Introduction
An inflammation mediator, called secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (sFRP4), is closely associated with endometrial tissue. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of sFRP4 as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker in different grades of endometriosis and to study the presence of sFRP4 in the peritoneal fluid of these patients. Aims and objectives: To correlate serum & peritoneal fluid (PF) levels of sFRP4 in women with endometriosis. Materials and methods: A hospital based cross-sectional case control study was carried out on women who were admitted for operative laparoscopy for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Based on their grading according to the revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM), 22 patients with endometriosis aged 18– 45 years and 21 age matched healthy controls were included in the study. sFRP4 was estimated by ELISA method. Results: Mean of serum and saline wash of POD levels of sFRP4 in endometriosis patients was found to be 8017.0 ± 2577.8 pg/ml &3718.9 ± 1650.8 pg/ml, respectively & that in serum of controls was 3871.0 ± 2077.8 pg/ml. Serum sFRP4 levels of cases were significantly elevated when compared to controls (p<0.0001). Total serum sFRP4 levels were positively correlated with saline wash of POD sFRP4 (r=0.743, p<0.001). Conclusion: An increase in serum sFRP4, correlates with peritoneal fluid concentrations, and accompanies with increasing grades of endometriosis.
Introduction
An inflammation mediator, called secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (sFRP4), is closely associated with endometrial tissue. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of sFRP4 as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker in different grades of endometriosis and to study the presence of sFRP4 in the peritoneal fluid of these patients. Aims and objectives: To correlate serum & peritoneal fluid (PF) levels of sFRP4 in women with endometriosis. Materials and methods: A hospital based cross-sectional case control study was carried out on women who were admitted for operative laparoscopy for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Based on their grading according to the revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM), 22 patients with endometriosis aged 18– 45 years and 21 age matched healthy controls were included in the study. sFRP4 was estimated by ELISA method. Results: Mean of serum and saline wash of POD levels of sFRP4 in endometriosis patients was found to be 8017.0 ± 2577.8 pg/ml &3718.9 ± 1650.8 pg/ml, respectively & that in serum of controls was 3871.0 ± 2077.8 pg/ml. Serum sFRP4 levels of cases were significantly elevated when compared to controls (p<0.0001). Total serum sFRP4 levels were positively correlated with saline wash of POD sFRP4 (r=0.743, p<0.001). Conclusion: An increase in serum sFRP4, correlates with peritoneal fluid concentrations, and accompanies with increasing grades of endometriosis.
Files
IJPCR,Vol15,Issue2,Article87.pdf
Files
(345.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5ffde66b2a1852cdded605321db4d350
|
345.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2023-02-17
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue2,Article87.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Schorge J, Williams J. Williams gynecology. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008. 2. Acién P, Velasco I. Endometriosis: A Disease That Remains Enigmatic. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2013:1-12. 3. Bendigeri T, Warty N, Sawant R, Dasmahapatra P, Padte K, Humane A, Chauhan A, Begum S, Khan S, Gajbhiye R. Endometriosis: Clinical Experience of 500 Patients from India.The Indian Practitioner. 2015 Jul 1;68 (7):34-40. 4. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;10(5):261-275. 5. Cetin C, Serdaroglu H, Tuzlali S. The importance of endometrial nerve fibres and macrophage cell count in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 201 3;11(5):405-414. 6. Rahmioglu N, Missmer S, Montgomery G, Zondervan K. Insights into Assessing the Genetics of Endometriosis. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2012;1(3):124-137. 7. Johnson N, Hummelshoj L, Abrao M, Adamson G, Allaire C, Amelung V et al. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(6):1552-1568. 8. Othman E, Hornung D, Al-Hendy A. Biomarkers of endometriosis. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2008;2(7):741-752. 9. Fassbender A, Burney R, F. O D, D'Hooghe T, Giudice L. Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:1-14. 10. May K, Conduit-Hulbert S, Villar J, Kirtley S, Kennedy S, Becker C. Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update. 2010;16 (6): 651-674. 11. Carmon K, Loose D. Secreted FrizzledRelated Protein 4 Regulates Two WNT7a Signaling Pathways and Inhibits Proliferation in Endometrial Cancer Cells. Molecular Cancer Research. 2008;6(6):1017-1028. 12. Carmon KS. sFRP4regulation of WNT 7 a signalling and cellular proliferation in the endometrium (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas Grad. Sch. of Biomed. Sci. At Houston). 13. Knöfler M, Pollheimer J. Human placental trophoblast invasion and differentiation: a particular focus on WNT signaling. Front Genet. 2013;4. 14. Garry R. Diagnosis of endometriosis and pelvic pain. Fertility and Sterility. 2006; 86(5):1307-1309. 15. Wang Y, van der Zee M, Fodde R, Blok L. WNT/Β-Catenin and Sex Hormone Signaling In Endometrial Homeostasis and Cancer. Oncotarget. 2010; 1(7): 674-684. 16. Painter J, Anderson C, Nyholt D, Macgregor S, Lin J, Lee S et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a locus at 7p15.2 associated with endometriosis. Nature Genetics. 2010;43(1):51-54. 17. Wang Y, Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Hanekamp E, Kloosterboer H, Franken P, Veldscholte J et al. Progesterone Inhibition of WNT/ -Catenin Signaling in Normal Endometrium and Endometrial Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 2009;15(18):5784-5793. 18. Nguyen H, Sprung C, Gargett C. Differential Expression of WNT Signaling Molecules Between Pre- and Postmenopausal Endometrial Epithelial Cells Suggests a Population of Putative Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells Reside in the Basalis Layer. Endocrinology. 2012;153(6):2870-288 3. 19. Tulac S, Nayak N, Kao L, van Waes M, Huang J, Lobo S et al. Identification, Characterization, and Regulation of the Canonical WNT Signaling Pathway in Human Endometrium. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003; 88(8):3860-3866. 20. Hewitt D, Mark P, Dharmarajan A, Waddell B. Placental Expression of Secreted Frizzled Related Protein-4 in the Rat and the Impact of Glucocorticoid-Induced Fetal and Placental Growth Restriction. Biology of Reproduction. 2006;75(1):75-81. 21. Lin J, Zong L, Kennedy S, Zondervan K. Coding regions of INHBA, sFRP4 and HOXA10 are not implicated in familial endometriosis linked tochromosome. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2011;17(10):60 5-611. 22. Sanchez A, Viganò P, Quattrone F, Pagliardini L, Papaleo E, Candiani M et al. The WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway and expression of survivalpromoting genes in luteinized granulosa cells: endometriosis as a paradigm for a dysregulated apoptosis pathway. Fertility and Sterility. 2014; 101(6):1688-1696. 23. Saran U, Arfuso F, Zeps N, Dharmarajan A. Secreted frizzledrelated protein 4 expression is positively associated with responsiveness to cisplatin of ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro and with lower tumour grade in mucinous ovarian cancers. BMC cell biology. 2012 Dec;13(1):1-2. 24. Abdulabbas H. S., Abed S. Y., Mahdi Z. A.A., Al-Hindy H. A.A. M., Akram M., Laila U., Zainab R., Al-Khafaji N. S., Al-Dahmoshi H. O., & Chabuck Z. A. G. Antiviral effects of medicinal plants: Minireview. Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 2023;6(2): 2424–2429.