Extensions of Open Science for Applied Behavior Analysis: Preregistration for Single Case Experimental Designs

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This paper discusses how preregistration, a key open science practice, can improve the rigor and transparency of single-case experimental designs in applied behavior analysis, offering practical guidance and a checklist for researchers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Open science practices are designed to enhance the utility, integrity, and credibility of scientific research. This paper highlights how preregistration as a key open science practice can be leveraged to enhance the rigor and transparency of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) within an applied behavior analysis (ABA) framework. We provide an overview of the benefits of preregistration, including increased transparency, reduced risk of researcher bias, and improved replicability, and we review the specific contexts under which these practices most benefit the proposed framework. We discuss potential concerns with and unique considerations for preregistering SCED experiments, with practical guidance for researchers seeking to preregister their studies. We present a checklist as a tool for ABA researchers to engage in preregistration and provide recommendations for our field to strengthen the contingencies for open science practices inclusive of preregistration.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00