network open . 2025 ; 8 ( 4 ): e257956 . OpenUrl 54. ↵ Ye T , Guo Y , Chen G , et al. Risk and burden of hospital admissions associated with wildfire-related PM(2·5) in Brazil, 2000-15: a nationwide time-series study . The Lancet Planetary health . 2021 ; 5 ( 9 ): e599 – e607 . OpenUrl PubMed 55. ↵ Chen AI , Ebisu K , Benmarhnia T , Basu R . Emergency department visits associated with wildfire smoke events in California, 2016-2019 . Environmental research . 2023 ; 238 ( Pt 1 ): 117154 . OpenUrl CrossRef 56. ↵ Krasovich Southworth E , Qiu M , Gould CF , et al. The Influence of Wildfire Smoke on Ambient PM(2.5) Chemical Species Concentrations in the Contiguous US . Environmental science & technology . 2025 ; 59 ( 6 ): 2961 – 2973 . OpenUrl PubMed 57. Wegesser TC , Franzi LM , Mitloehner FM , Eiguren-Fernandez A , Last JA . Lung antioxidant and cytokine responses to coarse and fine particulate matter from the great California wildfires of 2008 . Inhalation toxicology . 2010 ; 22 ( 7 ): 561 – 570 . OpenUrl PubMed 58. ↵ Williams KM , Franzi LM , Last JA . Cell-specific oxidative stress and cytotoxicity after wildfire coarse particulate matter instillation into mouse lung . Toxicology and applied pharmacology . 2013 ; 266 ( 1 ): 48 – 55 . OpenUrl PubMed 59. ↵ Bailey ZD , Krieger N , Agénor M , Graves J , Linos N , Bassett MT . Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet (London , England ). 2017 ; 389 ( 10077 ): 1453 – 1463 . OpenUrl 60. Beech BM , Ford C , Thorpe RJ , Jr. , Bruce MA , Norris KC. Poverty , Racism, and the Public Health Crisis in America . Frontiers in public health . 2021 ; 9 : 699049 . OpenUrl PubMed 61. ↵ Tessum CW , Apte JS , Goodkind AL , et al. Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2019 ; 116 ( 13 ): 6001 – 6006 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 62. ↵ Du Preez A , Onorato D , Eiben I , et al. Chronic stress followed by social isolation promotes depressive-like behaviour, alters microglial and astrocyte biology and reduces hippocampal neurogenesis in male mice . Brain, behavior, and immunity . 2021 ; 91 : 24 – 47 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Shimo Y , Cathomas F , Lin HY , et al. Social stress induces autoimmune responses against the brain . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2023 ; 120 ( 49 ): e2305778120 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 64. ↵ Khaing P , Pandit P , Awsare B , Summer R . Pulmonary Circulation in Obesity, Diabetes, and Metabolic Syndrome . Comprehensive Physiology . 2019 ; 10 ( 1 ): 297 – 316 . OpenUrl PubMed 65. Mahsin MD , Cabaj J , Saini V . Respiratory and cardiovascular condition-related physician visits associated with wildfire smoke exposure in Calgary, Canada, in 2015: a population-based study . International journal of epidemiology . 2022 ; 51 ( 1 ): 166 – 178 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ Niemann B , Rohrbach S , Miller MR , Newby DE , Fuster V , Kovacic JC . Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Risk: Obesity, Diabetes, Smoking, and Pollution: Part 3 of a 3-Part Series . Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2017 ; 70 ( 2 ): 230 – 251 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted July 16, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire and non-wildfire PM2.5 in 20 US states Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire and non-wildfire PM 2.5 in 20 US states Min Zhang , Edgar Castro , Minghao Qiu , Mahdieh Danesh Yazdi , Boyuan Li , Rosalind J. Wright , Joel D. Schwartz , Robert O. Wright , Yaguang Wei medRxiv 2025.07.15.25331618; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.15.25331618 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire and non-wildfire PM 2.5 in 20 US states Min Zhang , Edgar Castro , Minghao Qiu , Mahdieh Danesh Yazdi , Boyuan Li , Rosalind J. Wright , Joel D. Schwartz , Robert O. Wright , Yaguang Wei medRxiv 2025.07.15.25331618; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.15.25331618 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Public and Global Health Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (570) Allergy and Immunology (864) Anesthesia (302) Cardiovascular Medicine (4445) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (609) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1515) Epidemiology (15236) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1127) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6610) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1000) Health Informatics (4549) Health Policy (1370) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1266) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15926) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1104) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (668) Neurology (6613) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1147) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3341) Ophthalmology (975) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1694) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5458) Public and Global Health (9244) Radiology and Imaging (2205) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1197) Rheumatology (596) Sexual and Reproductive Health (715) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (713) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a02437cda9888650',t:'MTc3OTg3NjUwMg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.